Do spellcasters know that the Lesser and Greater Restoration spells can cure madness?












12












$begingroup$


The lesser restoration spell description states:




You touch a creature and can end either one disease or one condition afflicting it. The condition can be blinded, deafened, paralyzed, or poisoned.




The description of greater restoration says:




You imbue a creature you touch with positive energy to undo a debilitating effect. You can reduce the target’s exhaustion level by one, or end one of the following effects on the target:




  • One effect that charmed or petrified the target

  • One curse, including the target’s attunement to a cursed magic item

  • Any reduction to one of the target’s ability scores

  • One effect reducing the target’s hit point maximum




But, on DMG page 260, under "Curing Madness", it says:




A calm emotions spell can suppress the effects of madness, while a lesser restoration spell can rid a character of a short-term or long-term madness. Depending on the source of the madness, remove curse or dispel evil and good might also prove effective. A greater restoration spell or more powerful magic is required to rid a character of indefinite madness.




Normally, the ruling is that specific takes precedence over general, but these are both pretty specific; additionally, this flies directly in the face of the concept of "spells do exactly what they say they do and nothing more", because both of these spells have an additional condition effect they can remove that isn't specified in the PHB at all.



So, as I put it in the title: Do casters know that these spells can cure madness? Or is this information excluded intentionally?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    12












    $begingroup$


    The lesser restoration spell description states:




    You touch a creature and can end either one disease or one condition afflicting it. The condition can be blinded, deafened, paralyzed, or poisoned.




    The description of greater restoration says:




    You imbue a creature you touch with positive energy to undo a debilitating effect. You can reduce the target’s exhaustion level by one, or end one of the following effects on the target:




    • One effect that charmed or petrified the target

    • One curse, including the target’s attunement to a cursed magic item

    • Any reduction to one of the target’s ability scores

    • One effect reducing the target’s hit point maximum




    But, on DMG page 260, under "Curing Madness", it says:




    A calm emotions spell can suppress the effects of madness, while a lesser restoration spell can rid a character of a short-term or long-term madness. Depending on the source of the madness, remove curse or dispel evil and good might also prove effective. A greater restoration spell or more powerful magic is required to rid a character of indefinite madness.




    Normally, the ruling is that specific takes precedence over general, but these are both pretty specific; additionally, this flies directly in the face of the concept of "spells do exactly what they say they do and nothing more", because both of these spells have an additional condition effect they can remove that isn't specified in the PHB at all.



    So, as I put it in the title: Do casters know that these spells can cure madness? Or is this information excluded intentionally?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      12












      12








      12





      $begingroup$


      The lesser restoration spell description states:




      You touch a creature and can end either one disease or one condition afflicting it. The condition can be blinded, deafened, paralyzed, or poisoned.




      The description of greater restoration says:




      You imbue a creature you touch with positive energy to undo a debilitating effect. You can reduce the target’s exhaustion level by one, or end one of the following effects on the target:




      • One effect that charmed or petrified the target

      • One curse, including the target’s attunement to a cursed magic item

      • Any reduction to one of the target’s ability scores

      • One effect reducing the target’s hit point maximum




      But, on DMG page 260, under "Curing Madness", it says:




      A calm emotions spell can suppress the effects of madness, while a lesser restoration spell can rid a character of a short-term or long-term madness. Depending on the source of the madness, remove curse or dispel evil and good might also prove effective. A greater restoration spell or more powerful magic is required to rid a character of indefinite madness.




      Normally, the ruling is that specific takes precedence over general, but these are both pretty specific; additionally, this flies directly in the face of the concept of "spells do exactly what they say they do and nothing more", because both of these spells have an additional condition effect they can remove that isn't specified in the PHB at all.



      So, as I put it in the title: Do casters know that these spells can cure madness? Or is this information excluded intentionally?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The lesser restoration spell description states:




      You touch a creature and can end either one disease or one condition afflicting it. The condition can be blinded, deafened, paralyzed, or poisoned.




      The description of greater restoration says:




      You imbue a creature you touch with positive energy to undo a debilitating effect. You can reduce the target’s exhaustion level by one, or end one of the following effects on the target:




      • One effect that charmed or petrified the target

      • One curse, including the target’s attunement to a cursed magic item

      • Any reduction to one of the target’s ability scores

      • One effect reducing the target’s hit point maximum




      But, on DMG page 260, under "Curing Madness", it says:




      A calm emotions spell can suppress the effects of madness, while a lesser restoration spell can rid a character of a short-term or long-term madness. Depending on the source of the madness, remove curse or dispel evil and good might also prove effective. A greater restoration spell or more powerful magic is required to rid a character of indefinite madness.




      Normally, the ruling is that specific takes precedence over general, but these are both pretty specific; additionally, this flies directly in the face of the concept of "spells do exactly what they say they do and nothing more", because both of these spells have an additional condition effect they can remove that isn't specified in the PHB at all.



      So, as I put it in the title: Do casters know that these spells can cure madness? Or is this information excluded intentionally?







      dnd-5e spells conditions sanity






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 12 at 4:52









      V2Blast

      21.4k361135




      21.4k361135










      asked Jan 11 at 16:13









      L.S. CooperL.S. Cooper

      4,3861434




      4,3861434






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          20












          $begingroup$

          Additive, Not Exclusive



          To address the first point... You have two specific sets of rules, but they don't conflict. The spells have a list of things they can do. The optional Madness rules add to the scope of the spells. You'll find other features scattered through the game (particularly in the Monster Manual) that say "This effect can be removed by ______."



          While the Restoration spells don't natively say they're effective, other abilities can add to the capabilities of the spells. However, without some sort of supporting text, the Restoration spells are limited to the text of the spell itself.



          Character Knowledge



          The rules don't address it either way. Most DMs assume characters to be competent adventurers, familiar with the tools and techniques their class provides them.



          Think of the characters like you would people. If this brand of deep madness is new to the characters or the society they come from, they very well might not know. In the very same game, you could conceivably have a character who's background story indicates experience within a sanitorium or asylum and that specific character would know. You could also abstract it with Arcana checks, if you'd like - base the DC on how obscure the whole concept of madness is in the world.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for saying what I was thinking.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            Jan 11 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for corroborating basically how I'd ruled on this in the past! I wanted to be sure I wasn't doing something completely out of left field with this one.
            $endgroup$
            – L.S. Cooper
            Jan 11 at 16:43











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138872%2fdo-spellcasters-know-that-the-lesser-and-greater-restoration-spells-can-cure-mad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          20












          $begingroup$

          Additive, Not Exclusive



          To address the first point... You have two specific sets of rules, but they don't conflict. The spells have a list of things they can do. The optional Madness rules add to the scope of the spells. You'll find other features scattered through the game (particularly in the Monster Manual) that say "This effect can be removed by ______."



          While the Restoration spells don't natively say they're effective, other abilities can add to the capabilities of the spells. However, without some sort of supporting text, the Restoration spells are limited to the text of the spell itself.



          Character Knowledge



          The rules don't address it either way. Most DMs assume characters to be competent adventurers, familiar with the tools and techniques their class provides them.



          Think of the characters like you would people. If this brand of deep madness is new to the characters or the society they come from, they very well might not know. In the very same game, you could conceivably have a character who's background story indicates experience within a sanitorium or asylum and that specific character would know. You could also abstract it with Arcana checks, if you'd like - base the DC on how obscure the whole concept of madness is in the world.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for saying what I was thinking.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            Jan 11 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for corroborating basically how I'd ruled on this in the past! I wanted to be sure I wasn't doing something completely out of left field with this one.
            $endgroup$
            – L.S. Cooper
            Jan 11 at 16:43
















          20












          $begingroup$

          Additive, Not Exclusive



          To address the first point... You have two specific sets of rules, but they don't conflict. The spells have a list of things they can do. The optional Madness rules add to the scope of the spells. You'll find other features scattered through the game (particularly in the Monster Manual) that say "This effect can be removed by ______."



          While the Restoration spells don't natively say they're effective, other abilities can add to the capabilities of the spells. However, without some sort of supporting text, the Restoration spells are limited to the text of the spell itself.



          Character Knowledge



          The rules don't address it either way. Most DMs assume characters to be competent adventurers, familiar with the tools and techniques their class provides them.



          Think of the characters like you would people. If this brand of deep madness is new to the characters or the society they come from, they very well might not know. In the very same game, you could conceivably have a character who's background story indicates experience within a sanitorium or asylum and that specific character would know. You could also abstract it with Arcana checks, if you'd like - base the DC on how obscure the whole concept of madness is in the world.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for saying what I was thinking.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            Jan 11 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for corroborating basically how I'd ruled on this in the past! I wanted to be sure I wasn't doing something completely out of left field with this one.
            $endgroup$
            – L.S. Cooper
            Jan 11 at 16:43














          20












          20








          20





          $begingroup$

          Additive, Not Exclusive



          To address the first point... You have two specific sets of rules, but they don't conflict. The spells have a list of things they can do. The optional Madness rules add to the scope of the spells. You'll find other features scattered through the game (particularly in the Monster Manual) that say "This effect can be removed by ______."



          While the Restoration spells don't natively say they're effective, other abilities can add to the capabilities of the spells. However, without some sort of supporting text, the Restoration spells are limited to the text of the spell itself.



          Character Knowledge



          The rules don't address it either way. Most DMs assume characters to be competent adventurers, familiar with the tools and techniques their class provides them.



          Think of the characters like you would people. If this brand of deep madness is new to the characters or the society they come from, they very well might not know. In the very same game, you could conceivably have a character who's background story indicates experience within a sanitorium or asylum and that specific character would know. You could also abstract it with Arcana checks, if you'd like - base the DC on how obscure the whole concept of madness is in the world.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Additive, Not Exclusive



          To address the first point... You have two specific sets of rules, but they don't conflict. The spells have a list of things they can do. The optional Madness rules add to the scope of the spells. You'll find other features scattered through the game (particularly in the Monster Manual) that say "This effect can be removed by ______."



          While the Restoration spells don't natively say they're effective, other abilities can add to the capabilities of the spells. However, without some sort of supporting text, the Restoration spells are limited to the text of the spell itself.



          Character Knowledge



          The rules don't address it either way. Most DMs assume characters to be competent adventurers, familiar with the tools and techniques their class provides them.



          Think of the characters like you would people. If this brand of deep madness is new to the characters or the society they come from, they very well might not know. In the very same game, you could conceivably have a character who's background story indicates experience within a sanitorium or asylum and that specific character would know. You could also abstract it with Arcana checks, if you'd like - base the DC on how obscure the whole concept of madness is in the world.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 11 at 16:31

























          answered Jan 11 at 16:28









          T.J.L.T.J.L.

          31.1k5107164




          31.1k5107164












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for saying what I was thinking.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            Jan 11 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for corroborating basically how I'd ruled on this in the past! I wanted to be sure I wasn't doing something completely out of left field with this one.
            $endgroup$
            – L.S. Cooper
            Jan 11 at 16:43


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for saying what I was thinking.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            Jan 11 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for corroborating basically how I'd ruled on this in the past! I wanted to be sure I wasn't doing something completely out of left field with this one.
            $endgroup$
            – L.S. Cooper
            Jan 11 at 16:43
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for saying what I was thinking.
          $endgroup$
          – KorvinStarmast
          Jan 11 at 16:29




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for saying what I was thinking.
          $endgroup$
          – KorvinStarmast
          Jan 11 at 16:29












          $begingroup$
          Thanks for corroborating basically how I'd ruled on this in the past! I wanted to be sure I wasn't doing something completely out of left field with this one.
          $endgroup$
          – L.S. Cooper
          Jan 11 at 16:43




          $begingroup$
          Thanks for corroborating basically how I'd ruled on this in the past! I wanted to be sure I wasn't doing something completely out of left field with this one.
          $endgroup$
          – L.S. Cooper
          Jan 11 at 16:43


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138872%2fdo-spellcasters-know-that-the-lesser-and-greater-restoration-spells-can-cure-mad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

          Aardman Animations

          Are they similar matrix