Prove that union of countable sets is countable












1












$begingroup$


Could anyone explain to me the part in red? I can't see how the existence of the set T is used in the proof, and how theorem 2.8 is applied.



enter image description here



Here are the relevant definitions and theorem.



enter image description hereenter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Suppose the sequence of elements is $1,2,2,3,4,4,4,6,,,,,,,$, then to each element we assign a label, i.e. the first element is $1$, the second is $2$, the third is also $2$ and so on. But when you make up the set $S$, you won't be repeating elements. So $S$ will have number 1, number 2, number 4, number 5, number 8... and so on. So the set $T={1,2,4,5,8, ldots} subset Bbb{N}$ is in one-one correspondence with $S$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:05


















1












$begingroup$


Could anyone explain to me the part in red? I can't see how the existence of the set T is used in the proof, and how theorem 2.8 is applied.



enter image description here



Here are the relevant definitions and theorem.



enter image description hereenter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Suppose the sequence of elements is $1,2,2,3,4,4,4,6,,,,,,,$, then to each element we assign a label, i.e. the first element is $1$, the second is $2$, the third is also $2$ and so on. But when you make up the set $S$, you won't be repeating elements. So $S$ will have number 1, number 2, number 4, number 5, number 8... and so on. So the set $T={1,2,4,5,8, ldots} subset Bbb{N}$ is in one-one correspondence with $S$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:05
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Could anyone explain to me the part in red? I can't see how the existence of the set T is used in the proof, and how theorem 2.8 is applied.



enter image description here



Here are the relevant definitions and theorem.



enter image description hereenter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Could anyone explain to me the part in red? I can't see how the existence of the set T is used in the proof, and how theorem 2.8 is applied.



enter image description here



Here are the relevant definitions and theorem.



enter image description hereenter image description here







real-analysis proof-explanation






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 12 '18 at 18:55









Josh NgJosh Ng

977




977












  • $begingroup$
    Suppose the sequence of elements is $1,2,2,3,4,4,4,6,,,,,,,$, then to each element we assign a label, i.e. the first element is $1$, the second is $2$, the third is also $2$ and so on. But when you make up the set $S$, you won't be repeating elements. So $S$ will have number 1, number 2, number 4, number 5, number 8... and so on. So the set $T={1,2,4,5,8, ldots} subset Bbb{N}$ is in one-one correspondence with $S$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:05




















  • $begingroup$
    Suppose the sequence of elements is $1,2,2,3,4,4,4,6,,,,,,,$, then to each element we assign a label, i.e. the first element is $1$, the second is $2$, the third is also $2$ and so on. But when you make up the set $S$, you won't be repeating elements. So $S$ will have number 1, number 2, number 4, number 5, number 8... and so on. So the set $T={1,2,4,5,8, ldots} subset Bbb{N}$ is in one-one correspondence with $S$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:05


















$begingroup$
Suppose the sequence of elements is $1,2,2,3,4,4,4,6,,,,,,,$, then to each element we assign a label, i.e. the first element is $1$, the second is $2$, the third is also $2$ and so on. But when you make up the set $S$, you won't be repeating elements. So $S$ will have number 1, number 2, number 4, number 5, number 8... and so on. So the set $T={1,2,4,5,8, ldots} subset Bbb{N}$ is in one-one correspondence with $S$.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 12 '18 at 19:05






$begingroup$
Suppose the sequence of elements is $1,2,2,3,4,4,4,6,,,,,,,$, then to each element we assign a label, i.e. the first element is $1$, the second is $2$, the third is also $2$ and so on. But when you make up the set $S$, you won't be repeating elements. So $S$ will have number 1, number 2, number 4, number 5, number 8... and so on. So the set $T={1,2,4,5,8, ldots} subset Bbb{N}$ is in one-one correspondence with $S$.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 12 '18 at 19:05












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Following the arrows you get a surjective function $f:mathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$, but there might be repetitions, so it is not injective. Well then you just discard the duplicates and get a bijective function
$f:Tsubseteqmathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    The sequence is a function from $mathbb{N} rightarrow$ S, where $i mapsto x_i$.. This function is surjective by construction. Since there may be double counting, there is a subset T $subset mathbb{N}$ such that T $sim$ S.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      What you have in (17) is a function $g:mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nto S$. Namely, $g(k,j)=x_{k,j}$. You have that $g$ is surjective, but it may not be injective if there are elements repeated among the $E_n$.



