Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},…)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite...












3












$begingroup$



Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite extension.




I think for the algebraic part, since for every simple extension, each of those elements can be adjoined and each of these simple extensions has a minimal polynomial that cannot be reduced in $mathbb{Q}$. For example, the simple extension $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3}, sqrt[4]{3})(sqrt[8]{3})$ has minimal polynomial $x^{8}-3$. And since each simple extension has an increasingly large degree, the degree of the simple extensions over the previous extension gets larger for each attachment. But I am not sure how to express this formally...



For the infinite degree part, I was thinking because the set $left {sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...right }$ is linearly independent?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$



    Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite extension.




    I think for the algebraic part, since for every simple extension, each of those elements can be adjoined and each of these simple extensions has a minimal polynomial that cannot be reduced in $mathbb{Q}$. For example, the simple extension $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3}, sqrt[4]{3})(sqrt[8]{3})$ has minimal polynomial $x^{8}-3$. And since each simple extension has an increasingly large degree, the degree of the simple extensions over the previous extension gets larger for each attachment. But I am not sure how to express this formally...



    For the infinite degree part, I was thinking because the set $left {sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...right }$ is linearly independent?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      0



      $begingroup$



      Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite extension.




      I think for the algebraic part, since for every simple extension, each of those elements can be adjoined and each of these simple extensions has a minimal polynomial that cannot be reduced in $mathbb{Q}$. For example, the simple extension $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3}, sqrt[4]{3})(sqrt[8]{3})$ has minimal polynomial $x^{8}-3$. And since each simple extension has an increasingly large degree, the degree of the simple extensions over the previous extension gets larger for each attachment. But I am not sure how to express this formally...



      For the infinite degree part, I was thinking because the set $left {sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...right }$ is linearly independent?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite extension.




      I think for the algebraic part, since for every simple extension, each of those elements can be adjoined and each of these simple extensions has a minimal polynomial that cannot be reduced in $mathbb{Q}$. For example, the simple extension $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3}, sqrt[4]{3})(sqrt[8]{3})$ has minimal polynomial $x^{8}-3$. And since each simple extension has an increasingly large degree, the degree of the simple extensions over the previous extension gets larger for each attachment. But I am not sure how to express this formally...



      For the infinite degree part, I was thinking because the set $left {sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...right }$ is linearly independent?







      abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 7 '18 at 6:38









      numericalorangenumericalorange

      1,735311




      1,735311






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.



          A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
            $endgroup$
            – numericalorange
            Dec 7 '18 at 18:07



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.



          Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.



          However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).



          Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029568%2fshow-that-mathbbq-sqrt3-sqrt43-sqrt83-is-algebraic-over%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.



            A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
              $endgroup$
              – numericalorange
              Dec 7 '18 at 18:07
















            5












            $begingroup$

            Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.



            A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
              $endgroup$
              – numericalorange
              Dec 7 '18 at 18:07














            5












            5








            5





            $begingroup$

            Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.



            A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.



            A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 7 '18 at 6:48









            Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen

            278k22269499




            278k22269499












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
              $endgroup$
              – numericalorange
              Dec 7 '18 at 18:07


















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
              $endgroup$
              – numericalorange
              Dec 7 '18 at 18:07
















            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
            $endgroup$
            – numericalorange
            Dec 7 '18 at 18:07




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
            $endgroup$
            – numericalorange
            Dec 7 '18 at 18:07











            1












            $begingroup$

            Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.



            Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.



            However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).



            Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.



              Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.



              However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).



              Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.



                Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.



                However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).



                Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.



                Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.



                However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).



                Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 7 '18 at 6:55









                астон вілла олоф мэллбэргастон вілла олоф мэллбэрг

                38k33376




                38k33376






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029568%2fshow-that-mathbbq-sqrt3-sqrt43-sqrt83-is-algebraic-over%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix