What is the cardinality of the following set?
$begingroup$
What is the cardinality of the following set: ${f: mathbb{R} rightarrow {a+bsqrt[3]4 | a,b in mathbb{Q}}}$?
Let $S = {f: mathbb{R} rightarrow {a+bsqrt[3]4 | a,b in mathbb{Q}}}$.
I already show that ${f:mathbb{R}rightarrow{0,1}} subset S$, then $|S| ge |{f:mathbb{R}rightarrow{0,1}}| = 2^c$, and I need to show the rest of the part i.e.: $|S| le 2^c$, then to conclude that the cardinality of the set $S$ is $2^c$. (please correct me if this part is wrong)
But I get stuck, I don't know how to show that $|S| le 2^c$. Can you please help me out? Thanks in advance!
abstract-algebra elementary-set-theory cardinals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the cardinality of the following set: ${f: mathbb{R} rightarrow {a+bsqrt[3]4 | a,b in mathbb{Q}}}$?
Let $S = {f: mathbb{R} rightarrow {a+bsqrt[3]4 | a,b in mathbb{Q}}}$.
I already show that ${f:mathbb{R}rightarrow{0,1}} subset S$, then $|S| ge |{f:mathbb{R}rightarrow{0,1}}| = 2^c$, and I need to show the rest of the part i.e.: $|S| le 2^c$, then to conclude that the cardinality of the set $S$ is $2^c$. (please correct me if this part is wrong)
But I get stuck, I don't know how to show that $|S| le 2^c$. Can you please help me out? Thanks in advance!
abstract-algebra elementary-set-theory cardinals
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I assume $R$ and $Q$ are supposed to be $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{Q}$?
$endgroup$
– GenericMathematician
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
2
$begingroup$
Would you be more comfortable if ${,a+bsqrt[3]4mid a,binBbb Q,}$ were replaced with $Bbb N$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the cardinality of the following set: ${f: mathbb{R} rightarrow {a+bsqrt[3]4 | a,b in mathbb{Q}}}$?
Let $S = {f: mathbb{R} rightarrow {a+bsqrt[3]4 | a,b in mathbb{Q}}}$.
I already show that ${f:mathbb{R}rightarrow{0,1}} subset S$, then $|S| ge |{f:mathbb{R}rightarrow{0,1}}| = 2^c$, and I need to show the rest of the part i.e.: $|S| le 2^c$, then to conclude that the cardinality of the set $S$ is $2^c$. (please correct me if this part is wrong)
But I get stuck, I don't know how to show that $|S| le 2^c$. Can you please help me out? Thanks in advance!
abstract-algebra elementary-set-theory cardinals
$endgroup$
What is the cardinality of the following set: ${f: mathbb{R} rightarrow {a+bsqrt[3]4 | a,b in mathbb{Q}}}$?
Let $S = {f: mathbb{R} rightarrow {a+bsqrt[3]4 | a,b in mathbb{Q}}}$.
I already show that ${f:mathbb{R}rightarrow{0,1}} subset S$, then $|S| ge |{f:mathbb{R}rightarrow{0,1}}| = 2^c$, and I need to show the rest of the part i.e.: $|S| le 2^c$, then to conclude that the cardinality of the set $S$ is $2^c$. (please correct me if this part is wrong)
But I get stuck, I don't know how to show that $|S| le 2^c$. Can you please help me out? Thanks in advance!
abstract-algebra elementary-set-theory cardinals
abstract-algebra elementary-set-theory cardinals
edited Dec 9 '18 at 22:08
ODF
1,486510
1,486510
asked Dec 9 '18 at 21:50
EdwardEdward
132
132
$begingroup$
I assume $R$ and $Q$ are supposed to be $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{Q}$?
$endgroup$
– GenericMathematician
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
2
$begingroup$
Would you be more comfortable if ${,a+bsqrt[3]4mid a,binBbb Q,}$ were replaced with $Bbb N$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I assume $R$ and $Q$ are supposed to be $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{Q}$?
$endgroup$
– GenericMathematician
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
2
$begingroup$
Would you be more comfortable if ${,a+bsqrt[3]4mid a,binBbb Q,}$ were replaced with $Bbb N$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
I assume $R$ and $Q$ are supposed to be $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{Q}$?
$endgroup$
– GenericMathematician
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
I assume $R$ and $Q$ are supposed to be $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{Q}$?
$endgroup$
– GenericMathematician
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
2
2
$begingroup$
Would you be more comfortable if ${,a+bsqrt[3]4mid a,binBbb Q,}$ were replaced with $Bbb N$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
$begingroup$
Would you be more comfortable if ${,a+bsqrt[3]4mid a,binBbb Q,}$ were replaced with $Bbb N$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You're looking at the set of functins from $mathbb{R}$ which has size $2^{aleph_0}= mathfrak{c}$ to a countable set (as $|mathbb{Q}^2| = aleph_0$) which by definition has size $(aleph_0)^{2^{aleph_0}} = 2^{mathfrak{c}}$ by standard cardinal arithmetic : $$ 2^mathfrak{c} le aleph_0^{mathfrak{c}} le (2^mathfrak{c})^mathfrak{c} = 2^mathfrak{c}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you find an one to one function map to show that the cardinality of the set S is less than or equal to $2^c$. Since we haven't learned cardinal arithmetic yet...
$endgroup$
– Edward
Dec 9 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
You'll need axiom of choice for that, in order to use a bijection between $mathfrak c times mathfrak c$ and $mathfrak c$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 10 '18 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net well for $mathfrak{c}$ we can show it without AC: use the representation as sequences of natural numbers that can be interleaved.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 10 '18 at 17:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033071%2fwhat-is-the-cardinality-of-the-following-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You're looking at the set of functins from $mathbb{R}$ which has size $2^{aleph_0}= mathfrak{c}$ to a countable set (as $|mathbb{Q}^2| = aleph_0$) which by definition has size $(aleph_0)^{2^{aleph_0}} = 2^{mathfrak{c}}$ by standard cardinal arithmetic : $$ 2^mathfrak{c} le aleph_0^{mathfrak{c}} le (2^mathfrak{c})^mathfrak{c} = 2^mathfrak{c}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you find an one to one function map to show that the cardinality of the set S is less than or equal to $2^c$. Since we haven't learned cardinal arithmetic yet...
$endgroup$
– Edward
Dec 9 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
You'll need axiom of choice for that, in order to use a bijection between $mathfrak c times mathfrak c$ and $mathfrak c$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 10 '18 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net well for $mathfrak{c}$ we can show it without AC: use the representation as sequences of natural numbers that can be interleaved.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 10 '18 at 17:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're looking at the set of functins from $mathbb{R}$ which has size $2^{aleph_0}= mathfrak{c}$ to a countable set (as $|mathbb{Q}^2| = aleph_0$) which by definition has size $(aleph_0)^{2^{aleph_0}} = 2^{mathfrak{c}}$ by standard cardinal arithmetic : $$ 2^mathfrak{c} le aleph_0^{mathfrak{c}} le (2^mathfrak{c})^mathfrak{c} = 2^mathfrak{c}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you find an one to one function map to show that the cardinality of the set S is less than or equal to $2^c$. Since we haven't learned cardinal arithmetic yet...
$endgroup$
– Edward
Dec 9 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
You'll need axiom of choice for that, in order to use a bijection between $mathfrak c times mathfrak c$ and $mathfrak c$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 10 '18 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net well for $mathfrak{c}$ we can show it without AC: use the representation as sequences of natural numbers that can be interleaved.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 10 '18 at 17:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're looking at the set of functins from $mathbb{R}$ which has size $2^{aleph_0}= mathfrak{c}$ to a countable set (as $|mathbb{Q}^2| = aleph_0$) which by definition has size $(aleph_0)^{2^{aleph_0}} = 2^{mathfrak{c}}$ by standard cardinal arithmetic : $$ 2^mathfrak{c} le aleph_0^{mathfrak{c}} le (2^mathfrak{c})^mathfrak{c} = 2^mathfrak{c}$$
$endgroup$
You're looking at the set of functins from $mathbb{R}$ which has size $2^{aleph_0}= mathfrak{c}$ to a countable set (as $|mathbb{Q}^2| = aleph_0$) which by definition has size $(aleph_0)^{2^{aleph_0}} = 2^{mathfrak{c}}$ by standard cardinal arithmetic : $$ 2^mathfrak{c} le aleph_0^{mathfrak{c}} le (2^mathfrak{c})^mathfrak{c} = 2^mathfrak{c}$$
answered Dec 9 '18 at 22:03
Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma
108k347114
108k347114
$begingroup$
Can you find an one to one function map to show that the cardinality of the set S is less than or equal to $2^c$. Since we haven't learned cardinal arithmetic yet...
$endgroup$
– Edward
Dec 9 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
You'll need axiom of choice for that, in order to use a bijection between $mathfrak c times mathfrak c$ and $mathfrak c$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 10 '18 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net well for $mathfrak{c}$ we can show it without AC: use the representation as sequences of natural numbers that can be interleaved.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 10 '18 at 17:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can you find an one to one function map to show that the cardinality of the set S is less than or equal to $2^c$. Since we haven't learned cardinal arithmetic yet...
$endgroup$
– Edward
Dec 9 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
You'll need axiom of choice for that, in order to use a bijection between $mathfrak c times mathfrak c$ and $mathfrak c$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 10 '18 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net well for $mathfrak{c}$ we can show it without AC: use the representation as sequences of natural numbers that can be interleaved.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 10 '18 at 17:38
$begingroup$
Can you find an one to one function map to show that the cardinality of the set S is less than or equal to $2^c$. Since we haven't learned cardinal arithmetic yet...
$endgroup$
– Edward
Dec 9 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
Can you find an one to one function map to show that the cardinality of the set S is less than or equal to $2^c$. Since we haven't learned cardinal arithmetic yet...
$endgroup$
– Edward
Dec 9 '18 at 22:11
$begingroup$
You'll need axiom of choice for that, in order to use a bijection between $mathfrak c times mathfrak c$ and $mathfrak c$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 10 '18 at 16:52
$begingroup$
You'll need axiom of choice for that, in order to use a bijection between $mathfrak c times mathfrak c$ and $mathfrak c$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 10 '18 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net well for $mathfrak{c}$ we can show it without AC: use the representation as sequences of natural numbers that can be interleaved.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 10 '18 at 17:38
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net well for $mathfrak{c}$ we can show it without AC: use the representation as sequences of natural numbers that can be interleaved.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 10 '18 at 17:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033071%2fwhat-is-the-cardinality-of-the-following-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I assume $R$ and $Q$ are supposed to be $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{Q}$?
$endgroup$
– GenericMathematician
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57
2
$begingroup$
Would you be more comfortable if ${,a+bsqrt[3]4mid a,binBbb Q,}$ were replaced with $Bbb N$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Dec 9 '18 at 21:57