Differentiating $f(x)= sqrt[x]{x}$ from first principles












3












$begingroup$


An interesting fact is that the point of maximum of $y=sqrt[x]{x}$ is attained when x equals to exactly e (as seen from the pic)



I know how to differentiate $y= sqrt[x]{x}$, by logarithmic methodology, but can anyone teach me how to differentiate this function using only the first principle?



Note: I am still a beginner, thus it would help greatly if you can include all the steps.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
    $endgroup$
    – ComFreek
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Dec 31 '18 at 16:12










  • $begingroup$
    What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 1 at 10:46


















3












$begingroup$


An interesting fact is that the point of maximum of $y=sqrt[x]{x}$ is attained when x equals to exactly e (as seen from the pic)



I know how to differentiate $y= sqrt[x]{x}$, by logarithmic methodology, but can anyone teach me how to differentiate this function using only the first principle?



Note: I am still a beginner, thus it would help greatly if you can include all the steps.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
    $endgroup$
    – ComFreek
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Dec 31 '18 at 16:12










  • $begingroup$
    What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 1 at 10:46
















3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


An interesting fact is that the point of maximum of $y=sqrt[x]{x}$ is attained when x equals to exactly e (as seen from the pic)



I know how to differentiate $y= sqrt[x]{x}$, by logarithmic methodology, but can anyone teach me how to differentiate this function using only the first principle?



Note: I am still a beginner, thus it would help greatly if you can include all the steps.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




An interesting fact is that the point of maximum of $y=sqrt[x]{x}$ is attained when x equals to exactly e (as seen from the pic)



I know how to differentiate $y= sqrt[x]{x}$, by logarithmic methodology, but can anyone teach me how to differentiate this function using only the first principle?



Note: I am still a beginner, thus it would help greatly if you can include all the steps.



enter image description here







calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '18 at 15:59









Namaste

1




1










asked Dec 31 '18 at 15:26







user630471



















  • $begingroup$
    In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
    $endgroup$
    – ComFreek
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Dec 31 '18 at 16:12










  • $begingroup$
    What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 1 at 10:46




















  • $begingroup$
    In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
    $endgroup$
    – ComFreek
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Dec 31 '18 at 16:12










  • $begingroup$
    What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 1 at 10:46


















$begingroup$
In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
$endgroup$
– ComFreek
Dec 31 '18 at 15:34




$begingroup$
In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
$endgroup$
– ComFreek
Dec 31 '18 at 15:34




1




1




$begingroup$
What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Dec 31 '18 at 16:12




$begingroup$
What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Dec 31 '18 at 16:12












$begingroup$
What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 1 at 10:46






$begingroup$
What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 1 at 10:46












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$



Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    6












    $begingroup$

    I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
      $$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
      The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
      $$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057805%2fdifferentiating-fx-sqrtxx-from-first-principles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown
























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        10












        $begingroup$

        A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
        This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$



        Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          10












          $begingroup$

          A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
          This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$



          Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            10












            10








            10





            $begingroup$

            A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
            This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$



            Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
            This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$



            Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 31 '18 at 15:32









            cansomeonehelpmeoutcansomeonehelpmeout

            7,3193935




            7,3193935























                6












                $begingroup$

                I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  6












                  $begingroup$

                  I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    6












                    6








                    6





                    $begingroup$

                    I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 31 '18 at 15:31









                    WuestenfuxWuestenfux

                    5,3331513




                    5,3331513























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
                        $$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
                        The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
                        $$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
                          $$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
                          The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
                          $$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
                            $$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
                            The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
                            $$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
                            $$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
                            The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
                            $$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 1 at 10:35









                            Christian BlatterChristian Blatter

                            175k8115327




                            175k8115327






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057805%2fdifferentiating-fx-sqrtxx-from-first-principles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                                Aardman Animations

                                Are they similar matrix