Superheated wing blast!












11












$begingroup$


So, we know that big creatures will generate lots of heat if they’re active. We also know that wings are very good at venting excess heat. Now for most animals, this heat isn’t exactly spectacular, a few degrees here or there. Of course, if an animal generated more heat because it was really, really big, the effect might be a little more exciting. So let’s take a big creature that generates lots of heat. Let’s put big wings on this creature that vent the excess heat, and let’s say that this creature can control how the heat is vented from its wings. The creature vents the heat to the underside of its massive wings, creating large pockets of very hot air. Then, upon encountering something that the creature doesn’t like, it flaps its gargantuan wings and generates a hurricane force blast of scalding hot air.



So the question here is how much heat, and how much wind? For the purposes of this question, we’ll go big. Let’s say a 2-mile wingspan, each wing from 1/4 to 1 mile in breadth (base to tip), on a creature that is 2 miles long, with the heat generation you would expect from an active animal that size. If you can answer for both raptor-like wings and bat-like wings that would be great. For the purposes of this question ignore things like “how could this creature move” or “how could the wings withstand the force of being flapped” as those are different questions entirely.



Here’s a link to my other related questions 1: http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/137872/the-nuclear-dragon






biology creature-design physics temperature







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We need to know the breadth of the wings, too (each wing is 1 mile wide, how high?) so we can calculate surface area. We also might need you to give us relative structure (the wings are built similar to what Terrestrial creature?) as the curve of the wings as they are brought to bear will affect the blast. Finally, we need to know exactly how much heat is being dissipated by the wings so we can calculate how quickly the air will heat.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 17:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think your numbers are too big. The answers will probably come with a lot of buts and howevers. Maybe if you reduce your numbers to a kaiju-like scale you will get more feasible answers.
    $endgroup$
    – Magus
    Jan 28 at 19:45










  • $begingroup$
    Nick, could you edit your posts in this series (preferably all of them) and cross-link them? Not only is that a benefit to other users, but SE tracks linked posts. (Maybe just link back to post #1, and keep a running list of all the questions in the series in that post).
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 21:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, and for fun and giggles I started to post a question on Physics about calculating the actual amount of air someone below a Robin would feel per-downstroke when I realized that almost nothing would be harder to integrate than the surface area of a bird's wing in flight, moment-by-moment, so that you can calculate actual air pressure and density under the wing. Mother Nature is very good at what she does. Cheers for a remarkably challenging question.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 21:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    how strong is gravity? I doubt there's a substance known to man that can support a thin one mile cantilever in earth-like cravity.
    $endgroup$
    – Jasen
    Jan 29 at 3:38


















11












$begingroup$


So, we know that big creatures will generate lots of heat if they’re active. We also know that wings are very good at venting excess heat. Now for most animals, this heat isn’t exactly spectacular, a few degrees here or there. Of course, if an animal generated more heat because it was really, really big, the effect might be a little more exciting. So let’s take a big creature that generates lots of heat. Let’s put big wings on this creature that vent the excess heat, and let’s say that this creature can control how the heat is vented from its wings. The creature vents the heat to the underside of its massive wings, creating large pockets of very hot air. Then, upon encountering something that the creature doesn’t like, it flaps its gargantuan wings and generates a hurricane force blast of scalding hot air.



So the question here is how much heat, and how much wind? For the purposes of this question, we’ll go big. Let’s say a 2-mile wingspan, each wing from 1/4 to 1 mile in breadth (base to tip), on a creature that is 2 miles long, with the heat generation you would expect from an active animal that size. If you can answer for both raptor-like wings and bat-like wings that would be great. For the purposes of this question ignore things like “how could this creature move” or “how could the wings withstand the force of being flapped” as those are different questions entirely.



Here’s a link to my other related questions 1: http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/137872/the-nuclear-dragon






biology creature-design physics temperature







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We need to know the breadth of the wings, too (each wing is 1 mile wide, how high?) so we can calculate surface area. We also might need you to give us relative structure (the wings are built similar to what Terrestrial creature?) as the curve of the wings as they are brought to bear will affect the blast. Finally, we need to know exactly how much heat is being dissipated by the wings so we can calculate how quickly the air will heat.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 17:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think your numbers are too big. The answers will probably come with a lot of buts and howevers. Maybe if you reduce your numbers to a kaiju-like scale you will get more feasible answers.
    $endgroup$
    – Magus
    Jan 28 at 19:45










  • $begingroup$
    Nick, could you edit your posts in this series (preferably all of them) and cross-link them? Not only is that a benefit to other users, but SE tracks linked posts. (Maybe just link back to post #1, and keep a running list of all the questions in the series in that post).
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 21:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, and for fun and giggles I started to post a question on Physics about calculating the actual amount of air someone below a Robin would feel per-downstroke when I realized that almost nothing would be harder to integrate than the surface area of a bird's wing in flight, moment-by-moment, so that you can calculate actual air pressure and density under the wing. Mother Nature is very good at what she does. Cheers for a remarkably challenging question.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 21:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    how strong is gravity? I doubt there's a substance known to man that can support a thin one mile cantilever in earth-like cravity.
    $endgroup$
    – Jasen
    Jan 29 at 3:38
















11












11








11





$begingroup$


So, we know that big creatures will generate lots of heat if they’re active. We also know that wings are very good at venting excess heat. Now for most animals, this heat isn’t exactly spectacular, a few degrees here or there. Of course, if an animal generated more heat because it was really, really big, the effect might be a little more exciting. So let’s take a big creature that generates lots of heat. Let’s put big wings on this creature that vent the excess heat, and let’s say that this creature can control how the heat is vented from its wings. The creature vents the heat to the underside of its massive wings, creating large pockets of very hot air. Then, upon encountering something that the creature doesn’t like, it flaps its gargantuan wings and generates a hurricane force blast of scalding hot air.



So the question here is how much heat, and how much wind? For the purposes of this question, we’ll go big. Let’s say a 2-mile wingspan, each wing from 1/4 to 1 mile in breadth (base to tip), on a creature that is 2 miles long, with the heat generation you would expect from an active animal that size. If you can answer for both raptor-like wings and bat-like wings that would be great. For the purposes of this question ignore things like “how could this creature move” or “how could the wings withstand the force of being flapped” as those are different questions entirely.



Here’s a link to my other related questions 1: http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/137872/the-nuclear-dragon






biology creature-design physics temperature







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




So, we know that big creatures will generate lots of heat if they’re active. We also know that wings are very good at venting excess heat. Now for most animals, this heat isn’t exactly spectacular, a few degrees here or there. Of course, if an animal generated more heat because it was really, really big, the effect might be a little more exciting. So let’s take a big creature that generates lots of heat. Let’s put big wings on this creature that vent the excess heat, and let’s say that this creature can control how the heat is vented from its wings. The creature vents the heat to the underside of its massive wings, creating large pockets of very hot air. Then, upon encountering something that the creature doesn’t like, it flaps its gargantuan wings and generates a hurricane force blast of scalding hot air.



So the question here is how much heat, and how much wind? For the purposes of this question, we’ll go big. Let’s say a 2-mile wingspan, each wing from 1/4 to 1 mile in breadth (base to tip), on a creature that is 2 miles long, with the heat generation you would expect from an active animal that size. If you can answer for both raptor-like wings and bat-like wings that would be great. For the purposes of this question ignore things like “how could this creature move” or “how could the wings withstand the force of being flapped” as those are different questions entirely.



Here’s a link to my other related questions 1: http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/137872/the-nuclear-dragon






biology creature-design physics temperature




biology creature-design physics temperature






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 29 at 2:01









Cyn

9,22612246




9,22612246










asked Jan 28 at 16:50









NickNick

2,3201031




2,3201031








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We need to know the breadth of the wings, too (each wing is 1 mile wide, how high?) so we can calculate surface area. We also might need you to give us relative structure (the wings are built similar to what Terrestrial creature?) as the curve of the wings as they are brought to bear will affect the blast. Finally, we need to know exactly how much heat is being dissipated by the wings so we can calculate how quickly the air will heat.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 17:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think your numbers are too big. The answers will probably come with a lot of buts and howevers. Maybe if you reduce your numbers to a kaiju-like scale you will get more feasible answers.
    $endgroup$
    – Magus
    Jan 28 at 19:45










  • $begingroup$
    Nick, could you edit your posts in this series (preferably all of them) and cross-link them? Not only is that a benefit to other users, but SE tracks linked posts. (Maybe just link back to post #1, and keep a running list of all the questions in the series in that post).
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 21:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, and for fun and giggles I started to post a question on Physics about calculating the actual amount of air someone below a Robin would feel per-downstroke when I realized that almost nothing would be harder to integrate than the surface area of a bird's wing in flight, moment-by-moment, so that you can calculate actual air pressure and density under the wing. Mother Nature is very good at what she does. Cheers for a remarkably challenging question.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 21:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    how strong is gravity? I doubt there's a substance known to man that can support a thin one mile cantilever in earth-like cravity.
    $endgroup$
    – Jasen
    Jan 29 at 3:38
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We need to know the breadth of the wings, too (each wing is 1 mile wide, how high?) so we can calculate surface area. We also might need you to give us relative structure (the wings are built similar to what Terrestrial creature?) as the curve of the wings as they are brought to bear will affect the blast. Finally, we need to know exactly how much heat is being dissipated by the wings so we can calculate how quickly the air will heat.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 17:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think your numbers are too big. The answers will probably come with a lot of buts and howevers. Maybe if you reduce your numbers to a kaiju-like scale you will get more feasible answers.
    $endgroup$
    – Magus
    Jan 28 at 19:45










  • $begingroup$
    Nick, could you edit your posts in this series (preferably all of them) and cross-link them? Not only is that a benefit to other users, but SE tracks linked posts. (Maybe just link back to post #1, and keep a running list of all the questions in the series in that post).
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 21:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, and for fun and giggles I started to post a question on Physics about calculating the actual amount of air someone below a Robin would feel per-downstroke when I realized that almost nothing would be harder to integrate than the surface area of a bird's wing in flight, moment-by-moment, so that you can calculate actual air pressure and density under the wing. Mother Nature is very good at what she does. Cheers for a remarkably challenging question.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 21:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    how strong is gravity? I doubt there's a substance known to man that can support a thin one mile cantilever in earth-like cravity.
    $endgroup$
    – Jasen
    Jan 29 at 3:38










1




1




$begingroup$
We need to know the breadth of the wings, too (each wing is 1 mile wide, how high?) so we can calculate surface area. We also might need you to give us relative structure (the wings are built similar to what Terrestrial creature?) as the curve of the wings as they are brought to bear will affect the blast. Finally, we need to know exactly how much heat is being dissipated by the wings so we can calculate how quickly the air will heat.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 28 at 17:09




$begingroup$
We need to know the breadth of the wings, too (each wing is 1 mile wide, how high?) so we can calculate surface area. We also might need you to give us relative structure (the wings are built similar to what Terrestrial creature?) as the curve of the wings as they are brought to bear will affect the blast. Finally, we need to know exactly how much heat is being dissipated by the wings so we can calculate how quickly the air will heat.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 28 at 17:09




3




3




$begingroup$
I think your numbers are too big. The answers will probably come with a lot of buts and howevers. Maybe if you reduce your numbers to a kaiju-like scale you will get more feasible answers.
$endgroup$
– Magus
Jan 28 at 19:45




$begingroup$
I think your numbers are too big. The answers will probably come with a lot of buts and howevers. Maybe if you reduce your numbers to a kaiju-like scale you will get more feasible answers.
$endgroup$
– Magus
Jan 28 at 19:45












$begingroup$
Nick, could you edit your posts in this series (preferably all of them) and cross-link them? Not only is that a benefit to other users, but SE tracks linked posts. (Maybe just link back to post #1, and keep a running list of all the questions in the series in that post).
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 28 at 21:24




$begingroup$
Nick, could you edit your posts in this series (preferably all of them) and cross-link them? Not only is that a benefit to other users, but SE tracks linked posts. (Maybe just link back to post #1, and keep a running list of all the questions in the series in that post).
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 28 at 21:24




1




1




$begingroup$
Oh, and for fun and giggles I started to post a question on Physics about calculating the actual amount of air someone below a Robin would feel per-downstroke when I realized that almost nothing would be harder to integrate than the surface area of a bird's wing in flight, moment-by-moment, so that you can calculate actual air pressure and density under the wing. Mother Nature is very good at what she does. Cheers for a remarkably challenging question.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 28 at 21:26




$begingroup$
Oh, and for fun and giggles I started to post a question on Physics about calculating the actual amount of air someone below a Robin would feel per-downstroke when I realized that almost nothing would be harder to integrate than the surface area of a bird's wing in flight, moment-by-moment, so that you can calculate actual air pressure and density under the wing. Mother Nature is very good at what she does. Cheers for a remarkably challenging question.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 28 at 21:26




1




1




$begingroup$
how strong is gravity? I doubt there's a substance known to man that can support a thin one mile cantilever in earth-like cravity.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jan 29 at 3:38






$begingroup$
how strong is gravity? I doubt there's a substance known to man that can support a thin one mile cantilever in earth-like cravity.
$endgroup$
– Jasen
Jan 29 at 3:38












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















24












$begingroup$

A one mile long wing is big, I mean, REALLY big.



Let's say the "offensive wing beat" starts with the wing pointing backwards and completes 180 degress later pointing forwards.



The wing tip completes a full half circle with a one mile radius, so basically 3.14 miles.



How long does a beat take? 1 minute? 1 second? 10 seconds? Lets go with 10 seconds.



The wing tip will travel 3.14 miles in 10 seconds, or 1,884 miles per hour. The speed of sound - at sea level - is approx 770 miles per hour, so the wing tip is traveling at something like mach 2.5 during its rotation.



So for each beat the wings are displacing a couple of cubic miles of air in those 10 seconds, I'm guessing there'll be a massive pressure wave similar to a nuclear blast traveling forwards from your mega bird.
The secondary blast is from the air rushing in to replace that moved by the wing beat, dragging debris with it.



I don't have enough physics to workout the actual forces involved, but the stored heat under the wings is the least of your worries.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Sounds a bit like Randall Monroe :)
    $endgroup$
    – Cerberus
    Jan 29 at 4:26






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Cerberus nah, if it was Randall, it'd be in comic form, with all the forces calculated ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Jan 29 at 9:18










  • $begingroup$
    @Baldrickk: Absoutely! My high-school science was 30 years ago, Randal Monroe I am not :)
    $endgroup$
    – Binary Worrier
    Jan 29 at 9:27






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For some reason I can't stop laughing: Death by being kicked out from your own planet by a huge chicken gosh :)
    $endgroup$
    – Alma Do
    Jan 29 at 12:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Air works very differently at supersonic speeds from its behavior at subsonic speeds. I wonder if a supersonic wing flap even works...
    $endgroup$
    – KRyan
    Jan 29 at 15:15



















18












$begingroup$

Edit



jdunlop has repeatedly pointed out the flaws of my answer so even if you have read the answer please reread it because there have been a few significant changes made. (in the Energy real world comparison part and following, it's a more accurate formula)



This simply is an expansion to Binary Worriers answer. (Math to display the true scale)



This is not that accurate because there are a lot of assumptions but it is good to display the ballpark in which the forces are working.



Values:




  • 1 mile (1,609.34 m) long wings

  • 10 seconds to move 3.14 miles (ca. 5,053 m)

  • we assume a 2:1 ratio in length to width so 0.5 miles (804.67 m) for our wing width

  • this gets us a surface area of 1294987.62 $m^2$ or 0.5 $miles^2$

  • A sphere of 1 mile (1,609.34 m) has a volume of 1.746 $cdot 10^{10}m^3$ or 4.189 $miles^3$

  • But our wing only has $frac {1}{4}$ of the diameter the volume drops accordingly to 4 364 877 255 $m^3$ or 1.05 $miles^3$

  • Lets reduce this by another 20% to adjust for imperfections of the wings and no full 180° flap of the wings (also wings don't tend to be perfectly shaped like the upper part of a circle). Which gives us 3 291 901 804 $m^3$ or 0.84 $miles^3$

  • Finally we need the weight of air which is 1.275 kg per $m^3$


Math



As Binary Worrier already explained the speed of each wing must be 1884 mph (3,032 km/h) to keep the numbers from exploding to astronomical scale we will assume that the wings already have this speed when starting to flap.



Weight



First we need the weight of the air which is our volume times the weight we already established. $1.275 kg cdot 3291901804 m^3 = 4,452,174,800 kg$ This is 8.90435 TIMES THE WEIGHT OF THE BURJI KHALIFA. (The tallest building in the world currently)



Force



To get the force we use this trusty formula: $F = m cdot a;$ F = force, m = mass, a = acceleration. Our acceleration is the speed of the wings divided by 10 (it takes 10 seconds for the wings to hit every air molecule in our designated volume) so 303.2 $km/h^2$ or 84.22222222 $frac {m}{s^2}$.



So when plugged into our formula it looks like this: $F = 4452174800 kg cdot 84.22222 frac {m}{s^2} = 3.75 cdot 10^{11} N$ (N = Newton)



Energy/Real world comparison (redone)



Energy is $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ E = Energy, m = Mass, v = speed. Plugging our values in: $E = 0.5 cdot 4452174800 kg cdot 842.22222222^2 frac{m}{s} = 1.579 cdot 10^{15}j$ Which is about $3 cdot 10^{14}j$ less but still enough to supply the world in 2015 for 6 days. Or 6 times less than a standard hurricane releases per second.



Edit V.2



For the creature unleashing the attack with the rough approximation for the weight by jdunlop we can estimate the creatures speed by the same formula we used above: $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ this time we have to rearange it to get the speed: $v^2 = frac {E}{0.5 cdot m}$ again with our numbers: $v^2 = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 20 cdot 10^9 kg} = 157904.9$ because v is squared we have to take the root and get: 397.37 m/s or 1430.54 km/h or 894.01 mph.



Conclusion (corrected weight comparison)



Anything that faces this creature has far greater problems than the heat released by this creature. The much bigger problem for the attacked creature is if it doesn't weigh more than 25 311 cars (each 1000 kg or 1 metric ton) it will leave an earth like planet for ever because it will reach escape velocity. And even when both (the attacked and the attacker) weigh more these creatures have to somehow not hit the ground, mountain, or hill with supersonic speed.



Additional Info



For the weight in cars needed not to leave the planet I used the formula from above and re arranged it this way: $m = frac {E}{0.5 cdot v^2}$ for the escape velocity is 11170 m/s. Couldn't use my physics book to site it but used its value instead of Wikipedia's the values are close enough though. So with the values: $m = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 11170^2m/s} = 25310794 kg$ or 25 310.794 metric tons.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That final number looks suspiciously on the order of a nuclear blast.... But the analysis is missing the force of air resistance (the standing air that the cupped air is pushing against) forcing cupped air to spill over the wings. I suspect only a fraction of the air we're talking about would actually make it to the intended target. Nevertheless, +1 for a wonderful effort that does show the scale of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 20:36










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH For simplicity I simply assumed that the lost air and the air resistance cancel each other out. But yeah for a higher accuracy this would be needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Soan
    Jan 28 at 20:42






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Soan - I can see why you might doubt that, but that's not the case! Buildings are actually not very dense at all, whereas organic beings are. Take, for example, an unladen european swallow. Weight: 20g. Wingspan: 21cm. So a 10 cm (approximately) wing. To reach a mile long, we have to multiply that by a factor of 10 666 (or approximately 10000, in fermi numbers). Its volume (and therefore mass) would be multiplied by that factor cubed, and therefore would be twenty trillion grams, twenty billion kg. Burji Khalifa? A paltry 453 million kg.
    $endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Jan 28 at 21:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (For a reference for which I have the data, the Willis tower masses about 202 million kg, and has a volume of approximately 1.4 million cubic metres, giving it a density of ~0.14 relative to water. Your average critter, even birds, has a density much closer to that of water.)
    $endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Jan 28 at 21:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So, @Soan, my original comment was incorrect; a creature that big wouldn't weigh in the range of the BK - it would weigh much, much more.
    $endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Jan 28 at 21:53



















6












$begingroup$

I agree with Binary Worrier's analysis, however: assuming this critter is in fact your 2-mile long nuclear dragon from an earlier question, the generation of massive amounts of heat under the wing surface helps answer the "how the hell does it FLY??" question very nicely - lift generation in a typical wing is driven by pressure differential between the lower straighter surface and the upper more curved surface of a wing (the air moves faster over the curved section and as a result, the 90 pressure against the wing itself is lessened, this more pressure beneath the wing) and secondarily through angle of attack dynamics, and in highly mobile wings on certain birds, root twist and other considerations. Your Nuke-dragon's excess heat radiators, in heating up the atmosphere beneath them, generate lift automagically, as the hotter gas expands it exerts more pressure on nearby surfaces.



Of course, the critter would need to cup the wings deeply to prevent escape of the heated gas... so the "flight" would be more like free ballooning - perhaps it's but one trick in the critter's flight methods - a way to do an equivalent to raising on thermals as hawks do absent an external thermal gradient - then your beastie closes wings behind and dives...






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137891%2fsuperheated-wing-blast%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    24












    $begingroup$

    A one mile long wing is big, I mean, REALLY big.



    Let's say the "offensive wing beat" starts with the wing pointing backwards and completes 180 degress later pointing forwards.



    The wing tip completes a full half circle with a one mile radius, so basically 3.14 miles.



    How long does a beat take? 1 minute? 1 second? 10 seconds? Lets go with 10 seconds.



    The wing tip will travel 3.14 miles in 10 seconds, or 1,884 miles per hour. The speed of sound - at sea level - is approx 770 miles per hour, so the wing tip is traveling at something like mach 2.5 during its rotation.



    So for each beat the wings are displacing a couple of cubic miles of air in those 10 seconds, I'm guessing there'll be a massive pressure wave similar to a nuclear blast traveling forwards from your mega bird.
    The secondary blast is from the air rushing in to replace that moved by the wing beat, dragging debris with it.



    I don't have enough physics to workout the actual forces involved, but the stored heat under the wings is the least of your worries.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Sounds a bit like Randall Monroe :)
      $endgroup$
      – Cerberus
      Jan 29 at 4:26






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Cerberus nah, if it was Randall, it'd be in comic form, with all the forces calculated ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Baldrickk
      Jan 29 at 9:18










    • $begingroup$
      @Baldrickk: Absoutely! My high-school science was 30 years ago, Randal Monroe I am not :)
      $endgroup$
      – Binary Worrier
      Jan 29 at 9:27






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      For some reason I can't stop laughing: Death by being kicked out from your own planet by a huge chicken gosh :)
      $endgroup$
      – Alma Do
      Jan 29 at 12:48






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Air works very differently at supersonic speeds from its behavior at subsonic speeds. I wonder if a supersonic wing flap even works...
      $endgroup$
      – KRyan
      Jan 29 at 15:15
















    24












    $begingroup$

    A one mile long wing is big, I mean, REALLY big.



    Let's say the "offensive wing beat" starts with the wing pointing backwards and completes 180 degress later pointing forwards.



    The wing tip completes a full half circle with a one mile radius, so basically 3.14 miles.



    How long does a beat take? 1 minute? 1 second? 10 seconds? Lets go with 10 seconds.



    The wing tip will travel 3.14 miles in 10 seconds, or 1,884 miles per hour. The speed of sound - at sea level - is approx 770 miles per hour, so the wing tip is traveling at something like mach 2.5 during its rotation.



    So for each beat the wings are displacing a couple of cubic miles of air in those 10 seconds, I'm guessing there'll be a massive pressure wave similar to a nuclear blast traveling forwards from your mega bird.
    The secondary blast is from the air rushing in to replace that moved by the wing beat, dragging debris with it.



    I don't have enough physics to workout the actual forces involved, but the stored heat under the wings is the least of your worries.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Sounds a bit like Randall Monroe :)
      $endgroup$
      – Cerberus
      Jan 29 at 4:26






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Cerberus nah, if it was Randall, it'd be in comic form, with all the forces calculated ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Baldrickk
      Jan 29 at 9:18










    • $begingroup$
      @Baldrickk: Absoutely! My high-school science was 30 years ago, Randal Monroe I am not :)
      $endgroup$
      – Binary Worrier
      Jan 29 at 9:27






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      For some reason I can't stop laughing: Death by being kicked out from your own planet by a huge chicken gosh :)
      $endgroup$
      – Alma Do
      Jan 29 at 12:48






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Air works very differently at supersonic speeds from its behavior at subsonic speeds. I wonder if a supersonic wing flap even works...
      $endgroup$
      – KRyan
      Jan 29 at 15:15














    24












    24








    24





    $begingroup$

    A one mile long wing is big, I mean, REALLY big.



    Let's say the "offensive wing beat" starts with the wing pointing backwards and completes 180 degress later pointing forwards.



    The wing tip completes a full half circle with a one mile radius, so basically 3.14 miles.



    How long does a beat take? 1 minute? 1 second? 10 seconds? Lets go with 10 seconds.



    The wing tip will travel 3.14 miles in 10 seconds, or 1,884 miles per hour. The speed of sound - at sea level - is approx 770 miles per hour, so the wing tip is traveling at something like mach 2.5 during its rotation.



    So for each beat the wings are displacing a couple of cubic miles of air in those 10 seconds, I'm guessing there'll be a massive pressure wave similar to a nuclear blast traveling forwards from your mega bird.
    The secondary blast is from the air rushing in to replace that moved by the wing beat, dragging debris with it.



    I don't have enough physics to workout the actual forces involved, but the stored heat under the wings is the least of your worries.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    A one mile long wing is big, I mean, REALLY big.



    Let's say the "offensive wing beat" starts with the wing pointing backwards and completes 180 degress later pointing forwards.



    The wing tip completes a full half circle with a one mile radius, so basically 3.14 miles.



    How long does a beat take? 1 minute? 1 second? 10 seconds? Lets go with 10 seconds.



    The wing tip will travel 3.14 miles in 10 seconds, or 1,884 miles per hour. The speed of sound - at sea level - is approx 770 miles per hour, so the wing tip is traveling at something like mach 2.5 during its rotation.



    So for each beat the wings are displacing a couple of cubic miles of air in those 10 seconds, I'm guessing there'll be a massive pressure wave similar to a nuclear blast traveling forwards from your mega bird.
    The secondary blast is from the air rushing in to replace that moved by the wing beat, dragging debris with it.



    I don't have enough physics to workout the actual forces involved, but the stored heat under the wings is the least of your worries.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jan 29 at 10:12

























    answered Jan 28 at 17:42









    Binary WorrierBinary Worrier

    2,000814




    2,000814








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Sounds a bit like Randall Monroe :)
      $endgroup$
      – Cerberus
      Jan 29 at 4:26






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Cerberus nah, if it was Randall, it'd be in comic form, with all the forces calculated ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Baldrickk
      Jan 29 at 9:18










    • $begingroup$
      @Baldrickk: Absoutely! My high-school science was 30 years ago, Randal Monroe I am not :)
      $endgroup$
      – Binary Worrier
      Jan 29 at 9:27






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      For some reason I can't stop laughing: Death by being kicked out from your own planet by a huge chicken gosh :)
      $endgroup$
      – Alma Do
      Jan 29 at 12:48






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Air works very differently at supersonic speeds from its behavior at subsonic speeds. I wonder if a supersonic wing flap even works...
      $endgroup$
      – KRyan
      Jan 29 at 15:15














    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Sounds a bit like Randall Monroe :)
      $endgroup$
      – Cerberus
      Jan 29 at 4:26






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Cerberus nah, if it was Randall, it'd be in comic form, with all the forces calculated ;)
      $endgroup$
      – Baldrickk
      Jan 29 at 9:18










    • $begingroup$
      @Baldrickk: Absoutely! My high-school science was 30 years ago, Randal Monroe I am not :)
      $endgroup$
      – Binary Worrier
      Jan 29 at 9:27






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      For some reason I can't stop laughing: Death by being kicked out from your own planet by a huge chicken gosh :)
      $endgroup$
      – Alma Do
      Jan 29 at 12:48






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Air works very differently at supersonic speeds from its behavior at subsonic speeds. I wonder if a supersonic wing flap even works...
      $endgroup$
      – KRyan
      Jan 29 at 15:15








    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    Sounds a bit like Randall Monroe :)
    $endgroup$
    – Cerberus
    Jan 29 at 4:26




    $begingroup$
    Sounds a bit like Randall Monroe :)
    $endgroup$
    – Cerberus
    Jan 29 at 4:26




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @Cerberus nah, if it was Randall, it'd be in comic form, with all the forces calculated ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Jan 29 at 9:18




    $begingroup$
    @Cerberus nah, if it was Randall, it'd be in comic form, with all the forces calculated ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Jan 29 at 9:18












    $begingroup$
    @Baldrickk: Absoutely! My high-school science was 30 years ago, Randal Monroe I am not :)
    $endgroup$
    – Binary Worrier
    Jan 29 at 9:27




    $begingroup$
    @Baldrickk: Absoutely! My high-school science was 30 years ago, Randal Monroe I am not :)
    $endgroup$
    – Binary Worrier
    Jan 29 at 9:27




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    For some reason I can't stop laughing: Death by being kicked out from your own planet by a huge chicken gosh :)
    $endgroup$
    – Alma Do
    Jan 29 at 12:48




    $begingroup$
    For some reason I can't stop laughing: Death by being kicked out from your own planet by a huge chicken gosh :)
    $endgroup$
    – Alma Do
    Jan 29 at 12:48




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Air works very differently at supersonic speeds from its behavior at subsonic speeds. I wonder if a supersonic wing flap even works...
    $endgroup$
    – KRyan
    Jan 29 at 15:15




    $begingroup$
    Air works very differently at supersonic speeds from its behavior at subsonic speeds. I wonder if a supersonic wing flap even works...
    $endgroup$
    – KRyan
    Jan 29 at 15:15











    18












    $begingroup$

    Edit



    jdunlop has repeatedly pointed out the flaws of my answer so even if you have read the answer please reread it because there have been a few significant changes made. (in the Energy real world comparison part and following, it's a more accurate formula)



    This simply is an expansion to Binary Worriers answer. (Math to display the true scale)



    This is not that accurate because there are a lot of assumptions but it is good to display the ballpark in which the forces are working.



    Values:




    • 1 mile (1,609.34 m) long wings

    • 10 seconds to move 3.14 miles (ca. 5,053 m)

    • we assume a 2:1 ratio in length to width so 0.5 miles (804.67 m) for our wing width

    • this gets us a surface area of 1294987.62 $m^2$ or 0.5 $miles^2$

    • A sphere of 1 mile (1,609.34 m) has a volume of 1.746 $cdot 10^{10}m^3$ or 4.189 $miles^3$

    • But our wing only has $frac {1}{4}$ of the diameter the volume drops accordingly to 4 364 877 255 $m^3$ or 1.05 $miles^3$

    • Lets reduce this by another 20% to adjust for imperfections of the wings and no full 180° flap of the wings (also wings don't tend to be perfectly shaped like the upper part of a circle). Which gives us 3 291 901 804 $m^3$ or 0.84 $miles^3$

    • Finally we need the weight of air which is 1.275 kg per $m^3$


    Math



    As Binary Worrier already explained the speed of each wing must be 1884 mph (3,032 km/h) to keep the numbers from exploding to astronomical scale we will assume that the wings already have this speed when starting to flap.



    Weight



    First we need the weight of the air which is our volume times the weight we already established. $1.275 kg cdot 3291901804 m^3 = 4,452,174,800 kg$ This is 8.90435 TIMES THE WEIGHT OF THE BURJI KHALIFA. (The tallest building in the world currently)



    Force



    To get the force we use this trusty formula: $F = m cdot a;$ F = force, m = mass, a = acceleration. Our acceleration is the speed of the wings divided by 10 (it takes 10 seconds for the wings to hit every air molecule in our designated volume) so 303.2 $km/h^2$ or 84.22222222 $frac {m}{s^2}$.



    So when plugged into our formula it looks like this: $F = 4452174800 kg cdot 84.22222 frac {m}{s^2} = 3.75 cdot 10^{11} N$ (N = Newton)



    Energy/Real world comparison (redone)



    Energy is $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ E = Energy, m = Mass, v = speed. Plugging our values in: $E = 0.5 cdot 4452174800 kg cdot 842.22222222^2 frac{m}{s} = 1.579 cdot 10^{15}j$ Which is about $3 cdot 10^{14}j$ less but still enough to supply the world in 2015 for 6 days. Or 6 times less than a standard hurricane releases per second.



    Edit V.2



    For the creature unleashing the attack with the rough approximation for the weight by jdunlop we can estimate the creatures speed by the same formula we used above: $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ this time we have to rearange it to get the speed: $v^2 = frac {E}{0.5 cdot m}$ again with our numbers: $v^2 = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 20 cdot 10^9 kg} = 157904.9$ because v is squared we have to take the root and get: 397.37 m/s or 1430.54 km/h or 894.01 mph.



    Conclusion (corrected weight comparison)



    Anything that faces this creature has far greater problems than the heat released by this creature. The much bigger problem for the attacked creature is if it doesn't weigh more than 25 311 cars (each 1000 kg or 1 metric ton) it will leave an earth like planet for ever because it will reach escape velocity. And even when both (the attacked and the attacker) weigh more these creatures have to somehow not hit the ground, mountain, or hill with supersonic speed.



    Additional Info



    For the weight in cars needed not to leave the planet I used the formula from above and re arranged it this way: $m = frac {E}{0.5 cdot v^2}$ for the escape velocity is 11170 m/s. Couldn't use my physics book to site it but used its value instead of Wikipedia's the values are close enough though. So with the values: $m = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 11170^2m/s} = 25310794 kg$ or 25 310.794 metric tons.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      That final number looks suspiciously on the order of a nuclear blast.... But the analysis is missing the force of air resistance (the standing air that the cupped air is pushing against) forcing cupped air to spill over the wings. I suspect only a fraction of the air we're talking about would actually make it to the intended target. Nevertheless, +1 for a wonderful effort that does show the scale of the problem.
      $endgroup$
      – JBH
      Jan 28 at 20:36










    • $begingroup$
      @JBH For simplicity I simply assumed that the lost air and the air resistance cancel each other out. But yeah for a higher accuracy this would be needed.
      $endgroup$
      – Soan
      Jan 28 at 20:42






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Soan - I can see why you might doubt that, but that's not the case! Buildings are actually not very dense at all, whereas organic beings are. Take, for example, an unladen european swallow. Weight: 20g. Wingspan: 21cm. So a 10 cm (approximately) wing. To reach a mile long, we have to multiply that by a factor of 10 666 (or approximately 10000, in fermi numbers). Its volume (and therefore mass) would be multiplied by that factor cubed, and therefore would be twenty trillion grams, twenty billion kg. Burji Khalifa? A paltry 453 million kg.
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:44






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      (For a reference for which I have the data, the Willis tower masses about 202 million kg, and has a volume of approximately 1.4 million cubic metres, giving it a density of ~0.14 relative to water. Your average critter, even birds, has a density much closer to that of water.)
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:51






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So, @Soan, my original comment was incorrect; a creature that big wouldn't weigh in the range of the BK - it would weigh much, much more.
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:53
















    18












    $begingroup$

    Edit



    jdunlop has repeatedly pointed out the flaws of my answer so even if you have read the answer please reread it because there have been a few significant changes made. (in the Energy real world comparison part and following, it's a more accurate formula)



    This simply is an expansion to Binary Worriers answer. (Math to display the true scale)



    This is not that accurate because there are a lot of assumptions but it is good to display the ballpark in which the forces are working.



    Values:




    • 1 mile (1,609.34 m) long wings

    • 10 seconds to move 3.14 miles (ca. 5,053 m)

    • we assume a 2:1 ratio in length to width so 0.5 miles (804.67 m) for our wing width

    • this gets us a surface area of 1294987.62 $m^2$ or 0.5 $miles^2$

    • A sphere of 1 mile (1,609.34 m) has a volume of 1.746 $cdot 10^{10}m^3$ or 4.189 $miles^3$

    • But our wing only has $frac {1}{4}$ of the diameter the volume drops accordingly to 4 364 877 255 $m^3$ or 1.05 $miles^3$

    • Lets reduce this by another 20% to adjust for imperfections of the wings and no full 180° flap of the wings (also wings don't tend to be perfectly shaped like the upper part of a circle). Which gives us 3 291 901 804 $m^3$ or 0.84 $miles^3$

    • Finally we need the weight of air which is 1.275 kg per $m^3$


    Math



    As Binary Worrier already explained the speed of each wing must be 1884 mph (3,032 km/h) to keep the numbers from exploding to astronomical scale we will assume that the wings already have this speed when starting to flap.



    Weight



    First we need the weight of the air which is our volume times the weight we already established. $1.275 kg cdot 3291901804 m^3 = 4,452,174,800 kg$ This is 8.90435 TIMES THE WEIGHT OF THE BURJI KHALIFA. (The tallest building in the world currently)



    Force



    To get the force we use this trusty formula: $F = m cdot a;$ F = force, m = mass, a = acceleration. Our acceleration is the speed of the wings divided by 10 (it takes 10 seconds for the wings to hit every air molecule in our designated volume) so 303.2 $km/h^2$ or 84.22222222 $frac {m}{s^2}$.



    So when plugged into our formula it looks like this: $F = 4452174800 kg cdot 84.22222 frac {m}{s^2} = 3.75 cdot 10^{11} N$ (N = Newton)



    Energy/Real world comparison (redone)



    Energy is $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ E = Energy, m = Mass, v = speed. Plugging our values in: $E = 0.5 cdot 4452174800 kg cdot 842.22222222^2 frac{m}{s} = 1.579 cdot 10^{15}j$ Which is about $3 cdot 10^{14}j$ less but still enough to supply the world in 2015 for 6 days. Or 6 times less than a standard hurricane releases per second.



    Edit V.2



    For the creature unleashing the attack with the rough approximation for the weight by jdunlop we can estimate the creatures speed by the same formula we used above: $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ this time we have to rearange it to get the speed: $v^2 = frac {E}{0.5 cdot m}$ again with our numbers: $v^2 = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 20 cdot 10^9 kg} = 157904.9$ because v is squared we have to take the root and get: 397.37 m/s or 1430.54 km/h or 894.01 mph.



    Conclusion (corrected weight comparison)



    Anything that faces this creature has far greater problems than the heat released by this creature. The much bigger problem for the attacked creature is if it doesn't weigh more than 25 311 cars (each 1000 kg or 1 metric ton) it will leave an earth like planet for ever because it will reach escape velocity. And even when both (the attacked and the attacker) weigh more these creatures have to somehow not hit the ground, mountain, or hill with supersonic speed.



    Additional Info



    For the weight in cars needed not to leave the planet I used the formula from above and re arranged it this way: $m = frac {E}{0.5 cdot v^2}$ for the escape velocity is 11170 m/s. Couldn't use my physics book to site it but used its value instead of Wikipedia's the values are close enough though. So with the values: $m = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 11170^2m/s} = 25310794 kg$ or 25 310.794 metric tons.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      That final number looks suspiciously on the order of a nuclear blast.... But the analysis is missing the force of air resistance (the standing air that the cupped air is pushing against) forcing cupped air to spill over the wings. I suspect only a fraction of the air we're talking about would actually make it to the intended target. Nevertheless, +1 for a wonderful effort that does show the scale of the problem.
      $endgroup$
      – JBH
      Jan 28 at 20:36










    • $begingroup$
      @JBH For simplicity I simply assumed that the lost air and the air resistance cancel each other out. But yeah for a higher accuracy this would be needed.
      $endgroup$
      – Soan
      Jan 28 at 20:42






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Soan - I can see why you might doubt that, but that's not the case! Buildings are actually not very dense at all, whereas organic beings are. Take, for example, an unladen european swallow. Weight: 20g. Wingspan: 21cm. So a 10 cm (approximately) wing. To reach a mile long, we have to multiply that by a factor of 10 666 (or approximately 10000, in fermi numbers). Its volume (and therefore mass) would be multiplied by that factor cubed, and therefore would be twenty trillion grams, twenty billion kg. Burji Khalifa? A paltry 453 million kg.
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:44






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      (For a reference for which I have the data, the Willis tower masses about 202 million kg, and has a volume of approximately 1.4 million cubic metres, giving it a density of ~0.14 relative to water. Your average critter, even birds, has a density much closer to that of water.)
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:51






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So, @Soan, my original comment was incorrect; a creature that big wouldn't weigh in the range of the BK - it would weigh much, much more.
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:53














    18












    18








    18





    $begingroup$

    Edit



    jdunlop has repeatedly pointed out the flaws of my answer so even if you have read the answer please reread it because there have been a few significant changes made. (in the Energy real world comparison part and following, it's a more accurate formula)



    This simply is an expansion to Binary Worriers answer. (Math to display the true scale)



    This is not that accurate because there are a lot of assumptions but it is good to display the ballpark in which the forces are working.



    Values:




    • 1 mile (1,609.34 m) long wings

    • 10 seconds to move 3.14 miles (ca. 5,053 m)

    • we assume a 2:1 ratio in length to width so 0.5 miles (804.67 m) for our wing width

    • this gets us a surface area of 1294987.62 $m^2$ or 0.5 $miles^2$

    • A sphere of 1 mile (1,609.34 m) has a volume of 1.746 $cdot 10^{10}m^3$ or 4.189 $miles^3$

    • But our wing only has $frac {1}{4}$ of the diameter the volume drops accordingly to 4 364 877 255 $m^3$ or 1.05 $miles^3$

    • Lets reduce this by another 20% to adjust for imperfections of the wings and no full 180° flap of the wings (also wings don't tend to be perfectly shaped like the upper part of a circle). Which gives us 3 291 901 804 $m^3$ or 0.84 $miles^3$

    • Finally we need the weight of air which is 1.275 kg per $m^3$


    Math



    As Binary Worrier already explained the speed of each wing must be 1884 mph (3,032 km/h) to keep the numbers from exploding to astronomical scale we will assume that the wings already have this speed when starting to flap.



    Weight



    First we need the weight of the air which is our volume times the weight we already established. $1.275 kg cdot 3291901804 m^3 = 4,452,174,800 kg$ This is 8.90435 TIMES THE WEIGHT OF THE BURJI KHALIFA. (The tallest building in the world currently)



    Force



    To get the force we use this trusty formula: $F = m cdot a;$ F = force, m = mass, a = acceleration. Our acceleration is the speed of the wings divided by 10 (it takes 10 seconds for the wings to hit every air molecule in our designated volume) so 303.2 $km/h^2$ or 84.22222222 $frac {m}{s^2}$.



    So when plugged into our formula it looks like this: $F = 4452174800 kg cdot 84.22222 frac {m}{s^2} = 3.75 cdot 10^{11} N$ (N = Newton)



    Energy/Real world comparison (redone)



    Energy is $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ E = Energy, m = Mass, v = speed. Plugging our values in: $E = 0.5 cdot 4452174800 kg cdot 842.22222222^2 frac{m}{s} = 1.579 cdot 10^{15}j$ Which is about $3 cdot 10^{14}j$ less but still enough to supply the world in 2015 for 6 days. Or 6 times less than a standard hurricane releases per second.



    Edit V.2



    For the creature unleashing the attack with the rough approximation for the weight by jdunlop we can estimate the creatures speed by the same formula we used above: $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ this time we have to rearange it to get the speed: $v^2 = frac {E}{0.5 cdot m}$ again with our numbers: $v^2 = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 20 cdot 10^9 kg} = 157904.9$ because v is squared we have to take the root and get: 397.37 m/s or 1430.54 km/h or 894.01 mph.



    Conclusion (corrected weight comparison)



    Anything that faces this creature has far greater problems than the heat released by this creature. The much bigger problem for the attacked creature is if it doesn't weigh more than 25 311 cars (each 1000 kg or 1 metric ton) it will leave an earth like planet for ever because it will reach escape velocity. And even when both (the attacked and the attacker) weigh more these creatures have to somehow not hit the ground, mountain, or hill with supersonic speed.



    Additional Info



    For the weight in cars needed not to leave the planet I used the formula from above and re arranged it this way: $m = frac {E}{0.5 cdot v^2}$ for the escape velocity is 11170 m/s. Couldn't use my physics book to site it but used its value instead of Wikipedia's the values are close enough though. So with the values: $m = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 11170^2m/s} = 25310794 kg$ or 25 310.794 metric tons.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Edit



    jdunlop has repeatedly pointed out the flaws of my answer so even if you have read the answer please reread it because there have been a few significant changes made. (in the Energy real world comparison part and following, it's a more accurate formula)



    This simply is an expansion to Binary Worriers answer. (Math to display the true scale)



    This is not that accurate because there are a lot of assumptions but it is good to display the ballpark in which the forces are working.



    Values:




    • 1 mile (1,609.34 m) long wings

    • 10 seconds to move 3.14 miles (ca. 5,053 m)

    • we assume a 2:1 ratio in length to width so 0.5 miles (804.67 m) for our wing width

    • this gets us a surface area of 1294987.62 $m^2$ or 0.5 $miles^2$

    • A sphere of 1 mile (1,609.34 m) has a volume of 1.746 $cdot 10^{10}m^3$ or 4.189 $miles^3$

    • But our wing only has $frac {1}{4}$ of the diameter the volume drops accordingly to 4 364 877 255 $m^3$ or 1.05 $miles^3$

    • Lets reduce this by another 20% to adjust for imperfections of the wings and no full 180° flap of the wings (also wings don't tend to be perfectly shaped like the upper part of a circle). Which gives us 3 291 901 804 $m^3$ or 0.84 $miles^3$

    • Finally we need the weight of air which is 1.275 kg per $m^3$


    Math



    As Binary Worrier already explained the speed of each wing must be 1884 mph (3,032 km/h) to keep the numbers from exploding to astronomical scale we will assume that the wings already have this speed when starting to flap.



    Weight



    First we need the weight of the air which is our volume times the weight we already established. $1.275 kg cdot 3291901804 m^3 = 4,452,174,800 kg$ This is 8.90435 TIMES THE WEIGHT OF THE BURJI KHALIFA. (The tallest building in the world currently)



    Force



    To get the force we use this trusty formula: $F = m cdot a;$ F = force, m = mass, a = acceleration. Our acceleration is the speed of the wings divided by 10 (it takes 10 seconds for the wings to hit every air molecule in our designated volume) so 303.2 $km/h^2$ or 84.22222222 $frac {m}{s^2}$.



    So when plugged into our formula it looks like this: $F = 4452174800 kg cdot 84.22222 frac {m}{s^2} = 3.75 cdot 10^{11} N$ (N = Newton)



    Energy/Real world comparison (redone)



    Energy is $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ E = Energy, m = Mass, v = speed. Plugging our values in: $E = 0.5 cdot 4452174800 kg cdot 842.22222222^2 frac{m}{s} = 1.579 cdot 10^{15}j$ Which is about $3 cdot 10^{14}j$ less but still enough to supply the world in 2015 for 6 days. Or 6 times less than a standard hurricane releases per second.



    Edit V.2



    For the creature unleashing the attack with the rough approximation for the weight by jdunlop we can estimate the creatures speed by the same formula we used above: $E = 0.5 cdot m cdot v^2$ this time we have to rearange it to get the speed: $v^2 = frac {E}{0.5 cdot m}$ again with our numbers: $v^2 = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 20 cdot 10^9 kg} = 157904.9$ because v is squared we have to take the root and get: 397.37 m/s or 1430.54 km/h or 894.01 mph.



    Conclusion (corrected weight comparison)



    Anything that faces this creature has far greater problems than the heat released by this creature. The much bigger problem for the attacked creature is if it doesn't weigh more than 25 311 cars (each 1000 kg or 1 metric ton) it will leave an earth like planet for ever because it will reach escape velocity. And even when both (the attacked and the attacker) weigh more these creatures have to somehow not hit the ground, mountain, or hill with supersonic speed.



    Additional Info



    For the weight in cars needed not to leave the planet I used the formula from above and re arranged it this way: $m = frac {E}{0.5 cdot v^2}$ for the escape velocity is 11170 m/s. Couldn't use my physics book to site it but used its value instead of Wikipedia's the values are close enough though. So with the values: $m = frac {1.579 cdot 10^{15}j}{0.5 cdot 11170^2m/s} = 25310794 kg$ or 25 310.794 metric tons.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jan 29 at 20:52

























    answered Jan 28 at 19:41









    SoanSoan

    2,732422




    2,732422








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      That final number looks suspiciously on the order of a nuclear blast.... But the analysis is missing the force of air resistance (the standing air that the cupped air is pushing against) forcing cupped air to spill over the wings. I suspect only a fraction of the air we're talking about would actually make it to the intended target. Nevertheless, +1 for a wonderful effort that does show the scale of the problem.
      $endgroup$
      – JBH
      Jan 28 at 20:36










    • $begingroup$
      @JBH For simplicity I simply assumed that the lost air and the air resistance cancel each other out. But yeah for a higher accuracy this would be needed.
      $endgroup$
      – Soan
      Jan 28 at 20:42






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Soan - I can see why you might doubt that, but that's not the case! Buildings are actually not very dense at all, whereas organic beings are. Take, for example, an unladen european swallow. Weight: 20g. Wingspan: 21cm. So a 10 cm (approximately) wing. To reach a mile long, we have to multiply that by a factor of 10 666 (or approximately 10000, in fermi numbers). Its volume (and therefore mass) would be multiplied by that factor cubed, and therefore would be twenty trillion grams, twenty billion kg. Burji Khalifa? A paltry 453 million kg.
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:44






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      (For a reference for which I have the data, the Willis tower masses about 202 million kg, and has a volume of approximately 1.4 million cubic metres, giving it a density of ~0.14 relative to water. Your average critter, even birds, has a density much closer to that of water.)
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:51






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So, @Soan, my original comment was incorrect; a creature that big wouldn't weigh in the range of the BK - it would weigh much, much more.
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:53














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      That final number looks suspiciously on the order of a nuclear blast.... But the analysis is missing the force of air resistance (the standing air that the cupped air is pushing against) forcing cupped air to spill over the wings. I suspect only a fraction of the air we're talking about would actually make it to the intended target. Nevertheless, +1 for a wonderful effort that does show the scale of the problem.
      $endgroup$
      – JBH
      Jan 28 at 20:36










    • $begingroup$
      @JBH For simplicity I simply assumed that the lost air and the air resistance cancel each other out. But yeah for a higher accuracy this would be needed.
      $endgroup$
      – Soan
      Jan 28 at 20:42






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Soan - I can see why you might doubt that, but that's not the case! Buildings are actually not very dense at all, whereas organic beings are. Take, for example, an unladen european swallow. Weight: 20g. Wingspan: 21cm. So a 10 cm (approximately) wing. To reach a mile long, we have to multiply that by a factor of 10 666 (or approximately 10000, in fermi numbers). Its volume (and therefore mass) would be multiplied by that factor cubed, and therefore would be twenty trillion grams, twenty billion kg. Burji Khalifa? A paltry 453 million kg.
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:44






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      (For a reference for which I have the data, the Willis tower masses about 202 million kg, and has a volume of approximately 1.4 million cubic metres, giving it a density of ~0.14 relative to water. Your average critter, even birds, has a density much closer to that of water.)
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:51






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So, @Soan, my original comment was incorrect; a creature that big wouldn't weigh in the range of the BK - it would weigh much, much more.
      $endgroup$
      – jdunlop
      Jan 28 at 21:53








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    That final number looks suspiciously on the order of a nuclear blast.... But the analysis is missing the force of air resistance (the standing air that the cupped air is pushing against) forcing cupped air to spill over the wings. I suspect only a fraction of the air we're talking about would actually make it to the intended target. Nevertheless, +1 for a wonderful effort that does show the scale of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 20:36




    $begingroup$
    That final number looks suspiciously on the order of a nuclear blast.... But the analysis is missing the force of air resistance (the standing air that the cupped air is pushing against) forcing cupped air to spill over the wings. I suspect only a fraction of the air we're talking about would actually make it to the intended target. Nevertheless, +1 for a wonderful effort that does show the scale of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jan 28 at 20:36












    $begingroup$
    @JBH For simplicity I simply assumed that the lost air and the air resistance cancel each other out. But yeah for a higher accuracy this would be needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Soan
    Jan 28 at 20:42




    $begingroup$
    @JBH For simplicity I simply assumed that the lost air and the air resistance cancel each other out. But yeah for a higher accuracy this would be needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Soan
    Jan 28 at 20:42




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @Soan - I can see why you might doubt that, but that's not the case! Buildings are actually not very dense at all, whereas organic beings are. Take, for example, an unladen european swallow. Weight: 20g. Wingspan: 21cm. So a 10 cm (approximately) wing. To reach a mile long, we have to multiply that by a factor of 10 666 (or approximately 10000, in fermi numbers). Its volume (and therefore mass) would be multiplied by that factor cubed, and therefore would be twenty trillion grams, twenty billion kg. Burji Khalifa? A paltry 453 million kg.
    $endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Jan 28 at 21:44




    $begingroup$
    @Soan - I can see why you might doubt that, but that's not the case! Buildings are actually not very dense at all, whereas organic beings are. Take, for example, an unladen european swallow. Weight: 20g. Wingspan: 21cm. So a 10 cm (approximately) wing. To reach a mile long, we have to multiply that by a factor of 10 666 (or approximately 10000, in fermi numbers). Its volume (and therefore mass) would be multiplied by that factor cubed, and therefore would be twenty trillion grams, twenty billion kg. Burji Khalifa? A paltry 453 million kg.
    $endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Jan 28 at 21:44




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    (For a reference for which I have the data, the Willis tower masses about 202 million kg, and has a volume of approximately 1.4 million cubic metres, giving it a density of ~0.14 relative to water. Your average critter, even birds, has a density much closer to that of water.)
    $endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Jan 28 at 21:51




    $begingroup$
    (For a reference for which I have the data, the Willis tower masses about 202 million kg, and has a volume of approximately 1.4 million cubic metres, giving it a density of ~0.14 relative to water. Your average critter, even birds, has a density much closer to that of water.)
    $endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Jan 28 at 21:51




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    So, @Soan, my original comment was incorrect; a creature that big wouldn't weigh in the range of the BK - it would weigh much, much more.
    $endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Jan 28 at 21:53




    $begingroup$
    So, @Soan, my original comment was incorrect; a creature that big wouldn't weigh in the range of the BK - it would weigh much, much more.
    $endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Jan 28 at 21:53











    6












    $begingroup$

    I agree with Binary Worrier's analysis, however: assuming this critter is in fact your 2-mile long nuclear dragon from an earlier question, the generation of massive amounts of heat under the wing surface helps answer the "how the hell does it FLY??" question very nicely - lift generation in a typical wing is driven by pressure differential between the lower straighter surface and the upper more curved surface of a wing (the air moves faster over the curved section and as a result, the 90 pressure against the wing itself is lessened, this more pressure beneath the wing) and secondarily through angle of attack dynamics, and in highly mobile wings on certain birds, root twist and other considerations. Your Nuke-dragon's excess heat radiators, in heating up the atmosphere beneath them, generate lift automagically, as the hotter gas expands it exerts more pressure on nearby surfaces.



    Of course, the critter would need to cup the wings deeply to prevent escape of the heated gas... so the "flight" would be more like free ballooning - perhaps it's but one trick in the critter's flight methods - a way to do an equivalent to raising on thermals as hawks do absent an external thermal gradient - then your beastie closes wings behind and dives...






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      6












      $begingroup$

      I agree with Binary Worrier's analysis, however: assuming this critter is in fact your 2-mile long nuclear dragon from an earlier question, the generation of massive amounts of heat under the wing surface helps answer the "how the hell does it FLY??" question very nicely - lift generation in a typical wing is driven by pressure differential between the lower straighter surface and the upper more curved surface of a wing (the air moves faster over the curved section and as a result, the 90 pressure against the wing itself is lessened, this more pressure beneath the wing) and secondarily through angle of attack dynamics, and in highly mobile wings on certain birds, root twist and other considerations. Your Nuke-dragon's excess heat radiators, in heating up the atmosphere beneath them, generate lift automagically, as the hotter gas expands it exerts more pressure on nearby surfaces.



      Of course, the critter would need to cup the wings deeply to prevent escape of the heated gas... so the "flight" would be more like free ballooning - perhaps it's but one trick in the critter's flight methods - a way to do an equivalent to raising on thermals as hawks do absent an external thermal gradient - then your beastie closes wings behind and dives...






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        I agree with Binary Worrier's analysis, however: assuming this critter is in fact your 2-mile long nuclear dragon from an earlier question, the generation of massive amounts of heat under the wing surface helps answer the "how the hell does it FLY??" question very nicely - lift generation in a typical wing is driven by pressure differential between the lower straighter surface and the upper more curved surface of a wing (the air moves faster over the curved section and as a result, the 90 pressure against the wing itself is lessened, this more pressure beneath the wing) and secondarily through angle of attack dynamics, and in highly mobile wings on certain birds, root twist and other considerations. Your Nuke-dragon's excess heat radiators, in heating up the atmosphere beneath them, generate lift automagically, as the hotter gas expands it exerts more pressure on nearby surfaces.



        Of course, the critter would need to cup the wings deeply to prevent escape of the heated gas... so the "flight" would be more like free ballooning - perhaps it's but one trick in the critter's flight methods - a way to do an equivalent to raising on thermals as hawks do absent an external thermal gradient - then your beastie closes wings behind and dives...






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        I agree with Binary Worrier's analysis, however: assuming this critter is in fact your 2-mile long nuclear dragon from an earlier question, the generation of massive amounts of heat under the wing surface helps answer the "how the hell does it FLY??" question very nicely - lift generation in a typical wing is driven by pressure differential between the lower straighter surface and the upper more curved surface of a wing (the air moves faster over the curved section and as a result, the 90 pressure against the wing itself is lessened, this more pressure beneath the wing) and secondarily through angle of attack dynamics, and in highly mobile wings on certain birds, root twist and other considerations. Your Nuke-dragon's excess heat radiators, in heating up the atmosphere beneath them, generate lift automagically, as the hotter gas expands it exerts more pressure on nearby surfaces.



        Of course, the critter would need to cup the wings deeply to prevent escape of the heated gas... so the "flight" would be more like free ballooning - perhaps it's but one trick in the critter's flight methods - a way to do an equivalent to raising on thermals as hawks do absent an external thermal gradient - then your beastie closes wings behind and dives...







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jan 29 at 8:18









        Separatrix

        83k31194324




        83k31194324










        answered Jan 28 at 19:29









        GerardFallaGerardFalla

        3,730525




        3,730525






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137891%2fsuperheated-wing-blast%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Image
            0 0 $begingroup$ Need help with this problem. Suppose our lazy professor collects a quiz and a homework assignment from a class of n students one day, then distributes both the quizzes and the homework assignments back to the class in a random fashion for grading. Each student receives one quiz and one homework assignment to grade. (a) What is the probability that every student receives someone else's quiz to grade, and someone else's homework to grade? (b) What is the probability that no student receives both their own quiz and their own homework assignment to grade? In this case, some students may receive their own quiz, and others may receive their own homework assignment. (c) Compute the limiting probability as n approaches infinity in each case. ...
            Read more

            Aardman Animations

            Image
            Aardman Animations, Ltd. Aardman Animations Tipo privada Atividade Animação em stop-motion , Animação em CGI Fundação 1972 Fundador(es) Peter Lord David Sproxton Sede Bristol, Inglaterra  Reino Unido Proprietário(s) Dreamworks Pessoas-chave Peter Lord David Sproxton Nick Park Divisões Aardman Features Aardman Digital Aardman Commercials Aardman Broadcast Aardman International Aardman Rights Aardman Effects Aardman 3-D Systems Aardman Nathan Love AardBoiled Website oficial aardman.com ...
            Read more

            Are they similar matrix

            Image
            0 $begingroup$ Do $begin{bmatrix} 0&i&0\0&0&1\0&0&0 end{bmatrix} $ and $begin{bmatrix} 0&0&0\-i&0&0\0&1&0 end{bmatrix} $ are similar.Is this True/false Clearly both are nilpotent and one is conjucate transpose of other but how to know if they are similar.i'm stuck. Please help me linear-algebra vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors generalizedeigenvector share | cite | improve this question edited Dec 10 '18 at 6:38 Vasanth Kris asked Dec 10 '18 at 6:19 ...
            Read more