Finding a distribution with a given correlation to a Normal Distribution
$begingroup$
Below is my attempt to solve a problem which I believe has a solution. My work shows there is no solution. I believe I did something wrong. It could be related to the algebra.
Thanks,
Bob
Problem:
Let $X$ and $Y$ independent normally distributed random variables with a mean of $0$ and a standard deviation
of $1$. Let $K$ be a positive real number. Let $Z = Y + KX$ such that the correlation of $X$ and $Z$ is $frac{1}{2}$. Find $K$.
Answer:
If we select $K = 0$ then we get a correlation of $0$. If we select $K$ to be a very large number
then the correlation will be close to $1$.
begin{align*}
rho &= frac{1}{2} \
u_x &= 0 \
u_y &= 0 \
u_z &= u_y + K(u_y) = 0 + K(0) = 0 \
sigma_x &= 1 \
sigma_y &= 1 \
sigma_z^2 &= sigma_y^2 + K^2 sigma_x^2 + K(sigma_{xy}) \
sigma_{xy} &= 0 \
sigma_z^2 &= 1^2 + K^2 1^2 + K(0) = K^2 + 1 \
end{align*}
begin{align*}
sigma_{xz} &= E(XZ) - E(X)E(Z) \
E(X) &= 0 \
sigma_{xz} &= E(XZ) - (0)E(Z) = E(XZ) \
E(XZ) &= E( X(Y+KX)) = E(XY + KX^2) = E(XY) + KE(X^2) \
E(X^2) &= 1 \
end{align*}
Now we need to find $E(XY)$.
begin{align*}
E(XY) &= E(X) E(Y) = 0(0) \
E(XY) &= 0 \
E(XZ) &= 0 + K(1) = K \
sigma_{xz} &= K \
rho_{xz} &= frac{sigma_x sigma_z }{sigma_{xz}} \
frac{1}{2} &= frac{ sqrt{K^2+1} }{K} \
frac{K}{2} &= sqrt{K^2+1} \
frac{K^2}{4} &= K^2 + 1 \
frac{-3K^2}{4} &= 1 \
end{align*}
This equation has no real roots.
probability
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is my attempt to solve a problem which I believe has a solution. My work shows there is no solution. I believe I did something wrong. It could be related to the algebra.
Thanks,
Bob
Problem:
Let $X$ and $Y$ independent normally distributed random variables with a mean of $0$ and a standard deviation
of $1$. Let $K$ be a positive real number. Let $Z = Y + KX$ such that the correlation of $X$ and $Z$ is $frac{1}{2}$. Find $K$.
Answer:
If we select $K = 0$ then we get a correlation of $0$. If we select $K$ to be a very large number
then the correlation will be close to $1$.
begin{align*}
rho &= frac{1}{2} \
u_x &= 0 \
u_y &= 0 \
u_z &= u_y + K(u_y) = 0 + K(0) = 0 \
sigma_x &= 1 \
sigma_y &= 1 \
sigma_z^2 &= sigma_y^2 + K^2 sigma_x^2 + K(sigma_{xy}) \
sigma_{xy} &= 0 \
sigma_z^2 &= 1^2 + K^2 1^2 + K(0) = K^2 + 1 \
end{align*}
begin{align*}
sigma_{xz} &= E(XZ) - E(X)E(Z) \
E(X) &= 0 \
sigma_{xz} &= E(XZ) - (0)E(Z) = E(XZ) \
E(XZ) &= E( X(Y+KX)) = E(XY + KX^2) = E(XY) + KE(X^2) \
E(X^2) &= 1 \
end{align*}
Now we need to find $E(XY)$.
begin{align*}
E(XY) &= E(X) E(Y) = 0(0) \
E(XY) &= 0 \
E(XZ) &= 0 + K(1) = K \
sigma_{xz} &= K \
rho_{xz} &= frac{sigma_x sigma_z }{sigma_{xz}} \
frac{1}{2} &= frac{ sqrt{K^2+1} }{K} \
frac{K}{2} &= sqrt{K^2+1} \
frac{K^2}{4} &= K^2 + 1 \
frac{-3K^2}{4} &= 1 \
end{align*}
This equation has no real roots.
probability
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Your correlation formula is inverse. Correlation is equal to covariance divided by product of standard deviations. Fix that and you get $K=1/sqrt{3}$ and $K=-1/sqrt{3}$
$endgroup$
– Sauhard Sharma
Dec 23 '18 at 18:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Below is my attempt to solve a problem which I believe has a solution. My work shows there is no solution. I believe I did something wrong. It could be related to the algebra.
Thanks,
Bob
Problem:
Let $X$ and $Y$ independent normally distributed random variables with a mean of $0$ and a standard deviation
of $1$. Let $K$ be a positive real number. Let $Z = Y + KX$ such that the correlation of $X$ and $Z$ is $frac{1}{2}$. Find $K$.
Answer:
If we select $K = 0$ then we get a correlation of $0$. If we select $K$ to be a very large number
then the correlation will be close to $1$.
begin{align*}
rho &= frac{1}{2} \
u_x &= 0 \
u_y &= 0 \
u_z &= u_y + K(u_y) = 0 + K(0) = 0 \
sigma_x &= 1 \
sigma_y &= 1 \
sigma_z^2 &= sigma_y^2 + K^2 sigma_x^2 + K(sigma_{xy}) \
sigma_{xy} &= 0 \
sigma_z^2 &= 1^2 + K^2 1^2 + K(0) = K^2 + 1 \
end{align*}
begin{align*}
sigma_{xz} &= E(XZ) - E(X)E(Z) \
E(X) &= 0 \
sigma_{xz} &= E(XZ) - (0)E(Z) = E(XZ) \
E(XZ) &= E( X(Y+KX)) = E(XY + KX^2) = E(XY) + KE(X^2) \
E(X^2) &= 1 \
end{align*}
Now we need to find $E(XY)$.
begin{align*}
E(XY) &= E(X) E(Y) = 0(0) \
E(XY) &= 0 \
E(XZ) &= 0 + K(1) = K \
sigma_{xz} &= K \
rho_{xz} &= frac{sigma_x sigma_z }{sigma_{xz}} \
frac{1}{2} &= frac{ sqrt{K^2+1} }{K} \
frac{K}{2} &= sqrt{K^2+1} \
frac{K^2}{4} &= K^2 + 1 \
frac{-3K^2}{4} &= 1 \
end{align*}
This equation has no real roots.
probability
$endgroup$
Below is my attempt to solve a problem which I believe has a solution. My work shows there is no solution. I believe I did something wrong. It could be related to the algebra.
Thanks,
Bob
Problem:
Let $X$ and $Y$ independent normally distributed random variables with a mean of $0$ and a standard deviation
of $1$. Let $K$ be a positive real number. Let $Z = Y + KX$ such that the correlation of $X$ and $Z$ is $frac{1}{2}$. Find $K$.
Answer:
If we select $K = 0$ then we get a correlation of $0$. If we select $K$ to be a very large number
then the correlation will be close to $1$.
begin{align*}
rho &= frac{1}{2} \
u_x &= 0 \
u_y &= 0 \
u_z &= u_y + K(u_y) = 0 + K(0) = 0 \
sigma_x &= 1 \
sigma_y &= 1 \
sigma_z^2 &= sigma_y^2 + K^2 sigma_x^2 + K(sigma_{xy}) \
sigma_{xy} &= 0 \
sigma_z^2 &= 1^2 + K^2 1^2 + K(0) = K^2 + 1 \
end{align*}
begin{align*}
sigma_{xz} &= E(XZ) - E(X)E(Z) \
E(X) &= 0 \
sigma_{xz} &= E(XZ) - (0)E(Z) = E(XZ) \
E(XZ) &= E( X(Y+KX)) = E(XY + KX^2) = E(XY) + KE(X^2) \
E(X^2) &= 1 \
end{align*}
Now we need to find $E(XY)$.
begin{align*}
E(XY) &= E(X) E(Y) = 0(0) \
E(XY) &= 0 \
E(XZ) &= 0 + K(1) = K \
sigma_{xz} &= K \
rho_{xz} &= frac{sigma_x sigma_z }{sigma_{xz}} \
frac{1}{2} &= frac{ sqrt{K^2+1} }{K} \
frac{K}{2} &= sqrt{K^2+1} \
frac{K^2}{4} &= K^2 + 1 \
frac{-3K^2}{4} &= 1 \
end{align*}
This equation has no real roots.
probability
probability
asked Dec 23 '18 at 18:19
BobBob
928515
928515
1
$begingroup$
Your correlation formula is inverse. Correlation is equal to covariance divided by product of standard deviations. Fix that and you get $K=1/sqrt{3}$ and $K=-1/sqrt{3}$
$endgroup$
– Sauhard Sharma
Dec 23 '18 at 18:43
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Your correlation formula is inverse. Correlation is equal to covariance divided by product of standard deviations. Fix that and you get $K=1/sqrt{3}$ and $K=-1/sqrt{3}$
$endgroup$
– Sauhard Sharma
Dec 23 '18 at 18:43
1
1
$begingroup$
Your correlation formula is inverse. Correlation is equal to covariance divided by product of standard deviations. Fix that and you get $K=1/sqrt{3}$ and $K=-1/sqrt{3}$
$endgroup$
– Sauhard Sharma
Dec 23 '18 at 18:43
$begingroup$
Your correlation formula is inverse. Correlation is equal to covariance divided by product of standard deviations. Fix that and you get $K=1/sqrt{3}$ and $K=-1/sqrt{3}$
$endgroup$
– Sauhard Sharma
Dec 23 '18 at 18:43
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The formula for the correlation is incorrect (you mixed the numerator with the denominator). The corrected one is below (as already stated in the comments).
$$rho_{xz}=frac{sigma_{xz}}{sigma_xsigma_z}$$
It can help to check your assumptions in cases like this, for example your claim that 'if $K$ is very large the correlation approaches $1$' does not hold with $frac{sqrt{K^2+1}}{K}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$Cov(X,Z)=E(XZ)=E(X(Y+kX))=kE(X^2)+E(X)E(Y)=k,Var(Z)=1+k^2.$ So we want $1/2=cor(X,Z)=frac{cov(X,Z)}{sqrt{var(X)var(Z)}}=k/sqrt{1+k^2}.$ So, $k=1/sqrt 3$ should work.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050584%2ffinding-a-distribution-with-a-given-correlation-to-a-normal-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The formula for the correlation is incorrect (you mixed the numerator with the denominator). The corrected one is below (as already stated in the comments).
$$rho_{xz}=frac{sigma_{xz}}{sigma_xsigma_z}$$
It can help to check your assumptions in cases like this, for example your claim that 'if $K$ is very large the correlation approaches $1$' does not hold with $frac{sqrt{K^2+1}}{K}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The formula for the correlation is incorrect (you mixed the numerator with the denominator). The corrected one is below (as already stated in the comments).
$$rho_{xz}=frac{sigma_{xz}}{sigma_xsigma_z}$$
It can help to check your assumptions in cases like this, for example your claim that 'if $K$ is very large the correlation approaches $1$' does not hold with $frac{sqrt{K^2+1}}{K}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The formula for the correlation is incorrect (you mixed the numerator with the denominator). The corrected one is below (as already stated in the comments).
$$rho_{xz}=frac{sigma_{xz}}{sigma_xsigma_z}$$
It can help to check your assumptions in cases like this, for example your claim that 'if $K$ is very large the correlation approaches $1$' does not hold with $frac{sqrt{K^2+1}}{K}$.
$endgroup$
The formula for the correlation is incorrect (you mixed the numerator with the denominator). The corrected one is below (as already stated in the comments).
$$rho_{xz}=frac{sigma_{xz}}{sigma_xsigma_z}$$
It can help to check your assumptions in cases like this, for example your claim that 'if $K$ is very large the correlation approaches $1$' does not hold with $frac{sqrt{K^2+1}}{K}$.
answered Dec 23 '18 at 18:52
Cows quackCows quack
1184
1184
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$Cov(X,Z)=E(XZ)=E(X(Y+kX))=kE(X^2)+E(X)E(Y)=k,Var(Z)=1+k^2.$ So we want $1/2=cor(X,Z)=frac{cov(X,Z)}{sqrt{var(X)var(Z)}}=k/sqrt{1+k^2}.$ So, $k=1/sqrt 3$ should work.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$Cov(X,Z)=E(XZ)=E(X(Y+kX))=kE(X^2)+E(X)E(Y)=k,Var(Z)=1+k^2.$ So we want $1/2=cor(X,Z)=frac{cov(X,Z)}{sqrt{var(X)var(Z)}}=k/sqrt{1+k^2}.$ So, $k=1/sqrt 3$ should work.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$Cov(X,Z)=E(XZ)=E(X(Y+kX))=kE(X^2)+E(X)E(Y)=k,Var(Z)=1+k^2.$ So we want $1/2=cor(X,Z)=frac{cov(X,Z)}{sqrt{var(X)var(Z)}}=k/sqrt{1+k^2}.$ So, $k=1/sqrt 3$ should work.
$endgroup$
$Cov(X,Z)=E(XZ)=E(X(Y+kX))=kE(X^2)+E(X)E(Y)=k,Var(Z)=1+k^2.$ So we want $1/2=cor(X,Z)=frac{cov(X,Z)}{sqrt{var(X)var(Z)}}=k/sqrt{1+k^2}.$ So, $k=1/sqrt 3$ should work.
answered Dec 23 '18 at 18:55
John_WickJohn_Wick
1,616111
1,616111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050584%2ffinding-a-distribution-with-a-given-correlation-to-a-normal-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Your correlation formula is inverse. Correlation is equal to covariance divided by product of standard deviations. Fix that and you get $K=1/sqrt{3}$ and $K=-1/sqrt{3}$
$endgroup$
– Sauhard Sharma
Dec 23 '18 at 18:43