What is the topology on the direct limit of $Bbb R^i rightarrow Bbb R^j$












1












$begingroup$


If we let $X$ be direct limit of
$$Bbb R rightarrow Bbb R^2 rightarrow Bbb R^3 rightarrow cdots $$
where each arrow is inclusion to first coordinates.



What is a choice of $X$ (with a toplogy that coincides with the direct limit topology).



EDIT: I believe it is subspace of $Bbb R^{Bbb N}$, sequence eventually $0$ taking values in $Bbb R$, with the product topology. I wonder if this is correct.






general-topology algebraic-topology







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The direct limit is the set of sequences which are eventually zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 4 '18 at 7:40










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, sorry, that is right. But how about the topology?
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Dec 4 '18 at 7:41


















1












$begingroup$


If we let $X$ be direct limit of
$$Bbb R rightarrow Bbb R^2 rightarrow Bbb R^3 rightarrow cdots $$
where each arrow is inclusion to first coordinates.



What is a choice of $X$ (with a toplogy that coincides with the direct limit topology).



EDIT: I believe it is subspace of $Bbb R^{Bbb N}$, sequence eventually $0$ taking values in $Bbb R$, with the product topology. I wonder if this is correct.






general-topology algebraic-topology







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The direct limit is the set of sequences which are eventually zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 4 '18 at 7:40










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, sorry, that is right. But how about the topology?
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Dec 4 '18 at 7:41
















1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


If we let $X$ be direct limit of
$$Bbb R rightarrow Bbb R^2 rightarrow Bbb R^3 rightarrow cdots $$
where each arrow is inclusion to first coordinates.



What is a choice of $X$ (with a toplogy that coincides with the direct limit topology).



EDIT: I believe it is subspace of $Bbb R^{Bbb N}$, sequence eventually $0$ taking values in $Bbb R$, with the product topology. I wonder if this is correct.






general-topology algebraic-topology







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




If we let $X$ be direct limit of
$$Bbb R rightarrow Bbb R^2 rightarrow Bbb R^3 rightarrow cdots $$
where each arrow is inclusion to first coordinates.



What is a choice of $X$ (with a toplogy that coincides with the direct limit topology).



EDIT: I believe it is subspace of $Bbb R^{Bbb N}$, sequence eventually $0$ taking values in $Bbb R$, with the product topology. I wonder if this is correct.






general-topology algebraic-topology




general-topology algebraic-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 9:18







CL.

















asked Dec 4 '18 at 7:39









CL.CL.

2,1902824




2,1902824








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The direct limit is the set of sequences which are eventually zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 4 '18 at 7:40










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, sorry, that is right. But how about the topology?
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Dec 4 '18 at 7:41
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The direct limit is the set of sequences which are eventually zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 4 '18 at 7:40










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, sorry, that is right. But how about the topology?
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Dec 4 '18 at 7:41










2




2




$begingroup$
The direct limit is the set of sequences which are eventually zero.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 4 '18 at 7:40




$begingroup$
The direct limit is the set of sequences which are eventually zero.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 4 '18 at 7:40












$begingroup$
Yes, sorry, that is right. But how about the topology?
$endgroup$
– CL.
Dec 4 '18 at 7:41






$begingroup$
Yes, sorry, that is right. But how about the topology?
$endgroup$
– CL.
Dec 4 '18 at 7:41












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

As mentioned in comments the direct limit is



$$L={(x_1,x_2,x_3,ldots)inmathbb{R}^{mathbb{N}} | x_i=0text{ eventually}}$$



The direct limit topology on $L$ is the topology coherent with ${mathbb{R}^n | ninmathbb{N}}$ treated as subspaces of $L$ via obvious inclusions.



There's another natural choice for topology on $L$: the one induced by the Euclidean norm (note that the Euclidean norm is well defined on sequences that are eventually $0$).



I remember my surprise when I learned that these two are not the same. The example is as follows: let $v_i$ be a vector with $1/i$ on the $i$-th position and $0$ elsewhere. Then $E={e_i}_{i=1}^infty$ is closed in the direct limit (because $Ecapmathbb{R}^n$ is finite for any $n$) but not closed in the Euclidean norm (because $lVert v_irVert=1/i$ and so the sequence converges to $0$).



In fact it can be shown that the direct limit is not metrizable. In particular this also means that $L$ is not a subspace (even up to homeomorphism) of the product topology (at least a product of metrizable spaces) because countable product of metrizable spaces is metrizable.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I wonder what happens if you use the topology where the closed sets are either the full space, or else (images of) closed subsets of some $mathbb{R}^n$. It seems like that would be the smallest topology that makes each $mathbb{R}^n$ have the subspace topology be the Euclidean topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:48











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025251%2fwhat-is-the-topology-on-the-direct-limit-of-bbb-ri-rightarrow-bbb-rj%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

As mentioned in comments the direct limit is



$$L={(x_1,x_2,x_3,ldots)inmathbb{R}^{mathbb{N}} | x_i=0text{ eventually}}$$



The direct limit topology on $L$ is the topology coherent with ${mathbb{R}^n | ninmathbb{N}}$ treated as subspaces of $L$ via obvious inclusions.



There's another natural choice for topology on $L$: the one induced by the Euclidean norm (note that the Euclidean norm is well defined on sequences that are eventually $0$).



I remember my surprise when I learned that these two are not the same. The example is as follows: let $v_i$ be a vector with $1/i$ on the $i$-th position and $0$ elsewhere. Then $E={e_i}_{i=1}^infty$ is closed in the direct limit (because $Ecapmathbb{R}^n$ is finite for any $n$) but not closed in the Euclidean norm (because $lVert v_irVert=1/i$ and so the sequence converges to $0$).



In fact it can be shown that the direct limit is not metrizable. In particular this also means that $L$ is not a subspace (even up to homeomorphism) of the product topology (at least a product of metrizable spaces) because countable product of metrizable spaces is metrizable.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I wonder what happens if you use the topology where the closed sets are either the full space, or else (images of) closed subsets of some $mathbb{R}^n$. It seems like that would be the smallest topology that makes each $mathbb{R}^n$ have the subspace topology be the Euclidean topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:48
















1












$begingroup$

As mentioned in comments the direct limit is



$$L={(x_1,x_2,x_3,ldots)inmathbb{R}^{mathbb{N}} | x_i=0text{ eventually}}$$



The direct limit topology on $L$ is the topology coherent with ${mathbb{R}^n | ninmathbb{N}}$ treated as subspaces of $L$ via obvious inclusions.



There's another natural choice for topology on $L$: the one induced by the Euclidean norm (note that the Euclidean norm is well defined on sequences that are eventually $0$).



I remember my surprise when I learned that these two are not the same. The example is as follows: let $v_i$ be a vector with $1/i$ on the $i$-th position and $0$ elsewhere. Then $E={e_i}_{i=1}^infty$ is closed in the direct limit (because $Ecapmathbb{R}^n$ is finite for any $n$) but not closed in the Euclidean norm (because $lVert v_irVert=1/i$ and so the sequence converges to $0$).



In fact it can be shown that the direct limit is not metrizable. In particular this also means that $L$ is not a subspace (even up to homeomorphism) of the product topology (at least a product of metrizable spaces) because countable product of metrizable spaces is metrizable.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I wonder what happens if you use the topology where the closed sets are either the full space, or else (images of) closed subsets of some $mathbb{R}^n$. It seems like that would be the smallest topology that makes each $mathbb{R}^n$ have the subspace topology be the Euclidean topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:48














1












1








1





$begingroup$

As mentioned in comments the direct limit is



$$L={(x_1,x_2,x_3,ldots)inmathbb{R}^{mathbb{N}} | x_i=0text{ eventually}}$$



The direct limit topology on $L$ is the topology coherent with ${mathbb{R}^n | ninmathbb{N}}$ treated as subspaces of $L$ via obvious inclusions.



There's another natural choice for topology on $L$: the one induced by the Euclidean norm (note that the Euclidean norm is well defined on sequences that are eventually $0$).



I remember my surprise when I learned that these two are not the same. The example is as follows: let $v_i$ be a vector with $1/i$ on the $i$-th position and $0$ elsewhere. Then $E={e_i}_{i=1}^infty$ is closed in the direct limit (because $Ecapmathbb{R}^n$ is finite for any $n$) but not closed in the Euclidean norm (because $lVert v_irVert=1/i$ and so the sequence converges to $0$).



In fact it can be shown that the direct limit is not metrizable. In particular this also means that $L$ is not a subspace (even up to homeomorphism) of the product topology (at least a product of metrizable spaces) because countable product of metrizable spaces is metrizable.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



As mentioned in comments the direct limit is



$$L={(x_1,x_2,x_3,ldots)inmathbb{R}^{mathbb{N}} | x_i=0text{ eventually}}$$



The direct limit topology on $L$ is the topology coherent with ${mathbb{R}^n | ninmathbb{N}}$ treated as subspaces of $L$ via obvious inclusions.



There's another natural choice for topology on $L$: the one induced by the Euclidean norm (note that the Euclidean norm is well defined on sequences that are eventually $0$).



I remember my surprise when I learned that these two are not the same. The example is as follows: let $v_i$ be a vector with $1/i$ on the $i$-th position and $0$ elsewhere. Then $E={e_i}_{i=1}^infty$ is closed in the direct limit (because $Ecapmathbb{R}^n$ is finite for any $n$) but not closed in the Euclidean norm (because $lVert v_irVert=1/i$ and so the sequence converges to $0$).



In fact it can be shown that the direct limit is not metrizable. In particular this also means that $L$ is not a subspace (even up to homeomorphism) of the product topology (at least a product of metrizable spaces) because countable product of metrizable spaces is metrizable.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 6 '18 at 20:37

























answered Dec 6 '18 at 11:34









freakishfreakish

11.9k1629




11.9k1629












  • $begingroup$
    I wonder what happens if you use the topology where the closed sets are either the full space, or else (images of) closed subsets of some $mathbb{R}^n$. It seems like that would be the smallest topology that makes each $mathbb{R}^n$ have the subspace topology be the Euclidean topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:48


















  • $begingroup$
    I wonder what happens if you use the topology where the closed sets are either the full space, or else (images of) closed subsets of some $mathbb{R}^n$. It seems like that would be the smallest topology that makes each $mathbb{R}^n$ have the subspace topology be the Euclidean topology.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:48
















$begingroup$
I wonder what happens if you use the topology where the closed sets are either the full space, or else (images of) closed subsets of some $mathbb{R}^n$. It seems like that would be the smallest topology that makes each $mathbb{R}^n$ have the subspace topology be the Euclidean topology.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 6 '18 at 20:48




$begingroup$
I wonder what happens if you use the topology where the closed sets are either the full space, or else (images of) closed subsets of some $mathbb{R}^n$. It seems like that would be the smallest topology that makes each $mathbb{R}^n$ have the subspace topology be the Euclidean topology.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 6 '18 at 20:48


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025251%2fwhat-is-the-topology-on-the-direct-limit-of-bbb-ri-rightarrow-bbb-rj%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Aardman Animations

Image
Aardman Animations, Ltd. Aardman Animations Tipo privada Atividade Animação em stop-motion , Animação em CGI Fundação 1972 Fundador(es) Peter Lord David Sproxton Sede Bristol, Inglaterra  Reino Unido Proprietário(s) Dreamworks Pessoas-chave Peter Lord David Sproxton Nick Park Divisões Aardman Features Aardman Digital Aardman Commercials Aardman Broadcast Aardman International Aardman Rights Aardman Effects Aardman 3-D Systems Aardman Nathan Love AardBoiled Website oficial aardman.com
Read more

Are they similar matrix

Image
0 $begingroup$ Do $begin{bmatrix} 0&i&0\0&0&1\0&0&0 end{bmatrix} $ and $begin{bmatrix} 0&0&0\-i&0&0\0&1&0 end{bmatrix} $ are similar.Is this True/false Clearly both are nilpotent and one is conjucate transpose of other but how to know if they are similar.i'm stuck. Please help me linear-algebra vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors generalizedeigenvector share | cite | improve this question edited Dec 10 '18 at 6:38 Vasanth Kris asked Dec 10 '18 at 6:19
Read more

“minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis

Image
3 $begingroup$ I have stumbled upon an exercice for second year undegraduate student majoring in economics which I find quite demanding. I have an idea for the solution, but it seems awfully complicated, and I am wondering if there was a simpler way to solve it. This goes as follows: Let $(E, langle, rangle)$ be a euclidean space of dimension $n geq 2$ . 1) For any $x in E$ , show that $||x|| = sqrt{n}$ if and only if there exists $(e_1, dots, e_n)$ an orthonormal basis of $E$ such that $x =e_1+ ldots + e_n$ . 2) For any $(x,y) in E$ , show that $||x|| = sqrt{n}$ , $||y|| = sqrt{frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}}$ and $langle x,y rangle = frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ if and only if there eixsts $(e_1, ldots, e_n)$ an orthonormal basis of $E$ such that $x = e_1 + ldots + e_n$ and $y = e_1 + 2e_2 + ldots + ne_n$ The first q
Read more