Getting an “is not a block special device.” error when trying to mount an 8TB disk in CentOS 7.6
I'm trying to format and mount a 8TB external as an ext4 and it doesn't seem to work right. The drive is a Seagate 8TB expansion desktop drive. Model number is STEB8000402.
I can create my partition using gdisk:
sdc 8:32 0 7.3T 0 disk
└─sdc1 8:33 0 7.3T 0 part
But when I create the filesystem I get a weird error that says: “/dev/sdc1 is not a block special device.” however it seems to complete:
# mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdc1
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
/dev/sdc1 is not a block special device.
Proceed anyway? (y,n) y
Discarding device blocks: done
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=4096 (log=2)
Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
Stride=0 blocks, Stripe width=0 blocks
246512 inodes, 984801 blocks
49240 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
First data block=0
Maximum filesystem blocks=1008730112
31 block groups
32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
7952 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736
Allocating group tables: done
Writing inode tables: done
Creating journal (16384 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
Afterwards though, when mounting it doesn't seem to work and it mounts /dev/loop0
instead? I'm not even sure what that is and the filesystem is the wrong size.
/dev/loop0 4.0G 16M 3.7G 1% /mnt/test
I was reading apparently this is some new type of drive with sectors not in the normal place? Any help would be appreciated.
hard-drive centos ext4
|
show 1 more comment
I'm trying to format and mount a 8TB external as an ext4 and it doesn't seem to work right. The drive is a Seagate 8TB expansion desktop drive. Model number is STEB8000402.
I can create my partition using gdisk:
sdc 8:32 0 7.3T 0 disk
└─sdc1 8:33 0 7.3T 0 part
But when I create the filesystem I get a weird error that says: “/dev/sdc1 is not a block special device.” however it seems to complete:
# mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdc1
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
/dev/sdc1 is not a block special device.
Proceed anyway? (y,n) y
Discarding device blocks: done
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=4096 (log=2)
Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
Stride=0 blocks, Stripe width=0 blocks
246512 inodes, 984801 blocks
49240 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
First data block=0
Maximum filesystem blocks=1008730112
31 block groups
32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
7952 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736
Allocating group tables: done
Writing inode tables: done
Creating journal (16384 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
Afterwards though, when mounting it doesn't seem to work and it mounts /dev/loop0
instead? I'm not even sure what that is and the filesystem is the wrong size.
/dev/loop0 4.0G 16M 3.7G 1% /mnt/test
I was reading apparently this is some new type of drive with sectors not in the normal place? Any help would be appreciated.
hard-drive centos ext4
Is the partitioning method GPT? MBR eont work for large disks.
– davidgo
Jan 20 at 4:48
2
Try to umount before running mke2fs, or use-F
.
– harrymc
Jan 20 at 7:42
it is set to gpt, I mount after mke2fs
– acme64
Jan 21 at 5:06
i formatted the drive as NTFS in windows, just to make sure the partition is right, but mounting the drive still only shows up as 3.8G when running df-h
– acme64
Feb 3 at 2:29
Please edit your question to add specifics such as what version of CentOS you are on and what the exact brand, make and model of the drive is. Also, did you read this article on drives not showing correct sizes past 2TB? While you are showing 4TB it seems like it might be helpful.
– JakeGould
Feb 3 at 2:35
|
show 1 more comment
I'm trying to format and mount a 8TB external as an ext4 and it doesn't seem to work right. The drive is a Seagate 8TB expansion desktop drive. Model number is STEB8000402.
I can create my partition using gdisk:
sdc 8:32 0 7.3T 0 disk
└─sdc1 8:33 0 7.3T 0 part
But when I create the filesystem I get a weird error that says: “/dev/sdc1 is not a block special device.” however it seems to complete:
# mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdc1
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
/dev/sdc1 is not a block special device.
Proceed anyway? (y,n) y
Discarding device blocks: done
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=4096 (log=2)
Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
Stride=0 blocks, Stripe width=0 blocks
246512 inodes, 984801 blocks
49240 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
First data block=0
Maximum filesystem blocks=1008730112
31 block groups
32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
7952 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736
Allocating group tables: done
Writing inode tables: done
Creating journal (16384 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
Afterwards though, when mounting it doesn't seem to work and it mounts /dev/loop0
instead? I'm not even sure what that is and the filesystem is the wrong size.
/dev/loop0 4.0G 16M 3.7G 1% /mnt/test
I was reading apparently this is some new type of drive with sectors not in the normal place? Any help would be appreciated.
hard-drive centos ext4
I'm trying to format and mount a 8TB external as an ext4 and it doesn't seem to work right. The drive is a Seagate 8TB expansion desktop drive. Model number is STEB8000402.
I can create my partition using gdisk:
sdc 8:32 0 7.3T 0 disk
└─sdc1 8:33 0 7.3T 0 part
But when I create the filesystem I get a weird error that says: “/dev/sdc1 is not a block special device.” however it seems to complete:
# mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdc1
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
/dev/sdc1 is not a block special device.
Proceed anyway? (y,n) y
Discarding device blocks: done
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=4096 (log=2)
Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
Stride=0 blocks, Stripe width=0 blocks
246512 inodes, 984801 blocks
49240 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
First data block=0
Maximum filesystem blocks=1008730112
31 block groups
32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
7952 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736
Allocating group tables: done
Writing inode tables: done
Creating journal (16384 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
Afterwards though, when mounting it doesn't seem to work and it mounts /dev/loop0
instead? I'm not even sure what that is and the filesystem is the wrong size.
/dev/loop0 4.0G 16M 3.7G 1% /mnt/test
I was reading apparently this is some new type of drive with sectors not in the normal place? Any help would be appreciated.
hard-drive centos ext4
hard-drive centos ext4
edited Feb 3 at 6:31
JakeGould
31.3k1096138
31.3k1096138
asked Jan 20 at 4:40
acme64acme64
317518
317518
Is the partitioning method GPT? MBR eont work for large disks.
– davidgo
Jan 20 at 4:48
2
Try to umount before running mke2fs, or use-F
.
– harrymc
Jan 20 at 7:42
it is set to gpt, I mount after mke2fs
– acme64
Jan 21 at 5:06
i formatted the drive as NTFS in windows, just to make sure the partition is right, but mounting the drive still only shows up as 3.8G when running df-h
– acme64
Feb 3 at 2:29
Please edit your question to add specifics such as what version of CentOS you are on and what the exact brand, make and model of the drive is. Also, did you read this article on drives not showing correct sizes past 2TB? While you are showing 4TB it seems like it might be helpful.
– JakeGould
Feb 3 at 2:35
|
show 1 more comment
Is the partitioning method GPT? MBR eont work for large disks.
– davidgo
Jan 20 at 4:48
2
Try to umount before running mke2fs, or use-F
.
– harrymc
Jan 20 at 7:42
it is set to gpt, I mount after mke2fs
– acme64
Jan 21 at 5:06
i formatted the drive as NTFS in windows, just to make sure the partition is right, but mounting the drive still only shows up as 3.8G when running df-h
– acme64
Feb 3 at 2:29
Please edit your question to add specifics such as what version of CentOS you are on and what the exact brand, make and model of the drive is. Also, did you read this article on drives not showing correct sizes past 2TB? While you are showing 4TB it seems like it might be helpful.
– JakeGould
Feb 3 at 2:35
Is the partitioning method GPT? MBR eont work for large disks.
– davidgo
Jan 20 at 4:48
Is the partitioning method GPT? MBR eont work for large disks.
– davidgo
Jan 20 at 4:48
2
2
Try to umount before running mke2fs, or use
-F
.– harrymc
Jan 20 at 7:42
Try to umount before running mke2fs, or use
-F
.– harrymc
Jan 20 at 7:42
it is set to gpt, I mount after mke2fs
– acme64
Jan 21 at 5:06
it is set to gpt, I mount after mke2fs
– acme64
Jan 21 at 5:06
i formatted the drive as NTFS in windows, just to make sure the partition is right, but mounting the drive still only shows up as 3.8G when running df-h
– acme64
Feb 3 at 2:29
i formatted the drive as NTFS in windows, just to make sure the partition is right, but mounting the drive still only shows up as 3.8G when running df-h
– acme64
Feb 3 at 2:29
Please edit your question to add specifics such as what version of CentOS you are on and what the exact brand, make and model of the drive is. Also, did you read this article on drives not showing correct sizes past 2TB? While you are showing 4TB it seems like it might be helpful.
