Proof verification: finding all prime numbers in the form of $n^3-1, n>1$












0












$begingroup$


Let $p$ be a prime number of the form $p = n ^3 - 1$ for a positive integer $n geq 2$.



Then, factoring the difference of perfect cubes, we obtain $p = (n-1)(n^2 + n + 1)$.



Since $p = 1 cdot p$ as well, and $n^2 + n + 1 > 1$, $n$ must satisfy $n-1=1$, thus implying $n=2$, yielding $p=7$.



Is this proof valid? Is $p=7$ the only prime number of this form?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Looks good. $quad$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Nov 16 '18 at 14:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that’s correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 16 '18 at 14:28
















0












$begingroup$


Let $p$ be a prime number of the form $p = n ^3 - 1$ for a positive integer $n geq 2$.



Then, factoring the difference of perfect cubes, we obtain $p = (n-1)(n^2 + n + 1)$.



Since $p = 1 cdot p$ as well, and $n^2 + n + 1 > 1$, $n$ must satisfy $n-1=1$, thus implying $n=2$, yielding $p=7$.



Is this proof valid? Is $p=7$ the only prime number of this form?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Looks good. $quad$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Nov 16 '18 at 14:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that’s correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 16 '18 at 14:28














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $p$ be a prime number of the form $p = n ^3 - 1$ for a positive integer $n geq 2$.



Then, factoring the difference of perfect cubes, we obtain $p = (n-1)(n^2 + n + 1)$.



Since $p = 1 cdot p$ as well, and $n^2 + n + 1 > 1$, $n$ must satisfy $n-1=1$, thus implying $n=2$, yielding $p=7$.



Is this proof valid? Is $p=7$ the only prime number of this form?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $p$ be a prime number of the form $p = n ^3 - 1$ for a positive integer $n geq 2$.



Then, factoring the difference of perfect cubes, we obtain $p = (n-1)(n^2 + n + 1)$.



Since $p = 1 cdot p$ as well, and $n^2 + n + 1 > 1$, $n$ must satisfy $n-1=1$, thus implying $n=2$, yielding $p=7$.



Is this proof valid? Is $p=7$ the only prime number of this form?







proof-verification prime-numbers prime-factorization






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 18 '18 at 6:36









Eevee Trainer

6,79311237




6,79311237










asked Nov 16 '18 at 14:25









Marko ŠkorićMarko Škorić

70610




70610








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Looks good. $quad$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Nov 16 '18 at 14:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that’s correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 16 '18 at 14:28














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Looks good. $quad$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Nov 16 '18 at 14:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, that’s correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 16 '18 at 14:28








3




3




$begingroup$
Looks good. $quad$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Nov 16 '18 at 14:26




$begingroup$
Looks good. $quad$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Nov 16 '18 at 14:26




3




3




$begingroup$
Yes, that’s correct.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 16 '18 at 14:28




$begingroup$
Yes, that’s correct.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 16 '18 at 14:28










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

As the others said in the comments: Yes, your proof is valid.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This answer exists to remove this question from the Unanswered queue. To complete this process, please upvote this answer to a score of at least +1.
    $endgroup$
    – aleph_two
    Dec 18 '18 at 5:14











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001200%2fproof-verification-finding-all-prime-numbers-in-the-form-of-n3-1-n1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

As the others said in the comments: Yes, your proof is valid.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This answer exists to remove this question from the Unanswered queue. To complete this process, please upvote this answer to a score of at least +1.
    $endgroup$
    – aleph_two
    Dec 18 '18 at 5:14
















2












$begingroup$

As the others said in the comments: Yes, your proof is valid.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This answer exists to remove this question from the Unanswered queue. To complete this process, please upvote this answer to a score of at least +1.
    $endgroup$
    – aleph_two
    Dec 18 '18 at 5:14














2












2








2





$begingroup$

As the others said in the comments: Yes, your proof is valid.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



As the others said in the comments: Yes, your proof is valid.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








answered Dec 18 '18 at 5:13


























community wiki





aleph_two













  • $begingroup$
    This answer exists to remove this question from the Unanswered queue. To complete this process, please upvote this answer to a score of at least +1.
    $endgroup$
    – aleph_two
    Dec 18 '18 at 5:14


















  • $begingroup$
    This answer exists to remove this question from the Unanswered queue. To complete this process, please upvote this answer to a score of at least +1.
    $endgroup$
    – aleph_two
    Dec 18 '18 at 5:14
















$begingroup$
This answer exists to remove this question from the Unanswered queue. To complete this process, please upvote this answer to a score of at least +1.
$endgroup$
– aleph_two
Dec 18 '18 at 5:14




$begingroup$
This answer exists to remove this question from the Unanswered queue. To complete this process, please upvote this answer to a score of at least +1.
$endgroup$
– aleph_two
Dec 18 '18 at 5:14


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001200%2fproof-verification-finding-all-prime-numbers-in-the-form-of-n3-1-n1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

When does type information flow backwards in C++?

Grease: Live!