Cyclotomic fields and splitting of central simple algebras












2












$begingroup$


Let $K$ be a cyclotomic field of degree $n$ and $A$ a central simple algebra over $mathbb{Q}$ of dimension $n^2$. How can one determine whether there is a $mathbb{Q}$-algebra embedding $K hookrightarrow A$?



This is equivalent to asking whether $A otimes_{mathbb{Q}} K simeq M_n(K)$. Is there a local-to-global principle that can be used?



If, for example, $A simeq M_n(D)$ where $D$ is a quaternion algebra over $mathbb{Q}$, is there a simple criterion relating subfields of $K$ and splitting fields of $D$?



Any reference to a similar example where this is worked out would be greatly appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $K$ be a cyclotomic field of degree $n$ and $A$ a central simple algebra over $mathbb{Q}$ of dimension $n^2$. How can one determine whether there is a $mathbb{Q}$-algebra embedding $K hookrightarrow A$?



    This is equivalent to asking whether $A otimes_{mathbb{Q}} K simeq M_n(K)$. Is there a local-to-global principle that can be used?



    If, for example, $A simeq M_n(D)$ where $D$ is a quaternion algebra over $mathbb{Q}$, is there a simple criterion relating subfields of $K$ and splitting fields of $D$?



    Any reference to a similar example where this is worked out would be greatly appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Let $K$ be a cyclotomic field of degree $n$ and $A$ a central simple algebra over $mathbb{Q}$ of dimension $n^2$. How can one determine whether there is a $mathbb{Q}$-algebra embedding $K hookrightarrow A$?



      This is equivalent to asking whether $A otimes_{mathbb{Q}} K simeq M_n(K)$. Is there a local-to-global principle that can be used?



      If, for example, $A simeq M_n(D)$ where $D$ is a quaternion algebra over $mathbb{Q}$, is there a simple criterion relating subfields of $K$ and splitting fields of $D$?



      Any reference to a similar example where this is worked out would be greatly appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $K$ be a cyclotomic field of degree $n$ and $A$ a central simple algebra over $mathbb{Q}$ of dimension $n^2$. How can one determine whether there is a $mathbb{Q}$-algebra embedding $K hookrightarrow A$?



      This is equivalent to asking whether $A otimes_{mathbb{Q}} K simeq M_n(K)$. Is there a local-to-global principle that can be used?



      If, for example, $A simeq M_n(D)$ where $D$ is a quaternion algebra over $mathbb{Q}$, is there a simple criterion relating subfields of $K$ and splitting fields of $D$?



      Any reference to a similar example where this is worked out would be greatly appreciated!







      nt.number-theory ra.rings-and-algebras central-simple-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 28 at 14:23









      Sun RaSun Ra

      532




      532






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          I believe that the characterization you are after is a more or less straightforward consequence of the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem and recommend that you take a look at Chapter 32 of Reiner's book Maximal Orders. The chapter is entitled "Splitting of Simple Algebras" and covers the subject in great detail.



          Let $F$ be a number field and $A$ be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over $F$. Given a prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ (possibly infinite) denote by $m_frak{p}$ the local index of $A$ at $mathfrak{p}$ (i.e., the degree of the division algebra part of $Aotimes_F F_mathfrak{p}$).



          The following is Theorem 32.15 of Reiner.



          Theorem. Let $L$ be a finite extension of $F$. Then $L$ is a splitting field for $A$ if and only if for every prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ and prime $mathfrak P$ of $L$ lying above $mathfrak p$, we have:
          begin{equation}
          m_{mathfrak p}mid [L_mathfrak P:F_mathfrak p].
          end{equation}






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Perhaps I am misunderstanding the definition of local index, but if I take $A/mathbb{Q}$ a quaternion algebra ramified at $p$, then $m_p=4$. So for a quadratic extension $L$ to split $A$, we would need $4|[L_mathfrak{p}:mathbb{Q}]$ which is impossible. Sorry for the confusion, I must be missing something.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            @SunRa - If $A$ is a rational quaternion algebra ramified at $p$ then the local index of $A$ at $p$ is $2=sqrt{4}=sqrt{dim(Aotimes_{mathbb Q} mathbb Q_p)}$. In general the local index is the degree (=square root of dimension) of the division algebra part of the central simple algebra, i.e., the division algebra $D$ for which your algebra is of the form $M_n(D)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Linowitz
            Feb 5 at 15:30












          • $begingroup$
            That makes a lot more sense. Thanks, this is just the sort of criterion I was looking for.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 17:28











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f321892%2fcyclotomic-fields-and-splitting-of-central-simple-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          I believe that the characterization you are after is a more or less straightforward consequence of the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem and recommend that you take a look at Chapter 32 of Reiner's book Maximal Orders. The chapter is entitled "Splitting of Simple Algebras" and covers the subject in great detail.



          Let $F$ be a number field and $A$ be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over $F$. Given a prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ (possibly infinite) denote by $m_frak{p}$ the local index of $A$ at $mathfrak{p}$ (i.e., the degree of the division algebra part of $Aotimes_F F_mathfrak{p}$).



          The following is Theorem 32.15 of Reiner.



          Theorem. Let $L$ be a finite extension of $F$. Then $L$ is a splitting field for $A$ if and only if for every prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ and prime $mathfrak P$ of $L$ lying above $mathfrak p$, we have:
          begin{equation}
          m_{mathfrak p}mid [L_mathfrak P:F_mathfrak p].
          end{equation}






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Perhaps I am misunderstanding the definition of local index, but if I take $A/mathbb{Q}$ a quaternion algebra ramified at $p$, then $m_p=4$. So for a quadratic extension $L$ to split $A$, we would need $4|[L_mathfrak{p}:mathbb{Q}]$ which is impossible. Sorry for the confusion, I must be missing something.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            @SunRa - If $A$ is a rational quaternion algebra ramified at $p$ then the local index of $A$ at $p$ is $2=sqrt{4}=sqrt{dim(Aotimes_{mathbb Q} mathbb Q_p)}$. In general the local index is the degree (=square root of dimension) of the division algebra part of the central simple algebra, i.e., the division algebra $D$ for which your algebra is of the form $M_n(D)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Linowitz
            Feb 5 at 15:30












          • $begingroup$
            That makes a lot more sense. Thanks, this is just the sort of criterion I was looking for.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 17:28
















          5












          $begingroup$

          I believe that the characterization you are after is a more or less straightforward consequence of the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem and recommend that you take a look at Chapter 32 of Reiner's book Maximal Orders. The chapter is entitled "Splitting of Simple Algebras" and covers the subject in great detail.



          Let $F$ be a number field and $A$ be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over $F$. Given a prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ (possibly infinite) denote by $m_frak{p}$ the local index of $A$ at $mathfrak{p}$ (i.e., the degree of the division algebra part of $Aotimes_F F_mathfrak{p}$).



          The following is Theorem 32.15 of Reiner.



          Theorem. Let $L$ be a finite extension of $F$. Then $L$ is a splitting field for $A$ if and only if for every prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ and prime $mathfrak P$ of $L$ lying above $mathfrak p$, we have:
          begin{equation}
          m_{mathfrak p}mid [L_mathfrak P:F_mathfrak p].
          end{equation}






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Perhaps I am misunderstanding the definition of local index, but if I take $A/mathbb{Q}$ a quaternion algebra ramified at $p$, then $m_p=4$. So for a quadratic extension $L$ to split $A$, we would need $4|[L_mathfrak{p}:mathbb{Q}]$ which is impossible. Sorry for the confusion, I must be missing something.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            @SunRa - If $A$ is a rational quaternion algebra ramified at $p$ then the local index of $A$ at $p$ is $2=sqrt{4}=sqrt{dim(Aotimes_{mathbb Q} mathbb Q_p)}$. In general the local index is the degree (=square root of dimension) of the division algebra part of the central simple algebra, i.e., the division algebra $D$ for which your algebra is of the form $M_n(D)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Linowitz
            Feb 5 at 15:30












          • $begingroup$
            That makes a lot more sense. Thanks, this is just the sort of criterion I was looking for.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 17:28














          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          I believe that the characterization you are after is a more or less straightforward consequence of the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem and recommend that you take a look at Chapter 32 of Reiner's book Maximal Orders. The chapter is entitled "Splitting of Simple Algebras" and covers the subject in great detail.



          Let $F$ be a number field and $A$ be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over $F$. Given a prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ (possibly infinite) denote by $m_frak{p}$ the local index of $A$ at $mathfrak{p}$ (i.e., the degree of the division algebra part of $Aotimes_F F_mathfrak{p}$).



          The following is Theorem 32.15 of Reiner.



          Theorem. Let $L$ be a finite extension of $F$. Then $L$ is a splitting field for $A$ if and only if for every prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ and prime $mathfrak P$ of $L$ lying above $mathfrak p$, we have:
          begin{equation}
          m_{mathfrak p}mid [L_mathfrak P:F_mathfrak p].
          end{equation}






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          I believe that the characterization you are after is a more or less straightforward consequence of the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem and recommend that you take a look at Chapter 32 of Reiner's book Maximal Orders. The chapter is entitled "Splitting of Simple Algebras" and covers the subject in great detail.



          Let $F$ be a number field and $A$ be a finite dimensional central simple algebra over $F$. Given a prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ (possibly infinite) denote by $m_frak{p}$ the local index of $A$ at $mathfrak{p}$ (i.e., the degree of the division algebra part of $Aotimes_F F_mathfrak{p}$).



          The following is Theorem 32.15 of Reiner.



          Theorem. Let $L$ be a finite extension of $F$. Then $L$ is a splitting field for $A$ if and only if for every prime $mathfrak p$ of $F$ and prime $mathfrak P$ of $L$ lying above $mathfrak p$, we have:
          begin{equation}
          m_{mathfrak p}mid [L_mathfrak P:F_mathfrak p].
          end{equation}







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 29 at 13:20

























          answered Jan 28 at 14:48









          Ben LinowitzBen Linowitz

          5,96913255




          5,96913255












          • $begingroup$
            Perhaps I am misunderstanding the definition of local index, but if I take $A/mathbb{Q}$ a quaternion algebra ramified at $p$, then $m_p=4$. So for a quadratic extension $L$ to split $A$, we would need $4|[L_mathfrak{p}:mathbb{Q}]$ which is impossible. Sorry for the confusion, I must be missing something.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            @SunRa - If $A$ is a rational quaternion algebra ramified at $p$ then the local index of $A$ at $p$ is $2=sqrt{4}=sqrt{dim(Aotimes_{mathbb Q} mathbb Q_p)}$. In general the local index is the degree (=square root of dimension) of the division algebra part of the central simple algebra, i.e., the division algebra $D$ for which your algebra is of the form $M_n(D)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Linowitz
            Feb 5 at 15:30












          • $begingroup$
            That makes a lot more sense. Thanks, this is just the sort of criterion I was looking for.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 17:28


















          • $begingroup$
            Perhaps I am misunderstanding the definition of local index, but if I take $A/mathbb{Q}$ a quaternion algebra ramified at $p$, then $m_p=4$. So for a quadratic extension $L$ to split $A$, we would need $4|[L_mathfrak{p}:mathbb{Q}]$ which is impossible. Sorry for the confusion, I must be missing something.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 14:52










          • $begingroup$
            @SunRa - If $A$ is a rational quaternion algebra ramified at $p$ then the local index of $A$ at $p$ is $2=sqrt{4}=sqrt{dim(Aotimes_{mathbb Q} mathbb Q_p)}$. In general the local index is the degree (=square root of dimension) of the division algebra part of the central simple algebra, i.e., the division algebra $D$ for which your algebra is of the form $M_n(D)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Linowitz
            Feb 5 at 15:30












          • $begingroup$
            That makes a lot more sense. Thanks, this is just the sort of criterion I was looking for.
            $endgroup$
            – Sun Ra
            Feb 5 at 17:28
















          $begingroup$
          Perhaps I am misunderstanding the definition of local index, but if I take $A/mathbb{Q}$ a quaternion algebra ramified at $p$, then $m_p=4$. So for a quadratic extension $L$ to split $A$, we would need $4|[L_mathfrak{p}:mathbb{Q}]$ which is impossible. Sorry for the confusion, I must be missing something.
          $endgroup$
          – Sun Ra
          Feb 5 at 14:52




          $begingroup$
          Perhaps I am misunderstanding the definition of local index, but if I take $A/mathbb{Q}$ a quaternion algebra ramified at $p$, then $m_p=4$. So for a quadratic extension $L$ to split $A$, we would need $4|[L_mathfrak{p}:mathbb{Q}]$ which is impossible. Sorry for the confusion, I must be missing something.
          $endgroup$
          – Sun Ra
          Feb 5 at 14:52












          $begingroup$
          @SunRa - If $A$ is a rational quaternion algebra ramified at $p$ then the local index of $A$ at $p$ is $2=sqrt{4}=sqrt{dim(Aotimes_{mathbb Q} mathbb Q_p)}$. In general the local index is the degree (=square root of dimension) of the division algebra part of the central simple algebra, i.e., the division algebra $D$ for which your algebra is of the form $M_n(D)$.
          $endgroup$
          – Ben Linowitz
          Feb 5 at 15:30






          $begingroup$
          @SunRa - If $A$ is a rational quaternion algebra ramified at $p$ then the local index of $A$ at $p$ is $2=sqrt{4}=sqrt{dim(Aotimes_{mathbb Q} mathbb Q_p)}$. In general the local index is the degree (=square root of dimension) of the division algebra part of the central simple algebra, i.e., the division algebra $D$ for which your algebra is of the form $M_n(D)$.
          $endgroup$
          – Ben Linowitz
          Feb 5 at 15:30














          $begingroup$
          That makes a lot more sense. Thanks, this is just the sort of criterion I was looking for.
          $endgroup$
          – Sun Ra
          Feb 5 at 17:28




          $begingroup$
          That makes a lot more sense. Thanks, this is just the sort of criterion I was looking for.
          $endgroup$
          – Sun Ra
          Feb 5 at 17:28


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f321892%2fcyclotomic-fields-and-splitting-of-central-simple-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Index of /

          Tribalistas

          Listed building