What is the expected mathematical repertoire of a Ph.D. program applicant in the US?
$begingroup$
I am an undergraduate (currently a sophomore) studying to prepare for applying to a Ph.D. program in mathematics. I have thus far structured my course selection upon the advice of a friend I met during freshman year (he was a senior) who has gone on to a Ph.D. program himself. A large part of his advice was what a Ph.D. program in mathematics would expect from a strong applicant. Or perhaps "expect" is not the right word - his words were that having certain topics under my belt by the end of undergraduate study would make me a pretty strong candidate.
His suggested topics for study were: real analysis at least at the level of baby Rudin, preferably further real analysis (measure theory, functional analysis, etc. - probably Folland or similar), point-set topology, complex analysis, Fourier analysis, differential geometry, probability, linear algebra, and abstract algebra (e.g. Artin, Dummit & Foote). He also suggested that if I had time for it, it would be worthwhile to know commutative algebra, algebraic topology, axiomatic set theory, number theory, and mathematical logic, though these wouldn't be strictly necessary.
The notable omissions from this list, I think, are elementary partial differential equations, combinatorics, and graph theory. At the time I spoke to him, I had already done up to multivariable calculus and was doing ordinary differential equations, so those were omitted for that reason. The reason for leaving out PDEs was apparently because it would be more worthwhile to study a lot more background material in analysis and topology before moving onto PDEs, as opposed to jumping into PDEs with just ODE knowledge. As for discrete mathematics, apparently these are more optional than things like set theory and number theory - again, nice if you know these things, but not catastrophic if you don't for Ph.D. admissions.
Here is my question: is this an accurate picture of what a sample strong applicant for a Ph.D. program might look like? Are there other topics I should consider studying? I realize that students apply to Ph.D. programs from all mathematical backgrounds, and faculty recommendations, GRE scores, summer REUs/programs, extracurricular mathematical activity (seminar talks, etc.) also contribute heavily. But I imagine that there is a basic level of coursework that in addition to having good recommendations, REUs, etc. would suggest that an applicant is ready for graduate work.
My concern with this picture of recommended coursework is that the friend who suggested it to me is primarily interested in analysis, and I think it's worthwhile to have perspectives from mathematicians interested in algebra, discrete mathematics, etc. on this matter. It would also be great to have some perspectives from professors on graduate admissions committees and professors that often mentor graduate students/teach graduate classes.
If it is relevant to this discussion: right now I am leaning toward studying topology and geometry, though I am also interested in the nonlinear analysis I am reading right now. Take this with a grain of salt - I haven't studied many of the topics in the above list yet. It's very likely my opinion will change once I know abstract algebra. My current progress on the list: I am studying real analysis using baby Rudin, I have studied topology, probability, linear algebra, and combinatorics, this semester I will start differential geometry and complex analysis, and I plan to go over topology again.
soft-question education career-development
asked Jan 17 '13 at 20:26
Gyu Eun LeeGyu Eun Lee
13.2k2353
$endgroup$
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$
I am an undergraduate (currently a sophomore) studying to prepare for applying to a Ph.D. program in mathematics. I have thus far structured my course selection upon the advice of a friend I met during freshman year (he was a senior) who has gone on to a Ph.D. program himself. A large part of his advice was what a Ph.D. program in mathematics would expect from a strong applicant. Or perhaps "expect" is not the right word - his words were that having certain topics under my belt by the end of undergraduate study would make me a pretty strong candidate.
His suggested topics for study were: real analysis at least at the level of baby Rudin, preferably further real analysis (measure theory, functional analysis, etc. - probably Folland or similar), point-set topology, complex analysis, Fourier analysis, differential geometry, probability, linear algebra, and abstract algebra (e.g. Artin, Dummit & Foote). He also suggested that if I had time for it, it would be worthwhile to know commutative algebra, algebraic topology, axiomatic set theory, number theory, and mathematical logic, though these wouldn't be strictly necessary.
The notable omissions from this list, I think, are elementary partial differential equations, combinatorics, and graph theory. At the time I spoke to him, I had already done up to multivariable calculus and was doing ordinary differential equations, so those were omitted for that reason. The reason for leaving out PDEs was apparently because it would be more worthwhile to study a lot more background material in analysis and topology before moving onto PDEs, as opposed to jumping into PDEs with just ODE knowledge. As for discrete mathematics, apparently these are more optional than things like set theory and number theory - again, nice if you know these things, but not catastrophic if you don't for Ph.D. admissions.
Here is my question: is this an accurate picture of what a sample strong applicant for a Ph.D. program might look like? Are there other topics I should consider studying? I realize that students apply to Ph.D. programs from all mathematical backgrounds, and faculty recommendations, GRE scores, summer REUs/programs, extracurricular mathematical activity (seminar talks, etc.) also contribute heavily. But I imagine that there is a basic level of coursework that in addition to having good recommendations, REUs, etc. would suggest that an applicant is ready for graduate work.
My concern with this picture of recommended coursework is that the friend who suggested it to me is primarily interested in analysis, and I think it's worthwhile to have perspectives from mathematicians interested in algebra, discrete mathematics, etc. on this matter. It would also be great to have some perspectives from professors on graduate admissions committees and professors that often mentor graduate students/teach graduate classes.
If it is relevant to this discussion: right now I am leaning toward studying topology and geometry, though I am also interested in the nonlinear analysis I am reading right now. Take this with a grain of salt - I haven't studied many of the topics in the above list yet. It's very likely my opinion will change once I know abstract algebra. My current progress on the list: I am studying real analysis using baby Rudin, I have studied topology, probability, linear algebra, and combinatorics, this semester I will start differential geometry and complex analysis, and I plan to go over topology again.
soft-question education career-development
asked Jan 17 '13 at 20:26
Gyu Eun LeeGyu Eun Lee
13.2k2353
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Take whatever you need to take to get your undergrad degree, then take classes that interest you (not necessarily in that order). Also, get to know your professors and ask them for advice on what to take. Every school is different, and they will know what classes there are worth taking.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Vargas
Jan 17 '13 at 20:32
$begingroup$
Differential equations are for engineers :) Definitely not required, unless related to fields you are interested in. Graph theory is usually considered part of combinatorics, FWIW.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@AntonioVargas Let's say that all of these topics interest me (nice thing about being a math major). I'd like to emphasize that not all of these topics are classes - many of them are not offered as classes at my school. Some of the ones that are offered are not what I'm looking for (e.g. lots of handwavy stuff for engineers and teachers). I'd like you to think of them more as topics of study, which I might do through independent study or such.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
It obviously greatly depends on what interests you. If you are interested in finite mathematics, then take it. If you are interested in logic, take that (there is a lot of interesting undergrad-level logic, a big topic that you have mostly skipped.)
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:40
3
$begingroup$
Personally, I'd focus less about covering all possible bases, and more on thoroughly mastering the foundational classes (by referring to "foundational", I do not mean in any way to imply "elementary"), leaving a little "wiggle room" in your schedule to pursue one or two of the topics that you find particularly interesting in the foundational classes - perhaps topics for undergrad research, or a thesis, etc.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 21:17
|
show 11 more comments
$begingroup$
I am an undergraduate (currently a sophomore) studying to prepare for applying to a Ph.D. program in mathematics. I have thus far structured my course selection upon the advice of a friend I met during freshman year (he was a senior) who has gone on to a Ph.D. program himself. A large part of his advice was what a Ph.D. program in mathematics would expect from a strong applicant. Or perhaps "expect" is not the right word - his words were that having certain topics under my belt by the end of undergraduate study would make me a pretty strong candidate.
His suggested topics for study were: real analysis at least at the level of baby Rudin, preferably further real analysis (measure theory, functional analysis, etc. - probably Folland or similar), point-set topology, complex analysis, Fourier analysis, differential geometry, probability, linear algebra, and abstract algebra (e.g. Artin, Dummit & Foote). He also suggested that if I had time for it, it would be worthwhile to know commutative algebra, algebraic topology, axiomatic set theory, number theory, and mathematical logic, though these wouldn't be strictly necessary.
The notable omissions from this list, I think, are elementary partial differential equations, combinatorics, and graph theory. At the time I spoke to him, I had already done up to multivariable calculus and was doing ordinary differential equations, so those were omitted for that reason. The reason for leaving out PDEs was apparently because it would be more worthwhile to study a lot more background material in analysis and topology before moving onto PDEs, as opposed to jumping into PDEs with just ODE knowledge. As for discrete mathematics, apparently these are more optional than things like set theory and number theory - again, nice if you know these things, but not catastrophic if you don't for Ph.D. admissions.
Here is my question: is this an accurate picture of what a sample strong applicant for a Ph.D. program might look like? Are there other topics I should consider studying? I realize that students apply to Ph.D. programs from all mathematical backgrounds, and faculty recommendations, GRE scores, summer REUs/programs, extracurricular mathematical activity (seminar talks, etc.) also contribute heavily. But I imagine that there is a basic level of coursework that in addition to having good recommendations, REUs, etc. would suggest that an applicant is ready for graduate work.
My concern with this picture of recommended coursework is that the friend who suggested it to me is primarily interested in analysis, and I think it's worthwhile to have perspectives from mathematicians interested in algebra, discrete mathematics, etc. on this matter. It would also be great to have some perspectives from professors on graduate admissions committees and professors that often mentor graduate students/teach graduate classes.
If it is relevant to this discussion: right now I am leaning toward studying topology and geometry, though I am also interested in the nonlinear analysis I am reading right now. Take this with a grain of salt - I haven't studied many of the topics in the above list yet. It's very likely my opinion will change once I know abstract algebra. My current progress on the list: I am studying real analysis using baby Rudin, I have studied topology, probability, linear algebra, and combinatorics, this semester I will start differential geometry and complex analysis, and I plan to go over topology again.
soft-question education career-development
asked Jan 17 '13 at 20:26
Gyu Eun LeeGyu Eun Lee
13.2k2353
$endgroup$
I am an undergraduate (currently a sophomore) studying to prepare for applying to a Ph.D. program in mathematics. I have thus far structured my course selection upon the advice of a friend I met during freshman year (he was a senior) who has gone on to a Ph.D. program himself. A large part of his advice was what a Ph.D. program in mathematics would expect from a strong applicant. Or perhaps "expect" is not the right word - his words were that having certain topics under my belt by the end of undergraduate study would make me a pretty strong candidate.
His suggested topics for study were: real analysis at least at the level of baby Rudin, preferably further real analysis (measure theory, functional analysis, etc. - probably Folland or similar), point-set topology, complex analysis, Fourier analysis, differential geometry, probability, linear algebra, and abstract algebra (e.g. Artin, Dummit & Foote). He also suggested that if I had time for it, it would be worthwhile to know commutative algebra, algebraic topology, axiomatic set theory, number theory, and mathematical logic, though these wouldn't be strictly necessary.
The notable omissions from this list, I think, are elementary partial differential equations, combinatorics, and graph theory. At the time I spoke to him, I had already done up to multivariable calculus and was doing ordinary differential equations, so those were omitted for that reason. The reason for leaving out PDEs was apparently because it would be more worthwhile to study a lot more background material in analysis and topology before moving onto PDEs, as opposed to jumping into PDEs with just ODE knowledge. As for discrete mathematics, apparently these are more optional than things like set theory and number theory - again, nice if you know these things, but not catastrophic if you don't for Ph.D. admissions.
Here is my question: is this an accurate picture of what a sample strong applicant for a Ph.D. program might look like? Are there other topics I should consider studying? I realize that students apply to Ph.D. programs from all mathematical backgrounds, and faculty recommendations, GRE scores, summer REUs/programs, extracurricular mathematical activity (seminar talks, etc.) also contribute heavily. But I imagine that there is a basic level of coursework that in addition to having good recommendations, REUs, etc. would suggest that an applicant is ready for graduate work.
My concern with this picture of recommended coursework is that the friend who suggested it to me is primarily interested in analysis, and I think it's worthwhile to have perspectives from mathematicians interested in algebra, discrete mathematics, etc. on this matter. It would also be great to have some perspectives from professors on graduate admissions committees and professors that often mentor graduate students/teach graduate classes.
