Not able to solve a matrix problem
This is my first question of SO so sorry if I made a mistake somewhere.
I have this matrices problem which I'm not able to solve. I asked many of my friends but they just don't get the question.
This is the question:
$text{Let n} geq 3. text{Let A} = ((a_{ij}))_{1 leq i, j leq n} text{be an n} times text{n matrix such that a}_{ij} in {1, -1} text{for all 0} leq i, j leq n.
text{Suppose a}_{k1} = text{1 for all 1} leq k leq text{n. } \ text{And} sum_{k = 1}^{n} a_{ki}cdot a_{kj}text{= 0. For all i} neq j.\ text{Show that n is a multiple of 4.}$
(sorry I can't add an image and I'm not so good at latex too)
I think I've understood the summation part: when k = 1, the argument of summation becomes $a_{1i} cdot a_{1j}$. Which is the sum of product of elements of 1st row taken 2 at a time. (that's what I interpreted $a_{1i} cdot a_{1j}$ as. Is this right?)
I'm not able to utilize the summation to get an equation in n.
Thanx in advance!
matrices summation
add a comment |
This is my first question of SO so sorry if I made a mistake somewhere.
I have this matrices problem which I'm not able to solve. I asked many of my friends but they just don't get the question.
This is the question:
$text{Let n} geq 3. text{Let A} = ((a_{ij}))_{1 leq i, j leq n} text{be an n} times text{n matrix such that a}_{ij} in {1, -1} text{for all 0} leq i, j leq n.
text{Suppose a}_{k1} = text{1 for all 1} leq k leq text{n. } \ text{And} sum_{k = 1}^{n} a_{ki}cdot a_{kj}text{= 0. For all i} neq j.\ text{Show that n is a multiple of 4.}$
(sorry I can't add an image and I'm not so good at latex too)
I think I've understood the summation part: when k = 1, the argument of summation becomes $a_{1i} cdot a_{1j}$. Which is the sum of product of elements of 1st row taken 2 at a time. (that's what I interpreted $a_{1i} cdot a_{1j}$ as. Is this right?)
I'm not able to utilize the summation to get an equation in n.
Thanx in advance!
matrices summation
You are looking at Hadamard matrices, so now you know what to look for.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:54
See, e.g., math.stackexchange.com/questions/753867/…
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:59
add a comment |
This is my first question of SO so sorry if I made a mistake somewhere.
I have this matrices problem which I'm not able to solve. I asked many of my friends but they just don't get the question.
This is the question:
$text{Let n} geq 3. text{Let A} = ((a_{ij}))_{1 leq i, j leq n} text{be an n} times text{n matrix such that a}_{ij} in {1, -1} text{for all 0} leq i, j leq n.
text{Suppose a}_{k1} = text{1 for all 1} leq k leq text{n. } \ text{And} sum_{k = 1}^{n} a_{ki}cdot a_{kj}text{= 0. For all i} neq j.\ text{Show that n is a multiple of 4.}$
(sorry I can't add an image and I'm not so good at latex too)
I think I've understood the summation part: when k = 1, the argument of summation becomes $a_{1i} cdot a_{1j}$. Which is the sum of product of elements of 1st row taken 2 at a time. (that's what I interpreted $a_{1i} cdot a_{1j}$ as. Is this right?)
I'm not able to utilize the summation to get an equation in n.
Thanx in advance!
matrices summation
This is my first question of SO so sorry if I made a mistake somewhere.
I have this matrices problem which I'm not able to solve. I asked many of my friends but they just don't get the question.
This is the question:
$text{Let n} geq 3. text{Let A} = ((a_{ij}))_{1 leq i, j leq n} text{be an n} times text{n matrix such that a}_{ij} in {1, -1} text{for all 0} leq i, j leq n.
text{Suppose a}_{k1} = text{1 for all 1} leq k leq text{n. } \ text{And} sum_{k = 1}^{n} a_{ki}cdot a_{kj}text{= 0. For all i} neq j.\ text{Show that n is a multiple of 4.}$
(sorry I can't add an image and I'm not so good at latex too)
I think I've understood the summation part: when k = 1, the argument of summation becomes $a_{1i} cdot a_{1j}$. Which is the sum of product of elements of 1st row taken 2 at a time. (that's what I interpreted $a_{1i} cdot a_{1j}$ as. Is this right?)
I'm not able to utilize the summation to get an equation in n.
