When to include $r$ when converting to polar coordinates?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
When evaluating integrals, if you convert to polar/cylindrical coordinates, I know you have to include $r$ ($r, dr , dtheta$).
However, when you parametrize first (for line integrals, or surface integrals) do you still include $r$? For example, I'll parametrize $x = r costheta$, $y = r sintheta$, $z = z$. Plug in as $F(r(r,theta))$, and do the cross product of the partial derivatives. Is the extra $r$ already included in this process?
calculus multivariable-calculus
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
When evaluating integrals, if you convert to polar/cylindrical coordinates, I know you have to include $r$ ($r, dr , dtheta$).
However, when you parametrize first (for line integrals, or surface integrals) do you still include $r$? For example, I'll parametrize $x = r costheta$, $y = r sintheta$, $z = z$. Plug in as $F(r(r,theta))$, and do the cross product of the partial derivatives. Is the extra $r$ already included in this process?
calculus multivariable-calculus
put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
– Masacroso
Nov 20 at 22:13
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
When evaluating integrals, if you convert to polar/cylindrical coordinates, I know you have to include $r$ ($r, dr , dtheta$).
However, when you parametrize first (for line integrals, or surface integrals) do you still include $r$? For example, I'll parametrize $x = r costheta$, $y = r sintheta$, $z = z$. Plug in as $F(r(r,theta))$, and do the cross product of the partial derivatives. Is the extra $r$ already included in this process?
calculus multivariable-calculus
When evaluating integrals, if you convert to polar/cylindrical coordinates, I know you have to include $r$ ($r, dr , dtheta$).
However, when you parametrize first (for line integrals, or surface integrals) do you still include $r$? For example, I'll parametrize $x = r costheta$, $y = r sintheta$, $z = z$. Plug in as $F(r(r,theta))$, and do the cross product of the partial derivatives. Is the extra $r$ already included in this process?
calculus multivariable-calculus
calculus multivariable-calculus
edited Nov 20 at 22:11
Masacroso
12.6k41746
12.6k41746
asked Nov 20 at 22:03
LtLame
63
63
put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
– Masacroso
Nov 20 at 22:13
add a comment |
put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
– Masacroso
Nov 20 at 22:13
put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
– Masacroso
Nov 20 at 22:13
put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
– Masacroso
Nov 20 at 22:13
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.
In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.
answered Nov 20 at 22:18
J.G.
20.6k21933
20.6k21933
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006965%2fwhen-to-include-r-when-converting-to-polar-coordinates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
– Masacroso
Nov 20 at 22:13