Differentiating $f(x)= sqrt[x]{x}$ from first principles
$begingroup$
An interesting fact is that the point of maximum of $y=sqrt[x]{x}$ is attained when x equals to exactly e (as seen from the pic)
I know how to differentiate $y= sqrt[x]{x}$, by logarithmic methodology, but can anyone teach me how to differentiate this function using only the first principle?
Note: I am still a beginner, thus it would help greatly if you can include all the steps.
calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An interesting fact is that the point of maximum of $y=sqrt[x]{x}$ is attained when x equals to exactly e (as seen from the pic)
I know how to differentiate $y= sqrt[x]{x}$, by logarithmic methodology, but can anyone teach me how to differentiate this function using only the first principle?
Note: I am still a beginner, thus it would help greatly if you can include all the steps.
calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
$endgroup$
– ComFreek
Dec 31 '18 at 15:34
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Dec 31 '18 at 16:12
$begingroup$
What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 1 at 10:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An interesting fact is that the point of maximum of $y=sqrt[x]{x}$ is attained when x equals to exactly e (as seen from the pic)
I know how to differentiate $y= sqrt[x]{x}$, by logarithmic methodology, but can anyone teach me how to differentiate this function using only the first principle?
Note: I am still a beginner, thus it would help greatly if you can include all the steps.
calculus
$endgroup$
An interesting fact is that the point of maximum of $y=sqrt[x]{x}$ is attained when x equals to exactly e (as seen from the pic)
I know how to differentiate $y= sqrt[x]{x}$, by logarithmic methodology, but can anyone teach me how to differentiate this function using only the first principle?
Note: I am still a beginner, thus it would help greatly if you can include all the steps.
calculus
calculus
edited Dec 31 '18 at 15:59
Namaste
1
1
asked Dec 31 '18 at 15:26
user630471
$begingroup$
In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
$endgroup$
– ComFreek
Dec 31 '18 at 15:34
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Dec 31 '18 at 16:12
$begingroup$
What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 1 at 10:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
$endgroup$
– ComFreek
Dec 31 '18 at 15:34
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Dec 31 '18 at 16:12
$begingroup$
What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 1 at 10:46
$begingroup$
In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
$endgroup$
– ComFreek
Dec 31 '18 at 15:34
$begingroup$
In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
$endgroup$
– ComFreek
Dec 31 '18 at 15:34
1
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Dec 31 '18 at 16:12
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Dec 31 '18 at 16:12
$begingroup$
What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 1 at 10:46
$begingroup$
What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 1 at 10:46
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$
Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
$$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
$$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057805%2fdifferentiating-fx-sqrtxx-from-first-principles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$
Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$
Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$
Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$
$endgroup$
A nice trick is to rewrite $y=sqrt[x]x$ as $$y=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}tag{1}$$
This is because $$y=sqrt[x]x=x^frac{1}{x}=e^{lnleft(x^frac{1}{x}right)}=e^frac{ln(x)}{x}$$
Differentiating $(1)$, and setting it equal to $0$ yields: $$frac{dy}{dx}=e^{frac{ln(x)}{x}}left(frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}right)=0\Rightarrow frac{1}{x^2}-frac{ln(x)}{x^2}=0\Rightarrow ln(x)=1\Rightarrow x=e$$
answered Dec 31 '18 at 15:32
cansomeonehelpmeoutcansomeonehelpmeout
7,3193935
7,3193935
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.
$endgroup$
I'd consider the case $x>0$. Since the functions $exp:{Bbb R}rightarrow {Bbb R}_{>0}: xmapsto e^x$ and $ln:{Bbb R}_{>0}rightarrow {Bbb R}: xmapsto ln(x)$ are inverse to each other, we have $sqrt[x]x = x^{1/x} = e^{ln(x^{1/x})}$. From here you should be able to differentiate w.r.t. $x$.
answered Dec 31 '18 at 15:31
WuestenfuxWuestenfux
5,3331513
5,3331513
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
$$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
$$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
$$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
$$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
$$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
$$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$
$endgroup$
You have the "outer" function $$Psi(u,v):=u^vqquad(uin{mathbb R}_{>0}, vin{mathbb R})$$ of two variables, with partial derivatives
$$Psi_u(u,v)=v,u^{v-1}>,qquadPsi_v(u,v)=log (u) u^v .$$
The function $$f(x):=Psileft(x,{1over x}right)$$ then has to be differentiated using the chain rule:
$$eqalign{f'(x)&=Psi_u(x,1/x)cdot 1+Psi_v(x,1/x)cdotleft(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={1over x}x^{1/x-1}+log (x)>x^{1/x}left(-{1over x^2}right)cr &={root x of xover x^2}bigl(1-log (x)bigr) .cr}$$
answered Jan 1 at 10:35
Christian BlatterChristian Blatter
175k8115327
175k8115327
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057805%2fdifferentiating-fx-sqrtxx-from-first-principles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
In addition to the answers given so far you should also verify that it is indeed a local maximum point, e.g. by showing $f''(e) < 0$ or that $f'$ changes signs at $e$.
$endgroup$
– ComFreek
Dec 31 '18 at 15:34
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "using only the first principle"? If you mean by using the definition, I think you're in for a rather rough ride.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Dec 31 '18 at 16:12
$begingroup$
What's the purpose of going through a very complicated manipulation that's essentially nothing else than “reproving” the chain rule and the product rule in a special case? I'll reveal you a secret: knowing how to differentiate gives you knowledge of a very wide range of limits! Many basic exercises on limits are just “adorned” derivatives.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 1 at 10:46