Hartshorne II 3.1
$begingroup$
Definition: A morphism $f:Xto Y$ of schemes is locally of finite type if there exists a covering of $Y$ by open affine subsets $V_i=mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, such that for each $i$, $f^{-1}(V_i)$ can be covered by open affine subsets $V_i=mathrm{Spec}(A_{ij})$, where each $A_{ij}$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra.
Exercise 3.1: Show that a morphism $f:Xto Y$ is locally of finite type if and only if for every open affine subset $V=mathrm{Spec}(B)$ of $Y$, $f^{-1}(V)$ can be covered by open affine subsets $U_j=mathrm{Spec}(A_j)$, where each $A_j$ is a finitely generated $B$-algebra.
The 'if' direction is trivial, so I'm asking about the 'only if' direction.
Assume that $f:Xto Y$ is locally of finite type and let $V=mathrm{Spec}(B)$ an open affine subset of $Y$. I can use the covering of $Y$ given by the hypothesis to obtain a covering of $Vsubseteqbigcup_i V_i=bigcup_i mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, so $f^{-1}(V)subseteq bigcup_i f^{-1}(V_i)subseteqbigcup_{i,j}mathrm{Spec}(A_{ij})$. Since $A_{ij}$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra, it would suffice to show that $B_i$ is a finitely generated $B$-algebra.
Using this question I can find $mathrm{Spec(R)}subseteq mathrm{Spec}(B)cap mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, so inclusions of topological spaces give rise to ring homomorphism $varphi:Bto R$ and $psi:B_ito R$. What I need to show then is that $R$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra and that there exists a ring homomorphism $theta: Bto B_i$ such that $psicirctheta=varphi$.
Is my idea right? If so, how can I complete it? Is there any better way to solve this exercise? Thank you.
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra category-theory schemes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Definition: A morphism $f:Xto Y$ of schemes is locally of finite type if there exists a covering of $Y$ by open affine subsets $V_i=mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, such that for each $i$, $f^{-1}(V_i)$ can be covered by open affine subsets $V_i=mathrm{Spec}(A_{ij})$, where each $A_{ij}$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra.
Exercise 3.1: Show that a morphism $f:Xto Y$ is locally of finite type if and only if for every open affine subset $V=mathrm{Spec}(B)$ of $Y$, $f^{-1}(V)$ can be covered by open affine subsets $U_j=mathrm{Spec}(A_j)$, where each $A_j$ is a finitely generated $B$-algebra.
The 'if' direction is trivial, so I'm asking about the 'only if' direction.
Assume that $f:Xto Y$ is locally of finite type and let $V=mathrm{Spec}(B)$ an open affine subset of $Y$. I can use the covering of $Y$ given by the hypothesis to obtain a covering of $Vsubseteqbigcup_i V_i=bigcup_i mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, so $f^{-1}(V)subseteq bigcup_i f^{-1}(V_i)subseteqbigcup_{i,j}mathrm{Spec}(A_{ij})$. Since $A_{ij}$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra, it would suffice to show that $B_i$ is a finitely generated $B$-algebra.
Using this question I can find $mathrm{Spec(R)}subseteq mathrm{Spec}(B)cap mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, so inclusions of topological spaces give rise to ring homomorphism $varphi:Bto R$ and $psi:B_ito R$. What I need to show then is that $R$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra and that there exists a ring homomorphism $theta: Bto B_i$ such that $psicirctheta=varphi$.
Is my idea right? If so, how can I complete it? Is there any better way to solve this exercise? Thank you.
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra category-theory schemes
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Something seems not quite right. I think the hypothesis does not grant you an open cover of $V$; it only gives one for $f^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:12
2
$begingroup$
As for a better way to complete this exercise (and prove similar statements for many, many other properties of morphisms of schemes), look into the Affine Communication Lemma. This is the technical result that Ravi Vakil makes great use of in his notes.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
@Andrew from the definition $f$ being locally of fintie type there is a covering of $Y$ by affine subsets. Then I can take some of them to cover $V$. Thanks for there reference, I'll take a look at it.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
2
$begingroup$
Oh of course you are right. Next time I'll wait to finish my morning coffee to do math! ;)
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Definition: A morphism $f:Xto Y$ of schemes is locally of finite type if there exists a covering of $Y$ by open affine subsets $V_i=mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, such that for each $i$, $f^{-1}(V_i)$ can be covered by open affine subsets $V_i=mathrm{Spec}(A_{ij})$, where each $A_{ij}$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra.
Exercise 3.1: Show that a morphism $f:Xto Y$ is locally of finite type if and only if for every open affine subset $V=mathrm{Spec}(B)$ of $Y$, $f^{-1}(V)$ can be covered by open affine subsets $U_j=mathrm{Spec}(A_j)$, where each $A_j$ is a finitely generated $B$-algebra.
The 'if' direction is trivial, so I'm asking about the 'only if' direction.
Assume that $f:Xto Y$ is locally of finite type and let $V=mathrm{Spec}(B)$ an open affine subset of $Y$. I can use the covering of $Y$ given by the hypothesis to obtain a covering of $Vsubseteqbigcup_i V_i=bigcup_i mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, so $f^{-1}(V)subseteq bigcup_i f^{-1}(V_i)subseteqbigcup_{i,j}mathrm{Spec}(A_{ij})$. Since $A_{ij}$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra, it would suffice to show that $B_i$ is a finitely generated $B$-algebra.
Using this question I can find $mathrm{Spec(R)}subseteq mathrm{Spec}(B)cap mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, so inclusions of topological spaces give rise to ring homomorphism $varphi:Bto R$ and $psi:B_ito R$. What I need to show then is that $R$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra and that there exists a ring homomorphism $theta: Bto B_i$ such that $psicirctheta=varphi$.
Is my idea right? If so, how can I complete it? Is there any better way to solve this exercise? Thank you.
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra category-theory schemes
$endgroup$
Definition: A morphism $f:Xto Y$ of schemes is locally of finite type if there exists a covering of $Y$ by open affine subsets $V_i=mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, such that for each $i$, $f^{-1}(V_i)$ can be covered by open affine subsets $V_i=mathrm{Spec}(A_{ij})$, where each $A_{ij}$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra.
Exercise 3.1: Show that a morphism $f:Xto Y$ is locally of finite type if and only if for every open affine subset $V=mathrm{Spec}(B)$ of $Y$, $f^{-1}(V)$ can be covered by open affine subsets $U_j=mathrm{Spec}(A_j)$, where each $A_j$ is a finitely generated $B$-algebra.
The 'if' direction is trivial, so I'm asking about the 'only if' direction.
Assume that $f:Xto Y$ is locally of finite type and let $V=mathrm{Spec}(B)$ an open affine subset of $Y$. I can use the covering of $Y$ given by the hypothesis to obtain a covering of $Vsubseteqbigcup_i V_i=bigcup_i mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, so $f^{-1}(V)subseteq bigcup_i f^{-1}(V_i)subseteqbigcup_{i,j}mathrm{Spec}(A_{ij})$. Since $A_{ij}$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra, it would suffice to show that $B_i$ is a finitely generated $B$-algebra.
Using this question I can find $mathrm{Spec(R)}subseteq mathrm{Spec}(B)cap mathrm{Spec}(B_i)$, so inclusions of topological spaces give rise to ring homomorphism $varphi:Bto R$ and $psi:B_ito R$. What I need to show then is that $R$ is a finitely generated $B_i$-algebra and that there exists a ring homomorphism $theta: Bto B_i$ such that $psicirctheta=varphi$.
Is my idea right? If so, how can I complete it? Is there any better way to solve this exercise? Thank you.
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra category-theory schemes
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra category-theory schemes
asked Dec 14 '18 at 17:03
JaviJavi
2,6992826
2,6992826
$begingroup$
Something seems not quite right. I think the hypothesis does not grant you an open cover of $V$; it only gives one for $f^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:12
2
$begingroup$
As for a better way to complete this exercise (and prove similar statements for many, many other properties of morphisms of schemes), look into the Affine Communication Lemma. This is the technical result that Ravi Vakil makes great use of in his notes.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
@Andrew from the definition $f$ being locally of fintie type there is a covering of $Y$ by affine subsets. Then I can take some of them to cover $V$. Thanks for there reference, I'll take a look at it.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
2
$begingroup$
Oh of course you are right. Next time I'll wait to finish my morning coffee to do math! ;)
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Something seems not quite right. I think the hypothesis does not grant you an open cover of $V$; it only gives one for $f^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:12
2
$begingroup$
As for a better way to complete this exercise (and prove similar statements for many, many other properties of morphisms of schemes), look into the Affine Communication Lemma. This is the technical result that Ravi Vakil makes great use of in his notes.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
@Andrew from the definition $f$ being locally of fintie type there is a covering of $Y$ by affine subsets. Then I can take some of them to cover $V$. Thanks for there reference, I'll take a look at it.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
2
$begingroup$
Oh of course you are right. Next time I'll wait to finish my morning coffee to do math! ;)
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Something seems not quite right. I think the hypothesis does not grant you an open cover of $V$; it only gives one for $f^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:12
$begingroup$
Something seems not quite right. I think the hypothesis does not grant you an open cover of $V$; it only gives one for $f^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:12
2
2
$begingroup$
As for a better way to complete this exercise (and prove similar statements for many, many other properties of morphisms of schemes), look into the Affine Communication Lemma. This is the technical result that Ravi Vakil makes great use of in his notes.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
As for a better way to complete this exercise (and prove similar statements for many, many other properties of morphisms of schemes), look into the Affine Communication Lemma. This is the technical result that Ravi Vakil makes great use of in his notes.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
1
1
$begingroup$
@Andrew from the definition $f$ being locally of fintie type there is a covering of $Y$ by affine subsets. Then I can take some of them to cover $V$. Thanks for there reference, I'll take a look at it.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
@Andrew from the definition $f$ being locally of fintie type there is a covering of $Y$ by affine subsets. Then I can take some of them to cover $V$. Thanks for there reference, I'll take a look at it.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
2
2
$begingroup$
Oh of course you are right. Next time I'll wait to finish my morning coffee to do math! ;)
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Oh of course you are right. Next time I'll wait to finish my morning coffee to do math! ;)
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:17
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039639%2fhartshorne-ii-3-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039639%2fhartshorne-ii-3-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Something seems not quite right. I think the hypothesis does not grant you an open cover of $V$; it only gives one for $f^{-1}(V)$.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:12
2
$begingroup$
As for a better way to complete this exercise (and prove similar statements for many, many other properties of morphisms of schemes), look into the Affine Communication Lemma. This is the technical result that Ravi Vakil makes great use of in his notes.
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
@Andrew from the definition $f$ being locally of fintie type there is a covering of $Y$ by affine subsets. Then I can take some of them to cover $V$. Thanks for there reference, I'll take a look at it.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Dec 14 '18 at 17:14
2
$begingroup$
Oh of course you are right. Next time I'll wait to finish my morning coffee to do math! ;)
$endgroup$
– Andrew
Dec 14 '18 at 17:17