Existence of $T$ such that $[(Tcirc T)(f)](n)=f(n+1)$












0














Defined $A$ as the set of all the functions $f:mathbb Zrightarrow mathbb R$ exists a function $T:Arightarrow A$ such that
$$
(T^2f)(n)=f(n+1)text{ for all }ninmathbb Ztext{ and }fin A
$$

or not? And if codomain of $f$ is $mathbb Z$?



Remember that $T^2=Tcirc T$ and $T^2f=Tleft[T(f)right]$.





And if $T$ is also linear on $A$ seen as a vectorial space over $mathbb R$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • This question is related, but asks for a $T$ that is linear over $mathbb C$ rather than $mathbb R$ and also only considers $ell^1(mathbb Z)$ rather than the full $mathbb C^{mathbb Z}$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 22:22


















0














Defined $A$ as the set of all the functions $f:mathbb Zrightarrow mathbb R$ exists a function $T:Arightarrow A$ such that
$$
(T^2f)(n)=f(n+1)text{ for all }ninmathbb Ztext{ and }fin A
$$

or not? And if codomain of $f$ is $mathbb Z$?



Remember that $T^2=Tcirc T$ and $T^2f=Tleft[T(f)right]$.





And if $T$ is also linear on $A$ seen as a vectorial space over $mathbb R$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • This question is related, but asks for a $T$ that is linear over $mathbb C$ rather than $mathbb R$ and also only considers $ell^1(mathbb Z)$ rather than the full $mathbb C^{mathbb Z}$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 22:22
















0












0








0







Defined $A$ as the set of all the functions $f:mathbb Zrightarrow mathbb R$ exists a function $T:Arightarrow A$ such that
$$
(T^2f)(n)=f(n+1)text{ for all }ninmathbb Ztext{ and }fin A
$$

or not? And if codomain of $f$ is $mathbb Z$?



Remember that $T^2=Tcirc T$ and $T^2f=Tleft[T(f)right]$.





And if $T$ is also linear on $A$ seen as a vectorial space over $mathbb R$?










share|cite|improve this question















Defined $A$ as the set of all the functions $f:mathbb Zrightarrow mathbb R$ exists a function $T:Arightarrow A$ such that
$$
(T^2f)(n)=f(n+1)text{ for all }ninmathbb Ztext{ and }fin A
$$

or not? And if codomain of $f$ is $mathbb Z$?



Remember that $T^2=Tcirc T$ and $T^2f=Tleft[T(f)right]$.





And if $T$ is also linear on $A$ seen as a vectorial space over $mathbb R$?







functions discrete-mathematics integers natural-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 25 at 16:42









Henning Makholm

237k16301536




237k16301536










asked Nov 25 at 15:40









P De Donato

3947




3947












  • This question is related, but asks for a $T$ that is linear over $mathbb C$ rather than $mathbb R$ and also only considers $ell^1(mathbb Z)$ rather than the full $mathbb C^{mathbb Z}$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 22:22




















  • This question is related, but asks for a $T$ that is linear over $mathbb C$ rather than $mathbb R$ and also only considers $ell^1(mathbb Z)$ rather than the full $mathbb C^{mathbb Z}$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 22:22


















This question is related, but asks for a $T$ that is linear over $mathbb C$ rather than $mathbb R$ and also only considers $ell^1(mathbb Z)$ rather than the full $mathbb C^{mathbb Z}$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 25 at 22:22






This question is related, but asks for a $T$ that is linear over $mathbb C$ rather than $mathbb R$ and also only considers $ell^1(mathbb Z)$ rather than the full $mathbb C^{mathbb Z}$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 25 at 22:22












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Let $h$ be your favorite bijection $mathbb R^2tomathbb R$, and let $pi_1,pi_2$ be the corresponding projections such that $h(pi_1(x),pi_2(x))=x$. Then take
$$ (Tf)(n) = h(pi_2(f(n)),pi_1(f(n+1))) $$





The same construction works for every infinite codomain for the $f$s, assuming the axiom of choice. Things get trickier for finite codomains. For a codomain whose size is a perfect square, a variant of the above construction will work; on the other hand for codomains of size $4n+2$ or $4n+3$ the task is impossible. I am not yet sure of the remaining cases.





There can't be linear $T$ with this property as long as the field is $mathbb R$ or a subfield of $mathbb R$ such as $mathbb Q$. Consider the functions
$$ f_1(n) = 1 qquad f_{-1}(n) = (-1)^n $$



Since $T^2(Tf_1)= T^3f_1 = T(T^2f_1)=Tf_1$ it must be that $Tf_1$ is something that maps to itself under $T^2$, which means that it is a constant function, that is $Tf_1 = lambda f_1$ for some $lambda$.



Then how about $Tf_{-1}$? It will need to be something with period $2$ under $T^2$, which means that it is a linear combination $af_1 + bf_{-1}$. But the equation for $T^2 f_{-1}$ becomes $T^2 f_{-1} = -f_{-1}$, and the preceding boils down to the matrix equation
$$ begin{pmatrix} lambda & a \ 0 & b end{pmatrix}^2 = begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 end{pmatrix} $$
But this is impossible because it would require $b^2=-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • But in this case we obtain $$ T^2f(n)=hleft{pi_2left[h(pi_2f(n), pi_1f(n+1))right], pi_1left[h(pi_2f(n+1), pi_1f(n+2))right]right} $$ and seems it doesn't work
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:18












  • @PDeDonato: Yes; now simplify using $pi_1(h(x,y))=x$ and $pi_2(h(x,y)=y$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:22










  • Ah now I understand, $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ form the inverse of $h$
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:24












  • @PDeDonato: Answer extended to show that a linear $T$ is impossible.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:57










  • It looks a lot like a linear $T$ over $mathbb C$ ought to be possible, but the details are subtle and elusive.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 22:28











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012990%2fexistence-of-t-such-that-t-circ-tfn-fn1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Let $h$ be your favorite bijection $mathbb R^2tomathbb R$, and let $pi_1,pi_2$ be the corresponding projections such that $h(pi_1(x),pi_2(x))=x$. Then take
$$ (Tf)(n) = h(pi_2(f(n)),pi_1(f(n+1))) $$





The same construction works for every infinite codomain for the $f$s, assuming the axiom of choice. Things get trickier for finite codomains. For a codomain whose size is a perfect square, a variant of the above construction will work; on the other hand for codomains of size $4n+2$ or $4n+3$ the task is impossible. I am not yet sure of the remaining cases.





There can't be linear $T$ with this property as long as the field is $mathbb R$ or a subfield of $mathbb R$ such as $mathbb Q$. Consider the functions
$$ f_1(n) = 1 qquad f_{-1}(n) = (-1)^n $$



Since $T^2(Tf_1)= T^3f_1 = T(T^2f_1)=Tf_1$ it must be that $Tf_1$ is something that maps to itself under $T^2$, which means that it is a constant function, that is $Tf_1 = lambda f_1$ for some $lambda$.



Then how about $Tf_{-1}$? It will need to be something with period $2$ under $T^2$, which means that it is a linear combination $af_1 + bf_{-1}$. But the equation for $T^2 f_{-1}$ becomes $T^2 f_{-1} = -f_{-1}$, and the preceding boils down to the matrix equation
$$ begin{pmatrix} lambda & a \ 0 & b end{pmatrix}^2 = begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 end{pmatrix} $$
But this is impossible because it would require $b^2=-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • But in this case we obtain $$ T^2f(n)=hleft{pi_2left[h(pi_2f(n), pi_1f(n+1))right], pi_1left[h(pi_2f(n+1), pi_1f(n+2))right]right} $$ and seems it doesn't work
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:18












  • @PDeDonato: Yes; now simplify using $pi_1(h(x,y))=x$ and $pi_2(h(x,y)=y$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:22










  • Ah now I understand, $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ form the inverse of $h$
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:24












  • @PDeDonato: Answer extended to show that a linear $T$ is impossible.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:57










  • It looks a lot like a linear $T$ over $mathbb C$ ought to be possible, but the details are subtle and elusive.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 22:28
















2














Let $h$ be your favorite bijection $mathbb R^2tomathbb R$, and let $pi_1,pi_2$ be the corresponding projections such that $h(pi_1(x),pi_2(x))=x$. Then take
$$ (Tf)(n) = h(pi_2(f(n)),pi_1(f(n+1))) $$





The same construction works for every infinite codomain for the $f$s, assuming the axiom of choice. Things get trickier for finite codomains. For a codomain whose size is a perfect square, a variant of the above construction will work; on the other hand for codomains of size $4n+2$ or $4n+3$ the task is impossible. I am not yet sure of the remaining cases.





There can't be linear $T$ with this property as long as the field is $mathbb R$ or a subfield of $mathbb R$ such as $mathbb Q$. Consider the functions
$$ f_1(n) = 1 qquad f_{-1}(n) = (-1)^n $$



Since $T^2(Tf_1)= T^3f_1 = T(T^2f_1)=Tf_1$ it must be that $Tf_1$ is something that maps to itself under $T^2$, which means that it is a constant function, that is $Tf_1 = lambda f_1$ for some $lambda$.



Then how about $Tf_{-1}$? It will need to be something with period $2$ under $T^2$, which means that it is a linear combination $af_1 + bf_{-1}$. But the equation for $T^2 f_{-1}$ becomes $T^2 f_{-1} = -f_{-1}$, and the preceding boils down to the matrix equation
$$ begin{pmatrix} lambda & a \ 0 & b end{pmatrix}^2 = begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 end{pmatrix} $$
But this is impossible because it would require $b^2=-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • But in this case we obtain $$ T^2f(n)=hleft{pi_2left[h(pi_2f(n), pi_1f(n+1))right], pi_1left[h(pi_2f(n+1), pi_1f(n+2))right]right} $$ and seems it doesn't work
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:18












  • @PDeDonato: Yes; now simplify using $pi_1(h(x,y))=x$ and $pi_2(h(x,y)=y$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:22










  • Ah now I understand, $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ form the inverse of $h$
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:24












  • @PDeDonato: Answer extended to show that a linear $T$ is impossible.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:57










  • It looks a lot like a linear $T$ over $mathbb C$ ought to be possible, but the details are subtle and elusive.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 22:28














2












2








2






Let $h$ be your favorite bijection $mathbb R^2tomathbb R$, and let $pi_1,pi_2$ be the corresponding projections such that $h(pi_1(x),pi_2(x))=x$. Then take
$$ (Tf)(n) = h(pi_2(f(n)),pi_1(f(n+1))) $$





The same construction works for every infinite codomain for the $f$s, assuming the axiom of choice. Things get trickier for finite codomains. For a codomain whose size is a perfect square, a variant of the above construction will work; on the other hand for codomains of size $4n+2$ or $4n+3$ the task is impossible. I am not yet sure of the remaining cases.





There can't be linear $T$ with this property as long as the field is $mathbb R$ or a subfield of $mathbb R$ such as $mathbb Q$. Consider the functions
$$ f_1(n) = 1 qquad f_{-1}(n) = (-1)^n $$



Since $T^2(Tf_1)= T^3f_1 = T(T^2f_1)=Tf_1$ it must be that $Tf_1$ is something that maps to itself under $T^2$, which means that it is a constant function, that is $Tf_1 = lambda f_1$ for some $lambda$.



Then how about $Tf_{-1}$? It will need to be something with period $2$ under $T^2$, which means that it is a linear combination $af_1 + bf_{-1}$. But the equation for $T^2 f_{-1}$ becomes $T^2 f_{-1} = -f_{-1}$, and the preceding boils down to the matrix equation
$$ begin{pmatrix} lambda & a \ 0 & b end{pmatrix}^2 = begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 end{pmatrix} $$
But this is impossible because it would require $b^2=-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer














Let $h$ be your favorite bijection $mathbb R^2tomathbb R$, and let $pi_1,pi_2$ be the corresponding projections such that $h(pi_1(x),pi_2(x))=x$. Then take
$$ (Tf)(n) = h(pi_2(f(n)),pi_1(f(n+1))) $$





The same construction works for every infinite codomain for the $f$s, assuming the axiom of choice. Things get trickier for finite codomains. For a codomain whose size is a perfect square, a variant of the above construction will work; on the other hand for codomains of size $4n+2$ or $4n+3$ the task is impossible. I am not yet sure of the remaining cases.





There can't be linear $T$ with this property as long as the field is $mathbb R$ or a subfield of $mathbb R$ such as $mathbb Q$. Consider the functions
$$ f_1(n) = 1 qquad f_{-1}(n) = (-1)^n $$



Since $T^2(Tf_1)= T^3f_1 = T(T^2f_1)=Tf_1$ it must be that $Tf_1$ is something that maps to itself under $T^2$, which means that it is a constant function, that is $Tf_1 = lambda f_1$ for some $lambda$.



Then how about $Tf_{-1}$? It will need to be something with period $2$ under $T^2$, which means that it is a linear combination $af_1 + bf_{-1}$. But the equation for $T^2 f_{-1}$ becomes $T^2 f_{-1} = -f_{-1}$, and the preceding boils down to the matrix equation
$$ begin{pmatrix} lambda & a \ 0 & b end{pmatrix}^2 = begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & -1 end{pmatrix} $$
But this is impossible because it would require $b^2=-1$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 27 at 3:27

























answered Nov 25 at 15:59









Henning Makholm

237k16301536




237k16301536












  • But in this case we obtain $$ T^2f(n)=hleft{pi_2left[h(pi_2f(n), pi_1f(n+1))right], pi_1left[h(pi_2f(n+1), pi_1f(n+2))right]right} $$ and seems it doesn't work
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:18












  • @PDeDonato: Yes; now simplify using $pi_1(h(x,y))=x$ and $pi_2(h(x,y)=y$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:22










  • Ah now I understand, $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ form the inverse of $h$
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:24












  • @PDeDonato: Answer extended to show that a linear $T$ is impossible.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:57










  • It looks a lot like a linear $T$ over $mathbb C$ ought to be possible, but the details are subtle and elusive.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 22:28


















  • But in this case we obtain $$ T^2f(n)=hleft{pi_2left[h(pi_2f(n), pi_1f(n+1))right], pi_1left[h(pi_2f(n+1), pi_1f(n+2))right]right} $$ and seems it doesn't work
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:18












  • @PDeDonato: Yes; now simplify using $pi_1(h(x,y))=x$ and $pi_2(h(x,y)=y$.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:22










  • Ah now I understand, $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ form the inverse of $h$
    – P De Donato
    Nov 25 at 16:24












  • @PDeDonato: Answer extended to show that a linear $T$ is impossible.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 16:57










  • It looks a lot like a linear $T$ over $mathbb C$ ought to be possible, but the details are subtle and elusive.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 25 at 22:28
















But in this case we obtain $$ T^2f(n)=hleft{pi_2left[h(pi_2f(n), pi_1f(n+1))right], pi_1left[h(pi_2f(n+1), pi_1f(n+2))right]right} $$ and seems it doesn't work
– P De Donato
Nov 25 at 16:18






But in this case we obtain $$ T^2f(n)=hleft{pi_2left[h(pi_2f(n), pi_1f(n+1))right], pi_1left[h(pi_2f(n+1), pi_1f(n+2))right]right} $$ and seems it doesn't work
– P De Donato
Nov 25 at 16:18














@PDeDonato: Yes; now simplify using $pi_1(h(x,y))=x$ and $pi_2(h(x,y)=y$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 25 at 16:22




@PDeDonato: Yes; now simplify using $pi_1(h(x,y))=x$ and $pi_2(h(x,y)=y$.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 25 at 16:22












Ah now I understand, $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ form the inverse of $h$
– P De Donato
Nov 25 at 16:24






Ah now I understand, $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ form the inverse of $h$
– P De Donato
Nov 25 at 16:24














@PDeDonato: Answer extended to show that a linear $T$ is impossible.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 25 at 16:57




@PDeDonato: Answer extended to show that a linear $T$ is impossible.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 25 at 16:57












It looks a lot like a linear $T$ over $mathbb C$ ought to be possible, but the details are subtle and elusive.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 25 at 22:28




It looks a lot like a linear $T$ over $mathbb C$ ought to be possible, but the details are subtle and elusive.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 25 at 22:28


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012990%2fexistence-of-t-such-that-t-circ-tfn-fn1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix