semi continious functions characterizations [closed]
Does anyone knows how to prove this:
Let $f: (X, d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be an upper semi-continious function.
Prove that $f$ is u.s.c. if and only if $ { x | f(x) geq z } $ is closed $forall z in mathbb{R}$
Hope someone knows
real-analysis functions continuity
closed as off-topic by Lord Shark the Unknown, Did, Brahadeesh, Davide Giraudo, rtybase Nov 26 at 0:11
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Davide Giraudo, rtybase
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Does anyone knows how to prove this:
Let $f: (X, d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be an upper semi-continious function.
Prove that $f$ is u.s.c. if and only if $ { x | f(x) geq z } $ is closed $forall z in mathbb{R}$
Hope someone knows
real-analysis functions continuity
closed as off-topic by Lord Shark the Unknown, Did, Brahadeesh, Davide Giraudo, rtybase Nov 26 at 0:11
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Davide Giraudo, rtybase
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 20:12
I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
– anonimous
Nov 7 '14 at 21:22
That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:23
Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:26
2
Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 24 at 14:33
add a comment |
Does anyone knows how to prove this:
Let $f: (X, d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be an upper semi-continious function.
Prove that $f$ is u.s.c. if and only if $ { x | f(x) geq z } $ is closed $forall z in mathbb{R}$
Hope someone knows
real-analysis functions continuity
Does anyone knows how to prove this:
Let $f: (X, d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be an upper semi-continious function.
Prove that $f$ is u.s.c. if and only if $ { x | f(x) geq z } $ is closed $forall z in mathbb{R}$
Hope someone knows
real-analysis functions continuity
real-analysis functions continuity
asked Nov 7 '14 at 20:08
anonimous
1
1
closed as off-topic by Lord Shark the Unknown, Did, Brahadeesh, Davide Giraudo, rtybase Nov 26 at 0:11
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Davide Giraudo, rtybase
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by Lord Shark the Unknown, Did, Brahadeesh, Davide Giraudo, rtybase Nov 26 at 0:11
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Davide Giraudo, rtybase
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 20:12
I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
– anonimous
Nov 7 '14 at 21:22
That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:23
Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:26
2
Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 24 at 14:33
add a comment |
Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 20:12
I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
– anonimous
Nov 7 '14 at 21:22
That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:23
Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:26
2
Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 24 at 14:33
Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 20:12
Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 20:12
I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
– anonimous
Nov 7 '14 at 21:22
I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
– anonimous
Nov 7 '14 at 21:22
That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:23
That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:23
Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:26
Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:26
2
2
Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 24 at 14:33
Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 24 at 14:33
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.
Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.
add a comment |
We have
begin{align*}
{ f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
end{align*}
Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
end{equation}
Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
begin{equation*}
forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
end{equation*}
(follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)
Now let $A := { f > s }$.
From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.
Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.
add a comment |
Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.
Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.
add a comment |
Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.
Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.
Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.
Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.
answered Nov 7 '14 at 20:51
kobe
34.6k22247
34.6k22247
add a comment |
add a comment |
We have
begin{align*}
{ f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
end{align*}
Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
end{equation}
Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
begin{equation*}
forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
end{equation*}
(follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)
Now let $A := { f > s }$.
From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.
add a comment |
We have
begin{align*}
{ f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
end{align*}
Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
end{equation}
Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
begin{equation*}
forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
end{equation*}
(follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)
Now let $A := { f > s }$.
From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.
add a comment |
We have
begin{align*}
{ f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
end{align*}
Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
end{equation}
Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
begin{equation*}
forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
end{equation*}
(follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)
Now let $A := { f > s }$.
From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.
We have
begin{align*}
{ f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
end{align*}
Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
end{equation}
Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
begin{equation*}
forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
end{equation*}
(follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)
Now let $A := { f > s }$.
From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.
answered Nov 24 at 15:00
Viktor Glombik
513422
513422
add a comment |
add a comment |
Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 20:12
I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
– anonimous
Nov 7 '14 at 21:22
That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:23
Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Nov 7 '14 at 21:26
2
Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 24 at 14:33