Thanx in advance!
matrices summation
matrices summation
asked Nov 30 '18 at 10:58
YashKandalkarYashKandalkar
82
82
You are looking at Hadamard matrices, so now you know what to look for.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:54
See, e.g., math.stackexchange.com/questions/753867/…
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:59
add a comment |
You are looking at Hadamard matrices, so now you know what to look for.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:54
See, e.g., math.stackexchange.com/questions/753867/…
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:59
You are looking at Hadamard matrices, so now you know what to look for.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:54
You are looking at Hadamard matrices, so now you know what to look for.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:54
See, e.g., math.stackexchange.com/questions/753867/…
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:59
See, e.g., math.stackexchange.com/questions/753867/…
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Clearly $n$ can't be odd as the inner product of the first column, which solely consists of ones, must be zero. Hence in every other column we must have an equal number of ones and minus ones, let's call that number $m$. (That is $n=2m$.)
Now consider two column except the first one. Have a look at the rows in the first column with element one (there are $m$ such rows). Let the number of ones in the corresponding rows in the second column be $k$, clearly $0leq kleq m$. Their product equals obviously $k-(m-k)=2k-m$. Similarly, the sum of the product of the other rows is $2k-m$ as well.
So in total the sum of all products is $4k-2m=2(2k-m)$. As that sum is zero, $m$ must be even, hence $n$ is divisible by $4$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019953%2fnot-able-to-solve-a-matrix-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Clearly $n$ can't be odd as the inner product of the first column, which solely consists of ones, must be zero. Hence in every other column we must have an equal number of ones and minus ones, let's call that number $m$. (That is $n=2m$.)
Now consider two column except the first one. Have a look at the rows in the first column with element one (there are $m$ such rows). Let the number of ones in the corresponding rows in the second column be $k$, clearly $0leq kleq m$. Their product equals obviously $k-(m-k)=2k-m$. Similarly, the sum of the product of the other rows is $2k-m$ as well.
So in total the sum of all products is $4k-2m=2(2k-m)$. As that sum is zero, $m$ must be even, hence $n$ is divisible by $4$.
add a comment |
Clearly $n$ can't be odd as the inner product of the first column, which solely consists of ones, must be zero. Hence in every other column we must have an equal number of ones and minus ones, let's call that number $m$. (That is $n=2m$.)
Now consider two column except the first one. Have a look at the rows in the first column with element one (there are $m$ such rows). Let the number of ones in the corresponding rows in the second column be $k$, clearly $0leq kleq m$. Their product equals obviously $k-(m-k)=2k-m$. Similarly, the sum of the product of the other rows is $2k-m$ as well.
So in total the sum of all products is $4k-2m=2(2k-m)$. As that sum is zero, $m$ must be even, hence $n$ is divisible by $4$.
add a comment |
Clearly $n$ can't be odd as the inner product of the first column, which solely consists of ones, must be zero. Hence in every other column we must have an equal number of ones and minus ones, let's call that number $m$. (That is $n=2m$.)
Now consider two column except the first one. Have a look at the rows in the first column with element one (there are $m$ such rows). Let the number of ones in the corresponding rows in the second column be $k$, clearly $0leq kleq m$. Their product equals obviously $k-(m-k)=2k-m$. Similarly, the sum of the product of the other rows is $2k-m$ as well.
So in total the sum of all products is $4k-2m=2(2k-m)$. As that sum is zero, $m$ must be even, hence $n$ is divisible by $4$.
Clearly $n$ can't be odd as the inner product of the first column, which solely consists of ones, must be zero. Hence in every other column we must have an equal number of ones and minus ones, let's call that number $m$. (That is $n=2m$.)
Now consider two column except the first one. Have a look at the rows in the first column with element one (there are $m$ such rows). Let the number of ones in the corresponding rows in the second column be $k$, clearly $0leq kleq m$. Their product equals obviously $k-(m-k)=2k-m$. Similarly, the sum of the product of the other rows is $2k-m$ as well.
So in total the sum of all products is $4k-2m=2(2k-m)$. As that sum is zero, $m$ must be even, hence $n$ is divisible by $4$.
answered Nov 30 '18 at 12:40
Michael HoppeMichael Hoppe
10.8k31834
10.8k31834
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019953%2fnot-able-to-solve-a-matrix-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You are looking at Hadamard matrices, so now you know what to look for.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:54
See, e.g., math.stackexchange.com/questions/753867/…
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 30 '18 at 11:59