Defining Bott Class by relative $K$-theory












1












$begingroup$


I am really confused with this construction of Bott Class in Page 127, Example 8.4.12




If $V$ is a complex vector space of dimension $n$, we form the complex
$$ 0 rightarrow wedge^0 V rightarrow wedge^1 V rightarrow cdots rightarrow wedge ^nV rightarrow 0 $$
of trivial vector bundles over $V$.




What does this mean? So we have $n$ trivial vector bundles, $V times Bbb C^{binom{n}{k}}$?




The map $wedge^pV rightarrow wedge^{p+1}V$ is given by $w mapsto v wedge w$. Now we pass to complex conjugate bundles. IT is clear that if $f:V rightarrow W$ is a $Bbb C$ linear map then $f:bar{V} rightarrow bar{W}$.




What does $bar{V}$ mean? Where do we use "passing to the complex conjugate"?




Denote the resulting class $b_V in K^0(DV,DS)$.




(i) How is $b_V$ induced from all the things above? Is this by the wrapping defined on pg 126?



(ii) how is $b_V$ dependent on $f$ or $W$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 10 '18 at 10:33










  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
    $endgroup$
    – vap
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:40


















1












$begingroup$


I am really confused with this construction of Bott Class in Page 127, Example 8.4.12




If $V$ is a complex vector space of dimension $n$, we form the complex
$$ 0 rightarrow wedge^0 V rightarrow wedge^1 V rightarrow cdots rightarrow wedge ^nV rightarrow 0 $$
of trivial vector bundles over $V$.




What does this mean? So we have $n$ trivial vector bundles, $V times Bbb C^{binom{n}{k}}$?




The map $wedge^pV rightarrow wedge^{p+1}V$ is given by $w mapsto v wedge w$. Now we pass to complex conjugate bundles. IT is clear that if $f:V rightarrow W$ is a $Bbb C$ linear map then $f:bar{V} rightarrow bar{W}$.




What does $bar{V}$ mean? Where do we use "passing to the complex conjugate"?




Denote the resulting class $b_V in K^0(DV,DS)$.




(i) How is $b_V$ induced from all the things above? Is this by the wrapping defined on pg 126?



(ii) how is $b_V$ dependent on $f$ or $W$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 10 '18 at 10:33










  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
    $endgroup$
    – vap
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:40
















1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


I am really confused with this construction of Bott Class in Page 127, Example 8.4.12




If $V$ is a complex vector space of dimension $n$, we form the complex
$$ 0 rightarrow wedge^0 V rightarrow wedge^1 V rightarrow cdots rightarrow wedge ^nV rightarrow 0 $$
of trivial vector bundles over $V$.




What does this mean? So we have $n$ trivial vector bundles, $V times Bbb C^{binom{n}{k}}$?




The map $wedge^pV rightarrow wedge^{p+1}V$ is given by $w mapsto v wedge w$. Now we pass to complex conjugate bundles. IT is clear that if $f:V rightarrow W$ is a $Bbb C$ linear map then $f:bar{V} rightarrow bar{W}$.




What does $bar{V}$ mean? Where do we use "passing to the complex conjugate"?




Denote the resulting class $b_V in K^0(DV,DS)$.




(i) How is $b_V$ induced from all the things above? Is this by the wrapping defined on pg 126?



(ii) how is $b_V$ dependent on $f$ or $W$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am really confused with this construction of Bott Class in Page 127, Example 8.4.12




If $V$ is a complex vector space of dimension $n$, we form the complex
$$ 0 rightarrow wedge^0 V rightarrow wedge^1 V rightarrow cdots rightarrow wedge ^nV rightarrow 0 $$
of trivial vector bundles over $V$.




What does this mean? So we have $n$ trivial vector bundles, $V times Bbb C^{binom{n}{k}}$?




The map $wedge^pV rightarrow wedge^{p+1}V$ is given by $w mapsto v wedge w$. Now we pass to complex conjugate bundles. IT is clear that if $f:V rightarrow W$ is a $Bbb C$ linear map then $f:bar{V} rightarrow bar{W}$.




What does $bar{V}$ mean? Where do we use "passing to the complex conjugate"?




Denote the resulting class $b_V in K^0(DV,DS)$.




(i) How is $b_V$ induced from all the things above? Is this by the wrapping defined on pg 126?



(ii) how is $b_V$ dependent on $f$ or $W$.







algebraic-topology differential-topology k-theory topological-k-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 9 '18 at 22:09







CL.

















asked Dec 9 '18 at 21:49









CL.CL.

2,2232825




2,2232825












  • $begingroup$
    Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 10 '18 at 10:33










  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
    $endgroup$
    – vap
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:40




















  • $begingroup$
    Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 10 '18 at 10:33










  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
    $endgroup$
    – vap
    Dec 12 '18 at 18:40


















$begingroup$
Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 10 '18 at 10:33




$begingroup$
Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 10 '18 at 10:33












$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
$endgroup$
– vap
Dec 12 '18 at 18:40






$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
$endgroup$
– vap
Dec 12 '18 at 18:40












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033070%2fdefining-bott-class-by-relative-k-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033070%2fdefining-bott-class-by-relative-k-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix