name of algebraic structure generalizing closure and interior
$begingroup$
Is there a name for an algebraic structure equipped with an involution and two additional unary functions that "act like" the interior and closure of a set?
I'm after something a little bit like an $i$-lattice / DeMorgan algebra but additionally with something that "feels like" $square$ and $lozenge$ from modal logic.
Suppose we take the sets of subsets of $mathbb{R}$ and consider the operations $cup(cdot, cdot);,; cap(cdot, cdot);,; cdot^complement;,; mathrm{int}(cdot);,; overline{(cdot)} $ , so union, intersection, complement, interior, and closure.
$cup$ and $cap$ distribute over each other and are duals with respect to $cdot^complement$ and $x^complement{^complement} = x$ .
Interior are closure are also dual and each is idempotent.
$$ mathrm{int}(x^complement)^complement = overline{x} tag{1} $$
$$ mathrm{int}(mathrm{int}(x)) = mathrm{int}(x) tag{2} $$
And the union of the closures is the closure of the (finite) union(s).
$$ overline{x} cup overline{y} = overline{x cup y} tag{3} $$
Here's an example of a finite structure satisfying the rules. The domain of our structure is ${text{-1}, 0, 1}$
$$ x cap y stackrel{df}{=} min(x, y) tag{4} $$
$$ x cup y stackrel{df}{=} max(x, y) tag{5} $$
$$ x ^complement stackrel{df}{=} -x tag{6} $$
$$ mathrm{int}(text{-1}) stackrel{df}{=} text{-1} \
mathrm{int}(0) stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
mathrm{int}(1) stackrel{df}{=} 0 tag{7} $$
$$ overline{(text{-1})} stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
overline{0} stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
overline{1} stackrel{df}{=} 1 tag{8} $$
Note that it isn't possible to swap the definitions in (7) and (8) because of (3) ... which guarantees that union and closure "move things in a similar direction".
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a name for an algebraic structure equipped with an involution and two additional unary functions that "act like" the interior and closure of a set?
I'm after something a little bit like an $i$-lattice / DeMorgan algebra but additionally with something that "feels like" $square$ and $lozenge$ from modal logic.
Suppose we take the sets of subsets of $mathbb{R}$ and consider the operations $cup(cdot, cdot);,; cap(cdot, cdot);,; cdot^complement;,; mathrm{int}(cdot);,; overline{(cdot)} $ , so union, intersection, complement, interior, and closure.
$cup$ and $cap$ distribute over each other and are duals with respect to $cdot^complement$ and $x^complement{^complement} = x$ .
Interior are closure are also dual and each is idempotent.
$$ mathrm{int}(x^complement)^complement = overline{x} tag{1} $$
$$ mathrm{int}(mathrm{int}(x)) = mathrm{int}(x) tag{2} $$
And the union of the closures is the closure of the (finite) union(s).
$$ overline{x} cup overline{y} = overline{x cup y} tag{3} $$
Here's an example of a finite structure satisfying the rules. The domain of our structure is ${text{-1}, 0, 1}$
$$ x cap y stackrel{df}{=} min(x, y) tag{4} $$
$$ x cup y stackrel{df}{=} max(x, y) tag{5} $$
$$ x ^complement stackrel{df}{=} -x tag{6} $$
$$ mathrm{int}(text{-1}) stackrel{df}{=} text{-1} \
mathrm{int}(0) stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
mathrm{int}(1) stackrel{df}{=} 0 tag{7} $$
$$ overline{(text{-1})} stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
overline{0} stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
overline{1} stackrel{df}{=} 1 tag{8} $$
Note that it isn't possible to swap the definitions in (7) and (8) because of (3) ... which guarantees that union and closure "move things in a similar direction".
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think this falls into the category of Boolean algebras with operators?
$endgroup$
– Noah Schweber
Dec 3 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NoahSchweber Isn't it amazing that one could own that book for $389?!!
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 3 '18 at 2:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a name for an algebraic structure equipped with an involution and two additional unary functions that "act like" the interior and closure of a set?
I'm after something a little bit like an $i$-lattice / DeMorgan algebra but additionally with something that "feels like" $square$ and $lozenge$ from modal logic.
Suppose we take the sets of subsets of $mathbb{R}$ and consider the operations $cup(cdot, cdot);,; cap(cdot, cdot);,; cdot^complement;,; mathrm{int}(cdot);,; overline{(cdot)} $ , so union, intersection, complement, interior, and closure.
$cup$ and $cap$ distribute over each other and are duals with respect to $cdot^complement$ and $x^complement{^complement} = x$ .
