Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},…)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite...
$begingroup$
Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite extension.
I think for the algebraic part, since for every simple extension, each of those elements can be adjoined and each of these simple extensions has a minimal polynomial that cannot be reduced in $mathbb{Q}$. For example, the simple extension $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3}, sqrt[4]{3})(sqrt[8]{3})$ has minimal polynomial $x^{8}-3$. And since each simple extension has an increasingly large degree, the degree of the simple extensions over the previous extension gets larger for each attachment. But I am not sure how to express this formally...
For the infinite degree part, I was thinking because the set $left {sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...right }$ is linearly independent?
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite extension.
I think for the algebraic part, since for every simple extension, each of those elements can be adjoined and each of these simple extensions has a minimal polynomial that cannot be reduced in $mathbb{Q}$. For example, the simple extension $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3}, sqrt[4]{3})(sqrt[8]{3})$ has minimal polynomial $x^{8}-3$. And since each simple extension has an increasingly large degree, the degree of the simple extensions over the previous extension gets larger for each attachment. But I am not sure how to express this formally...
For the infinite degree part, I was thinking because the set $left {sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...right }$ is linearly independent?
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite extension.
I think for the algebraic part, since for every simple extension, each of those elements can be adjoined and each of these simple extensions has a minimal polynomial that cannot be reduced in $mathbb{Q}$. For example, the simple extension $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3}, sqrt[4]{3})(sqrt[8]{3})$ has minimal polynomial $x^{8}-3$. And since each simple extension has an increasingly large degree, the degree of the simple extensions over the previous extension gets larger for each attachment. But I am not sure how to express this formally...
For the infinite degree part, I was thinking because the set $left {sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...right }$ is linearly independent?
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field
$endgroup$
Show that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...)$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$ but not a finite extension.
I think for the algebraic part, since for every simple extension, each of those elements can be adjoined and each of these simple extensions has a minimal polynomial that cannot be reduced in $mathbb{Q}$. For example, the simple extension $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{3}, sqrt[4]{3})(sqrt[8]{3})$ has minimal polynomial $x^{8}-3$. And since each simple extension has an increasingly large degree, the degree of the simple extensions over the previous extension gets larger for each attachment. But I am not sure how to express this formally...
For the infinite degree part, I was thinking because the set $left {sqrt{3},sqrt[4]{3}, sqrt[8]{3},...right }$ is linearly independent?
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field
abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field
asked Dec 7 '18 at 6:38
numericalorangenumericalorange
1,735311
1,735311
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.
A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Dec 7 '18 at 18:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.
Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.
However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).
Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029568%2fshow-that-mathbbq-sqrt3-sqrt43-sqrt83-is-algebraic-over%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.
A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Dec 7 '18 at 18:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.
A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Dec 7 '18 at 18:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.
A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.
$endgroup$
Any element $alpha$ of $F$ is a rational expression in the numbers adjoined. As such, it can involve only finitely many of the $sqrt[2^k]3$. If in such an expression, $sqrt[2^n]3$ is one with maximal $k$, then all other $sqrt[2^k]3$ are powers of $sqrt[2 k]3$. It follows that $alphainBbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3)$ and $alpha $ is algebraic.
A different approach for the infinity part: By Eisenstein, the polynomial $X^{2^n}-3$ is irreducible. Hence $[F:Bbb Q]ge[Bbb Q(sqrt[2^n]3):Bbb Q]ge 2^n$, where $n$ is arbitrariy. It follows that $[F:Bbb Q]$ is inifnite.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 6:48
Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen
278k22269499
278k22269499
$begingroup$
Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Dec 7 '18 at 18:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Dec 7 '18 at 18:07
$begingroup$
Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Dec 7 '18 at 18:07
$begingroup$
Thanks for the insight! I didn't realize I could use Eisenstein's criterion.
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Dec 7 '18 at 18:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.
Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.
However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).
Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.
Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.
However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).
Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.
Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.
However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).
Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.
$endgroup$
Let $L = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$.
Why is $L$ algebraic over $mathbb Q$? It is because the generating set of $L$ is $mathbb Q cup {3^{frac 1{2^n}}}$, which are all contained in $bar{mathbb Q}$, the algebraic closure of $mathbb Q$. Therefore, $L subset bar {mathbb Q}$, which by definition of the algebraic closure implies it is algebraic over $mathbb Q$.
However, $L$ contains subfields of the form $K_n$, where $K_n = mathbb Q(3^{frac 1{2^n}})$. One can conclude that $[K_n : mathbb Q] = 2^n$, since $x^{2^n} - 3$ is irreducible via the Eisenstein criterion(shifted).
Then, suppose $L$ were finite, then $[L : mathbb Q] < infty $, but by the tower property it is equal to $[L : K_n][K_n : mathbb Q]$ for each $n$. In particular, $[L : mathbb Q]$ is a multiple of $2^n$ for all $n$, clearly impossible if it is finite.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 6:55
астон вілла олоф мэллбэргастон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
38k33376
38k33376
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029568%2fshow-that-mathbbq-sqrt3-sqrt43-sqrt83-is-algebraic-over%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown