Matrix differentiation involving exponential function












0














The function of interest is $textbf{X}'exp[textbf{X} boldsymbol{beta}]$. $textbf{X}$ is a $n times K$ matrix. The columns of $textbf{X}$ contain $K$ variables each with $n$ observations. That is, $textbf{x}_{k} = [x_{ik}, ldots, x_{nk}]'$ is a column in $textbf{X}$. $boldsymbol{beta}$ is a $K times 1$ parameter vector such that $boldsymbol{beta} = [beta_{1}, ldots, beta_{K}]'$. I need to differentiate this function with respect to $boldsymbol{beta}$. Since the function $textbf{X}'exp[textbf{X} boldsymbol{beta}]$ is $K times 1$ and parameter vector $boldsymbol{beta}$ is $K times 1$, the resulting derivative in matrix form will be $K times K$. I propose that the derivative uses the denominator layout. I happen to end up using the Hadamard product but struggle to get the final result.










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    The function of interest is $textbf{X}'exp[textbf{X} boldsymbol{beta}]$. $textbf{X}$ is a $n times K$ matrix. The columns of $textbf{X}$ contain $K$ variables each with $n$ observations. That is, $textbf{x}_{k} = [x_{ik}, ldots, x_{nk}]'$ is a column in $textbf{X}$. $boldsymbol{beta}$ is a $K times 1$ parameter vector such that $boldsymbol{beta} = [beta_{1}, ldots, beta_{K}]'$. I need to differentiate this function with respect to $boldsymbol{beta}$. Since the function $textbf{X}'exp[textbf{X} boldsymbol{beta}]$ is $K times 1$ and parameter vector $boldsymbol{beta}$ is $K times 1$, the resulting derivative in matrix form will be $K times K$. I propose that the derivative uses the denominator layout. I happen to end up using the Hadamard product but struggle to get the final result.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      The function of interest is $textbf{X}'exp[textbf{X} boldsymbol{beta}]$. $textbf{X}$ is a $n times K$ matrix. The columns of $textbf{X}$ contain $K$ variables each with $n$ observations. That is, $textbf{x}_{k} = [x_{ik}, ldots, x_{nk}]'$ is a column in $textbf{X}$. $boldsymbol{beta}$ is a $K times 1$ parameter vector such that $boldsymbol{beta} = [beta_{1}, ldots, beta_{K}]'$. I need to differentiate this function with respect to $boldsymbol{beta}$. Since the function $textbf{X}'exp[textbf{X} boldsymbol{beta}]$ is $K times 1$ and parameter vector $boldsymbol{beta}$ is $K times 1$, the resulting derivative in matrix form will be $K times K$. I propose that the derivative uses the denominator layout. I happen to end up using the Hadamard product but struggle to get the final result.










      share|cite|improve this question













      The function of interest is $textbf{X}'exp[textbf{X} boldsymbol{beta}]$. $textbf{X}$ is a $n times K$ matrix. The columns of $textbf{X}$ contain $K$ variables each with $n$ observations. That is, $textbf{x}_{k} = [x_{ik}, ldots, x_{nk}]'$ is a column in $textbf{X}$. $boldsymbol{beta}$ is a $K times 1$ parameter vector such that $boldsymbol{beta} = [beta_{1}, ldots, beta_{K}]'$. I need to differentiate this function with respect to $boldsymbol{beta}$. Since the function $textbf{X}'exp[textbf{X} boldsymbol{beta}]$ is $K times 1$ and parameter vector $boldsymbol{beta}$ is $K times 1$, the resulting derivative in matrix form will be $K times K$. I propose that the derivative uses the denominator layout. I happen to end up using the Hadamard product but struggle to get the final result.







      matrices derivatives






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 25 at 15:26









      Snoopy

      235




      235






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Define some new variables
          $$eqalign{
          y &= Xbeta &implies dy = X,dbeta cr
          e &= exp(y) &implies de = eodot dy cr
          E &= {rm Diag}(e) &implies de = E,dy cr
          }$$

          Write the function of interest in terms of these variables.

          Then find its differential and gradient.
          $$eqalign{
          f &= X^Te cr
          df &= X^Tde = X^TE,dy = X^TEX,dbeta cr
          frac{partial f}{partialbeta} &= X^TEX cr
          }$$

          The trick is to use a Diag operation to eliminate the Hadamard product.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012976%2fmatrix-differentiation-involving-exponential-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            Define some new variables
            $$eqalign{
            y &= Xbeta &implies dy = X,dbeta cr
            e &= exp(y) &implies de = eodot dy cr
            E &= {rm Diag}(e) &implies de = E,dy cr
            }$$

            Write the function of interest in terms of these variables.

            Then find its differential and gradient.
            $$eqalign{
            f &= X^Te cr
            df &= X^Tde = X^TE,dy = X^TEX,dbeta cr
            frac{partial f}{partialbeta} &= X^TEX cr
            }$$

            The trick is to use a Diag operation to eliminate the Hadamard product.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              0














              Define some new variables
              $$eqalign{
              y &= Xbeta &implies dy = X,dbeta cr
              e &= exp(y) &implies de = eodot dy cr
              E &= {rm Diag}(e) &implies de = E,dy cr
              }$$

              Write the function of interest in terms of these variables.

              Then find its differential and gradient.
              $$eqalign{
              f &= X^Te cr
              df &= X^Tde = X^TE,dy = X^TEX,dbeta cr
              frac{partial f}{partialbeta} &= X^TEX cr
              }$$

              The trick is to use a Diag operation to eliminate the Hadamard product.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                Define some new variables
                $$eqalign{
                y &= Xbeta &implies dy = X,dbeta cr
                e &= exp(y) &implies de = eodot dy cr
                E &= {rm Diag}(e) &implies de = E,dy cr
                }$$

                Write the function of interest in terms of these variables.

                Then find its differential and gradient.
                $$eqalign{
                f &= X^Te cr
                df &= X^Tde = X^TE,dy = X^TEX,dbeta cr
                frac{partial f}{partialbeta} &= X^TEX cr
                }$$

                The trick is to use a Diag operation to eliminate the Hadamard product.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Define some new variables
                $$eqalign{
                y &= Xbeta &implies dy = X,dbeta cr
                e &= exp(y) &implies de = eodot dy cr
                E &= {rm Diag}(e) &implies de = E,dy cr
                }$$

                Write the function of interest in terms of these variables.

                Then find its differential and gradient.
                $$eqalign{
                f &= X^Te cr
                df &= X^Tde = X^TE,dy = X^TEX,dbeta cr
                frac{partial f}{partialbeta} &= X^TEX cr
                }$$

                The trick is to use a Diag operation to eliminate the Hadamard product.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 26 at 3:23









                greg

                7,5001721




                7,5001721






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012976%2fmatrix-differentiation-involving-exponential-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix