A graph and metric on the class of finitely presented groups.
$begingroup$
Pick some countably infinite set $Y$. Call two finitely presented groups $G_1$ and $G_2$ presentation related if for some finite $X subseteq Y$,
$G_1 cong F{X} / H$ and $G_2 cong F{X} / langle H cup {h} rangle$
for some $h in F{X} setminus H$ and $H le F{X}$
or
$G_1 cong F{X} / H$ and $G_2 cong F{X cup {y}} / i(H)$ for some $y in Y$ and $H le F{X}$ where $i: F{X} mapsto F{X cup {x}}$ is the natural injection induced by the inclusion of sets.
Also, as two isomorphic groups always have identical presentations, it makes sense to define that two isomorphic groups are trivially presentation related.
We now have a graph on the finitely presented groups where there is an edge between two nodes/groups if those groups are (non-trivially) presentation related.
This also gives a metric by shortest paths / geodesic distance.
Is this construction useful? (Answer to comment: ) Or more directly, is this construction known and/or used in research mathematics?
Given the problem of putting a natural metric on the class of finitely presented groups, I believe many mathematicians would come up with something substantially similar to this.
group-theory measure-theory graph-theory group-presentation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pick some countably infinite set $Y$. Call two finitely presented groups $G_1$ and $G_2$ presentation related if for some finite $X subseteq Y$,
$G_1 cong F{X} / H$ and $G_2 cong F{X} / langle H cup {h} rangle$
for some $h in F{X} setminus H$ and $H le F{X}$
or
$G_1 cong F{X} / H$ and $G_2 cong F{X cup {y}} / i(H)$ for some $y in Y$ and $H le F{X}$ where $i: F{X} mapsto F{X cup {x}}$ is the natural injection induced by the inclusion of sets.
Also, as two isomorphic groups always have identical presentations, it makes sense to define that two isomorphic groups are trivially presentation related.
We now have a graph on the finitely presented groups where there is an edge between two nodes/groups if those groups are (non-trivially) presentation related.
This also gives a metric by shortest paths / geodesic distance.
Is this construction useful? (Answer to comment: ) Or more directly, is this construction known and/or used in research mathematics?
Given the problem of putting a natural metric on the class of finitely presented groups, I believe many mathematicians would come up with something substantially similar to this.
group-theory measure-theory graph-theory group-presentation
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Useful for what? Your question is too broad.
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Jul 10 '15 at 22:09
1
$begingroup$
I haven't seen the construction you give. The distance to the trivial group in your graph is called the weight of a group, which has been studied, and it seems that the distance to a free group is equal to the minimum number of relations. Like many things that haven't been studied, it's hard to tell whether it's useful without first finding out what you can say about it.
$endgroup$
– Jim Belk
Jul 11 '15 at 2:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pick some countably infinite set $Y$. Call two finitely presented groups $G_1$ and $G_2$ presentation related if for some finite $X subseteq Y$,
$G_1 cong F{X} / H$ and $G_2 cong F{X} / langle H cup {h} rangle$
for some $h in F{X} setminus H$ and $H le F{X}$
or
$G_1 cong F{X} / H$ and $G_2 cong F{X cup {y}} / i(H)$ for some $y in Y$ and $H le F{X}$ where $i: F{X} mapsto F{X cup {x}}$ is the natural injection induced by the inclusion of sets.
Also, as two isomorphic groups always have identical presentations, it makes sense to define that two isomorphic groups are trivially presentation related.
We now have a graph on the finitely presented groups where there is an edge between two nodes/groups if those groups are (non-trivially) presentation related.
This also gives a metric by shortest paths / geodesic distance.
Is this construction useful? (Answer to comment: ) Or more directly, is this construction known and/or used in research mathematics?
Given the problem of putting a natural metric on the class of finitely presented groups, I believe many mathematicians would come up with something substantially similar to this.
group-theory measure-theory graph-theory group-presentation
$endgroup$
Pick some countably infinite set $Y$. Call two finitely presented groups $G_1$ and $G_2$ presentation related if for some finite $X subseteq Y$,
$G_1 cong F{X} / H$ and $G_2 cong F{X} / langle H cup {h} rangle$
for some $h in F{X} setminus H$ and $H le F{X}$
or
$G_1 cong F{X} / H$ and $G_2 cong F{X cup {y}} / i(H)$ for some $y in Y$ and $H le F{X}$ where $i: F{X} mapsto F{X cup {x}}$ is the natural injection induced by the inclusion of sets.
Also, as two isomorphic groups always have identical presentations, it makes sense to define that two isomorphic groups are trivially presentation related.
We now have a graph on the finitely presented groups where there is an edge between two nodes/groups if those groups are (non-trivially) presentation related.
This also gives a metric by shortest paths / geodesic distance.
Is this construction useful? (Answer to comment: ) Or more directly, is this construction known and/or used in research mathematics?
Given the problem of putting a natural metric on the class of finitely presented groups, I believe many mathematicians would come up with something substantially similar to this.
group-theory measure-theory graph-theory group-presentation
group-theory measure-theory graph-theory group-presentation
edited Dec 3 '18 at 1:24
Shaun
8,883113681
8,883113681
asked Jul 10 '15 at 22:04
ThoralfSkolemThoralfSkolem
1,133615
1,133615
$begingroup$
Useful for what? Your question is too broad.
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Jul 10 '15 at 22:09
1
$begingroup$
I haven't seen the construction you give. The distance to the trivial group in your graph is called the weight of a group, which has been studied, and it seems that the distance to a free group is equal to the minimum number of relations. Like many things that haven't been studied, it's hard to tell whether it's useful without first finding out what you can say about it.
$endgroup$
– Jim Belk
Jul 11 '15 at 2:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Useful for what? Your question is too broad.
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Jul 10 '15 at 22:09
1
$begingroup$
I haven't seen the construction you give. The distance to the trivial group in your graph is called the weight of a group, which has been studied, and it seems that the distance to a free group is equal to the minimum number of relations. Like many things that haven't been studied, it's hard to tell whether it's useful without first finding out what you can say about it.
$endgroup$
– Jim Belk
Jul 11 '15 at 2:17
$begingroup$
Useful for what? Your question is too broad.
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Jul 10 '15 at 22:09
$begingroup$
Useful for what? Your question is too broad.
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Jul 10 '15 at 22:09
1
1
$begingroup$
I haven't seen the construction you give. The distance to the trivial group in your graph is called the weight of a group, which has been studied, and it seems that the distance to a free group is equal to the minimum number of relations. Like many things that haven't been studied, it's hard to tell whether it's useful without first finding out what you can say about it.
$endgroup$
– Jim Belk
Jul 11 '15 at 2:17
$begingroup$
I haven't seen the construction you give. The distance to the trivial group in your graph is called the weight of a group, which has been studied, and it seems that the distance to a free group is equal to the minimum number of relations. Like many things that haven't been studied, it's hard to tell whether it's useful without first finding out what you can say about it.
$endgroup$
– Jim Belk
Jul 11 '15 at 2:17
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1356906%2fa-graph-and-metric-on-the-class-of-finitely-presented-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1356906%2fa-graph-and-metric-on-the-class-of-finitely-presented-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Useful for what? Your question is too broad.
$endgroup$
– Martin Brandenburg
Jul 10 '15 at 22:09
1
$begingroup$
I haven't seen the construction you give. The distance to the trivial group in your graph is called the weight of a group, which has been studied, and it seems that the distance to a free group is equal to the minimum number of relations. Like many things that haven't been studied, it's hard to tell whether it's useful without first finding out what you can say about it.
$endgroup$
– Jim Belk
Jul 11 '15 at 2:17