If it is relevant to this discussion: right now I am leaning toward studying topology and geometry, though I am also interested in the nonlinear analysis I am reading right now. Take this with a grain of salt - I haven't studied many of the topics in the above list yet. It's very likely my opinion will change once I know abstract algebra. My current progress on the list: I am studying real analysis using baby Rudin, I have studied topology, probability, linear algebra, and combinatorics, this semester I will start differential geometry and complex analysis, and I plan to go over topology again.
soft-question education career-development
soft-question education career-development
asked Jan 17 '13 at 20:26
Gyu Eun LeeGyu Eun Lee
13.2k2353
asked Jan 17 '13 at 20:26
Gyu Eun LeeGyu Eun Lee
13.2k2353
edited Dec 13 '18 at 0:39
user198044
asked Jan 17 '13 at 20:26
Gyu Eun LeeGyu Eun Lee
13.2k2353
asked Jan 17 '13 at 20:26
Gyu Eun LeeGyu Eun Lee
13.2k2353
asked Jan 17 '13 at 20:26
Gyu Eun LeeGyu Eun Lee
13.2k2353
13.2k2353
3
$begingroup$
Take whatever you need to take to get your undergrad degree, then take classes that interest you (not necessarily in that order). Also, get to know your professors and ask them for advice on what to take. Every school is different, and they will know what classes there are worth taking.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Vargas
Jan 17 '13 at 20:32
$begingroup$
Differential equations are for engineers :) Definitely not required, unless related to fields you are interested in. Graph theory is usually considered part of combinatorics, FWIW.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@AntonioVargas Let's say that all of these topics interest me (nice thing about being a math major). I'd like to emphasize that not all of these topics are classes - many of them are not offered as classes at my school. Some of the ones that are offered are not what I'm looking for (e.g. lots of handwavy stuff for engineers and teachers). I'd like you to think of them more as topics of study, which I might do through independent study or such.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
It obviously greatly depends on what interests you. If you are interested in finite mathematics, then take it. If you are interested in logic, take that (there is a lot of interesting undergrad-level logic, a big topic that you have mostly skipped.)
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:40
3
$begingroup$
Personally, I'd focus less about covering all possible bases, and more on thoroughly mastering the foundational classes (by referring to "foundational", I do not mean in any way to imply "elementary"), leaving a little "wiggle room" in your schedule to pursue one or two of the topics that you find particularly interesting in the foundational classes - perhaps topics for undergrad research, or a thesis, etc.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 21:17
|
show 11 more comments
3
$begingroup$
Take whatever you need to take to get your undergrad degree, then take classes that interest you (not necessarily in that order). Also, get to know your professors and ask them for advice on what to take. Every school is different, and they will know what classes there are worth taking.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Vargas
Jan 17 '13 at 20:32
$begingroup$
Differential equations are for engineers :) Definitely not required, unless related to fields you are interested in. Graph theory is usually considered part of combinatorics, FWIW.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@AntonioVargas Let's say that all of these topics interest me (nice thing about being a math major). I'd like to emphasize that not all of these topics are classes - many of them are not offered as classes at my school. Some of the ones that are offered are not what I'm looking for (e.g. lots of handwavy stuff for engineers and teachers). I'd like you to think of them more as topics of study, which I might do through independent study or such.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
It obviously greatly depends on what interests you. If you are interested in finite mathematics, then take it. If you are interested in logic, take that (there is a lot of interesting undergrad-level logic, a big topic that you have mostly skipped.)
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:40
3
$begingroup$
Personally, I'd focus less about covering all possible bases, and more on thoroughly mastering the foundational classes (by referring to "foundational", I do not mean in any way to imply "elementary"), leaving a little "wiggle room" in your schedule to pursue one or two of the topics that you find particularly interesting in the foundational classes - perhaps topics for undergrad research, or a thesis, etc.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 21:17
3
3
$begingroup$
Take whatever you need to take to get your undergrad degree, then take classes that interest you (not necessarily in that order). Also, get to know your professors and ask them for advice on what to take. Every school is different, and they will know what classes there are worth taking.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Vargas
Jan 17 '13 at 20:32
$begingroup$
Take whatever you need to take to get your undergrad degree, then take classes that interest you (not necessarily in that order). Also, get to know your professors and ask them for advice on what to take. Every school is different, and they will know what classes there are worth taking.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Vargas
Jan 17 '13 at 20:32
$begingroup$
Differential equations are for engineers :) Definitely not required, unless related to fields you are interested in. Graph theory is usually considered part of combinatorics, FWIW.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
Differential equations are for engineers :) Definitely not required, unless related to fields you are interested in. Graph theory is usually considered part of combinatorics, FWIW.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@AntonioVargas Let's say that all of these topics interest me (nice thing about being a math major). I'd like to emphasize that not all of these topics are classes - many of them are not offered as classes at my school. Some of the ones that are offered are not what I'm looking for (e.g. lots of handwavy stuff for engineers and teachers). I'd like you to think of them more as topics of study, which I might do through independent study or such.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@AntonioVargas Let's say that all of these topics interest me (nice thing about being a math major). I'd like to emphasize that not all of these topics are classes - many of them are not offered as classes at my school. Some of the ones that are offered are not what I'm looking for (e.g. lots of handwavy stuff for engineers and teachers). I'd like you to think of them more as topics of study, which I might do through independent study or such.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
It obviously greatly depends on what interests you. If you are interested in finite mathematics, then take it. If you are interested in logic, take that (there is a lot of interesting undergrad-level logic, a big topic that you have mostly skipped.)
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:40
$begingroup$
It obviously greatly depends on what interests you. If you are interested in finite mathematics, then take it. If you are interested in logic, take that (there is a lot of interesting undergrad-level logic, a big topic that you have mostly skipped.)
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:40
3
3
$begingroup$
Personally, I'd focus less about covering all possible bases, and more on thoroughly mastering the foundational classes (by referring to "foundational", I do not mean in any way to imply "elementary"), leaving a little "wiggle room" in your schedule to pursue one or two of the topics that you find particularly interesting in the foundational classes - perhaps topics for undergrad research, or a thesis, etc.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 21:17
$begingroup$
Personally, I'd focus less about covering all possible bases, and more on thoroughly mastering the foundational classes (by referring to "foundational", I do not mean in any way to imply "elementary"), leaving a little "wiggle room" in your schedule to pursue one or two of the topics that you find particularly interesting in the foundational classes - perhaps topics for undergrad research, or a thesis, etc.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 21:17
|
show 11 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'd suggest you visit the American Mathematical Society's site for students: I've linked you to their page for information that addresses concerns of current undergrad students. There are links to graduate programs (and their requirements and contact information), and information about undergraduate research programs, funding sources, career prospects, etc.
Survey a few programs, their requirements for admission, suggestions to applicants, funding availability, program requirements, etc. Requirements for admission will vary from program to program, but you'll find a common basis with which to answer your own question.
answered Jan 17 '13 at 21:39
amWhyamWhy
1
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I like this site myself - the AMS grad blog is a personal favorite.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 22:04
$begingroup$
Good for you; I'll give it some more thought! If I find anything that I think might be additionally resourceful, I'll edit the answer to include it.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f280974%2fwhat-is-the-expected-mathematical-repertoire-of-a-ph-d-program-applicant-in-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'd suggest you visit the American Mathematical Society's site for students: I've linked you to their page for information that addresses concerns of current undergrad students. There are links to graduate programs (and their requirements and contact information), and information about undergraduate research programs, funding sources, career prospects, etc.
Survey a few programs, their requirements for admission, suggestions to applicants, funding availability, program requirements, etc. Requirements for admission will vary from program to program, but you'll find a common basis with which to answer your own question.
answered Jan 17 '13 at 21:39
amWhyamWhy
1
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I like this site myself - the AMS grad blog is a personal favorite.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 22:04
$begingroup$
Good for you; I'll give it some more thought! If I find anything that I think might be additionally resourceful, I'll edit the answer to include it.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd suggest you visit the American Mathematical Society's site for students: I've linked you to their page for information that addresses concerns of current undergrad students. There are links to graduate programs (and their requirements and contact information), and information about undergraduate research programs, funding sources, career prospects, etc.
Survey a few programs, their requirements for admission, suggestions to applicants, funding availability, program requirements, etc. Requirements for admission will vary from program to program, but you'll find a common basis with which to answer your own question.
answered Jan 17 '13 at 21:39
amWhyamWhy
1
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I like this site myself - the AMS grad blog is a personal favorite.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 22:04
$begingroup$
Good for you; I'll give it some more thought! If I find anything that I think might be additionally resourceful, I'll edit the answer to include it.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd suggest you visit the American Mathematical Society's site for students: I've linked you to their page for information that addresses concerns of current undergrad students. There are links to graduate programs (and their requirements and contact information), and information about undergraduate research programs, funding sources, career prospects, etc.
Survey a few programs, their requirements for admission, suggestions to applicants, funding availability, program requirements, etc. Requirements for admission will vary from program to program, but you'll find a common basis with which to answer your own question.
answered Jan 17 '13 at 21:39
amWhyamWhy
1
$endgroup$
I'd suggest you visit the American Mathematical Society's site for students: I've linked you to their page for information that addresses concerns of current undergrad students. There are links to graduate programs (and their requirements and contact information), and information about undergraduate research programs, funding sources, career prospects, etc.
Survey a few programs, their requirements for admission, suggestions to applicants, funding availability, program requirements, etc. Requirements for admission will vary from program to program, but you'll find a common basis with which to answer your own question.
answered Jan 17 '13 at 21:39
amWhyamWhy
1
answered Jan 17 '13 at 21:39
amWhyamWhy
1
answered Jan 17 '13 at 21:39
amWhyamWhy
1
answered Jan 17 '13 at 21:39
amWhyamWhy
1
1
$begingroup$
I like this site myself - the AMS grad blog is a personal favorite.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 22:04
$begingroup$
Good for you; I'll give it some more thought! If I find anything that I think might be additionally resourceful, I'll edit the answer to include it.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I like this site myself - the AMS grad blog is a personal favorite.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 22:04
$begingroup$
Good for you; I'll give it some more thought! If I find anything that I think might be additionally resourceful, I'll edit the answer to include it.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 22:18
$begingroup$
I like this site myself - the AMS grad blog is a personal favorite.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 22:04
$begingroup$
I like this site myself - the AMS grad blog is a personal favorite.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 22:04
$begingroup$
Good for you; I'll give it some more thought! If I find anything that I think might be additionally resourceful, I'll edit the answer to include it.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 22:18
$begingroup$
Good for you; I'll give it some more thought! If I find anything that I think might be additionally resourceful, I'll edit the answer to include it.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 22:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f280974%2fwhat-is-the-expected-mathematical-repertoire-of-a-ph-d-program-applicant-in-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Take whatever you need to take to get your undergrad degree, then take classes that interest you (not necessarily in that order). Also, get to know your professors and ask them for advice on what to take. Every school is different, and they will know what classes there are worth taking.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Vargas
Jan 17 '13 at 20:32
$begingroup$
Differential equations are for engineers :) Definitely not required, unless related to fields you are interested in. Graph theory is usually considered part of combinatorics, FWIW.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
@AntonioVargas Let's say that all of these topics interest me (nice thing about being a math major). I'd like to emphasize that not all of these topics are classes - many of them are not offered as classes at my school. Some of the ones that are offered are not what I'm looking for (e.g. lots of handwavy stuff for engineers and teachers). I'd like you to think of them more as topics of study, which I might do through independent study or such.
$endgroup$
– Gyu Eun Lee
Jan 17 '13 at 20:38
$begingroup$
It obviously greatly depends on what interests you. If you are interested in finite mathematics, then take it. If you are interested in logic, take that (there is a lot of interesting undergrad-level logic, a big topic that you have mostly skipped.)
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Jan 17 '13 at 20:40
3
$begingroup$
Personally, I'd focus less about covering all possible bases, and more on thoroughly mastering the foundational classes (by referring to "foundational", I do not mean in any way to imply "elementary"), leaving a little "wiggle room" in your schedule to pursue one or two of the topics that you find particularly interesting in the foundational classes - perhaps topics for undergrad research, or a thesis, etc.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Jan 17 '13 at 21:17