      Because $g$ is surjective, for each $sin S$ there exists $(x_1,y_1)inmathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ with $g(s_1,t_1)=s$. These pairs may not be unique if $g$ is not injective, but we may choose a single one for each $s$. Say $g(x_s,y_s)=s$. Now let
      $$
      T={(x_s,y_s): sin S}.
      $$

      Then $Ssim T$ and $Tsubset mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$. So $T$ is countable and $S$ is countable.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I was not talking about your answer, but rather the way it's phrased in the book, which might not be very clear for someone who is new to this.
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Argerami
        Dec 12 '18 at 19:15










      • $begingroup$
        Yes I agree that it is not sufficiently rigorous for something which should be quite pedagogical
        $endgroup$
        – Federico
        Dec 12 '18 at 19:23













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037085%2fprove-that-union-of-countable-sets-is-countable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      Following the arrows you get a surjective function $f:mathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$, but there might be repetitions, so it is not injective. Well then you just discard the duplicates and get a bijective function
      $f:Tsubseteqmathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        Following the arrows you get a surjective function $f:mathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$, but there might be repetitions, so it is not injective. Well then you just discard the duplicates and get a bijective function
        $f:Tsubseteqmathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Following the arrows you get a surjective function $f:mathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$, but there might be repetitions, so it is not injective. Well then you just discard the duplicates and get a bijective function
          $f:Tsubseteqmathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Following the arrows you get a surjective function $f:mathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$, but there might be repetitions, so it is not injective. Well then you just discard the duplicates and get a bijective function
          $f:Tsubseteqmathbb Ntobigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 12 '18 at 19:04









          FedericoFederico

          5,064514




          5,064514























              0












              $begingroup$

              The sequence is a function from $mathbb{N} rightarrow$ S, where $i mapsto x_i$.. This function is surjective by construction. Since there may be double counting, there is a subset T $subset mathbb{N}$ such that T $sim$ S.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                The sequence is a function from $mathbb{N} rightarrow$ S, where $i mapsto x_i$.. This function is surjective by construction. Since there may be double counting, there is a subset T $subset mathbb{N}$ such that T $sim$ S.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  The sequence is a function from $mathbb{N} rightarrow$ S, where $i mapsto x_i$.. This function is surjective by construction. Since there may be double counting, there is a subset T $subset mathbb{N}$ such that T $sim$ S.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The sequence is a function from $mathbb{N} rightarrow$ S, where $i mapsto x_i$.. This function is surjective by construction. Since there may be double counting, there is a subset T $subset mathbb{N}$ such that T $sim$ S.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 12 '18 at 19:10









                  Joel PereiraJoel Pereira

                  75919




                  75919























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      What you have in (17) is a function $g:mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nto S$. Namely, $g(k,j)=x_{k,j}$. You have that $g$ is surjective, but it may not be injective if there are elements repeated among the $E_n$.



                      Because $g$ is surjective, for each $sin S$ there exists $(x_1,y_1)inmathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ with $g(s_1,t_1)=s$. These pairs may not be unique if $g$ is not injective, but we may choose a single one for each $s$. Say $g(x_s,y_s)=s$. Now let
                      $$
                      T={(x_s,y_s): sin S}.
                      $$

                      Then $Ssim T$ and $Tsubset mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$. So $T$ is countable and $S$ is countable.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        I was not talking about your answer, but rather the way it's phrased in the book, which might not be very clear for someone who is new to this.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Martin Argerami
                        Dec 12 '18 at 19:15










                      • $begingroup$
                        Yes I agree that it is not sufficiently rigorous for something which should be quite pedagogical
                        $endgroup$
                        – Federico
                        Dec 12 '18 at 19:23


















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      What you have in (17) is a function $g:mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nto S$. Namely, $g(k,j)=x_{k,j}$. You have that $g$ is surjective, but it may not be injective if there are elements repeated among the $E_n$.



                      Because $g$ is surjective, for each $sin S$ there exists $(x_1,y_1)inmathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ with $g(s_1,t_1)=s$. These pairs may not be unique if $g$ is not injective, but we may choose a single one for each $s$. Say $g(x_s,y_s)=s$. Now let
                      $$
                      T={(x_s,y_s): sin S}.
                      $$

                      Then $Ssim T$ and $Tsubset mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$. So $T$ is countable and $S$ is countable.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        I was not talking about your answer, but rather the way it's phrased in the book, which might not be very clear for someone who is new to this.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Martin Argerami
                        Dec 12 '18 at 19:15










                      • $begingroup$
                        Yes I agree that it is not sufficiently rigorous for something which should be quite pedagogical
                        $endgroup$
                        – Federico
                        Dec 12 '18 at 19:23
















                      0












                      0








                      0





                      $begingroup$

                      What you have in (17) is a function $g:mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nto S$. Namely, $g(k,j)=x_{k,j}$. You have that $g$ is surjective, but it may not be injective if there are elements repeated among the $E_n$.



                      Because $g$ is surjective, for each $sin S$ there exists $(x_1,y_1)inmathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ with $g(s_1,t_1)=s$. These pairs may not be unique if $g$ is not injective, but we may choose a single one for each $s$. Say $g(x_s,y_s)=s$. Now let
                      $$
                      T={(x_s,y_s): sin S}.
                      $$

                      Then $Ssim T$ and $Tsubset mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$. So $T$ is countable and $S$ is countable.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      What you have in (17) is a function $g:mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nto S$. Namely, $g(k,j)=x_{k,j}$. You have that $g$ is surjective, but it may not be injective if there are elements repeated among the $E_n$.



                      Because $g$ is surjective, for each $sin S$ there exists $(x_1,y_1)inmathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ with $g(s_1,t_1)=s$. These pairs may not be unique if $g$ is not injective, but we may choose a single one for each $s$. Say $g(x_s,y_s)=s$. Now let
                      $$
                      T={(x_s,y_s): sin S}.
                      $$

                      Then $Ssim T$ and $Tsubset mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$. So $T$ is countable and $S$ is countable.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Dec 12 '18 at 19:14

























                      answered Dec 12 '18 at 19:06









                      Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

                      127k1182182




                      127k1182182












                      • $begingroup$
                        I was not talking about your answer, but rather the way it's phrased in the book, which might not be very clear for someone who is new to this.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Martin Argerami
                        Dec 12 '18 at 19:15










                      • $begingroup$
                        Yes I agree that it is not sufficiently rigorous for something which should be quite pedagogical
                        $endgroup$
                        – Federico
                        Dec 12 '18 at 19:23




















                      • $begingroup$
                        I was not talking about your answer, but rather the way it's phrased in the book, which might not be very clear for someone who is new to this.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Martin Argerami
                        Dec 12 '18 at 19:15










                      • $begingroup$
                        Yes I agree that it is not sufficiently rigorous for something which should be quite pedagogical
                        $endgroup$
                        – Federico
                        Dec 12 '18 at 19:23


















                      $begingroup$
                      I was not talking about your answer, but rather the way it's phrased in the book, which might not be very clear for someone who is new to this.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Martin Argerami
                      Dec 12 '18 at 19:15




                      $begingroup$
                      I was not talking about your answer, but rather the way it's phrased in the book, which might not be very clear for someone who is new to this.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Martin Argerami
                      Dec 12 '18 at 19:15












                      $begingroup$
                      Yes I agree that it is not sufficiently rigorous for something which should be quite pedagogical
                      $endgroup$
                      – Federico
                      Dec 12 '18 at 19:23






                      $begingroup$
                      Yes I agree that it is not sufficiently rigorous for something which should be quite pedagogical
                      $endgroup$
                      – Federico
                      Dec 12 '18 at 19:23




















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037085%2fprove-that-union-of-countable-sets-is-countable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Aardman Animations

                      Are they similar matrix

                      “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis