$mathfrak{h}_1,mathfrak{h}_2$ Cartan subalgebras with $mathfrak{h}_1capmathfrak{h}_2=0$











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2












Let $mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional simple Lie Algebra over an algebraically closed field $K$. I'm having trouble to show that always exists Cartan subalgebras $mathfrak{h}_1,mathfrak{h}_2$ such that $mathfrak{h}_1capmathfrak{h}_2=0$.



In general, if all (or one) cartan subalgebras of a finite dimensional Lie Algebra $mathfrak{g}$ are abelian, then $bigcap_{mathfrak{h}text{ cartan}}mathfrak{h}=mathfrak{z(g)}$. For this, call $mathfrak{h}'=bigcapmathfrak{h}$. Since $mathfrak{z(g)}subsetmathfrak{n(h)}=mathfrak{h}$, for all $mathfrak{h}$ cartan subalgebra, we have $mathfrak{z(g)}subsetmathfrak{h}'$. Now, let $Xinmathfrak{h}'$. Since each $mathfrak{h}$ is abelian, $X$ commutes with all $Yinmathfrak{bar g}={text{regular elements of }mathfrak{g}}$, so, $mathfrak{z}(X)supsetmathfrak{bar g}$. Since $mathfrak{z}(X)$ is an subalgebra (and so a vector subspace), we have $mathfrak{z}(X)=mathfrak{g}$, so $Xinmathfrak{z(g)}$.



From this, since any cartan subalgebra of a simple algebra is abelian, we have that the intersection of all subalgebras is $0$, since in this case $mathfrak{z(g)}=0$. But I have no idea how to show that only two is sufficient...



Any help will be appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    Let $mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional simple Lie Algebra over an algebraically closed field $K$. I'm having trouble to show that always exists Cartan subalgebras $mathfrak{h}_1,mathfrak{h}_2$ such that $mathfrak{h}_1capmathfrak{h}_2=0$.



    In general, if all (or one) cartan subalgebras of a finite dimensional Lie Algebra $mathfrak{g}$ are abelian, then $bigcap_{mathfrak{h}text{ cartan}}mathfrak{h}=mathfrak{z(g)}$. For this, call $mathfrak{h}'=bigcapmathfrak{h}$. Since $mathfrak{z(g)}subsetmathfrak{n(h)}=mathfrak{h}$, for all $mathfrak{h}$ cartan subalgebra, we have $mathfrak{z(g)}subsetmathfrak{h}'$. Now, let $Xinmathfrak{h}'$. Since each $mathfrak{h}$ is abelian, $X$ commutes with all $Yinmathfrak{bar g}={text{regular elements of }mathfrak{g}}$, so, $mathfrak{z}(X)supsetmathfrak{bar g}$. Since $mathfrak{z}(X)$ is an subalgebra (and so a vector subspace), we have $mathfrak{z}(X)=mathfrak{g}$, so $Xinmathfrak{z(g)}$.



    From this, since any cartan subalgebra of a simple algebra is abelian, we have that the intersection of all subalgebras is $0$, since in this case $mathfrak{z(g)}=0$. But I have no idea how to show that only two is sufficient...



    Any help will be appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      Let $mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional simple Lie Algebra over an algebraically closed field $K$. I'm having trouble to show that always exists Cartan subalgebras $mathfrak{h}_1,mathfrak{h}_2$ such that $mathfrak{h}_1capmathfrak{h}_2=0$.



      In general, if all (or one) cartan subalgebras of a finite dimensional Lie Algebra $mathfrak{g}$ are abelian, then $bigcap_{mathfrak{h}text{ cartan}}mathfrak{h}=mathfrak{z(g)}$. For this, call $mathfrak{h}'=bigcapmathfrak{h}$. Since $mathfrak{z(g)}subsetmathfrak{n(h)}=mathfrak{h}$, for all $mathfrak{h}$ cartan subalgebra, we have $mathfrak{z(g)}subsetmathfrak{h}'$. Now, let $Xinmathfrak{h}'$. Since each $mathfrak{h}$ is abelian, $X$ commutes with all $Yinmathfrak{bar g}={text{regular elements of }mathfrak{g}}$, so, $mathfrak{z}(X)supsetmathfrak{bar g}$. Since $mathfrak{z}(X)$ is an subalgebra (and so a vector subspace), we have $mathfrak{z}(X)=mathfrak{g}$, so $Xinmathfrak{z(g)}$.



      From this, since any cartan subalgebra of a simple algebra is abelian, we have that the intersection of all subalgebras is $0$, since in this case $mathfrak{z(g)}=0$. But I have no idea how to show that only two is sufficient...



      Any help will be appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional simple Lie Algebra over an algebraically closed field $K$. I'm having trouble to show that always exists Cartan subalgebras $mathfrak{h}_1,mathfrak{h}_2$ such that $mathfrak{h}_1capmathfrak{h}_2=0$.



      In general, if all (or one) cartan subalgebras of a finite dimensional Lie Algebra $mathfrak{g}$ are abelian, then $bigcap_{mathfrak{h}text{ cartan}}mathfrak{h}=mathfrak{z(g)}$. For this, call $mathfrak{h}'=bigcapmathfrak{h}$. Since $mathfrak{z(g)}subsetmathfrak{n(h)}=mathfrak{h}$, for all $mathfrak{h}$ cartan subalgebra, we have $mathfrak{z(g)}subsetmathfrak{h}'$. Now, let $Xinmathfrak{h}'$. Since each $mathfrak{h}$ is abelian, $X$ commutes with all $Yinmathfrak{bar g}={text{regular elements of }mathfrak{g}}$, so, $mathfrak{z}(X)supsetmathfrak{bar g}$. Since $mathfrak{z}(X)$ is an subalgebra (and so a vector subspace), we have $mathfrak{z}(X)=mathfrak{g}$, so $Xinmathfrak{z(g)}$.



      From this, since any cartan subalgebra of a simple algebra is abelian, we have that the intersection of all subalgebras is $0$, since in this case $mathfrak{z(g)}=0$. But I have no idea how to show that only two is sufficient...



      Any help will be appreciated!







      lie-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jun 10 '12 at 3:47

























      asked Jun 10 '12 at 3:32









      Yuki

      9292816




      9292816






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          I think this is an solution.



          We can assume $mathfrak{g}subsetmathfrak{gl}(V)$, $dim V=n$, since the adjoint representation has kernel $0$. Also, $textit tr:gtomathbb{K}$ is a null homomorphism. If $mathfrak{h}subsetmathfrak{g}$ is a Cartan subalgebra, then, each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is semisimple (then diagonalizable) and $mathfrak{h}$ is abelian, so, there exists a basis $beta={e_1,cdots,e_n}$ of $V$ such that each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is diagonal.



          Let $A_n={Xinmathfrak{gl}(V):[X]_betatext{ is diagonal and }textit{tr},(X)=0}supsetmathfrak{h}$. Then, if $E_{ij}$ denotes the matrix with $1$ in row $i$ and column $j$ and $H_{ij}=E_{ii}-E_{jj}$, then ${H_{1i}:2le ile n}$ form a basis for $A_n$. If we define $beta_0={e_1',cdots,e_n'}$, where $e_1'=e_1+cdots+e_n,e_2'=e_1-e_2,cdots,e_n'=e_1-e_n$, then we have
          $$
          [H_{1i}]_{beta_0}=left(
          begin{array}{cc}0&\
          vdots&\
          0&\
          1&quadastquad\
          0&\
          vdots&\
          0&
          end{array}right)
          $$
          Where the $1$ is in the row $i$, and $ast$ is anything. In particular, in the base $beta_0$, no element other than $0$ in $A_n$ is diagonal. So there exists a invertible matrix $Tinmathbb{M}_n(mathbb{K})$ such that for each $Xinmathfrak{h}$, $T[X]_beta T^{-1}$ isn't diagonal. So, if we define $mathfrak{h}_2={Yinmathfrak{gl}(V):[Y]_beta=T[X]_beta T^{-1},text{for some }Xinmathfrak{h}}$, then $mathfrak{h}_2capmathfrak{h}=0$ and $mathfrak{h}_2$ is a Cartan subalgebra, since $T(,,cdot,,) T^{-1}$ is an automorphism.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            If you're comfortable with simple Lie groups and their root subgroups, then here is a more conceptual version of @Yuki's answer. Let $G$ be the adjoint simple Lie group with Lie algebra $mathfrak g$, and $H_1$ a maximal torus in $G$. Let $u$ be a regular unipotent element of $G$—concretely, one may take $u$ to be the product of a non-trivial element from each simple root subgroup. Then we may take $mathfrak h_1 = operatorname{Lie}(H_1)$, and $mathfrak h_2 = operatorname{Ad}(u)(mathfrak h_1)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer






























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              I will propose another approach to solve the question. Sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple then we can decompose $$mathfrak g = mathfrak n^- oplus mathfrak h_1 oplusmathfrak n^{+}$$ where
              $$ mathfrak n^{+} = sum_{alpha >0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
              $$ mathfrak n^{-} = sum_{alpha <0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
              such that each $alpha$ is a root.



              Now, we can consider the isomorphism of Lie Algebras
              begin{align*}varphi:& mathfrak g to mathfrak g \
              H &mapsto e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_1})} cdot ldotscdot e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_n})}(H)end{align*}

              where ${X_{alpha_1},...,X_{alpha_n}}$ is a basis of $mathfrak n^+$, such that, $X_{alpha_i} in g_{alpha_i}$.



              Note that $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is well defined sinse $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is nilpotent. Moreover it is an isomorphism, because $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is a derivation and $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is an invertible linear transformation.



              Consider $H in mathfrak h_1setminus {0}$ once $H neq 0$, there exists a root $alpha$, such that $alpha (H) neq 0$, otherwise we would conclude that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g)$, because $[H,H_1] =0,$ $forall H_1 in mathfrak h_1$ and $[H,X_alpha] = alpha(H) X_alpha =0$ $forall$ root $alpha$ which implies that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g) Rightarrow H = 0$ sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple.



              Once there exists a root $alpha$ such that $alpha(H) neq 0$ we conclude that $varphi (H) notin mathfrak h_1$ for all $H in mathfrak h_1 setminus {0}$. Then $mathfrak h_2 = varphi (mathfrak h_1)$ is a Cartan subalgebra that satisfies the required properties.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156338%2fmathfrakh-1-mathfrakh-2-cartan-subalgebras-with-mathfrakh-1-cap-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                3
                down vote



                accepted










                I think this is an solution.



                We can assume $mathfrak{g}subsetmathfrak{gl}(V)$, $dim V=n$, since the adjoint representation has kernel $0$. Also, $textit tr:gtomathbb{K}$ is a null homomorphism. If $mathfrak{h}subsetmathfrak{g}$ is a Cartan subalgebra, then, each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is semisimple (then diagonalizable) and $mathfrak{h}$ is abelian, so, there exists a basis $beta={e_1,cdots,e_n}$ of $V$ such that each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is diagonal.



                Let $A_n={Xinmathfrak{gl}(V):[X]_betatext{ is diagonal and }textit{tr},(X)=0}supsetmathfrak{h}$. Then, if $E_{ij}$ denotes the matrix with $1$ in row $i$ and column $j$ and $H_{ij}=E_{ii}-E_{jj}$, then ${H_{1i}:2le ile n}$ form a basis for $A_n$. If we define $beta_0={e_1',cdots,e_n'}$, where $e_1'=e_1+cdots+e_n,e_2'=e_1-e_2,cdots,e_n'=e_1-e_n$, then we have
                $$
                [H_{1i}]_{beta_0}=left(
                begin{array}{cc}0&\
                vdots&\
                0&\
                1&quadastquad\
                0&\
                vdots&\
                0&
                end{array}right)
                $$
                Where the $1$ is in the row $i$, and $ast$ is anything. In particular, in the base $beta_0$, no element other than $0$ in $A_n$ is diagonal. So there exists a invertible matrix $Tinmathbb{M}_n(mathbb{K})$ such that for each $Xinmathfrak{h}$, $T[X]_beta T^{-1}$ isn't diagonal. So, if we define $mathfrak{h}_2={Yinmathfrak{gl}(V):[Y]_beta=T[X]_beta T^{-1},text{for some }Xinmathfrak{h}}$, then $mathfrak{h}_2capmathfrak{h}=0$ and $mathfrak{h}_2$ is a Cartan subalgebra, since $T(,,cdot,,) T^{-1}$ is an automorphism.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote



                  accepted










                  I think this is an solution.



                  We can assume $mathfrak{g}subsetmathfrak{gl}(V)$, $dim V=n$, since the adjoint representation has kernel $0$. Also, $textit tr:gtomathbb{K}$ is a null homomorphism. If $mathfrak{h}subsetmathfrak{g}$ is a Cartan subalgebra, then, each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is semisimple (then diagonalizable) and $mathfrak{h}$ is abelian, so, there exists a basis $beta={e_1,cdots,e_n}$ of $V$ such that each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is diagonal.



                  Let $A_n={Xinmathfrak{gl}(V):[X]_betatext{ is diagonal and }textit{tr},(X)=0}supsetmathfrak{h}$. Then, if $E_{ij}$ denotes the matrix with $1$ in row $i$ and column $j$ and $H_{ij}=E_{ii}-E_{jj}$, then ${H_{1i}:2le ile n}$ form a basis for $A_n$. If we define $beta_0={e_1',cdots,e_n'}$, where $e_1'=e_1+cdots+e_n,e_2'=e_1-e_2,cdots,e_n'=e_1-e_n$, then we have
                  $$
                  [H_{1i}]_{beta_0}=left(
                  begin{array}{cc}0&\
                  vdots&\
                  0&\
                  1&quadastquad\
                  0&\
                  vdots&\
                  0&
                  end{array}right)
                  $$
                  Where the $1$ is in the row $i$, and $ast$ is anything. In particular, in the base $beta_0$, no element other than $0$ in $A_n$ is diagonal. So there exists a invertible matrix $Tinmathbb{M}_n(mathbb{K})$ such that for each $Xinmathfrak{h}$, $T[X]_beta T^{-1}$ isn't diagonal. So, if we define $mathfrak{h}_2={Yinmathfrak{gl}(V):[Y]_beta=T[X]_beta T^{-1},text{for some }Xinmathfrak{h}}$, then $mathfrak{h}_2capmathfrak{h}=0$ and $mathfrak{h}_2$ is a Cartan subalgebra, since $T(,,cdot,,) T^{-1}$ is an automorphism.






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote



                    accepted







                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote



                    accepted






                    I think this is an solution.



                    We can assume $mathfrak{g}subsetmathfrak{gl}(V)$, $dim V=n$, since the adjoint representation has kernel $0$. Also, $textit tr:gtomathbb{K}$ is a null homomorphism. If $mathfrak{h}subsetmathfrak{g}$ is a Cartan subalgebra, then, each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is semisimple (then diagonalizable) and $mathfrak{h}$ is abelian, so, there exists a basis $beta={e_1,cdots,e_n}$ of $V$ such that each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is diagonal.



                    Let $A_n={Xinmathfrak{gl}(V):[X]_betatext{ is diagonal and }textit{tr},(X)=0}supsetmathfrak{h}$. Then, if $E_{ij}$ denotes the matrix with $1$ in row $i$ and column $j$ and $H_{ij}=E_{ii}-E_{jj}$, then ${H_{1i}:2le ile n}$ form a basis for $A_n$. If we define $beta_0={e_1',cdots,e_n'}$, where $e_1'=e_1+cdots+e_n,e_2'=e_1-e_2,cdots,e_n'=e_1-e_n$, then we have
                    $$
                    [H_{1i}]_{beta_0}=left(
                    begin{array}{cc}0&\
                    vdots&\
                    0&\
                    1&quadastquad\
                    0&\
                    vdots&\
                    0&
                    end{array}right)
                    $$
                    Where the $1$ is in the row $i$, and $ast$ is anything. In particular, in the base $beta_0$, no element other than $0$ in $A_n$ is diagonal. So there exists a invertible matrix $Tinmathbb{M}_n(mathbb{K})$ such that for each $Xinmathfrak{h}$, $T[X]_beta T^{-1}$ isn't diagonal. So, if we define $mathfrak{h}_2={Yinmathfrak{gl}(V):[Y]_beta=T[X]_beta T^{-1},text{for some }Xinmathfrak{h}}$, then $mathfrak{h}_2capmathfrak{h}=0$ and $mathfrak{h}_2$ is a Cartan subalgebra, since $T(,,cdot,,) T^{-1}$ is an automorphism.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    I think this is an solution.



                    We can assume $mathfrak{g}subsetmathfrak{gl}(V)$, $dim V=n$, since the adjoint representation has kernel $0$. Also, $textit tr:gtomathbb{K}$ is a null homomorphism. If $mathfrak{h}subsetmathfrak{g}$ is a Cartan subalgebra, then, each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is semisimple (then diagonalizable) and $mathfrak{h}$ is abelian, so, there exists a basis $beta={e_1,cdots,e_n}$ of $V$ such that each $Xinmathfrak{h}$ is diagonal.



                    Let $A_n={Xinmathfrak{gl}(V):[X]_betatext{ is diagonal and }textit{tr},(X)=0}supsetmathfrak{h}$. Then, if $E_{ij}$ denotes the matrix with $1$ in row $i$ and column $j$ and $H_{ij}=E_{ii}-E_{jj}$, then ${H_{1i}:2le ile n}$ form a basis for $A_n$. If we define $beta_0={e_1',cdots,e_n'}$, where $e_1'=e_1+cdots+e_n,e_2'=e_1-e_2,cdots,e_n'=e_1-e_n$, then we have
                    $$
                    [H_{1i}]_{beta_0}=left(
                    begin{array}{cc}0&\
                    vdots&\
                    0&\
                    1&quadastquad\
                    0&\
                    vdots&\
                    0&
                    end{array}right)
                    $$
                    Where the $1$ is in the row $i$, and $ast$ is anything. In particular, in the base $beta_0$, no element other than $0$ in $A_n$ is diagonal. So there exists a invertible matrix $Tinmathbb{M}_n(mathbb{K})$ such that for each $Xinmathfrak{h}$, $T[X]_beta T^{-1}$ isn't diagonal. So, if we define $mathfrak{h}_2={Yinmathfrak{gl}(V):[Y]_beta=T[X]_beta T^{-1},text{for some }Xinmathfrak{h}}$, then $mathfrak{h}_2capmathfrak{h}=0$ and $mathfrak{h}_2$ is a Cartan subalgebra, since $T(,,cdot,,) T^{-1}$ is an automorphism.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jun 14 '12 at 4:38









                    Yuki

                    9292816




                    9292816






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        If you're comfortable with simple Lie groups and their root subgroups, then here is a more conceptual version of @Yuki's answer. Let $G$ be the adjoint simple Lie group with Lie algebra $mathfrak g$, and $H_1$ a maximal torus in $G$. Let $u$ be a regular unipotent element of $G$—concretely, one may take $u$ to be the product of a non-trivial element from each simple root subgroup. Then we may take $mathfrak h_1 = operatorname{Lie}(H_1)$, and $mathfrak h_2 = operatorname{Ad}(u)(mathfrak h_1)$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer



























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          If you're comfortable with simple Lie groups and their root subgroups, then here is a more conceptual version of @Yuki's answer. Let $G$ be the adjoint simple Lie group with Lie algebra $mathfrak g$, and $H_1$ a maximal torus in $G$. Let $u$ be a regular unipotent element of $G$—concretely, one may take $u$ to be the product of a non-trivial element from each simple root subgroup. Then we may take $mathfrak h_1 = operatorname{Lie}(H_1)$, and $mathfrak h_2 = operatorname{Ad}(u)(mathfrak h_1)$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            If you're comfortable with simple Lie groups and their root subgroups, then here is a more conceptual version of @Yuki's answer. Let $G$ be the adjoint simple Lie group with Lie algebra $mathfrak g$, and $H_1$ a maximal torus in $G$. Let $u$ be a regular unipotent element of $G$—concretely, one may take $u$ to be the product of a non-trivial element from each simple root subgroup. Then we may take $mathfrak h_1 = operatorname{Lie}(H_1)$, and $mathfrak h_2 = operatorname{Ad}(u)(mathfrak h_1)$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            If you're comfortable with simple Lie groups and their root subgroups, then here is a more conceptual version of @Yuki's answer. Let $G$ be the adjoint simple Lie group with Lie algebra $mathfrak g$, and $H_1$ a maximal torus in $G$. Let $u$ be a regular unipotent element of $G$—concretely, one may take $u$ to be the product of a non-trivial element from each simple root subgroup. Then we may take $mathfrak h_1 = operatorname{Lie}(H_1)$, and $mathfrak h_2 = operatorname{Ad}(u)(mathfrak h_1)$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21









                            Community

                            1




                            1










                            answered Mar 7 '16 at 3:06









                            LSpice

                            1,226515




                            1,226515






















                                up vote
                                1
                                down vote













                                I will propose another approach to solve the question. Sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple then we can decompose $$mathfrak g = mathfrak n^- oplus mathfrak h_1 oplusmathfrak n^{+}$$ where
                                $$ mathfrak n^{+} = sum_{alpha >0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
                                $$ mathfrak n^{-} = sum_{alpha <0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
                                such that each $alpha$ is a root.



                                Now, we can consider the isomorphism of Lie Algebras
                                begin{align*}varphi:& mathfrak g to mathfrak g \
                                H &mapsto e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_1})} cdot ldotscdot e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_n})}(H)end{align*}

                                where ${X_{alpha_1},...,X_{alpha_n}}$ is a basis of $mathfrak n^+$, such that, $X_{alpha_i} in g_{alpha_i}$.



                                Note that $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is well defined sinse $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is nilpotent. Moreover it is an isomorphism, because $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is a derivation and $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is an invertible linear transformation.



                                Consider $H in mathfrak h_1setminus {0}$ once $H neq 0$, there exists a root $alpha$, such that $alpha (H) neq 0$, otherwise we would conclude that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g)$, because $[H,H_1] =0,$ $forall H_1 in mathfrak h_1$ and $[H,X_alpha] = alpha(H) X_alpha =0$ $forall$ root $alpha$ which implies that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g) Rightarrow H = 0$ sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple.



                                Once there exists a root $alpha$ such that $alpha(H) neq 0$ we conclude that $varphi (H) notin mathfrak h_1$ for all $H in mathfrak h_1 setminus {0}$. Then $mathfrak h_2 = varphi (mathfrak h_1)$ is a Cartan subalgebra that satisfies the required properties.






                                share|cite|improve this answer



























                                  up vote
                                  1
                                  down vote













                                  I will propose another approach to solve the question. Sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple then we can decompose $$mathfrak g = mathfrak n^- oplus mathfrak h_1 oplusmathfrak n^{+}$$ where
                                  $$ mathfrak n^{+} = sum_{alpha >0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
                                  $$ mathfrak n^{-} = sum_{alpha <0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
                                  such that each $alpha$ is a root.



                                  Now, we can consider the isomorphism of Lie Algebras
                                  begin{align*}varphi:& mathfrak g to mathfrak g \
                                  H &mapsto e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_1})} cdot ldotscdot e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_n})}(H)end{align*}

                                  where ${X_{alpha_1},...,X_{alpha_n}}$ is a basis of $mathfrak n^+$, such that, $X_{alpha_i} in g_{alpha_i}$.



                                  Note that $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is well defined sinse $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is nilpotent. Moreover it is an isomorphism, because $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is a derivation and $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is an invertible linear transformation.



                                  Consider $H in mathfrak h_1setminus {0}$ once $H neq 0$, there exists a root $alpha$, such that $alpha (H) neq 0$, otherwise we would conclude that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g)$, because $[H,H_1] =0,$ $forall H_1 in mathfrak h_1$ and $[H,X_alpha] = alpha(H) X_alpha =0$ $forall$ root $alpha$ which implies that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g) Rightarrow H = 0$ sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple.



                                  Once there exists a root $alpha$ such that $alpha(H) neq 0$ we conclude that $varphi (H) notin mathfrak h_1$ for all $H in mathfrak h_1 setminus {0}$. Then $mathfrak h_2 = varphi (mathfrak h_1)$ is a Cartan subalgebra that satisfies the required properties.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer

























                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote









                                    I will propose another approach to solve the question. Sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple then we can decompose $$mathfrak g = mathfrak n^- oplus mathfrak h_1 oplusmathfrak n^{+}$$ where
                                    $$ mathfrak n^{+} = sum_{alpha >0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
                                    $$ mathfrak n^{-} = sum_{alpha <0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
                                    such that each $alpha$ is a root.



                                    Now, we can consider the isomorphism of Lie Algebras
                                    begin{align*}varphi:& mathfrak g to mathfrak g \
                                    H &mapsto e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_1})} cdot ldotscdot e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_n})}(H)end{align*}

                                    where ${X_{alpha_1},...,X_{alpha_n}}$ is a basis of $mathfrak n^+$, such that, $X_{alpha_i} in g_{alpha_i}$.



                                    Note that $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is well defined sinse $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is nilpotent. Moreover it is an isomorphism, because $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is a derivation and $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is an invertible linear transformation.



                                    Consider $H in mathfrak h_1setminus {0}$ once $H neq 0$, there exists a root $alpha$, such that $alpha (H) neq 0$, otherwise we would conclude that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g)$, because $[H,H_1] =0,$ $forall H_1 in mathfrak h_1$ and $[H,X_alpha] = alpha(H) X_alpha =0$ $forall$ root $alpha$ which implies that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g) Rightarrow H = 0$ sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple.



                                    Once there exists a root $alpha$ such that $alpha(H) neq 0$ we conclude that $varphi (H) notin mathfrak h_1$ for all $H in mathfrak h_1 setminus {0}$. Then $mathfrak h_2 = varphi (mathfrak h_1)$ is a Cartan subalgebra that satisfies the required properties.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                    I will propose another approach to solve the question. Sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple then we can decompose $$mathfrak g = mathfrak n^- oplus mathfrak h_1 oplusmathfrak n^{+}$$ where
                                    $$ mathfrak n^{+} = sum_{alpha >0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
                                    $$ mathfrak n^{-} = sum_{alpha <0} mathfrak g_alpha$$
                                    such that each $alpha$ is a root.



                                    Now, we can consider the isomorphism of Lie Algebras
                                    begin{align*}varphi:& mathfrak g to mathfrak g \
                                    H &mapsto e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_1})} cdot ldotscdot e^{text {ad} (X_{alpha_n})}(H)end{align*}

                                    where ${X_{alpha_1},...,X_{alpha_n}}$ is a basis of $mathfrak n^+$, such that, $X_{alpha_i} in g_{alpha_i}$.



                                    Note that $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is well defined sinse $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is nilpotent. Moreover it is an isomorphism, because $text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})$ is a derivation and $e^{text{ad}(X_{alpha_i})}$ is an invertible linear transformation.



                                    Consider $H in mathfrak h_1setminus {0}$ once $H neq 0$, there exists a root $alpha$, such that $alpha (H) neq 0$, otherwise we would conclude that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g)$, because $[H,H_1] =0,$ $forall H_1 in mathfrak h_1$ and $[H,X_alpha] = alpha(H) X_alpha =0$ $forall$ root $alpha$ which implies that $H in mathfrak z (mathfrak g) Rightarrow H = 0$ sinse $mathfrak g$ is semisimple.



                                    Once there exists a root $alpha$ such that $alpha(H) neq 0$ we conclude that $varphi (H) notin mathfrak h_1$ for all $H in mathfrak h_1 setminus {0}$. Then $mathfrak h_2 = varphi (mathfrak h_1)$ is a Cartan subalgebra that satisfies the required properties.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer








                                    edited Nov 24 at 18:44

























                                    answered Nov 22 at 23:39









                                    Matheus Manzatto

                                    1,3011523




                                    1,3011523






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                        Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                        Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156338%2fmathfrakh-1-mathfrakh-2-cartan-subalgebras-with-mathfrakh-1-cap-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

                                        When does type information flow backwards in C++?

                                        Grease: Live!