Two stability of normal random variable detailed explanation












0












$begingroup$


I am reading about two stability of normal random variable and I am super confused (no good background in stats or calc), but I really need to understand it. Please, see the following:
enter image description here



I first got stuck on "By definition, $f_z(z) = int f_x(z-y) f_y(y) dy$"



Could someone explain me how we get $f_z$ ? I do not really understand the intuition behind the integral. I am further confused about the computation. It would be great if you could show me intermediate steps of this computation (integral) so I can follow. I will really appreciate!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is a convolution (the keyword might help): summing independent random variables corresponds to doing a convolution of their probability density functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Clement C.
    Dec 16 '18 at 2:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm a little disturbed that the "claim" fails to mention that $X$ and $Y$ are independent.
    $endgroup$
    – zoidberg
    Dec 16 '18 at 2:48










  • $begingroup$
    @ClementC. thanks for the reference!
    $endgroup$
    – YohanRoth
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:21
















0












$begingroup$


I am reading about two stability of normal random variable and I am super confused (no good background in stats or calc), but I really need to understand it. Please, see the following:
enter image description here



I first got stuck on "By definition, $f_z(z) = int f_x(z-y) f_y(y) dy$"



Could someone explain me how we get $f_z$ ? I do not really understand the intuition behind the integral. I am further confused about the computation. It would be great if you could show me intermediate steps of this computation (integral) so I can follow. I will really appreciate!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is a convolution (the keyword might help): summing independent random variables corresponds to doing a convolution of their probability density functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Clement C.
    Dec 16 '18 at 2:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm a little disturbed that the "claim" fails to mention that $X$ and $Y$ are independent.
    $endgroup$
    – zoidberg
    Dec 16 '18 at 2:48










  • $begingroup$
    @ClementC. thanks for the reference!
    $endgroup$
    – YohanRoth
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:21














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am reading about two stability of normal random variable and I am super confused (no good background in stats or calc), but I really need to understand it. Please, see the following:
enter image description here



I first got stuck on "By definition, $f_z(z) = int f_x(z-y) f_y(y) dy$"



Could someone explain me how we get $f_z$ ? I do not really understand the intuition behind the integral. I am further confused about the computation. It would be great if you could show me intermediate steps of this computation (integral) so I can follow. I will really appreciate!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am reading about two stability of normal random variable and I am super confused (no good background in stats or calc), but I really need to understand it. Please, see the following:
enter image description here



I first got stuck on "By definition, $f_z(z) = int f_x(z-y) f_y(y) dy$"



Could someone explain me how we get $f_z$ ? I do not really understand the intuition behind the integral. I am further confused about the computation. It would be great if you could show me intermediate steps of this computation (integral) so I can follow. I will really appreciate!







calculus probability statistics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 16 '18 at 1:54









YohanRothYohanRoth

6381714




6381714












  • $begingroup$
    It is a convolution (the keyword might help): summing independent random variables corresponds to doing a convolution of their probability density functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Clement C.
    Dec 16 '18 at 2:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm a little disturbed that the "claim" fails to mention that $X$ and $Y$ are independent.
    $endgroup$
    – zoidberg
    Dec 16 '18 at 2:48










  • $begingroup$
    @ClementC. thanks for the reference!
    $endgroup$
    – YohanRoth
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:21


















  • $begingroup$
    It is a convolution (the keyword might help): summing independent random variables corresponds to doing a convolution of their probability density functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Clement C.
    Dec 16 '18 at 2:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm a little disturbed that the "claim" fails to mention that $X$ and $Y$ are independent.
    $endgroup$
    – zoidberg
    Dec 16 '18 at 2:48










  • $begingroup$
    @ClementC. thanks for the reference!
    $endgroup$
    – YohanRoth
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:21
















$begingroup$
It is a convolution (the keyword might help): summing independent random variables corresponds to doing a convolution of their probability density functions.
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 16 '18 at 2:03




$begingroup$
It is a convolution (the keyword might help): summing independent random variables corresponds to doing a convolution of their probability density functions.
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 16 '18 at 2:03




1




1




$begingroup$
I'm a little disturbed that the "claim" fails to mention that $X$ and $Y$ are independent.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 16 '18 at 2:48




$begingroup$
I'm a little disturbed that the "claim" fails to mention that $X$ and $Y$ are independent.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 16 '18 at 2:48












$begingroup$
@ClementC. thanks for the reference!
$endgroup$
– YohanRoth
Dec 16 '18 at 4:21




$begingroup$
@ClementC. thanks for the reference!
$endgroup$
– YohanRoth
Dec 16 '18 at 4:21










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042151%2ftwo-stability-of-normal-random-variable-detailed-explanation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042151%2ftwo-stability-of-normal-random-variable-detailed-explanation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

When does type information flow backwards in C++?

Grease: Live!