$X={1,2,3},U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$ Is $(X,U)$ Hausdorff space?












2












$begingroup$



Consider $X={1,2,3}$ and a topology
$$U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$$
Is $(X,U)$ a Hausdorff space?




My solution:
Points $x$ and $y$ in a topological space $X$ can be separated by neighbourhoods if there exists a neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ and a neighbourhood $V$ of $y$ such that $U$ and $V$ are disjoint ($U ∩ V = ∅)$.
$X$ is a Hausdorff space if all distinct points in $X$ are pairwise neighborhood-separable.
So by the defintion we pick element 1 and 2. The "smallest" neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$, and of 2 is ${1,2}$. And intersection isn't the empty set. So this isn't true.

My question is this approach ok? Can we say that neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$



    Consider $X={1,2,3}$ and a topology
    $$U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$$
    Is $(X,U)$ a Hausdorff space?




    My solution:
    Points $x$ and $y$ in a topological space $X$ can be separated by neighbourhoods if there exists a neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ and a neighbourhood $V$ of $y$ such that $U$ and $V$ are disjoint ($U ∩ V = ∅)$.
    $X$ is a Hausdorff space if all distinct points in $X$ are pairwise neighborhood-separable.
    So by the defintion we pick element 1 and 2. The "smallest" neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$, and of 2 is ${1,2}$. And intersection isn't the empty set. So this isn't true.

    My question is this approach ok? Can we say that neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$



      Consider $X={1,2,3}$ and a topology
      $$U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$$
      Is $(X,U)$ a Hausdorff space?




      My solution:
      Points $x$ and $y$ in a topological space $X$ can be separated by neighbourhoods if there exists a neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ and a neighbourhood $V$ of $y$ such that $U$ and $V$ are disjoint ($U ∩ V = ∅)$.
      $X$ is a Hausdorff space if all distinct points in $X$ are pairwise neighborhood-separable.
      So by the defintion we pick element 1 and 2. The "smallest" neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$, and of 2 is ${1,2}$. And intersection isn't the empty set. So this isn't true.

      My question is this approach ok? Can we say that neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Consider $X={1,2,3}$ and a topology
      $$U={∅,{1},{1,2},{1,2,3}}$$
      Is $(X,U)$ a Hausdorff space?




      My solution:
      Points $x$ and $y$ in a topological space $X$ can be separated by neighbourhoods if there exists a neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ and a neighbourhood $V$ of $y$ such that $U$ and $V$ are disjoint ($U ∩ V = ∅)$.
      $X$ is a Hausdorff space if all distinct points in $X$ are pairwise neighborhood-separable.
      So by the defintion we pick element 1 and 2. The "smallest" neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$, and of 2 is ${1,2}$. And intersection isn't the empty set. So this isn't true.

      My question is this approach ok? Can we say that neighbourhood of 1 is ${1}$?







      general-topology metric-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 4 '18 at 13:30









      Xander Henderson

      14.3k103554




      14.3k103554










      asked Dec 4 '18 at 9:22









      josfjosf

      266216




      266216






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025335%2fx-1-2-3-u-%25e2%2588%2585-1-1-2-1-2-3-is-x-u-hausdorff-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Your approach is fine. ${1}$ is definitely a neighborhood of $1$ (that's what it means when ${1}$ appears in the definition of $U$ like that), and in this case each element actually has a smallest neighborhood, so it suffices to use those to prove / disprove Hausdorff-ness.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 4 '18 at 9:24









                ArthurArthur

                112k7109191




                112k7109191






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025335%2fx-1-2-3-u-%25e2%2588%2585-1-1-2-1-2-3-is-x-u-hausdorff-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix

                    “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis