Variation of the secretary problem
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
N secretaries arrive at a job interview randomly ,
in each interview the secretary is either hired or rejected ,and you cant change that decision.
the interviewer uses the following strategy for choosing:
for some number a<1, the interviewer chooses the first secretary after the aN secretary,
that is better than all previous secretaries,
find a for which the probability of choosing the best or second best secretary is maximal.
assume N is a large enough number, write down the probability of success.
Im at a lost here,
probability probability-theory
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
N secretaries arrive at a job interview randomly ,
in each interview the secretary is either hired or rejected ,and you cant change that decision.
the interviewer uses the following strategy for choosing:
for some number a<1, the interviewer chooses the first secretary after the aN secretary,
that is better than all previous secretaries,
find a for which the probability of choosing the best or second best secretary is maximal.
assume N is a large enough number, write down the probability of success.
Im at a lost here,
probability probability-theory
1
Are you familiar with the well-known very similar problem in which the selection algorithm is the same but object is to maximize the probability of finding the best secretay only? (The algorithm in that case is to choose the first secy after the first $N/e$ have been seen, who is better than all previous secretaries.)
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:17
Im not familiar, but will read up on it now, thank you!
– user3184910
Nov 20 at 21:20
1
I think G.C. Rota did early paper on this but I could be wrong; he introduced me to the problem in the form of "Follow the tallest gang member" and his way of solving it was as I remember much more clever than anything I can think of today...
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:54
While it makes sense to ask what factor $a$ gives the maximum probability (of choosing either the best or second best secretary), there are better approaches than the simple "one threshold" rule you've outlined.
– hardmath
Nov 27 at 6:15
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
– Did
16 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
N secretaries arrive at a job interview randomly ,
in each interview the secretary is either hired or rejected ,and you cant change that decision.
the interviewer uses the following strategy for choosing:
for some number a<1, the interviewer chooses the first secretary after the aN secretary,
that is better than all previous secretaries,
find a for which the probability of choosing the best or second best secretary is maximal.
assume N is a large enough number, write down the probability of success.
Im at a lost here,
probability probability-theory
N secretaries arrive at a job interview randomly ,
in each interview the secretary is either hired or rejected ,and you cant change that decision.
the interviewer uses the following strategy for choosing:
for some number a<1, the interviewer chooses the first secretary after the aN secretary,
that is better than all previous secretaries,
find a for which the probability of choosing the best or second best secretary is maximal.
assume N is a large enough number, write down the probability of success.
Im at a lost here,
probability probability-theory
probability probability-theory
asked Nov 20 at 21:06
user3184910
274
274
1
Are you familiar with the well-known very similar problem in which the selection algorithm is the same but object is to maximize the probability of finding the best secretay only? (The algorithm in that case is to choose the first secy after the first $N/e$ have been seen, who is better than all previous secretaries.)
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:17
Im not familiar, but will read up on it now, thank you!
– user3184910
Nov 20 at 21:20
1
I think G.C. Rota did early paper on this but I could be wrong; he introduced me to the problem in the form of "Follow the tallest gang member" and his way of solving it was as I remember much more clever than anything I can think of today...
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:54
While it makes sense to ask what factor $a$ gives the maximum probability (of choosing either the best or second best secretary), there are better approaches than the simple "one threshold" rule you've outlined.
– hardmath
Nov 27 at 6:15
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
– Did
16 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Are you familiar with the well-known very similar problem in which the selection algorithm is the same but object is to maximize the probability of finding the best secretay only? (The algorithm in that case is to choose the first secy after the first $N/e$ have been seen, who is better than all previous secretaries.)
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:17
Im not familiar, but will read up on it now, thank you!
– user3184910
Nov 20 at 21:20
1
I think G.C. Rota did early paper on this but I could be wrong; he introduced me to the problem in the form of "Follow the tallest gang member" and his way of solving it was as I remember much more clever than anything I can think of today...
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:54
While it makes sense to ask what factor $a$ gives the maximum probability (of choosing either the best or second best secretary), there are better approaches than the simple "one threshold" rule you've outlined.
– hardmath
Nov 27 at 6:15
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
– Did
16 hours ago
1
1
Are you familiar with the well-known very similar problem in which the selection algorithm is the same but object is to maximize the probability of finding the best secretay only? (The algorithm in that case is to choose the first secy after the first $N/e$ have been seen, who is better than all previous secretaries.)
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:17
Are you familiar with the well-known very similar problem in which the selection algorithm is the same but object is to maximize the probability of finding the best secretay only? (The algorithm in that case is to choose the first secy after the first $N/e$ have been seen, who is better than all previous secretaries.)
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:17
Im not familiar, but will read up on it now, thank you!
– user3184910
Nov 20 at 21:20
Im not familiar, but will read up on it now, thank you!
– user3184910
Nov 20 at 21:20
1
1
I think G.C. Rota did early paper on this but I could be wrong; he introduced me to the problem in the form of "Follow the tallest gang member" and his way of solving it was as I remember much more clever than anything I can think of today...
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:54
I think G.C. Rota did early paper on this but I could be wrong; he introduced me to the problem in the form of "Follow the tallest gang member" and his way of solving it was as I remember much more clever than anything I can think of today...
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:54
While it makes sense to ask what factor $a$ gives the maximum probability (of choosing either the best or second best secretary), there are better approaches than the simple "one threshold" rule you've outlined.
– hardmath
Nov 27 at 6:15
While it makes sense to ask what factor $a$ gives the maximum probability (of choosing either the best or second best secretary), there are better approaches than the simple "one threshold" rule you've outlined.
– hardmath
Nov 27 at 6:15
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
– Did
16 hours ago
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
– Did
16 hours ago
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006893%2fvariation-of-the-secretary-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Are you familiar with the well-known very similar problem in which the selection algorithm is the same but object is to maximize the probability of finding the best secretay only? (The algorithm in that case is to choose the first secy after the first $N/e$ have been seen, who is better than all previous secretaries.)
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:17
Im not familiar, but will read up on it now, thank you!
– user3184910
Nov 20 at 21:20
1
I think G.C. Rota did early paper on this but I could be wrong; he introduced me to the problem in the form of "Follow the tallest gang member" and his way of solving it was as I remember much more clever than anything I can think of today...
– Mark Fischler
Nov 20 at 21:54
While it makes sense to ask what factor $a$ gives the maximum probability (of choosing either the best or second best secretary), there are better approaches than the simple "one threshold" rule you've outlined.
– hardmath
Nov 27 at 6:15
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc.
– Did
16 hours ago