$X={1,2,3},U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$ Is $(X,U)$ Hausdorff space?
$begingroup$
Consider $X={1,2,3}$ and a topology
$$U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$$
Is $(X,U)$ a Hausdorff space?
My solution:
Points $x$ and $y$ in a topological space $X$ can be separated by neighbourhoods if there exists a neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ and a neighbourhood $V$ of $y$ such that $U$ and $V$ are disjoint ($U ∩ V = ∅)$.
$X$ is a Hausdorff space if all distinct points in $X$ are pairwise neighborhood-separable.
So by the defintion we pick element 1 and 2. The "smallest" neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$, and of 2 is ${1,2}$. And intersection isn't the empty set. So this isn't true.
My question is this approach ok? Can we say that neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$?
general-topology metric-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $X={1,2,3}$ and a topology
$$U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$$
Is $(X,U)$ a Hausdorff space?
My solution:
Points $x$ and $y$ in a topological space $X$ can be separated by neighbourhoods if there exists a neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ and a neighbourhood $V$ of $y$ such that $U$ and $V$ are disjoint ($U ∩ V = ∅)$.
$X$ is a Hausdorff space if all distinct points in $X$ are pairwise neighborhood-separable.
So by the defintion we pick element 1 and 2. The "smallest" neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$, and of 2 is ${1,2}$. And intersection isn't the empty set. So this isn't true.
My question is this approach ok? Can we say that neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$?
general-topology metric-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $X={1,2,3}$ and a topology
$$U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$$
Is $(X,U)$ a Hausdorff space?
My solution:
Points $x$ and $y$ in a topological space $X$ can be separated by neighbourhoods if there exists a neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ and a neighbourhood $V$ of $y$ such that $U$ and $V$ are disjoint ($U ∩ V = ∅)$.
$X$ is a Hausdorff space if all distinct points in $X$ are pairwise neighborhood-separable.
So by the defintion we pick element 1 and 2. The "smallest" neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$, and of 2 is ${1,2}$. And intersection isn't the empty set. So this isn't true.
My question is this approach ok? Can we say that neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$?
general-topology metric-spaces
$endgroup$
Consider $X={1,2,3}$ and a topology
$$U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$$
Is $(X,U)$ a Hausdorff space?
My solution:
Points $x$ and $y$ in a topological space $X$ can be separated by neighbourhoods if there exists a neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ and a neighbourhood $V$ of $y$ such that $U$ and $V$ are disjoint ($U ∩ V = ∅)$.
$X$ is a Hausdorff space if all distinct points in $X$ are pairwise neighborhood-separable.
So by the defintion we pick element 1 and 2. The "smallest" neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$, and of 2 is ${1,2}$. And intersection isn't the empty set. So this isn't true.
My question is this approach ok? Can we say that neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$?
general-topology metric-spaces
general-topology metric-spaces
edited Dec 4 '18 at 13:30
Xander Henderson
14.3k103554
14.3k103554
asked Dec 4 '18 at 9:22
josfjosf
266216
266216
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025335%2fx-1-2-3-u-%25e2%2588%2585-1-1-2-1-2-3-is-x-u-hausdorff-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.
$endgroup$
Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.
answered Dec 4 '18 at 9:24
ArthurArthur
112k7109191
112k7109191
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025335%2fx-1-2-3-u-%25e2%2588%2585-1-1-2-1-2-3-is-x-u-hausdorff-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown