Not sure how to begin this Calc problem. (Weird givens)











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












*This is NOT my homework assignment, but that of someone else. I still want to know how to do this. Can someone help me start it off? Much appreciated! *



=============================



$Q(t)$ represents the amount of a certain reactant present at time $t$
The rate of decrease of $Q(t)$ is proportional to $Q^3(t)$. That is, $Q'=-kQ^3$



Given that $Q(0)=frac{1}{8}$, how long will is take for the reactant to be reduced to one half of its original amount?



=============================



Here is my initial mindset:



Is that Q3 supposed to be Q cubed? Or is that just some weird notation?



Q(0) = 1/8, and you want to know when Q(t) = 1/16 (half)



Do you get Q(t) by taking the integral of Q' ?



Then use the initial value of (0, 1/8) to solve for the +C ?



And then set that resulting to 1/16 ?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • To find the form of $Q(t)$, separate your variables and integrate. (Google 'separation of variables' if you're not familiar with that.)
    – Semiclassical
    Sep 29 '14 at 12:17










  • A note on notation... often $Q^3(t)$ would denote $Q(Q(Q(t)))$ rather than $Q(t)^3$ or --- unambiguously --- $(Q(t))^3$. Here it probably denotes the latter.
    – JP McCarthy
    Sep 29 '14 at 12:20

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












*This is NOT my homework assignment, but that of someone else. I still want to know how to do this. Can someone help me start it off? Much appreciated! *



=============================



$Q(t)$ represents the amount of a certain reactant present at time $t$
The rate of decrease of $Q(t)$ is proportional to $Q^3(t)$. That is, $Q'=-kQ^3$



Given that $Q(0)=frac{1}{8}$, how long will is take for the reactant to be reduced to one half of its original amount?



=============================



Here is my initial mindset:



Is that Q3 supposed to be Q cubed? Or is that just some weird notation?



Q(0) = 1/8, and you want to know when Q(t) = 1/16 (half)



Do you get Q(t) by taking the integral of Q' ?



Then use the initial value of (0, 1/8) to solve for the +C ?



And then set that resulting to 1/16 ?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • To find the form of $Q(t)$, separate your variables and integrate. (Google 'separation of variables' if you're not familiar with that.)
    – Semiclassical
    Sep 29 '14 at 12:17










  • A note on notation... often $Q^3(t)$ would denote $Q(Q(Q(t)))$ rather than $Q(t)^3$ or --- unambiguously --- $(Q(t))^3$. Here it probably denotes the latter.
    – JP McCarthy
    Sep 29 '14 at 12:20















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











*This is NOT my homework assignment, but that of someone else. I still want to know how to do this. Can someone help me start it off? Much appreciated! *



=============================



$Q(t)$ represents the amount of a certain reactant present at time $t$
The rate of decrease of $Q(t)$ is proportional to $Q^3(t)$. That is, $Q'=-kQ^3$



Given that $Q(0)=frac{1}{8}$, how long will is take for the reactant to be reduced to one half of its original amount?



=============================



Here is my initial mindset:



Is that Q3 supposed to be Q cubed? Or is that just some weird notation?



Q(0) = 1/8, and you want to know when Q(t) = 1/16 (half)



Do you get Q(t) by taking the integral of Q' ?



Then use the initial value of (0, 1/8) to solve for the +C ?



And then set that resulting to 1/16 ?










share|cite|improve this question















*This is NOT my homework assignment, but that of someone else. I still want to know how to do this. Can someone help me start it off? Much appreciated! *



=============================



$Q(t)$ represents the amount of a certain reactant present at time $t$
The rate of decrease of $Q(t)$ is proportional to $Q^3(t)$. That is, $Q'=-kQ^3$



Given that $Q(0)=frac{1}{8}$, how long will is take for the reactant to be reduced to one half of its original amount?



=============================



Here is my initial mindset:



Is that Q3 supposed to be Q cubed? Or is that just some weird notation?



Q(0) = 1/8, and you want to know when Q(t) = 1/16 (half)



Do you get Q(t) by taking the integral of Q' ?



Then use the initial value of (0, 1/8) to solve for the +C ?



And then set that resulting to 1/16 ?







calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 29 '14 at 13:14







user940

















asked Sep 29 '14 at 12:12









JackOfAll

2,11843354




2,11843354












  • To find the form of $Q(t)$, separate your variables and integrate. (Google 'separation of variables' if you're not familiar with that.)
    – Semiclassical
    Sep 29 '14 at 12:17










  • A note on notation... often $Q^3(t)$ would denote $Q(Q(Q(t)))$ rather than $Q(t)^3$ or --- unambiguously --- $(Q(t))^3$. Here it probably denotes the latter.
    – JP McCarthy
    Sep 29 '14 at 12:20




















  • To find the form of $Q(t)$, separate your variables and integrate. (Google 'separation of variables' if you're not familiar with that.)
    – Semiclassical
    Sep 29 '14 at 12:17










  • A note on notation... often $Q^3(t)$ would denote $Q(Q(Q(t)))$ rather than $Q(t)^3$ or --- unambiguously --- $(Q(t))^3$. Here it probably denotes the latter.
    – JP McCarthy
    Sep 29 '14 at 12:20


















To find the form of $Q(t)$, separate your variables and integrate. (Google 'separation of variables' if you're not familiar with that.)
– Semiclassical
Sep 29 '14 at 12:17




To find the form of $Q(t)$, separate your variables and integrate. (Google 'separation of variables' if you're not familiar with that.)
– Semiclassical
Sep 29 '14 at 12:17












A note on notation... often $Q^3(t)$ would denote $Q(Q(Q(t)))$ rather than $Q(t)^3$ or --- unambiguously --- $(Q(t))^3$. Here it probably denotes the latter.
– JP McCarthy
Sep 29 '14 at 12:20






A note on notation... often $Q^3(t)$ would denote $Q(Q(Q(t)))$ rather than $Q(t)^3$ or --- unambiguously --- $(Q(t))^3$. Here it probably denotes the latter.
– JP McCarthy
Sep 29 '14 at 12:20












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













$Q^nleft(tright)$ can be ambiguous, yes. Here it means $left[Qleft(tright)right]^n$.



Integrate $dQ / dt=-kQ^3$:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kdt \
int_{Qleft(0right)}^{Qleft(tright)}frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kint_{0}^{t}dt' \
-frac{1}{2}left[Q^{-2}left(tright) - Q^{-2}left(0right)right] &=& -kt \
Qleft(tright) &=& left[2kt + Q^{-2}left(0right)right]^{-1/2} \
Qleft(tright) &=& left(2kt + 64 right)^{-1/2}
end{eqnarray}
$$



If you just want to answer the question "how long will it take for the reactant to be reduced to one half of its original amount?" stop at the third line above, set $Qleft(t^*right) = Qleft(0right)/2$, and solve for $t^*$:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
t^* &=& frac{1}{2k}left{left[frac{Qleft(0right)}{2}right]^{-2} - Q^{-2}left(0right)right} \
&=& frac{96}{k}
end{eqnarray}
$$






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f950966%2fnot-sure-how-to-begin-this-calc-problem-weird-givens%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    $Q^nleft(tright)$ can be ambiguous, yes. Here it means $left[Qleft(tright)right]^n$.



    Integrate $dQ / dt=-kQ^3$:
    $$
    begin{eqnarray}
    frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kdt \
    int_{Qleft(0right)}^{Qleft(tright)}frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kint_{0}^{t}dt' \
    -frac{1}{2}left[Q^{-2}left(tright) - Q^{-2}left(0right)right] &=& -kt \
    Qleft(tright) &=& left[2kt + Q^{-2}left(0right)right]^{-1/2} \
    Qleft(tright) &=& left(2kt + 64 right)^{-1/2}
    end{eqnarray}
    $$



    If you just want to answer the question "how long will it take for the reactant to be reduced to one half of its original amount?" stop at the third line above, set $Qleft(t^*right) = Qleft(0right)/2$, and solve for $t^*$:
    $$
    begin{eqnarray}
    t^* &=& frac{1}{2k}left{left[frac{Qleft(0right)}{2}right]^{-2} - Q^{-2}left(0right)right} \
    &=& frac{96}{k}
    end{eqnarray}
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      $Q^nleft(tright)$ can be ambiguous, yes. Here it means $left[Qleft(tright)right]^n$.



      Integrate $dQ / dt=-kQ^3$:
      $$
      begin{eqnarray}
      frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kdt \
      int_{Qleft(0right)}^{Qleft(tright)}frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kint_{0}^{t}dt' \
      -frac{1}{2}left[Q^{-2}left(tright) - Q^{-2}left(0right)right] &=& -kt \
      Qleft(tright) &=& left[2kt + Q^{-2}left(0right)right]^{-1/2} \
      Qleft(tright) &=& left(2kt + 64 right)^{-1/2}
      end{eqnarray}
      $$



      If you just want to answer the question "how long will it take for the reactant to be reduced to one half of its original amount?" stop at the third line above, set $Qleft(t^*right) = Qleft(0right)/2$, and solve for $t^*$:
      $$
      begin{eqnarray}
      t^* &=& frac{1}{2k}left{left[frac{Qleft(0right)}{2}right]^{-2} - Q^{-2}left(0right)right} \
      &=& frac{96}{k}
      end{eqnarray}
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        $Q^nleft(tright)$ can be ambiguous, yes. Here it means $left[Qleft(tright)right]^n$.



        Integrate $dQ / dt=-kQ^3$:
        $$
        begin{eqnarray}
        frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kdt \
        int_{Qleft(0right)}^{Qleft(tright)}frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kint_{0}^{t}dt' \
        -frac{1}{2}left[Q^{-2}left(tright) - Q^{-2}left(0right)right] &=& -kt \
        Qleft(tright) &=& left[2kt + Q^{-2}left(0right)right]^{-1/2} \
        Qleft(tright) &=& left(2kt + 64 right)^{-1/2}
        end{eqnarray}
        $$



        If you just want to answer the question "how long will it take for the reactant to be reduced to one half of its original amount?" stop at the third line above, set $Qleft(t^*right) = Qleft(0right)/2$, and solve for $t^*$:
        $$
        begin{eqnarray}
        t^* &=& frac{1}{2k}left{left[frac{Qleft(0right)}{2}right]^{-2} - Q^{-2}left(0right)right} \
        &=& frac{96}{k}
        end{eqnarray}
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        $Q^nleft(tright)$ can be ambiguous, yes. Here it means $left[Qleft(tright)right]^n$.



        Integrate $dQ / dt=-kQ^3$:
        $$
        begin{eqnarray}
        frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kdt \
        int_{Qleft(0right)}^{Qleft(tright)}frac{dQ}{Q^3} &=& -kint_{0}^{t}dt' \
        -frac{1}{2}left[Q^{-2}left(tright) - Q^{-2}left(0right)right] &=& -kt \
        Qleft(tright) &=& left[2kt + Q^{-2}left(0right)right]^{-1/2} \
        Qleft(tright) &=& left(2kt + 64 right)^{-1/2}
        end{eqnarray}
        $$



        If you just want to answer the question "how long will it take for the reactant to be reduced to one half of its original amount?" stop at the third line above, set $Qleft(t^*right) = Qleft(0right)/2$, and solve for $t^*$:
        $$
        begin{eqnarray}
        t^* &=& frac{1}{2k}left{left[frac{Qleft(0right)}{2}right]^{-2} - Q^{-2}left(0right)right} \
        &=& frac{96}{k}
        end{eqnarray}
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Sep 29 '14 at 13:15

























        answered Sep 29 '14 at 13:07









        Eric Angle

        1,63576




        1,63576






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f950966%2fnot-sure-how-to-begin-this-calc-problem-weird-givens%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

            When does type information flow backwards in C++?

            Grease: Live!