Interior are closure are also dual and each is idempotent.
$$ mathrm{int}(x^complement)^complement = overline{x} tag{1} $$
$$ mathrm{int}(mathrm{int}(x)) = mathrm{int}(x) tag{2} $$
And the union of the closures is the closure of the (finite) union(s).
$$ overline{x} cup overline{y} = overline{x cup y} tag{3} $$
Here's an example of a finite structure satisfying the rules. The domain of our structure is ${text{-1}, 0, 1}$
$$ x cap y stackrel{df}{=} min(x, y) tag{4} $$
$$ x cup y stackrel{df}{=} max(x, y) tag{5} $$
$$ x ^complement stackrel{df}{=} -x tag{6} $$
$$ mathrm{int}(text{-1}) stackrel{df}{=} text{-1} \
mathrm{int}(0) stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
mathrm{int}(1) stackrel{df}{=} 0 tag{7} $$
$$ overline{(text{-1})} stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
overline{0} stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
overline{1} stackrel{df}{=} 1 tag{8} $$
Note that it isn't possible to swap the definitions in (7) and (8) because of (3) ... which guarantees that union and closure "move things in a similar direction".
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
Is there a name for an algebraic structure equipped with an involution and two additional unary functions that "act like" the interior and closure of a set?
I'm after something a little bit like an $i$-lattice / DeMorgan algebra but additionally with something that "feels like" $square$ and $lozenge$ from modal logic.
Suppose we take the sets of subsets of $mathbb{R}$ and consider the operations $cup(cdot, cdot);,; cap(cdot, cdot);,; cdot^complement;,; mathrm{int}(cdot);,; overline{(cdot)} $ , so union, intersection, complement, interior, and closure.
$cup$ and $cap$ distribute over each other and are duals with respect to $cdot^complement$ and $x^complement{^complement} = x$ .
Interior are closure are also dual and each is idempotent.
$$ mathrm{int}(x^complement)^complement = overline{x} tag{1} $$
$$ mathrm{int}(mathrm{int}(x)) = mathrm{int}(x) tag{2} $$
And the union of the closures is the closure of the (finite) union(s).
$$ overline{x} cup overline{y} = overline{x cup y} tag{3} $$
Here's an example of a finite structure satisfying the rules. The domain of our structure is ${text{-1}, 0, 1}$
$$ x cap y stackrel{df}{=} min(x, y) tag{4} $$
$$ x cup y stackrel{df}{=} max(x, y) tag{5} $$
$$ x ^complement stackrel{df}{=} -x tag{6} $$
$$ mathrm{int}(text{-1}) stackrel{df}{=} text{-1} \
mathrm{int}(0) stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
mathrm{int}(1) stackrel{df}{=} 0 tag{7} $$
$$ overline{(text{-1})} stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
overline{0} stackrel{df}{=} 0 \
overline{1} stackrel{df}{=} 1 tag{8} $$
Note that it isn't possible to swap the definitions in (7) and (8) because of (3) ... which guarantees that union and closure "move things in a similar direction".
abstract-algebra
abstract-algebra
asked Dec 3 '18 at 0:42
Gregory NisbetGregory Nisbet
566312
566312
$begingroup$
I think this falls into the category of Boolean algebras with operators?
$endgroup$
– Noah Schweber
Dec 3 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NoahSchweber Isn't it amazing that one could own that book for $389?!!
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 3 '18 at 2:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think this falls into the category of Boolean algebras with operators?
$endgroup$
– Noah Schweber
Dec 3 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NoahSchweber Isn't it amazing that one could own that book for $389?!!
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 3 '18 at 2:22
$begingroup$
I think this falls into the category of Boolean algebras with operators?
$endgroup$
– Noah Schweber
Dec 3 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
I think this falls into the category of Boolean algebras with operators?
$endgroup$
– Noah Schweber
Dec 3 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NoahSchweber Isn't it amazing that one could own that book for $389?!!
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 3 '18 at 2:22
$begingroup$
@NoahSchweber Isn't it amazing that one could own that book for $389?!!
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 3 '18 at 2:22
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023440%2fname-of-algebraic-structure-generalizing-closure-and-interior%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023440%2fname-of-algebraic-structure-generalizing-closure-and-interior%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I think this falls into the category of Boolean algebras with operators?
$endgroup$
– Noah Schweber
Dec 3 '18 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@NoahSchweber Isn't it amazing that one could own that book for $389?!!
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 3 '18 at 2:22