– JakeGould
Feb 3 at 2:35
Please edit your question to add specifics such as what version of CentOS you are on and what the exact brand, make and model of the drive is. Also, did you read this article on drives not showing correct sizes past 2TB? While you are showing 4TB it seems like it might be helpful.
– JakeGould
Feb 3 at 2:35
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
My guess is you had created a regular file there somehow (or maybe a symlink to such file). Check it. If it was a block device then in the output of
ls -l /dev/sdc1
the first letter would be b
; additionally
file /dev/sdc1
would say block special
. If this is not the case, investigate what the object really is. It probably shouldn't be there in the first place. Note mounting a regular file uses a loop device, this fits your case.
If the object is indeed a regular file or a symlink, umount
it, then remove (rm
) or move (mv
) it out of the way. Keep in mind mke2fs
operated on the file, so if you already put any important data in the filesystem, it's in the file, not in the partition.
To recreate a proper /dev/sdc1
as a block device, invoke sudo partprobe
. This assumes there is no problem with /dev/sdc
and its partition table. You should also invoke mke2fs
again because the partition wasn't even touched by your previous mke2fs
.
A plausible cause of having a regular file there is writing an image file to /dev/sdc1
without making sure the target exists (normally as a block device). Such operation on an nonexistent target creates a regular file.
If the problem reappears (like after reboot, after connecting the external drive again) it means something recreates the file. This may be due to some poorly written script that assumes /dev/sdc1
always exists. Be warned such script can overwrite your actual partition when the drive is connected. Hopefully there is no script at all and the whole problem is because of one-time mishap as described above.
1
you where right apparently i created a file instead of a partition somehow. I removed it and followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working. thanks to you both!
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
add a comment |
Your device might already have been partitioned and have a file system.
You may need to first get rid of everything.
Use fdisk
on the disk itself, /dev/sdc
rather than on the partition
/dev/sdc1
:
sudo fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
If you have any existing partitions, first delete them using the command d
,
and finally w
to write the partition table and exit.
Reissue fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
and use n
to create a new partition with
maximum size and w
again.
Check that everything is correct using fdisk -lu /dev/sdc
.
You may finally format the new partition:
sudo mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdc1
Or alternatively:
sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdc1
I got it working thank you! the -cu switches didn't work for fdisk but i didn't need them it turned out. the mkfs command worked fine.
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
1
If you "followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working", shouldn't I be getting some credit?
– harrymc
Feb 3 at 20:56
indeed, but i can only pick 1 answer. although your instructions helped i already knew them. the issue was the fact i had a file instead of a partition. i wish i could pick both, as the issue isn't complete with just one post. Hopefully anyone else that comes across this can piece it together.
– acme64
Feb 5 at 2:23
You may actually pick 2 answers: One for acceptance and one for the bounty.
– harrymc
Feb 6 at 9:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1396230%2fgetting-an-is-not-a-block-special-device-error-when-trying-to-mount-an-8tb-di%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
My guess is you had created a regular file there somehow (or maybe a symlink to such file). Check it. If it was a block device then in the output of
ls -l /dev/sdc1
the first letter would be b
; additionally
file /dev/sdc1
would say block special
. If this is not the case, investigate what the object really is. It probably shouldn't be there in the first place. Note mounting a regular file uses a loop device, this fits your case.
If the object is indeed a regular file or a symlink, umount
it, then remove (rm
) or move (mv
) it out of the way. Keep in mind mke2fs
operated on the file, so if you already put any important data in the filesystem, it's in the file, not in the partition.
To recreate a proper /dev/sdc1
as a block device, invoke sudo partprobe
. This assumes there is no problem with /dev/sdc
and its partition table. You should also invoke mke2fs
again because the partition wasn't even touched by your previous mke2fs
.
A plausible cause of having a regular file there is writing an image file to /dev/sdc1
without making sure the target exists (normally as a block device). Such operation on an nonexistent target creates a regular file.
If the problem reappears (like after reboot, after connecting the external drive again) it means something recreates the file. This may be due to some poorly written script that assumes /dev/sdc1
always exists. Be warned such script can overwrite your actual partition when the drive is connected. Hopefully there is no script at all and the whole problem is because of one-time mishap as described above.
1
you where right apparently i created a file instead of a partition somehow. I removed it and followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working. thanks to you both!
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
add a comment |
My guess is you had created a regular file there somehow (or maybe a symlink to such file). Check it. If it was a block device then in the output of
ls -l /dev/sdc1
the first letter would be b
; additionally
file /dev/sdc1
would say block special
. If this is not the case, investigate what the object really is. It probably shouldn't be there in the first place. Note mounting a regular file uses a loop device, this fits your case.
If the object is indeed a regular file or a symlink, umount
it, then remove (rm
) or move (mv
) it out of the way. Keep in mind mke2fs
operated on the file, so if you already put any important data in the filesystem, it's in the file, not in the partition.
To recreate a proper /dev/sdc1
as a block device, invoke sudo partprobe
. This assumes there is no problem with /dev/sdc
and its partition table. You should also invoke mke2fs
again because the partition wasn't even touched by your previous mke2fs
.
A plausible cause of having a regular file there is writing an image file to /dev/sdc1
without making sure the target exists (normally as a block device). Such operation on an nonexistent target creates a regular file.
If the problem reappears (like after reboot, after connecting the external drive again) it means something recreates the file. This may be due to some poorly written script that assumes /dev/sdc1
always exists. Be warned such script can overwrite your actual partition when the drive is connected. Hopefully there is no script at all and the whole problem is because of one-time mishap as described above.
1
you where right apparently i created a file instead of a partition somehow. I removed it and followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working. thanks to you both!
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
add a comment |
My guess is you had created a regular file there somehow (or maybe a symlink to such file). Check it. If it was a block device then in the output of
ls -l /dev/sdc1
the first letter would be b
; additionally
file /dev/sdc1
would say block special
. If this is not the case, investigate what the object really is. It probably shouldn't be there in the first place. Note mounting a regular file uses a loop device, this fits your case.
If the object is indeed a regular file or a symlink, umount
it, then remove (rm
) or move (mv
) it out of the way. Keep in mind mke2fs
operated on the file, so if you already put any important data in the filesystem, it's in the file, not in the partition.
To recreate a proper /dev/sdc1
as a block device, invoke sudo partprobe
. This assumes there is no problem with /dev/sdc
and its partition table. You should also invoke mke2fs
again because the partition wasn't even touched by your previous mke2fs
.
A plausible cause of having a regular file there is writing an image file to /dev/sdc1
without making sure the target exists (normally as a block device). Such operation on an nonexistent target creates a regular file.
If the problem reappears (like after reboot, after connecting the external drive again) it means something recreates the file. This may be due to some poorly written script that assumes /dev/sdc1
always exists. Be warned such script can overwrite your actual partition when the drive is connected. Hopefully there is no script at all and the whole problem is because of one-time mishap as described above.
My guess is you had created a regular file there somehow (or maybe a symlink to such file). Check it. If it was a block device then in the output of
ls -l /dev/sdc1
the first letter would be b
; additionally
file /dev/sdc1
would say block special
. If this is not the case, investigate what the object really is. It probably shouldn't be there in the first place. Note mounting a regular file uses a loop device, this fits your case.
If the object is indeed a regular file or a symlink, umount
it, then remove (rm
) or move (mv
) it out of the way. Keep in mind mke2fs
operated on the file, so if you already put any important data in the filesystem, it's in the file, not in the partition.
To recreate a proper /dev/sdc1
as a block device, invoke sudo partprobe
. This assumes there is no problem with /dev/sdc
and its partition table. You should also invoke mke2fs
again because the partition wasn't even touched by your previous mke2fs
.
A plausible cause of having a regular file there is writing an image file to /dev/sdc1
without making sure the target exists (normally as a block device). Such operation on an nonexistent target creates a regular file.
If the problem reappears (like after reboot, after connecting the external drive again) it means something recreates the file. This may be due to some poorly written script that assumes /dev/sdc1
always exists. Be warned such script can overwrite your actual partition when the drive is connected. Hopefully there is no script at all and the whole problem is because of one-time mishap as described above.
answered Feb 3 at 10:15
Kamil MaciorowskiKamil Maciorowski
26.8k155781
26.8k155781
1
you where right apparently i created a file instead of a partition somehow. I removed it and followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working. thanks to you both!
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
add a comment |
1
you where right apparently i created a file instead of a partition somehow. I removed it and followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working. thanks to you both!
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
1
1
you where right apparently i created a file instead of a partition somehow. I removed it and followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working. thanks to you both!
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
you where right apparently i created a file instead of a partition somehow. I removed it and followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working. thanks to you both!
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
add a comment |
Your device might already have been partitioned and have a file system.
You may need to first get rid of everything.
Use fdisk
on the disk itself, /dev/sdc
rather than on the partition
/dev/sdc1
:
sudo fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
If you have any existing partitions, first delete them using the command d
,
and finally w
to write the partition table and exit.
Reissue fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
and use n
to create a new partition with
maximum size and w
again.
Check that everything is correct using fdisk -lu /dev/sdc
.
You may finally format the new partition:
sudo mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdc1
Or alternatively:
sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdc1
I got it working thank you! the -cu switches didn't work for fdisk but i didn't need them it turned out. the mkfs command worked fine.
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
1
If you "followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working", shouldn't I be getting some credit?
– harrymc
Feb 3 at 20:56
indeed, but i can only pick 1 answer. although your instructions helped i already knew them. the issue was the fact i had a file instead of a partition. i wish i could pick both, as the issue isn't complete with just one post. Hopefully anyone else that comes across this can piece it together.
– acme64
Feb 5 at 2:23
You may actually pick 2 answers: One for acceptance and one for the bounty.
– harrymc
Feb 6 at 9:13
add a comment |
Your device might already have been partitioned and have a file system.
You may need to first get rid of everything.
Use fdisk
on the disk itself, /dev/sdc
rather than on the partition
/dev/sdc1
:
sudo fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
If you have any existing partitions, first delete them using the command d
,
and finally w
to write the partition table and exit.
Reissue fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
and use n
to create a new partition with
maximum size and w
again.
Check that everything is correct using fdisk -lu /dev/sdc
.
You may finally format the new partition:
sudo mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdc1
Or alternatively:
sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdc1
I got it working thank you! the -cu switches didn't work for fdisk but i didn't need them it turned out. the mkfs command worked fine.
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
1
If you "followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working", shouldn't I be getting some credit?
– harrymc
Feb 3 at 20:56
indeed, but i can only pick 1 answer. although your instructions helped i already knew them. the issue was the fact i had a file instead of a partition. i wish i could pick both, as the issue isn't complete with just one post. Hopefully anyone else that comes across this can piece it together.
– acme64
Feb 5 at 2:23
You may actually pick 2 answers: One for acceptance and one for the bounty.
– harrymc
Feb 6 at 9:13
add a comment |
Your device might already have been partitioned and have a file system.
You may need to first get rid of everything.
Use fdisk
on the disk itself, /dev/sdc
rather than on the partition
/dev/sdc1
:
sudo fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
If you have any existing partitions, first delete them using the command d
,
and finally w
to write the partition table and exit.
Reissue fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
and use n
to create a new partition with
maximum size and w
again.
Check that everything is correct using fdisk -lu /dev/sdc
.
You may finally format the new partition:
sudo mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdc1
Or alternatively:
sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdc1
Your device might already have been partitioned and have a file system.
You may need to first get rid of everything.
Use fdisk
on the disk itself, /dev/sdc
rather than on the partition
/dev/sdc1
:
sudo fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
If you have any existing partitions, first delete them using the command d
,
and finally w
to write the partition table and exit.
Reissue fdisk -cu /dev/sdc
and use n
to create a new partition with
maximum size and w
again.
Check that everything is correct using fdisk -lu /dev/sdc
.
You may finally format the new partition:
sudo mke2fs -t ext4 /dev/sdc1
Or alternatively:
sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdc1
answered Feb 3 at 10:37
harrymcharrymc
258k14270572
258k14270572
I got it working thank you! the -cu switches didn't work for fdisk but i didn't need them it turned out. the mkfs command worked fine.
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
1
If you "followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working", shouldn't I be getting some credit?
– harrymc
Feb 3 at 20:56
indeed, but i can only pick 1 answer. although your instructions helped i already knew them. the issue was the fact i had a file instead of a partition. i wish i could pick both, as the issue isn't complete with just one post. Hopefully anyone else that comes across this can piece it together.
– acme64
Feb 5 at 2:23
You may actually pick 2 answers: One for acceptance and one for the bounty.
– harrymc
Feb 6 at 9:13
add a comment |
I got it working thank you! the -cu switches didn't work for fdisk but i didn't need them it turned out. the mkfs command worked fine.
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
1
If you "followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working", shouldn't I be getting some credit?
– harrymc
Feb 3 at 20:56
indeed, but i can only pick 1 answer. although your instructions helped i already knew them. the issue was the fact i had a file instead of a partition. i wish i could pick both, as the issue isn't complete with just one post. Hopefully anyone else that comes across this can piece it together.
– acme64
Feb 5 at 2:23
You may actually pick 2 answers: One for acceptance and one for the bounty.
– harrymc
Feb 6 at 9:13
I got it working thank you! the -cu switches didn't work for fdisk but i didn't need them it turned out. the mkfs command worked fine.
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
I got it working thank you! the -cu switches didn't work for fdisk but i didn't need them it turned out. the mkfs command worked fine.
– acme64
Feb 3 at 19:38
1
1
If you "followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working", shouldn't I be getting some credit?
– harrymc
Feb 3 at 20:56
If you "followed harrymc instructions and now everything is working", shouldn't I be getting some credit?
– harrymc
Feb 3 at 20:56
indeed, but i can only pick 1 answer. although your instructions helped i already knew them. the issue was the fact i had a file instead of a partition. i wish i could pick both, as the issue isn't complete with just one post. Hopefully anyone else that comes across this can piece it together.
– acme64
Feb 5 at 2:23
indeed, but i can only pick 1 answer. although your instructions helped i already knew them. the issue was the fact i had a file instead of a partition. i wish i could pick both, as the issue isn't complete with just one post. Hopefully anyone else that comes across this can piece it together.
– acme64
Feb 5 at 2:23
You may actually pick 2 answers: One for acceptance and one for the bounty.
– harrymc
Feb 6 at 9:13
You may actually pick 2 answers: One for acceptance and one for the bounty.
– harrymc
Feb 6 at 9:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1396230%2fgetting-an-is-not-a-block-special-device-error-when-trying-to-mount-an-8tb-di%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is the partitioning method GPT? MBR eont work for large disks.
– davidgo
Jan 20 at 4:48
2
Try to umount before running mke2fs, or use
-F
.– harrymc
Jan 20 at 7:42
it is set to gpt, I mount after mke2fs
– acme64
Jan 21 at 5:06
i formatted the drive as NTFS in windows, just to make sure the partition is right, but mounting the drive still only shows up as 3.8G when running df-h
– acme64
Feb 3 at 2:29
Please edit your question to add specifics such as what version of CentOS you are on and what the exact brand, make and model of the drive is. Also, did you read this article on drives not showing correct sizes past 2TB? While you are showing 4TB it seems like it might be helpful.
– JakeGould
Feb 3 at 2:35