Local fields. A $p$ - field $(k,v)$ with $mathfrak{l=o/p}=mathbb{F}_q$. Proof of lemma.












1














$(k,v)$ i a local field, $mathfrak{p} = {x | x in k, v(x) > 0 }$, $mathfrak{o}={x | xin k, v(x) geq 0}$.
I'm working on Local Fields and I don't understand few things in proof of this Lemma:




Let $mathfrak{l=o/p}=mathbb{F}_q$ for a $p$-field $(k,v)$. Then, for each $x in mathfrak{o}$, the limit $omega(x) = lim_{ntoinfty}x^{q^n}$ exists in $mathfrak{o}$, and the map $omega :mathfrak{o} to mathfrak{o} $ has the following properties: $omega(x)equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$, $ $ $omega(x)^q = omega(x) $, $omega(xy)=omega(x)omega(y)$.




Proof: By induction, we shall prove the congruences $x^{q^n}equiv x^{q^{n-1}} mod mathfrak{p}^n$ for all $ngeq 1$. For $n=1$,$x^q equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$ follows from th fact that $mathfrak{l=o/p}$ is a finite field with $q$ elements. Assume the congruence for $n geq 1$ so that $x^{q^{n}}=x^{q^{n-1}}+y$ with $y in mathfrak{p}^n$. Then
$$x^{q^{n+1}} = sum_{i=0}^{q}{qchoose i}x^{iq^{n-1}}y^{q-i}.$$
For $0<i<q$, the integer $${qchoose i}=frac{q}{i}{q-1choose i-1} $$ is divisble by $p$ so that ${qchoose i}y^{q-i}$ is contained in $mathfrak{p}^{n+1}$. Since the same is obviously true for $i=0$, we obtain $$ x^{q^{n+1}} equiv x^{q^{n}}mod mathfrak{p}^{n+1}.$$ Now, we see from these congurences that ${x^{q^{n}} }_{n geq 1 }$ is a Cauchy sequence in $mathfrak{o}$ in the $v$ - topology. As $v$ is complete and $mathfrak{o}$ is closed in $k$, the sequence converges to an element $omega(x)$ in $mathfrak{o}$. It is clear that congruences yield $x^{q^{n}} equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$ for all $n geq 1$. Hence $omega(x) equiv x mod mathfrak{p} $. We also see $$omega(x)^q = lim_{n to infty}x^{q^{n+1}} = omega(x), omega(x)(y) = lim_{n to infty}x^{q^{n}}y^{q^{n}} = omega(x)omega(y).$$ QED



1) Why we are interested in congruences modulo $mathfrak{p}^n$ ?



2) Why divisibility of ${qchoose i}$ by $p$ implies that ${qchoose i}y^{q-i}$ is contained in $mathfrak{p}^{n+1}$?



3) Why we see from these congruences that ${x^{q^{n}} }_{n geq 1 }$ is a Cauchy sequence in $mathfrak{o}$ in the $v$ - topology?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • To make things concrete pick an element $pi in mathfrak{p}, pi not in mathfrak{p}$ then $ mathfrak{p} = (pi)$ and everything works exactly as in $mathbb{Z}_p$.
    – reuns
    Nov 29 '18 at 13:44


















1














$(k,v)$ i a local field, $mathfrak{p} = {x | x in k, v(x) > 0 }$, $mathfrak{o}={x | xin k, v(x) geq 0}$.
I'm working on Local Fields and I don't understand few things in proof of this Lemma:




Let $mathfrak{l=o/p}=mathbb{F}_q$ for a $p$-field $(k,v)$. Then, for each $x in mathfrak{o}$, the limit $omega(x) = lim_{ntoinfty}x^{q^n}$ exists in $mathfrak{o}$, and the map $omega :mathfrak{o} to mathfrak{o} $ has the following properties: $omega(x)equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$, $ $ $omega(x)^q = omega(x) $, $omega(xy)=omega(x)omega(y)$.




Proof: By induction, we shall prove the congruences $x^{q^n}equiv x^{q^{n-1}} mod mathfrak{p}^n$ for all $ngeq 1$. For $n=1$,$x^q equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$ follows from th fact that $mathfrak{l=o/p}$ is a finite field with $q$ elements. Assume the congruence for $n geq 1$ so that $x^{q^{n}}=x^{q^{n-1}}+y$ with $y in mathfrak{p}^n$. Then
$$x^{q^{n+1}} = sum_{i=0}^{q}{qchoose i}x^{iq^{n-1}}y^{q-i}.$$
For $0<i<q$, the integer $${qchoose i}=frac{q}{i}{q-1choose i-1} $$ is divisble by $p$ so that ${qchoose i}y^{q-i}$ is contained in $mathfrak{p}^{n+1}$. Since the same is obviously true for $i=0$, we obtain $$ x^{q^{n+1}} equiv x^{q^{n}}mod mathfrak{p}^{n+1}.$$ Now, we see from these congurences that ${x^{q^{n}} }_{n geq 1 }$ is a Cauchy sequence in $mathfrak{o}$ in the $v$ - topology. As $v$ is complete and $mathfrak{o}$ is closed in $k$, the sequence converges to an element $omega(x)$ in $mathfrak{o}$. It is clear that congruences yield $x^{q^{n}} equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$ for all $n geq 1$. Hence $omega(x) equiv x mod mathfrak{p} $. We also see $$omega(x)^q = lim_{n to infty}x^{q^{n+1}} = omega(x), omega(x)(y) = lim_{n to infty}x^{q^{n}}y^{q^{n}} = omega(x)omega(y).$$ QED



1) Why we are interested in congruences modulo $mathfrak{p}^n$ ?



2) Why divisibility of ${qchoose i}$ by $p$ implies that ${qchoose i}y^{q-i}$ is contained in $mathfrak{p}^{n+1}$?



3) Why we see from these congruences that ${x^{q^{n}} }_{n geq 1 }$ is a Cauchy sequence in $mathfrak{o}$ in the $v$ - topology?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • To make things concrete pick an element $pi in mathfrak{p}, pi not in mathfrak{p}$ then $ mathfrak{p} = (pi)$ and everything works exactly as in $mathbb{Z}_p$.
    – reuns
    Nov 29 '18 at 13:44
















1












1








1







$(k,v)$ i a local field, $mathfrak{p} = {x | x in k, v(x) > 0 }$, $mathfrak{o}={x | xin k, v(x) geq 0}$.
I'm working on Local Fields and I don't understand few things in proof of this Lemma:




Let $mathfrak{l=o/p}=mathbb{F}_q$ for a $p$-field $(k,v)$. Then, for each $x in mathfrak{o}$, the limit $omega(x) = lim_{ntoinfty}x^{q^n}$ exists in $mathfrak{o}$, and the map $omega :mathfrak{o} to mathfrak{o} $ has the following properties: $omega(x)equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$, $ $ $omega(x)^q = omega(x) $, $omega(xy)=omega(x)omega(y)$.




Proof: By induction, we shall prove the congruences $x^{q^n}equiv x^{q^{n-1}} mod mathfrak{p}^n$ for all $ngeq 1$. For $n=1$,$x^q equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$ follows from th fact that $mathfrak{l=o/p}$ is a finite field with $q$ elements. Assume the congruence for $n geq 1$ so that $x^{q^{n}}=x^{q^{n-1}}+y$ with $y in mathfrak{p}^n$. Then
$$x^{q^{n+1}} = sum_{i=0}^{q}{qchoose i}x^{iq^{n-1}}y^{q-i}.$$
For $0<i<q$, the integer $${qchoose i}=frac{q}{i}{q-1choose i-1} $$ is divisble by $p$ so that ${qchoose i}y^{q-i}$ is contained in $mathfrak{p}^{n+1}$. Since the same is obviously true for $i=0$, we obtain $$ x^{q^{n+1}} equiv x^{q^{n}}mod mathfrak{p}^{n+1}.$$ Now, we see from these congurences that ${x^{q^{n}} }_{n geq 1 }$ is a Cauchy sequence in $mathfrak{o}$ in the $v$ - topology. As $v$ is complete and $mathfrak{o}$ is closed in $k$, the sequence converges to an element $omega(x)$ in $mathfrak{o}$. It is clear that congruences yield $x^{q^{n}} equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$ for all $n geq 1$. Hence $omega(x) equiv x mod mathfrak{p} $. We also see $$omega(x)^q = lim_{n to infty}x^{q^{n+1}} = omega(x), omega(x)(y) = lim_{n to infty}x^{q^{n}}y^{q^{n}} = omega(x)omega(y).$$ QED



1) Why we are interested in congruences modulo $mathfrak{p}^n$ ?



2) Why divisibility of ${qchoose i}$ by $p$ implies that ${qchoose i}y^{q-i}$ is contained in $mathfrak{p}^{n+1}$?



3) Why we see from these congruences that ${x^{q^{n}} }_{n geq 1 }$ is a Cauchy sequence in $mathfrak{o}$ in the $v$ - topology?










share|cite|improve this question













$(k,v)$ i a local field, $mathfrak{p} = {x | x in k, v(x) > 0 }$, $mathfrak{o}={x | xin k, v(x) geq 0}$.
I'm working on Local Fields and I don't understand few things in proof of this Lemma:




Let $mathfrak{l=o/p}=mathbb{F}_q$ for a $p$-field $(k,v)$. Then, for each $x in mathfrak{o}$, the limit $omega(x) = lim_{ntoinfty}x^{q^n}$ exists in $mathfrak{o}$, and the map $omega :mathfrak{o} to mathfrak{o} $ has the following properties: $omega(x)equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$, $ $ $omega(x)^q = omega(x) $, $omega(xy)=omega(x)omega(y)$.




Proof: By induction, we shall prove the congruences $x^{q^n}equiv x^{q^{n-1}} mod mathfrak{p}^n$ for all $ngeq 1$. For $n=1$,$x^q equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$ follows from th fact that $mathfrak{l=o/p}$ is a finite field with $q$ elements. Assume the congruence for $n geq 1$ so that $x^{q^{n}}=x^{q^{n-1}}+y$ with $y in mathfrak{p}^n$. Then
$$x^{q^{n+1}} = sum_{i=0}^{q}{qchoose i}x^{iq^{n-1}}y^{q-i}.$$
For $0<i<q$, the integer $${qchoose i}=frac{q}{i}{q-1choose i-1} $$ is divisble by $p$ so that ${qchoose i}y^{q-i}$ is contained in $mathfrak{p}^{n+1}$. Since the same is obviously true for $i=0$, we obtain $$ x^{q^{n+1}} equiv x^{q^{n}}mod mathfrak{p}^{n+1}.$$ Now, we see from these congurences that ${x^{q^{n}} }_{n geq 1 }$ is a Cauchy sequence in $mathfrak{o}$ in the $v$ - topology. As $v$ is complete and $mathfrak{o}$ is closed in $k$, the sequence converges to an element $omega(x)$ in $mathfrak{o}$. It is clear that congruences yield $x^{q^{n}} equiv x mod mathfrak{p}$ for all $n geq 1$. Hence $omega(x) equiv x mod mathfrak{p} $. We also see $$omega(x)^q = lim_{n to infty}x^{q^{n+1}} = omega(x), omega(x)(y) = lim_{n to infty}x^{q^{n}}y^{q^{n}} = omega(x)omega(y).$$ QED



1) Why we are interested in congruences modulo $mathfrak{p}^n$ ?



2) Why divisibility of ${qchoose i}$ by $p$ implies that ${qchoose i}y^{q-i}$ is contained in $mathfrak{p}^{n+1}$?



3) Why we see from these congruences that ${x^{q^{n}} }_{n geq 1 }$ is a Cauchy sequence in $mathfrak{o}$ in the $v$ - topology?







valuation-theory local-field






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 29 '18 at 11:31









Hikicianka

1428




1428












  • To make things concrete pick an element $pi in mathfrak{p}, pi not in mathfrak{p}$ then $ mathfrak{p} = (pi)$ and everything works exactly as in $mathbb{Z}_p$.
    – reuns
    Nov 29 '18 at 13:44




















  • To make things concrete pick an element $pi in mathfrak{p}, pi not in mathfrak{p}$ then $ mathfrak{p} = (pi)$ and everything works exactly as in $mathbb{Z}_p$.
    – reuns
    Nov 29 '18 at 13:44


















To make things concrete pick an element $pi in mathfrak{p}, pi not in mathfrak{p}$ then $ mathfrak{p} = (pi)$ and everything works exactly as in $mathbb{Z}_p$.
– reuns
Nov 29 '18 at 13:44






To make things concrete pick an element $pi in mathfrak{p}, pi not in mathfrak{p}$ then $ mathfrak{p} = (pi)$ and everything works exactly as in $mathbb{Z}_p$.
– reuns
Nov 29 '18 at 13:44












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














For 1) and 3)



Recall that a sequence $(x_n)$ of elements of $k$ is convergent iff there exist an element $lin k$ such that $v(l-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$ and is Cauchy iff $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$. Moreover, since the valution $v$ is discrete, we may assume that $v(k^*)=mathbb{Z}$ and so for every integer $n$, we have ${frak{p}}^n={xin kvert v(x)geqslant n}$. In particular, if $(x_n)$ is a sequence of $frak{o}$ such that for all $ngeqslant 1$, $x_{n+1}equiv x_n pmod{{frak{p}}^n}$ then $x_{n+1}-x_n in {frak{p}}^n$ ie $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)geqslant n$ so $(x_n)$ is a Cauchy sequence.



For 2)



For $0<i<q$: since $p$ is in $frak{p}$ and $frak{p}$ is an ideal of $frak{o}$, the divisibility of $binom{q}{i}$ by $p$ implies that $binom{q}{i}$ is in $frak{p}$. Likewise, ${frak{p}}^n$ is an ideal, $yin{frak{p}}^n$ and $q-igeqslant 1$, so $y^{q-i}in{frak{p}}^n$ hence $binom{q}{i}y^{q-i}in {frak{p}}{frak{p}}^n={frak{p}}^{n+1}$.
For $i=0$: $y^q in {frak{p}}^{qn}subseteq {frak{p}}^{n+1}$ since $qngeqslant 2ngeqslant n+1$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018510%2flocal-fields-a-p-field-k-v-with-mathfrakl-o-p-mathbbf-q-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    For 1) and 3)



    Recall that a sequence $(x_n)$ of elements of $k$ is convergent iff there exist an element $lin k$ such that $v(l-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$ and is Cauchy iff $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$. Moreover, since the valution $v$ is discrete, we may assume that $v(k^*)=mathbb{Z}$ and so for every integer $n$, we have ${frak{p}}^n={xin kvert v(x)geqslant n}$. In particular, if $(x_n)$ is a sequence of $frak{o}$ such that for all $ngeqslant 1$, $x_{n+1}equiv x_n pmod{{frak{p}}^n}$ then $x_{n+1}-x_n in {frak{p}}^n$ ie $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)geqslant n$ so $(x_n)$ is a Cauchy sequence.



    For 2)



    For $0<i<q$: since $p$ is in $frak{p}$ and $frak{p}$ is an ideal of $frak{o}$, the divisibility of $binom{q}{i}$ by $p$ implies that $binom{q}{i}$ is in $frak{p}$. Likewise, ${frak{p}}^n$ is an ideal, $yin{frak{p}}^n$ and $q-igeqslant 1$, so $y^{q-i}in{frak{p}}^n$ hence $binom{q}{i}y^{q-i}in {frak{p}}{frak{p}}^n={frak{p}}^{n+1}$.
    For $i=0$: $y^q in {frak{p}}^{qn}subseteq {frak{p}}^{n+1}$ since $qngeqslant 2ngeqslant n+1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      For 1) and 3)



      Recall that a sequence $(x_n)$ of elements of $k$ is convergent iff there exist an element $lin k$ such that $v(l-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$ and is Cauchy iff $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$. Moreover, since the valution $v$ is discrete, we may assume that $v(k^*)=mathbb{Z}$ and so for every integer $n$, we have ${frak{p}}^n={xin kvert v(x)geqslant n}$. In particular, if $(x_n)$ is a sequence of $frak{o}$ such that for all $ngeqslant 1$, $x_{n+1}equiv x_n pmod{{frak{p}}^n}$ then $x_{n+1}-x_n in {frak{p}}^n$ ie $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)geqslant n$ so $(x_n)$ is a Cauchy sequence.



      For 2)



      For $0<i<q$: since $p$ is in $frak{p}$ and $frak{p}$ is an ideal of $frak{o}$, the divisibility of $binom{q}{i}$ by $p$ implies that $binom{q}{i}$ is in $frak{p}$. Likewise, ${frak{p}}^n$ is an ideal, $yin{frak{p}}^n$ and $q-igeqslant 1$, so $y^{q-i}in{frak{p}}^n$ hence $binom{q}{i}y^{q-i}in {frak{p}}{frak{p}}^n={frak{p}}^{n+1}$.
      For $i=0$: $y^q in {frak{p}}^{qn}subseteq {frak{p}}^{n+1}$ since $qngeqslant 2ngeqslant n+1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        For 1) and 3)



        Recall that a sequence $(x_n)$ of elements of $k$ is convergent iff there exist an element $lin k$ such that $v(l-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$ and is Cauchy iff $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$. Moreover, since the valution $v$ is discrete, we may assume that $v(k^*)=mathbb{Z}$ and so for every integer $n$, we have ${frak{p}}^n={xin kvert v(x)geqslant n}$. In particular, if $(x_n)$ is a sequence of $frak{o}$ such that for all $ngeqslant 1$, $x_{n+1}equiv x_n pmod{{frak{p}}^n}$ then $x_{n+1}-x_n in {frak{p}}^n$ ie $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)geqslant n$ so $(x_n)$ is a Cauchy sequence.



        For 2)



        For $0<i<q$: since $p$ is in $frak{p}$ and $frak{p}$ is an ideal of $frak{o}$, the divisibility of $binom{q}{i}$ by $p$ implies that $binom{q}{i}$ is in $frak{p}$. Likewise, ${frak{p}}^n$ is an ideal, $yin{frak{p}}^n$ and $q-igeqslant 1$, so $y^{q-i}in{frak{p}}^n$ hence $binom{q}{i}y^{q-i}in {frak{p}}{frak{p}}^n={frak{p}}^{n+1}$.
        For $i=0$: $y^q in {frak{p}}^{qn}subseteq {frak{p}}^{n+1}$ since $qngeqslant 2ngeqslant n+1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        For 1) and 3)



        Recall that a sequence $(x_n)$ of elements of $k$ is convergent iff there exist an element $lin k$ such that $v(l-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$ and is Cauchy iff $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)underset{nto+infty}{longrightarrow}+infty$. Moreover, since the valution $v$ is discrete, we may assume that $v(k^*)=mathbb{Z}$ and so for every integer $n$, we have ${frak{p}}^n={xin kvert v(x)geqslant n}$. In particular, if $(x_n)$ is a sequence of $frak{o}$ such that for all $ngeqslant 1$, $x_{n+1}equiv x_n pmod{{frak{p}}^n}$ then $x_{n+1}-x_n in {frak{p}}^n$ ie $v(x_{n+1}-x_n)geqslant n$ so $(x_n)$ is a Cauchy sequence.



        For 2)



        For $0<i<q$: since $p$ is in $frak{p}$ and $frak{p}$ is an ideal of $frak{o}$, the divisibility of $binom{q}{i}$ by $p$ implies that $binom{q}{i}$ is in $frak{p}$. Likewise, ${frak{p}}^n$ is an ideal, $yin{frak{p}}^n$ and $q-igeqslant 1$, so $y^{q-i}in{frak{p}}^n$ hence $binom{q}{i}y^{q-i}in {frak{p}}{frak{p}}^n={frak{p}}^{n+1}$.
        For $i=0$: $y^q in {frak{p}}^{qn}subseteq {frak{p}}^{n+1}$ since $qngeqslant 2ngeqslant n+1$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 29 '18 at 13:26









        acid_adic

        564




        564






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018510%2flocal-fields-a-p-field-k-v-with-mathfrakl-o-p-mathbbf-q-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix

            “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis