Two presentations of a group, one certainly finite. Need the other be?
$begingroup$
I know the answer to the question above is "no", quite flatly. The counter example is below:
$$mathbb{Z}conglangle a,bmid b^2a^{-1}ranglecong langle a,bmidlbrace b^{2^{n+1
}}a^{-2^n}:ninmathbb{N}rbracerangle.$$
So my question, more broadly, is that if $langle A|Rrangleconglangle A|R'rangle$ and we know that $R$ is finite, what can we say about $R'$?
I think we can say that $langle Rrangle^Ncong langle R'rangle^N$, viewed inside the free group on $A$, but I'm not sure.
group-theory finite-groups group-presentation combinatorial-group-theory
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I know the answer to the question above is "no", quite flatly. The counter example is below:
$$mathbb{Z}conglangle a,bmid b^2a^{-1}ranglecong langle a,bmidlbrace b^{2^{n+1
}}a^{-2^n}:ninmathbb{N}rbracerangle.$$
So my question, more broadly, is that if $langle A|Rrangleconglangle A|R'rangle$ and we know that $R$ is finite, what can we say about $R'$?
I think we can say that $langle Rrangle^Ncong langle R'rangle^N$, viewed inside the free group on $A$, but I'm not sure.
group-theory finite-groups group-presentation combinatorial-group-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You can say that all but finitely many of the relators in $R'$ are redundant - i.e. they follow from the others. You haven't said what $N$ is and I don't know what you mean by "viewed inside the free group on $A$".
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 26 '18 at 20:51
2
$begingroup$
I don't like that notation! It looks like the normal closure of $langle R rangle$ under some subgroup $N$. I prefer $langlelangle R ranglerangle$. Anyway, the answer is yes, $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$, becuase they are free groups whose rank is determined by $|langle A mid R rangle|$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 8:18
1
$begingroup$
Although $langlelangle Rranglerangleconglanglelangle R'ranglerangle$, it is obvious that there are examples where $langlelangle Rranglerangleneq langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ (for example, $langle a, bmid arangleconglangle a, bmid brangle$). What is perhaps less obvious is that there are examples where the subgroups $langlelangle Rranglerangle$ and $langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ lie in different automorphic orbits of the ambient free group (and, surprisingly, in these examples you can take $R$ and $R'$ to consist of a single element).
$endgroup$
– user1729
Sep 27 '18 at 8:33
2
$begingroup$
@DerekHolt I've been thinking about the claim you made, that there is a reduction of $R'$. I believe it goes as follows: Since $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$ by some $phi$, we find that $langlelangle R' ranglerangle cong langlelangle phi(R) ranglerangle$. But, since $R$ is finite, $phi(R)$ is a collection of conjugates of some finite set $lbrace r_irbracesubset R'$. So, in fact, $langlelangle R' ranglerangle=langlelangle lbrace r_irbrace ranglerangle$ as desired.
$endgroup$
– Prototank
Sep 27 '18 at 12:29
2
$begingroup$
Yes that argument works!
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 12:54
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I know the answer to the question above is "no", quite flatly. The counter example is below:
$$mathbb{Z}conglangle a,bmid b^2a^{-1}ranglecong langle a,bmidlbrace b^{2^{n+1
}}a^{-2^n}:ninmathbb{N}rbracerangle.$$
So my question, more broadly, is that if $langle A|Rrangleconglangle A|R'rangle$ and we know that $R$ is finite, what can we say about $R'$?
I think we can say that $langle Rrangle^Ncong langle R'rangle^N$, viewed inside the free group on $A$, but I'm not sure.
group-theory finite-groups group-presentation combinatorial-group-theory
$endgroup$
I know the answer to the question above is "no", quite flatly. The counter example is below:
$$mathbb{Z}conglangle a,bmid b^2a^{-1}ranglecong langle a,bmidlbrace b^{2^{n+1
}}a^{-2^n}:ninmathbb{N}rbracerangle.$$
So my question, more broadly, is that if $langle A|Rrangleconglangle A|R'rangle$ and we know that $R$ is finite, what can we say about $R'$?
I think we can say that $langle Rrangle^Ncong langle R'rangle^N$, viewed inside the free group on $A$, but I'm not sure.
group-theory finite-groups group-presentation combinatorial-group-theory
group-theory finite-groups group-presentation combinatorial-group-theory
edited Dec 3 '18 at 1:04
Shaun
8,883113681
8,883113681
asked Sep 26 '18 at 20:06
PrototankPrototank
1,030820
1,030820
1
$begingroup$
You can say that all but finitely many of the relators in $R'$ are redundant - i.e. they follow from the others. You haven't said what $N$ is and I don't know what you mean by "viewed inside the free group on $A$".
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 26 '18 at 20:51
2
$begingroup$
I don't like that notation! It looks like the normal closure of $langle R rangle$ under some subgroup $N$. I prefer $langlelangle R ranglerangle$. Anyway, the answer is yes, $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$, becuase they are free groups whose rank is determined by $|langle A mid R rangle|$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 8:18
1
$begingroup$
Although $langlelangle Rranglerangleconglanglelangle R'ranglerangle$, it is obvious that there are examples where $langlelangle Rranglerangleneq langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ (for example, $langle a, bmid arangleconglangle a, bmid brangle$). What is perhaps less obvious is that there are examples where the subgroups $langlelangle Rranglerangle$ and $langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ lie in different automorphic orbits of the ambient free group (and, surprisingly, in these examples you can take $R$ and $R'$ to consist of a single element).
$endgroup$
– user1729
Sep 27 '18 at 8:33
2
$begingroup$
@DerekHolt I've been thinking about the claim you made, that there is a reduction of $R'$. I believe it goes as follows: Since $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$ by some $phi$, we find that $langlelangle R' ranglerangle cong langlelangle phi(R) ranglerangle$. But, since $R$ is finite, $phi(R)$ is a collection of conjugates of some finite set $lbrace r_irbracesubset R'$. So, in fact, $langlelangle R' ranglerangle=langlelangle lbrace r_irbrace ranglerangle$ as desired.
$endgroup$
– Prototank
Sep 27 '18 at 12:29
2
$begingroup$
Yes that argument works!
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 12:54
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
You can say that all but finitely many of the relators in $R'$ are redundant - i.e. they follow from the others. You haven't said what $N$ is and I don't know what you mean by "viewed inside the free group on $A$".
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 26 '18 at 20:51
2
$begingroup$
I don't like that notation! It looks like the normal closure of $langle R rangle$ under some subgroup $N$. I prefer $langlelangle R ranglerangle$. Anyway, the answer is yes, $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$, becuase they are free groups whose rank is determined by $|langle A mid R rangle|$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 8:18
1
$begingroup$
Although $langlelangle Rranglerangleconglanglelangle R'ranglerangle$, it is obvious that there are examples where $langlelangle Rranglerangleneq langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ (for example, $langle a, bmid arangleconglangle a, bmid brangle$). What is perhaps less obvious is that there are examples where the subgroups $langlelangle Rranglerangle$ and $langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ lie in different automorphic orbits of the ambient free group (and, surprisingly, in these examples you can take $R$ and $R'$ to consist of a single element).
$endgroup$
– user1729
Sep 27 '18 at 8:33
2
$begingroup$
@DerekHolt I've been thinking about the claim you made, that there is a reduction of $R'$. I believe it goes as follows: Since $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$ by some $phi$, we find that $langlelangle R' ranglerangle cong langlelangle phi(R) ranglerangle$. But, since $R$ is finite, $phi(R)$ is a collection of conjugates of some finite set $lbrace r_irbracesubset R'$. So, in fact, $langlelangle R' ranglerangle=langlelangle lbrace r_irbrace ranglerangle$ as desired.
$endgroup$
– Prototank
Sep 27 '18 at 12:29
2
$begingroup$
Yes that argument works!
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 12:54
1
1
$begingroup$
You can say that all but finitely many of the relators in $R'$ are redundant - i.e. they follow from the others. You haven't said what $N$ is and I don't know what you mean by "viewed inside the free group on $A$".
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 26 '18 at 20:51
$begingroup$
You can say that all but finitely many of the relators in $R'$ are redundant - i.e. they follow from the others. You haven't said what $N$ is and I don't know what you mean by "viewed inside the free group on $A$".
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 26 '18 at 20:51
2
2
$begingroup$
I don't like that notation! It looks like the normal closure of $langle R rangle$ under some subgroup $N$. I prefer $langlelangle R ranglerangle$. Anyway, the answer is yes, $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$, becuase they are free groups whose rank is determined by $|langle A mid R rangle|$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 8:18
$begingroup$
I don't like that notation! It looks like the normal closure of $langle R rangle$ under some subgroup $N$. I prefer $langlelangle R ranglerangle$. Anyway, the answer is yes, $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$, becuase they are free groups whose rank is determined by $|langle A mid R rangle|$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 8:18
1
1
$begingroup$
Although $langlelangle Rranglerangleconglanglelangle R'ranglerangle$, it is obvious that there are examples where $langlelangle Rranglerangleneq langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ (for example, $langle a, bmid arangleconglangle a, bmid brangle$). What is perhaps less obvious is that there are examples where the subgroups $langlelangle Rranglerangle$ and $langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ lie in different automorphic orbits of the ambient free group (and, surprisingly, in these examples you can take $R$ and $R'$ to consist of a single element).
$endgroup$
– user1729
Sep 27 '18 at 8:33
$begingroup$
Although $langlelangle Rranglerangleconglanglelangle R'ranglerangle$, it is obvious that there are examples where $langlelangle Rranglerangleneq langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ (for example, $langle a, bmid arangleconglangle a, bmid brangle$). What is perhaps less obvious is that there are examples where the subgroups $langlelangle Rranglerangle$ and $langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ lie in different automorphic orbits of the ambient free group (and, surprisingly, in these examples you can take $R$ and $R'$ to consist of a single element).
$endgroup$
– user1729
Sep 27 '18 at 8:33
2
2
$begingroup$
@DerekHolt I've been thinking about the claim you made, that there is a reduction of $R'$. I believe it goes as follows: Since $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$ by some $phi$, we find that $langlelangle R' ranglerangle cong langlelangle phi(R) ranglerangle$. But, since $R$ is finite, $phi(R)$ is a collection of conjugates of some finite set $lbrace r_irbracesubset R'$. So, in fact, $langlelangle R' ranglerangle=langlelangle lbrace r_irbrace ranglerangle$ as desired.
$endgroup$
– Prototank
Sep 27 '18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
@DerekHolt I've been thinking about the claim you made, that there is a reduction of $R'$. I believe it goes as follows: Since $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$ by some $phi$, we find that $langlelangle R' ranglerangle cong langlelangle phi(R) ranglerangle$. But, since $R$ is finite, $phi(R)$ is a collection of conjugates of some finite set $lbrace r_irbracesubset R'$. So, in fact, $langlelangle R' ranglerangle=langlelangle lbrace r_irbrace ranglerangle$ as desired.
$endgroup$
– Prototank
Sep 27 '18 at 12:29
2
2
$begingroup$
Yes that argument works!
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
Yes that argument works!
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 12:54
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2932131%2ftwo-presentations-of-a-group-one-certainly-finite-need-the-other-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2932131%2ftwo-presentations-of-a-group-one-certainly-finite-need-the-other-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You can say that all but finitely many of the relators in $R'$ are redundant - i.e. they follow from the others. You haven't said what $N$ is and I don't know what you mean by "viewed inside the free group on $A$".
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 26 '18 at 20:51
2
$begingroup$
I don't like that notation! It looks like the normal closure of $langle R rangle$ under some subgroup $N$. I prefer $langlelangle R ranglerangle$. Anyway, the answer is yes, $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$, becuase they are free groups whose rank is determined by $|langle A mid R rangle|$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 8:18
1
$begingroup$
Although $langlelangle Rranglerangleconglanglelangle R'ranglerangle$, it is obvious that there are examples where $langlelangle Rranglerangleneq langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ (for example, $langle a, bmid arangleconglangle a, bmid brangle$). What is perhaps less obvious is that there are examples where the subgroups $langlelangle Rranglerangle$ and $langlelangle R'ranglerangle$ lie in different automorphic orbits of the ambient free group (and, surprisingly, in these examples you can take $R$ and $R'$ to consist of a single element).
$endgroup$
– user1729
Sep 27 '18 at 8:33
2
$begingroup$
@DerekHolt I've been thinking about the claim you made, that there is a reduction of $R'$. I believe it goes as follows: Since $langlelangle R ranglerangle cong langlelangle R' ranglerangle$ by some $phi$, we find that $langlelangle R' ranglerangle cong langlelangle phi(R) ranglerangle$. But, since $R$ is finite, $phi(R)$ is a collection of conjugates of some finite set $lbrace r_irbracesubset R'$. So, in fact, $langlelangle R' ranglerangle=langlelangle lbrace r_irbrace ranglerangle$ as desired.
$endgroup$
– Prototank
Sep 27 '18 at 12:29
2
$begingroup$
Yes that argument works!
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Sep 27 '18 at 12:54