Function Optimization with Non-linear Constraint, Lagrange Multipliers Fails












2












$begingroup$


I am trying to maximize the function $A(x,y)=frac{1}{2}(x(12-x)+y(13-y))$ subject to the constraint $x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0$.



My attempt:



$begin{align*} nabla A=frac{1}{2}langle 12-2x,,13-2yrangle &= lambdalangle4x-24,, -4y+26rangle\ implies&begin{cases} -x+6=lambda(4x-24)\-y+frac{13}{2}=lambda(-4y+26)\x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0end{cases}end{align*}$



But clearly there is no solution due to the first two equations.



Using Wolfram Alpha, however, yields a maximum at $displaystyle left(frac{17}{2},,frac{13}{2}right)$ being $A=36$ and shows a nice little graph.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to maximize the function $A(x,y)=frac{1}{2}(x(12-x)+y(13-y))$ subject to the constraint $x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0$.



    My attempt:



    $begin{align*} nabla A=frac{1}{2}langle 12-2x,,13-2yrangle &= lambdalangle4x-24,, -4y+26rangle\ implies&begin{cases} -x+6=lambda(4x-24)\-y+frac{13}{2}=lambda(-4y+26)\x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0end{cases}end{align*}$



    But clearly there is no solution due to the first two equations.



    Using Wolfram Alpha, however, yields a maximum at $displaystyle left(frac{17}{2},,frac{13}{2}right)$ being $A=36$ and shows a nice little graph.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am trying to maximize the function $A(x,y)=frac{1}{2}(x(12-x)+y(13-y))$ subject to the constraint $x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0$.



      My attempt:



      $begin{align*} nabla A=frac{1}{2}langle 12-2x,,13-2yrangle &= lambdalangle4x-24,, -4y+26rangle\ implies&begin{cases} -x+6=lambda(4x-24)\-y+frac{13}{2}=lambda(-4y+26)\x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0end{cases}end{align*}$



      But clearly there is no solution due to the first two equations.



      Using Wolfram Alpha, however, yields a maximum at $displaystyle left(frac{17}{2},,frac{13}{2}right)$ being $A=36$ and shows a nice little graph.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am trying to maximize the function $A(x,y)=frac{1}{2}(x(12-x)+y(13-y))$ subject to the constraint $x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0$.



      My attempt:



      $begin{align*} nabla A=frac{1}{2}langle 12-2x,,13-2yrangle &= lambdalangle4x-24,, -4y+26rangle\ implies&begin{cases} -x+6=lambda(4x-24)\-y+frac{13}{2}=lambda(-4y+26)\x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0end{cases}end{align*}$



      But clearly there is no solution due to the first two equations.



      Using Wolfram Alpha, however, yields a maximum at $displaystyle left(frac{17}{2},,frac{13}{2}right)$ being $A=36$ and shows a nice little graph.







      calculus multivariable-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 4 at 23:43









      legendarierslegendariers

      737




      737






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          First, let's re-explain why the first two equations are contradictory. The first equation gives us:



          $$lambda=frac{-x+6}{4x-24}=-frac 1 4$$



          While the second equation gives us:



          $$lambda=frac{-y+frac{13} 2}{-4y+26}=frac 1 4$$



          However, what's important to realize here is that these two equations only work when $4x-24neq 0$ and when $-4y+26neq 0$. Therefore, in order to find a solution, we need to consider the other cases: $4x-24=0$ (i.e. $x=6$) and $-4y+26=0$ (i.e. $y=frac {13} 2$).



          Case 1: $x=6$



          Let's plug $x=6$ into our constraint equation:
          $$6^2+(12-6)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0rightarrow y=frac{13}{2}pm frac{5i}{2}$$
          Thus, this equation has no real solutions, and this case can be ignored.



          Case 1: $y=frac {13} 2$



          Let's plug $y=frac {13} 2$ into our constraint equation:
          $$x^2+(12-x)^2-left(frac{13}2right)^2-left(13-left(frac{13}2right)right)^2=0rightarrow x=frac 7 2 text{ or } x=frac{17}2$$



          Thus, we have two critical points: $(frac 7 2, frac{13}2)$ and $(frac{17}2, frac{13}2)$. I will leave it to you to show these critical points are maximums.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            For a constrained problem
            begin{align}
            max{} & f(x,y) \
            & g(x,y)le 0
            end{align}

            you must write the Lagrangian:
            $$
            L(x,y,lambda)=f(x,y)+lambda g(x,y)
            $$

            Then you must find stationary points of your Lagrangian (attention this is only necessary conditions, see wiki)
            begin{align}
            partial_x L &= 0 = partial_x f+ lambda partial_x g \
            partial_y L &= 0 = partial_y f+ lambda partial_y g \
            partial_lambda L &= 0 = g
            end{align}

            With your example, this is essentially computations:
            $$
            L(x,y,lambda)=frac{1}{2} ((12-x) x+(13-y) y)-lambda
            left(x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2right)
            $$

            your three equations are (after simplification):
            begin{align}
            -(-6 + x) (1 + 4 lambda) &= 0 \
            frac{1}{2} (-13 + 2 y) (-1 + 4 lambda) &= 0\
            -x^2-(12-x)^2+y^2+(13-y)^2 &=0 &\
            end{align}

            The (real) solutions are:
            $$
            (x,y,lambda)=(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
            $$

            and
            $$
            (x,y,lambda)=(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
            $$

            You can check that for these two solutions
            $$
            f(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2})=f(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2})=36
            $$



            Extra: to check that these points are maximizers you must check that the Hessian of $f(x,y)$ is symmetric definite negative, which is clearly the case as:
            $$
            nabla^2f=left(begin{array}{cc}-1& 0 \ 0 & -1end{array}right)
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              In my attempt I got to your system of three equations (albeit simplified) but then when I tried solving I got a contradiction from the first two equations
              $endgroup$
              – legendariers
              Jan 5 at 0:20










            • $begingroup$
              @legendariers I will try to detail equation resolution (I have used Mathematica for this), hold on :)
              $endgroup$
              – Picaud Vincent
              Jan 5 at 0:22



















            0












            $begingroup$

            Let $x(12-x)=a$ and $y(13-y)=b$.



            Thus, the condition gives $b=a+12.5$.



            Also, we have
            $$a=x(12-x)leqleft(frac{x+12-x}{2}right)=36$$ and
            $$b=y(13-y)leqleft(frac{y+13-y}{2}right)=42.25,$$
            which gives
            $$a=b-12.5leq42.25-12.5=29.75.$$
            Id est, $$A(x,y)=frac{1}{2}(a+b)=a+6.25leq29.75+6.25=36.$$
            The equality occurs for $b=42.25$ or $y=6.5$, which says that we got a maximal value.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062247%2ffunction-optimization-with-non-linear-constraint-lagrange-multipliers-fails%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              First, let's re-explain why the first two equations are contradictory. The first equation gives us:



              $$lambda=frac{-x+6}{4x-24}=-frac 1 4$$



              While the second equation gives us:



              $$lambda=frac{-y+frac{13} 2}{-4y+26}=frac 1 4$$



              However, what's important to realize here is that these two equations only work when $4x-24neq 0$ and when $-4y+26neq 0$. Therefore, in order to find a solution, we need to consider the other cases: $4x-24=0$ (i.e. $x=6$) and $-4y+26=0$ (i.e. $y=frac {13} 2$).



              Case 1: $x=6$



              Let's plug $x=6$ into our constraint equation:
              $$6^2+(12-6)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0rightarrow y=frac{13}{2}pm frac{5i}{2}$$
              Thus, this equation has no real solutions, and this case can be ignored.



              Case 1: $y=frac {13} 2$



              Let's plug $y=frac {13} 2$ into our constraint equation:
              $$x^2+(12-x)^2-left(frac{13}2right)^2-left(13-left(frac{13}2right)right)^2=0rightarrow x=frac 7 2 text{ or } x=frac{17}2$$



              Thus, we have two critical points: $(frac 7 2, frac{13}2)$ and $(frac{17}2, frac{13}2)$. I will leave it to you to show these critical points are maximums.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                First, let's re-explain why the first two equations are contradictory. The first equation gives us:



                $$lambda=frac{-x+6}{4x-24}=-frac 1 4$$



                While the second equation gives us:



                $$lambda=frac{-y+frac{13} 2}{-4y+26}=frac 1 4$$



                However, what's important to realize here is that these two equations only work when $4x-24neq 0$ and when $-4y+26neq 0$. Therefore, in order to find a solution, we need to consider the other cases: $4x-24=0$ (i.e. $x=6$) and $-4y+26=0$ (i.e. $y=frac {13} 2$).



                Case 1: $x=6$



                Let's plug $x=6$ into our constraint equation:
                $$6^2+(12-6)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0rightarrow y=frac{13}{2}pm frac{5i}{2}$$
                Thus, this equation has no real solutions, and this case can be ignored.



                Case 1: $y=frac {13} 2$



                Let's plug $y=frac {13} 2$ into our constraint equation:
                $$x^2+(12-x)^2-left(frac{13}2right)^2-left(13-left(frac{13}2right)right)^2=0rightarrow x=frac 7 2 text{ or } x=frac{17}2$$



                Thus, we have two critical points: $(frac 7 2, frac{13}2)$ and $(frac{17}2, frac{13}2)$. I will leave it to you to show these critical points are maximums.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  First, let's re-explain why the first two equations are contradictory. The first equation gives us:



                  $$lambda=frac{-x+6}{4x-24}=-frac 1 4$$



                  While the second equation gives us:



                  $$lambda=frac{-y+frac{13} 2}{-4y+26}=frac 1 4$$



                  However, what's important to realize here is that these two equations only work when $4x-24neq 0$ and when $-4y+26neq 0$. Therefore, in order to find a solution, we need to consider the other cases: $4x-24=0$ (i.e. $x=6$) and $-4y+26=0$ (i.e. $y=frac {13} 2$).



                  Case 1: $x=6$



                  Let's plug $x=6$ into our constraint equation:
                  $$6^2+(12-6)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0rightarrow y=frac{13}{2}pm frac{5i}{2}$$
                  Thus, this equation has no real solutions, and this case can be ignored.



                  Case 1: $y=frac {13} 2$



                  Let's plug $y=frac {13} 2$ into our constraint equation:
                  $$x^2+(12-x)^2-left(frac{13}2right)^2-left(13-left(frac{13}2right)right)^2=0rightarrow x=frac 7 2 text{ or } x=frac{17}2$$



                  Thus, we have two critical points: $(frac 7 2, frac{13}2)$ and $(frac{17}2, frac{13}2)$. I will leave it to you to show these critical points are maximums.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  First, let's re-explain why the first two equations are contradictory. The first equation gives us:



                  $$lambda=frac{-x+6}{4x-24}=-frac 1 4$$



                  While the second equation gives us:



                  $$lambda=frac{-y+frac{13} 2}{-4y+26}=frac 1 4$$



                  However, what's important to realize here is that these two equations only work when $4x-24neq 0$ and when $-4y+26neq 0$. Therefore, in order to find a solution, we need to consider the other cases: $4x-24=0$ (i.e. $x=6$) and $-4y+26=0$ (i.e. $y=frac {13} 2$).



                  Case 1: $x=6$



                  Let's plug $x=6$ into our constraint equation:
                  $$6^2+(12-6)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2=0rightarrow y=frac{13}{2}pm frac{5i}{2}$$
                  Thus, this equation has no real solutions, and this case can be ignored.



                  Case 1: $y=frac {13} 2$



                  Let's plug $y=frac {13} 2$ into our constraint equation:
                  $$x^2+(12-x)^2-left(frac{13}2right)^2-left(13-left(frac{13}2right)right)^2=0rightarrow x=frac 7 2 text{ or } x=frac{17}2$$



                  Thus, we have two critical points: $(frac 7 2, frac{13}2)$ and $(frac{17}2, frac{13}2)$. I will leave it to you to show these critical points are maximums.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 5 at 0:13









                  Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak

                  15.3k1835




                  15.3k1835























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      For a constrained problem
                      begin{align}
                      max{} & f(x,y) \
                      & g(x,y)le 0
                      end{align}

                      you must write the Lagrangian:
                      $$
                      L(x,y,lambda)=f(x,y)+lambda g(x,y)
                      $$

                      Then you must find stationary points of your Lagrangian (attention this is only necessary conditions, see wiki)
                      begin{align}
                      partial_x L &= 0 = partial_x f+ lambda partial_x g \
                      partial_y L &= 0 = partial_y f+ lambda partial_y g \
                      partial_lambda L &= 0 = g
                      end{align}

                      With your example, this is essentially computations:
                      $$
                      L(x,y,lambda)=frac{1}{2} ((12-x) x+(13-y) y)-lambda
                      left(x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2right)
                      $$

                      your three equations are (after simplification):
                      begin{align}
                      -(-6 + x) (1 + 4 lambda) &= 0 \
                      frac{1}{2} (-13 + 2 y) (-1 + 4 lambda) &= 0\
                      -x^2-(12-x)^2+y^2+(13-y)^2 &=0 &\
                      end{align}

                      The (real) solutions are:
                      $$
                      (x,y,lambda)=(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
                      $$

                      and
                      $$
                      (x,y,lambda)=(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
                      $$

                      You can check that for these two solutions
                      $$
                      f(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2})=f(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2})=36
                      $$



                      Extra: to check that these points are maximizers you must check that the Hessian of $f(x,y)$ is symmetric definite negative, which is clearly the case as:
                      $$
                      nabla^2f=left(begin{array}{cc}-1& 0 \ 0 & -1end{array}right)
                      $$






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        In my attempt I got to your system of three equations (albeit simplified) but then when I tried solving I got a contradiction from the first two equations
                        $endgroup$
                        – legendariers
                        Jan 5 at 0:20










                      • $begingroup$
                        @legendariers I will try to detail equation resolution (I have used Mathematica for this), hold on :)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Picaud Vincent
                        Jan 5 at 0:22
















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      For a constrained problem
                      begin{align}
                      max{} & f(x,y) \
                      & g(x,y)le 0
                      end{align}

                      you must write the Lagrangian:
                      $$
                      L(x,y,lambda)=f(x,y)+lambda g(x,y)
                      $$

                      Then you must find stationary points of your Lagrangian (attention this is only necessary conditions, see wiki)
                      begin{align}
                      partial_x L &= 0 = partial_x f+ lambda partial_x g \
                      partial_y L &= 0 = partial_y f+ lambda partial_y g \
                      partial_lambda L &= 0 = g
                      end{align}

                      With your example, this is essentially computations:
                      $$
                      L(x,y,lambda)=frac{1}{2} ((12-x) x+(13-y) y)-lambda
                      left(x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2right)
                      $$

                      your three equations are (after simplification):
                      begin{align}
                      -(-6 + x) (1 + 4 lambda) &= 0 \
                      frac{1}{2} (-13 + 2 y) (-1 + 4 lambda) &= 0\
                      -x^2-(12-x)^2+y^2+(13-y)^2 &=0 &\
                      end{align}

                      The (real) solutions are:
                      $$
                      (x,y,lambda)=(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
                      $$

                      and
                      $$
                      (x,y,lambda)=(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
                      $$

                      You can check that for these two solutions
                      $$
                      f(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2})=f(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2})=36
                      $$



                      Extra: to check that these points are maximizers you must check that the Hessian of $f(x,y)$ is symmetric definite negative, which is clearly the case as:
                      $$
                      nabla^2f=left(begin{array}{cc}-1& 0 \ 0 & -1end{array}right)
                      $$






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        In my attempt I got to your system of three equations (albeit simplified) but then when I tried solving I got a contradiction from the first two equations
                        $endgroup$
                        – legendariers
                        Jan 5 at 0:20










                      • $begingroup$
                        @legendariers I will try to detail equation resolution (I have used Mathematica for this), hold on :)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Picaud Vincent
                        Jan 5 at 0:22














                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      For a constrained problem
                      begin{align}
                      max{} & f(x,y) \
                      & g(x,y)le 0
                      end{align}

                      you must write the Lagrangian:
                      $$
                      L(x,y,lambda)=f(x,y)+lambda g(x,y)
                      $$

                      Then you must find stationary points of your Lagrangian (attention this is only necessary conditions, see wiki)
                      begin{align}
                      partial_x L &= 0 = partial_x f+ lambda partial_x g \
                      partial_y L &= 0 = partial_y f+ lambda partial_y g \
                      partial_lambda L &= 0 = g
                      end{align}

                      With your example, this is essentially computations:
                      $$
                      L(x,y,lambda)=frac{1}{2} ((12-x) x+(13-y) y)-lambda
                      left(x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2right)
                      $$

                      your three equations are (after simplification):
                      begin{align}
                      -(-6 + x) (1 + 4 lambda) &= 0 \
                      frac{1}{2} (-13 + 2 y) (-1 + 4 lambda) &= 0\
                      -x^2-(12-x)^2+y^2+(13-y)^2 &=0 &\
                      end{align}

                      The (real) solutions are:
                      $$
                      (x,y,lambda)=(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
                      $$

                      and
                      $$
                      (x,y,lambda)=(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
                      $$

                      You can check that for these two solutions
                      $$
                      f(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2})=f(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2})=36
                      $$



                      Extra: to check that these points are maximizers you must check that the Hessian of $f(x,y)$ is symmetric definite negative, which is clearly the case as:
                      $$
                      nabla^2f=left(begin{array}{cc}-1& 0 \ 0 & -1end{array}right)
                      $$






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      For a constrained problem
                      begin{align}
                      max{} & f(x,y) \
                      & g(x,y)le 0
                      end{align}

                      you must write the Lagrangian:
                      $$
                      L(x,y,lambda)=f(x,y)+lambda g(x,y)
                      $$

                      Then you must find stationary points of your Lagrangian (attention this is only necessary conditions, see wiki)
                      begin{align}
                      partial_x L &= 0 = partial_x f+ lambda partial_x g \
                      partial_y L &= 0 = partial_y f+ lambda partial_y g \
                      partial_lambda L &= 0 = g
                      end{align}

                      With your example, this is essentially computations:
                      $$
                      L(x,y,lambda)=frac{1}{2} ((12-x) x+(13-y) y)-lambda
                      left(x^2+(12-x)^2-y^2-(13-y)^2right)
                      $$

                      your three equations are (after simplification):
                      begin{align}
                      -(-6 + x) (1 + 4 lambda) &= 0 \
                      frac{1}{2} (-13 + 2 y) (-1 + 4 lambda) &= 0\
                      -x^2-(12-x)^2+y^2+(13-y)^2 &=0 &\
                      end{align}

                      The (real) solutions are:
                      $$
                      (x,y,lambda)=(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
                      $$

                      and
                      $$
                      (x,y,lambda)=(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2},-frac{1}{4})
                      $$

                      You can check that for these two solutions
                      $$
                      f(frac{7}{2},frac{13}{2})=f(frac{17}{2},frac{13}{2})=36
                      $$



                      Extra: to check that these points are maximizers you must check that the Hessian of $f(x,y)$ is symmetric definite negative, which is clearly the case as:
                      $$
                      nabla^2f=left(begin{array}{cc}-1& 0 \ 0 & -1end{array}right)
                      $$







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 5 at 0:34

























                      answered Jan 5 at 0:15









                      Picaud VincentPicaud Vincent

                      1,424310




                      1,424310












                      • $begingroup$
                        In my attempt I got to your system of three equations (albeit simplified) but then when I tried solving I got a contradiction from the first two equations
                        $endgroup$
                        – legendariers
                        Jan 5 at 0:20










                      • $begingroup$
                        @legendariers I will try to detail equation resolution (I have used Mathematica for this), hold on :)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Picaud Vincent
                        Jan 5 at 0:22


















                      • $begingroup$
                        In my attempt I got to your system of three equations (albeit simplified) but then when I tried solving I got a contradiction from the first two equations
                        $endgroup$
                        – legendariers
                        Jan 5 at 0:20










                      • $begingroup$
                        @legendariers I will try to detail equation resolution (I have used Mathematica for this), hold on :)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Picaud Vincent
                        Jan 5 at 0:22
















                      $begingroup$
                      In my attempt I got to your system of three equations (albeit simplified) but then when I tried solving I got a contradiction from the first two equations
                      $endgroup$
                      – legendariers
                      Jan 5 at 0:20




                      $begingroup$
                      In my attempt I got to your system of three equations (albeit simplified) but then when I tried solving I got a contradiction from the first two equations
                      $endgroup$
                      – legendariers
                      Jan 5 at 0:20












                      $begingroup$
                      @legendariers I will try to detail equation resolution (I have used Mathematica for this), hold on :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Picaud Vincent
                      Jan 5 at 0:22




                      $begingroup$
                      @legendariers I will try to detail equation resolution (I have used Mathematica for this), hold on :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Picaud Vincent
                      Jan 5 at 0:22











                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Let $x(12-x)=a$ and $y(13-y)=b$.



                      Thus, the condition gives $b=a+12.5$.



                      Also, we have
                      $$a=x(12-x)leqleft(frac{x+12-x}{2}right)=36$$ and
                      $$b=y(13-y)leqleft(frac{y+13-y}{2}right)=42.25,$$
                      which gives
                      $$a=b-12.5leq42.25-12.5=29.75.$$
                      Id est, $$A(x,y)=frac{1}{2}(a+b)=a+6.25leq29.75+6.25=36.$$
                      The equality occurs for $b=42.25$ or $y=6.5$, which says that we got a maximal value.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Let $x(12-x)=a$ and $y(13-y)=b$.



                        Thus, the condition gives $b=a+12.5$.



                        Also, we have
                        $$a=x(12-x)leqleft(frac{x+12-x}{2}right)=36$$ and
                        $$b=y(13-y)leqleft(frac{y+13-y}{2}right)=42.25,$$
                        which gives
                        $$a=b-12.5leq42.25-12.5=29.75.$$
                        Id est, $$A(x,y)=frac{1}{2}(a+b)=a+6.25leq29.75+6.25=36.$$
                        The equality occurs for $b=42.25$ or $y=6.5$, which says that we got a maximal value.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Let $x(12-x)=a$ and $y(13-y)=b$.



                          Thus, the condition gives $b=a+12.5$.



                          Also, we have
                          $$a=x(12-x)leqleft(frac{x+12-x}{2}right)=36$$ and
                          $$b=y(13-y)leqleft(frac{y+13-y}{2}right)=42.25,$$
                          which gives
                          $$a=b-12.5leq42.25-12.5=29.75.$$
                          Id est, $$A(x,y)=frac{1}{2}(a+b)=a+6.25leq29.75+6.25=36.$$
                          The equality occurs for $b=42.25$ or $y=6.5$, which says that we got a maximal value.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Let $x(12-x)=a$ and $y(13-y)=b$.



                          Thus, the condition gives $b=a+12.5$.



                          Also, we have
                          $$a=x(12-x)leqleft(frac{x+12-x}{2}right)=36$$ and
                          $$b=y(13-y)leqleft(frac{y+13-y}{2}right)=42.25,$$
                          which gives
                          $$a=b-12.5leq42.25-12.5=29.75.$$
                          Id est, $$A(x,y)=frac{1}{2}(a+b)=a+6.25leq29.75+6.25=36.$$
                          The equality occurs for $b=42.25$ or $y=6.5$, which says that we got a maximal value.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 5 at 6:17









                          Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg

                          109k1896201




                          109k1896201






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062247%2ffunction-optimization-with-non-linear-constraint-lagrange-multipliers-fails%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

                              When does type information flow backwards in C++?

                              Grease: Live!