semi continious functions characterizations [closed]












0














Does anyone knows how to prove this:



Let $f: (X, d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be an upper semi-continious function.



Prove that $f$ is u.s.c. if and only if $ { x | f(x) geq z } $ is closed $forall z in mathbb{R}$



Hope someone knows










share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Lord Shark the Unknown, Did, Brahadeesh, Davide Giraudo, rtybase Nov 26 at 0:11


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Davide Giraudo, rtybase

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 20:12










  • I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
    – anonimous
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:22












  • That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:23










  • Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:26






  • 2




    Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
    – Viktor Glombik
    Nov 24 at 14:33
















0














Does anyone knows how to prove this:



Let $f: (X, d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be an upper semi-continious function.



Prove that $f$ is u.s.c. if and only if $ { x | f(x) geq z } $ is closed $forall z in mathbb{R}$



Hope someone knows










share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Lord Shark the Unknown, Did, Brahadeesh, Davide Giraudo, rtybase Nov 26 at 0:11


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Davide Giraudo, rtybase

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 20:12










  • I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
    – anonimous
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:22












  • That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:23










  • Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:26






  • 2




    Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
    – Viktor Glombik
    Nov 24 at 14:33














0












0








0







Does anyone knows how to prove this:



Let $f: (X, d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be an upper semi-continious function.



Prove that $f$ is u.s.c. if and only if $ { x | f(x) geq z } $ is closed $forall z in mathbb{R}$



Hope someone knows










share|cite|improve this question













Does anyone knows how to prove this:



Let $f: (X, d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be an upper semi-continious function.



Prove that $f$ is u.s.c. if and only if $ { x | f(x) geq z } $ is closed $forall z in mathbb{R}$



Hope someone knows







real-analysis functions continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 7 '14 at 20:08









anonimous

1




1




closed as off-topic by Lord Shark the Unknown, Did, Brahadeesh, Davide Giraudo, rtybase Nov 26 at 0:11


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Davide Giraudo, rtybase

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Lord Shark the Unknown, Did, Brahadeesh, Davide Giraudo, rtybase Nov 26 at 0:11


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Davide Giraudo, rtybase

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 20:12










  • I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
    – anonimous
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:22












  • That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:23










  • Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:26






  • 2




    Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
    – Viktor Glombik
    Nov 24 at 14:33


















  • Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 20:12










  • I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
    – anonimous
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:22












  • That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:23










  • Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
    – Daniel Fischer
    Nov 7 '14 at 21:26






  • 2




    Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
    – Viktor Glombik
    Nov 24 at 14:33
















Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
– Daniel Fischer
Nov 7 '14 at 20:12




Which definition of upper semicontinuity are you working with? In the natural definition, it is immediate.
– Daniel Fischer
Nov 7 '14 at 20:12












I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
– anonimous
Nov 7 '14 at 21:22






I'm using: $f:(X,d) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is u.s.c on $x_0$ if $forall epsilon > 0, exists delta > 0$ such that $f(x) geq f(x_0) + epsilon forall x in B_{epsilon}(x_0)$.
– anonimous
Nov 7 '14 at 21:22














That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
– Daniel Fischer
Nov 7 '14 at 21:23




That must be $f(x) leqslant f(x_0) + epsilon$. Just a typo, I presume.
– Daniel Fischer
Nov 7 '14 at 21:23












Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
– Daniel Fischer
Nov 7 '14 at 21:26




Take three properties, 1. $f$ is u.s.c. at all $xin X$, 2. for all $z in mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}([z,+infty))$ is closed, 3. for all $zin mathbb{R}$ the set $f^{-1}((-infty,z))$ is open. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is direct, and the equivalence of 1. and 3. is easier to show than the equivalence of 1. and 2.
– Daniel Fischer
Nov 7 '14 at 21:26




2




2




Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 24 at 14:33




Possible duplicate of Let $f:R^nrightarrow R$ be a lower semi-continuity function, how to show for any constant $r$ , $U={zin R^n : f(z)> r}$ is open?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 24 at 14:33










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.



Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    0














    We have
    begin{align*}
    { f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
    iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
    iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
    end{align*}

    Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
    begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
    forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
    end{equation}

    Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
    begin{equation*}
    forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
    end{equation*}

    (follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)



    Now let $A := { f > s }$.
    From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.



      Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        1














        Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.



        Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          1












          1








          1






          Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.



          Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Let $A_z := {x , |, f(x) ge z}$, for all $z in Bbb R$. Suppose $A_z$ is closed for every $z$. Then given $x_0 in X$ and $epsilon > 0$, the set $U_{x_0,epsilon} := X setminus A_{f(x_0) + epsilon}$ is an open neighborhood of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon$ for all $x in U_{x_0,epsilon}$. Hence $f$ is upper semi-continuous.



          Conversely, suppose $f$ is upper semi-continuous. Fix $zin Bbb R$. Given $x_0 in X setminus A_z$, set $epsilon = z - f(x_0)$. Then $epsilon > 0$. So by upper semi-continuity of $f$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$ such that $f(x) < f(x_0) + epsilon = z$ for all $xin U$. Hence $x_0 in U subset X setminus A_z$. It follows that $X setminus A_z$ is open, so $A_z$ is closed.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 7 '14 at 20:51









          kobe

          34.6k22247




          34.6k22247























              0














              We have
              begin{align*}
              { f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
              iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
              iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
              end{align*}

              Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
              begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
              forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
              end{equation}

              Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
              begin{equation*}
              forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
              end{equation*}

              (follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)



              Now let $A := { f > s }$.
              From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                0














                We have
                begin{align*}
                { f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
                iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
                iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
                end{align*}

                Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
                begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
                forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
                end{equation}

                Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
                begin{equation*}
                forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
                end{equation*}

                (follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)



                Now let $A := { f > s }$.
                From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  We have
                  begin{align*}
                  { f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
                  iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
                  iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
                  end{align*}

                  Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
                  begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
                  forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
                  end{equation}

                  Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
                  begin{equation*}
                  forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
                  end{equation*}

                  (follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)



                  Now let $A := { f > s }$.
                  From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  We have
                  begin{align*}
                  { f le s } text{ closed for all } s in mathbb{R}
                  iff & { f > -s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R} \
                  iff & { f > s } text{ open for all } s in mathbb{R}
                  end{align*}

                  Now a subset $A subseteq X$ is called open in $X$, when
                  begin{equation} tag{$star$} label{eq:offen}
                  forall a in A exists delta > 0: B_{delta}(a) subset A.
                  end{equation}

                  Because $f$ is lower semi continuous on $X$, we have
                  begin{equation*}
                  forall c < f(x) exists delta > 0: f(y) > c forall y in B_{delta}(x).
                  end{equation*}

                  (follows from the standard $varepsilon-delta$-definition with $varepsilon := f(x) - c$.)



                  Now let $A := { f > s }$.
                  From definition eqref{eq:offen} the proposition follows, since for all $a in A { c in mathbb{R}: f(x) > c}$ exists a $delta > 0$, so that for all $y$ with $| x - y | < delta$, we have $y in A$ and therefore $f(y) > c$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 24 at 15:00









                  Viktor Glombik

                  513422




                  513422















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Aardman Animations

                      Are they similar matrix

                      “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis