function is not Lebesgue integrable











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












How to prove that $f(x)=2xsin(frac{1}{x^2})-frac{2}{x}cos(frac{1}{x^2})$ on if $xneq0$ and $f(x)=0$ if $x=0$ is not Lebesgue-integrable on $[-1,1]$? I think the reason is, that $frac{2}{x}$ is part of the function Showing that $1/x$ is NOT Lebesgue Integrable on $(0,1]$.



I tried to construct step functions using the step function for $1/x$ on $(0,1]$: Let $lfloor wrfloor$ be the greatest integer less than or equal to $w$. Then the function
$$xmapsto begin{cases} lfloor 2/xrfloor & text{if } lfloor 1/xrfloorle n \[8pt]
n & text{otherwise} end{cases}$$
is simple. It is $le 2/x$ and its integral over $(0,1]$ approaches $infty$ as $ntoinfty$.



Now with the upper gaussian brackets and using that $-1le sin(frac{1}{x^2}),cos(frac{1}{x^2})le 1$. But I don't get it










share|cite|improve this question
























  • It's worth commenting that this thing integrates to $x^2 sin x^{-2}$, and is Riemann integrable ...
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 21 at 15:43












  • The problem with the Lebesgue integral is the wild oscillation of $f'$ near zero.
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 21 at 15:45















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












How to prove that $f(x)=2xsin(frac{1}{x^2})-frac{2}{x}cos(frac{1}{x^2})$ on if $xneq0$ and $f(x)=0$ if $x=0$ is not Lebesgue-integrable on $[-1,1]$? I think the reason is, that $frac{2}{x}$ is part of the function Showing that $1/x$ is NOT Lebesgue Integrable on $(0,1]$.



I tried to construct step functions using the step function for $1/x$ on $(0,1]$: Let $lfloor wrfloor$ be the greatest integer less than or equal to $w$. Then the function
$$xmapsto begin{cases} lfloor 2/xrfloor & text{if } lfloor 1/xrfloorle n \[8pt]
n & text{otherwise} end{cases}$$
is simple. It is $le 2/x$ and its integral over $(0,1]$ approaches $infty$ as $ntoinfty$.



Now with the upper gaussian brackets and using that $-1le sin(frac{1}{x^2}),cos(frac{1}{x^2})le 1$. But I don't get it










share|cite|improve this question
























  • It's worth commenting that this thing integrates to $x^2 sin x^{-2}$, and is Riemann integrable ...
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 21 at 15:43












  • The problem with the Lebesgue integral is the wild oscillation of $f'$ near zero.
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 21 at 15:45













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











How to prove that $f(x)=2xsin(frac{1}{x^2})-frac{2}{x}cos(frac{1}{x^2})$ on if $xneq0$ and $f(x)=0$ if $x=0$ is not Lebesgue-integrable on $[-1,1]$? I think the reason is, that $frac{2}{x}$ is part of the function Showing that $1/x$ is NOT Lebesgue Integrable on $(0,1]$.



I tried to construct step functions using the step function for $1/x$ on $(0,1]$: Let $lfloor wrfloor$ be the greatest integer less than or equal to $w$. Then the function
$$xmapsto begin{cases} lfloor 2/xrfloor & text{if } lfloor 1/xrfloorle n \[8pt]
n & text{otherwise} end{cases}$$
is simple. It is $le 2/x$ and its integral over $(0,1]$ approaches $infty$ as $ntoinfty$.



Now with the upper gaussian brackets and using that $-1le sin(frac{1}{x^2}),cos(frac{1}{x^2})le 1$. But I don't get it










share|cite|improve this question















How to prove that $f(x)=2xsin(frac{1}{x^2})-frac{2}{x}cos(frac{1}{x^2})$ on if $xneq0$ and $f(x)=0$ if $x=0$ is not Lebesgue-integrable on $[-1,1]$? I think the reason is, that $frac{2}{x}$ is part of the function Showing that $1/x$ is NOT Lebesgue Integrable on $(0,1]$.



I tried to construct step functions using the step function for $1/x$ on $(0,1]$: Let $lfloor wrfloor$ be the greatest integer less than or equal to $w$. Then the function
$$xmapsto begin{cases} lfloor 2/xrfloor & text{if } lfloor 1/xrfloorle n \[8pt]
n & text{otherwise} end{cases}$$
is simple. It is $le 2/x$ and its integral over $(0,1]$ approaches $infty$ as $ntoinfty$.



Now with the upper gaussian brackets and using that $-1le sin(frac{1}{x^2}),cos(frac{1}{x^2})le 1$. But I don't get it







analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 15:32









Tianlalu

2,9901936




2,9901936










asked Nov 21 at 15:31









Gero

23319




23319












  • It's worth commenting that this thing integrates to $x^2 sin x^{-2}$, and is Riemann integrable ...
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 21 at 15:43












  • The problem with the Lebesgue integral is the wild oscillation of $f'$ near zero.
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 21 at 15:45


















  • It's worth commenting that this thing integrates to $x^2 sin x^{-2}$, and is Riemann integrable ...
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 21 at 15:43












  • The problem with the Lebesgue integral is the wild oscillation of $f'$ near zero.
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 21 at 15:45
















It's worth commenting that this thing integrates to $x^2 sin x^{-2}$, and is Riemann integrable ...
– Richard Martin
Nov 21 at 15:43






It's worth commenting that this thing integrates to $x^2 sin x^{-2}$, and is Riemann integrable ...
– Richard Martin
Nov 21 at 15:43














The problem with the Lebesgue integral is the wild oscillation of $f'$ near zero.
– Richard Martin
Nov 21 at 15:45




The problem with the Lebesgue integral is the wild oscillation of $f'$ near zero.
– Richard Martin
Nov 21 at 15:45










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The precise meaning that a function $f$ is Lebesgue integrable on some measurable set $E$ is that both positive and negative parts, $f^+(x) = max(f(x),0)$ and $f^-(x) = max(-f(x),0)$, must have finite-valued integrals



$$int_E f^+ < +infty, ,, int_E f^- < +infty$$



Since $f^+$ and $f^-$ are nonnegative and $|f| = f^+ +f^-$, Lebesgue integrability requires that $int_E|f| < +infty$.



In this case there is no problem with $x mapsto 2xsinfrac{1}{x^2}$ as this can be continuously extended at $0$ and so is both Riemann and Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$ and $[-1,0]$. Recall that a bounded function that is Riemann integrable on a bounded interval is always Lebesgue integrable.



On the other hand, $x mapsto frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2}$ is not Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$. If it were we could apply the change-of-variables $x to frac{1}{sqrt{t}}$ and have



$$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt = int_0^1 frac{2}{x} left|cos frac{1}{x^2}right| , dx < +infty$$



However,



$$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^inftyint_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{kpi +pi}int_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} |cos t| , dt = frac{2}{pi}sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{1}{k+1} \ = +infty $$



since the harmonic series on the RHS is divergent.



Note that the improper (Riemann) integral, without the absolute value present,



$$int_0^1 frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2} , dx $$



is convergent, but this does not enforce Lebesgue integrability.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    The derivative of $F(x)= x^2 sin (1/x^2)$ if $f$, except at $x=0$, where the former is zero and the latter is not defined.



    Now if $f$ were integrable, then $F$ would be absolutely continuous.



    We show that this is not the case.



    For $j=1,2,dots$ let $a_j= frac{1}{sqrt{pi j}}$ and $b_j = frac{1}{sqrt{pi( j + 1/2)}}$.



    Then $F(a_j)=0$ and $F(b_j)=pi (j+1/2)$.



    To conclude, for any $j_1$:





    • $sum_{j>j_1}| a_j - b_j| < a_{j_1}to 0$ as $j_1toinfty$, while


    • $sum_{j>j_1} |F(a_j)-F(b_j)| = sum_{j>j_1} pi (j+1/2)= infty$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007873%2ffunction-is-not-lebesgue-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote



      accepted










      The precise meaning that a function $f$ is Lebesgue integrable on some measurable set $E$ is that both positive and negative parts, $f^+(x) = max(f(x),0)$ and $f^-(x) = max(-f(x),0)$, must have finite-valued integrals



      $$int_E f^+ < +infty, ,, int_E f^- < +infty$$



      Since $f^+$ and $f^-$ are nonnegative and $|f| = f^+ +f^-$, Lebesgue integrability requires that $int_E|f| < +infty$.



      In this case there is no problem with $x mapsto 2xsinfrac{1}{x^2}$ as this can be continuously extended at $0$ and so is both Riemann and Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$ and $[-1,0]$. Recall that a bounded function that is Riemann integrable on a bounded interval is always Lebesgue integrable.



      On the other hand, $x mapsto frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2}$ is not Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$. If it were we could apply the change-of-variables $x to frac{1}{sqrt{t}}$ and have



      $$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt = int_0^1 frac{2}{x} left|cos frac{1}{x^2}right| , dx < +infty$$



      However,



      $$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^inftyint_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{kpi +pi}int_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} |cos t| , dt = frac{2}{pi}sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{1}{k+1} \ = +infty $$



      since the harmonic series on the RHS is divergent.



      Note that the improper (Riemann) integral, without the absolute value present,



      $$int_0^1 frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2} , dx $$



      is convergent, but this does not enforce Lebesgue integrability.






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted










        The precise meaning that a function $f$ is Lebesgue integrable on some measurable set $E$ is that both positive and negative parts, $f^+(x) = max(f(x),0)$ and $f^-(x) = max(-f(x),0)$, must have finite-valued integrals



        $$int_E f^+ < +infty, ,, int_E f^- < +infty$$



        Since $f^+$ and $f^-$ are nonnegative and $|f| = f^+ +f^-$, Lebesgue integrability requires that $int_E|f| < +infty$.



        In this case there is no problem with $x mapsto 2xsinfrac{1}{x^2}$ as this can be continuously extended at $0$ and so is both Riemann and Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$ and $[-1,0]$. Recall that a bounded function that is Riemann integrable on a bounded interval is always Lebesgue integrable.



        On the other hand, $x mapsto frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2}$ is not Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$. If it were we could apply the change-of-variables $x to frac{1}{sqrt{t}}$ and have



        $$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt = int_0^1 frac{2}{x} left|cos frac{1}{x^2}right| , dx < +infty$$



        However,



        $$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^inftyint_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{kpi +pi}int_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} |cos t| , dt = frac{2}{pi}sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{1}{k+1} \ = +infty $$



        since the harmonic series on the RHS is divergent.



        Note that the improper (Riemann) integral, without the absolute value present,



        $$int_0^1 frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2} , dx $$



        is convergent, but this does not enforce Lebesgue integrability.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          The precise meaning that a function $f$ is Lebesgue integrable on some measurable set $E$ is that both positive and negative parts, $f^+(x) = max(f(x),0)$ and $f^-(x) = max(-f(x),0)$, must have finite-valued integrals



          $$int_E f^+ < +infty, ,, int_E f^- < +infty$$



          Since $f^+$ and $f^-$ are nonnegative and $|f| = f^+ +f^-$, Lebesgue integrability requires that $int_E|f| < +infty$.



          In this case there is no problem with $x mapsto 2xsinfrac{1}{x^2}$ as this can be continuously extended at $0$ and so is both Riemann and Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$ and $[-1,0]$. Recall that a bounded function that is Riemann integrable on a bounded interval is always Lebesgue integrable.



          On the other hand, $x mapsto frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2}$ is not Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$. If it were we could apply the change-of-variables $x to frac{1}{sqrt{t}}$ and have



          $$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt = int_0^1 frac{2}{x} left|cos frac{1}{x^2}right| , dx < +infty$$



          However,



          $$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^inftyint_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{kpi +pi}int_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} |cos t| , dt = frac{2}{pi}sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{1}{k+1} \ = +infty $$



          since the harmonic series on the RHS is divergent.



          Note that the improper (Riemann) integral, without the absolute value present,



          $$int_0^1 frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2} , dx $$



          is convergent, but this does not enforce Lebesgue integrability.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          The precise meaning that a function $f$ is Lebesgue integrable on some measurable set $E$ is that both positive and negative parts, $f^+(x) = max(f(x),0)$ and $f^-(x) = max(-f(x),0)$, must have finite-valued integrals



          $$int_E f^+ < +infty, ,, int_E f^- < +infty$$



          Since $f^+$ and $f^-$ are nonnegative and $|f| = f^+ +f^-$, Lebesgue integrability requires that $int_E|f| < +infty$.



          In this case there is no problem with $x mapsto 2xsinfrac{1}{x^2}$ as this can be continuously extended at $0$ and so is both Riemann and Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$ and $[-1,0]$. Recall that a bounded function that is Riemann integrable on a bounded interval is always Lebesgue integrable.



          On the other hand, $x mapsto frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2}$ is not Lebesgue integrable on $[0,1]$. If it were we could apply the change-of-variables $x to frac{1}{sqrt{t}}$ and have



          $$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt = int_0^1 frac{2}{x} left|cos frac{1}{x^2}right| , dx < +infty$$



          However,



          $$int_1^infty frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^inftyint_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} frac{|cos t|}{t} , dt > sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{kpi +pi}int_{kpi}^{kpi + pi} |cos t| , dt = frac{2}{pi}sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{1}{k+1} \ = +infty $$



          since the harmonic series on the RHS is divergent.



          Note that the improper (Riemann) integral, without the absolute value present,



          $$int_0^1 frac{2}{x} cos frac{1}{x^2} , dx $$



          is convergent, but this does not enforce Lebesgue integrability.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 22 at 1:45

























          answered Nov 22 at 1:40









          RRL

          48.1k42573




          48.1k42573






















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              The derivative of $F(x)= x^2 sin (1/x^2)$ if $f$, except at $x=0$, where the former is zero and the latter is not defined.



              Now if $f$ were integrable, then $F$ would be absolutely continuous.



              We show that this is not the case.



              For $j=1,2,dots$ let $a_j= frac{1}{sqrt{pi j}}$ and $b_j = frac{1}{sqrt{pi( j + 1/2)}}$.



              Then $F(a_j)=0$ and $F(b_j)=pi (j+1/2)$.



              To conclude, for any $j_1$:





              • $sum_{j>j_1}| a_j - b_j| < a_{j_1}to 0$ as $j_1toinfty$, while


              • $sum_{j>j_1} |F(a_j)-F(b_j)| = sum_{j>j_1} pi (j+1/2)= infty$.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                The derivative of $F(x)= x^2 sin (1/x^2)$ if $f$, except at $x=0$, where the former is zero and the latter is not defined.



                Now if $f$ were integrable, then $F$ would be absolutely continuous.



                We show that this is not the case.



                For $j=1,2,dots$ let $a_j= frac{1}{sqrt{pi j}}$ and $b_j = frac{1}{sqrt{pi( j + 1/2)}}$.



                Then $F(a_j)=0$ and $F(b_j)=pi (j+1/2)$.



                To conclude, for any $j_1$:





                • $sum_{j>j_1}| a_j - b_j| < a_{j_1}to 0$ as $j_1toinfty$, while


                • $sum_{j>j_1} |F(a_j)-F(b_j)| = sum_{j>j_1} pi (j+1/2)= infty$.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  The derivative of $F(x)= x^2 sin (1/x^2)$ if $f$, except at $x=0$, where the former is zero and the latter is not defined.



                  Now if $f$ were integrable, then $F$ would be absolutely continuous.



                  We show that this is not the case.



                  For $j=1,2,dots$ let $a_j= frac{1}{sqrt{pi j}}$ and $b_j = frac{1}{sqrt{pi( j + 1/2)}}$.



                  Then $F(a_j)=0$ and $F(b_j)=pi (j+1/2)$.



                  To conclude, for any $j_1$:





                  • $sum_{j>j_1}| a_j - b_j| < a_{j_1}to 0$ as $j_1toinfty$, while


                  • $sum_{j>j_1} |F(a_j)-F(b_j)| = sum_{j>j_1} pi (j+1/2)= infty$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  The derivative of $F(x)= x^2 sin (1/x^2)$ if $f$, except at $x=0$, where the former is zero and the latter is not defined.



                  Now if $f$ were integrable, then $F$ would be absolutely continuous.



                  We show that this is not the case.



                  For $j=1,2,dots$ let $a_j= frac{1}{sqrt{pi j}}$ and $b_j = frac{1}{sqrt{pi( j + 1/2)}}$.



                  Then $F(a_j)=0$ and $F(b_j)=pi (j+1/2)$.



                  To conclude, for any $j_1$:





                  • $sum_{j>j_1}| a_j - b_j| < a_{j_1}to 0$ as $j_1toinfty$, while


                  • $sum_{j>j_1} |F(a_j)-F(b_j)| = sum_{j>j_1} pi (j+1/2)= infty$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 22 at 2:11









                  Fnacool

                  4,966511




                  4,966511






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007873%2ffunction-is-not-lebesgue-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                      Aardman Animations

                      Are they similar matrix