Given a book with $100$ pages and a $100$ lemmas, prove that there is some lemma written on the same page as...
A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.
If lemma no. $1$ is written on page $1$, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma no. $1$ is written on page $k, k>1$. Then on at least one page there must be $2$ lemmas. Let's assume that always on page $k+i$ we have lemma no. $i+1$ and so on. Then the last $100-k-i$ lemmas must fit on the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number $100$) on page $100$.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!
Any help?
combinatorics
add a comment |
A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.
If lemma no. $1$ is written on page $1$, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma no. $1$ is written on page $k, k>1$. Then on at least one page there must be $2$ lemmas. Let's assume that always on page $k+i$ we have lemma no. $i+1$ and so on. Then the last $100-k-i$ lemmas must fit on the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number $100$) on page $100$.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!
Any help?
combinatorics
1
Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
Nov 27 '18 at 18:52
8
@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:13
I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
Nov 28 '18 at 0:34
1
Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
add a comment |
A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.
If lemma no. $1$ is written on page $1$, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma no. $1$ is written on page $k, k>1$. Then on at least one page there must be $2$ lemmas. Let's assume that always on page $k+i$ we have lemma no. $i+1$ and so on. Then the last $100-k-i$ lemmas must fit on the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number $100$) on page $100$.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!
Any help?
combinatorics
A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.
If lemma no. $1$ is written on page $1$, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma no. $1$ is written on page $k, k>1$. Then on at least one page there must be $2$ lemmas. Let's assume that always on page $k+i$ we have lemma no. $i+1$ and so on. Then the last $100-k-i$ lemmas must fit on the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number $100$) on page $100$.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!
Any help?
combinatorics
combinatorics
edited Dec 10 '18 at 23:01
timtfj
1,006318
1,006318
asked Nov 27 '18 at 18:48
Reyansh Laghari
1616
1616
1
Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
Nov 27 '18 at 18:52
8
@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:13
I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
Nov 28 '18 at 0:34
1
Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
add a comment |
1
Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
Nov 27 '18 at 18:52
8
@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:13
I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
Nov 28 '18 at 0:34
1
Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
1
1
Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
Nov 27 '18 at 18:52
Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
Nov 27 '18 at 18:52
8
8
@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:13
@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:13
I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
Nov 28 '18 at 0:34
I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
Nov 28 '18 at 0:34
1
1
Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.
Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.
+1 The way to go!
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:40
That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
@StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
– Tim Pederick
Nov 28 '18 at 9:30
1
@StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
– awkward
Nov 28 '18 at 13:01
@awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 13:57
|
show 1 more comment
For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.
We have the following sequence:
$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$
If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.
Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).
The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.
Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:
$$p(i)<i$$
$$p(j)ge j$$
This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.
+1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 22:55
@EthanBolker I think my second one is (and that it's basically yours but with a horizontal dividing line).
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 12:29
add a comment |
Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:
Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.
Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.
1
I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
– user113102
Nov 27 '18 at 23:24
And I now see that I've repeated exactly the same.
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.
Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.
(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)
2
"since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:28
I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
– Reyansh Laghari
Nov 27 '18 at 19:31
@ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 19:36
1
@Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 20:51
1
It’s ok now, +1.
– Oldboy
Nov 28 '18 at 6:15
add a comment |
This is a special case of the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem (or a corollary thereof):
Theorem. Every increasing function from a certain set to itself has at least one fixed point
This is sometimes given as a nice exercise in real analysis courses, in the following form: Fixed point of a monotone on [0,1].
add a comment |
Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.
Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.
Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.
We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.
So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.
Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.
Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.
Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.
add a comment |
Another proof, this time not by induction.
[Edit: on being tidied up, this turned out to be basically an expanded version of the other proofs that don't use induction.]
Consider a book of $k$ lemmas and $k$ pages.
For $1le n le k$ and $ ninmathbb N$, let
$p_n$ be the page number of the $n$th lemma
$D_n=n-p_n$ be the difference between the lemma number and its page number.
We are asked to prove that for some $n$, $D_n=0$.
Suppose we have assigned pages to the first $n$ lemmas. The next lemma can be on either the same page as lemma $n$ or a later page, i.e.
$$p_{n+1}ge p_n$$
from which
$$D_{n+1}le D_n+1$$
That is, $D_n$ can't increase by more than $1$ between one lemma and the next.
If the first lemma is on the first page ($p_1=1$), or the last lemma is on the last page ($p_k=k$), we already have a lemma on its own-numbered page. So we need only consider the case where $p_1>1$ and $p_k<k$, making $D_1<0$ and $D_k>0$.
$D_n$ must therefore increase from a negative value to a positive one somewhere between $n=1$ and $n=k$. But it can only increase in steps of $1$. So for $D_n$ to change sign, there must be a value of $n$ for which $D_n=0$, ie for which lemma $n$ is on page $n$.
There is therefore at least one lemma on a page with the same number as the lemma.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016149%2fgiven-a-book-with-100-pages-and-a-100-lemmas-prove-that-there-is-some-lemma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.
Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.
+1 The way to go!
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:40
That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
@StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
– Tim Pederick
Nov 28 '18 at 9:30
1
@StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
– awkward
Nov 28 '18 at 13:01
@awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 13:57
|
show 1 more comment
We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.
Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.
+1 The way to go!
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:40
That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
@StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
– Tim Pederick
Nov 28 '18 at 9:30
1
@StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
– awkward
Nov 28 '18 at 13:01
@awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 13:57
|
show 1 more comment
We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.
Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.
We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.
Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.
answered Nov 28 '18 at 0:11
awkward
5,85611022
5,85611022
+1 The way to go!
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:40
That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
@StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
– Tim Pederick
Nov 28 '18 at 9:30
1
@StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
– awkward
Nov 28 '18 at 13:01
@awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 13:57
|
show 1 more comment
+1 The way to go!
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:40
That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
@StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
– Tim Pederick
Nov 28 '18 at 9:30
1
@StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
– awkward
Nov 28 '18 at 13:01
@awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 13:57
+1 The way to go!
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:40
+1 The way to go!
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:40
That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
@StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
– Tim Pederick
Nov 28 '18 at 9:30
@StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
– Tim Pederick
Nov 28 '18 at 9:30
1
1
@StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
– awkward
Nov 28 '18 at 13:01
@StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
– awkward
Nov 28 '18 at 13:01
@awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 13:57
@awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
– Stephan Kolassa
Nov 28 '18 at 13:57
|
show 1 more comment
For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.
We have the following sequence:
$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$
If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.
Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).
The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.
Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:
$$p(i)<i$$
$$p(j)ge j$$
This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.
+1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 22:55
@EthanBolker I think my second one is (and that it's basically yours but with a horizontal dividing line).
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 12:29
add a comment |
For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.
We have the following sequence:
$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$
If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.
Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).
The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.
Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:
$$p(i)<i$$
$$p(j)ge j$$
This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.
+1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 22:55
@EthanBolker I think my second one is (and that it's basically yours but with a horizontal dividing line).
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 12:29
add a comment |
For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.
We have the following sequence:
$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$
If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.
Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).
The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.
Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:
$$p(i)<i$$
$$p(j)ge j$$
This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.
For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.
We have the following sequence:
$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$
If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.
Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).
The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.
Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:
$$p(i)<i$$
$$p(j)ge j$$
This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.
edited Nov 27 '18 at 20:46
answered Nov 27 '18 at 19:51
Oldboy
6,8221831
6,8221831
+1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 22:55
@EthanBolker I think my second one is (and that it's basically yours but with a horizontal dividing line).
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 12:29
add a comment |
+1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 22:55
@EthanBolker I think my second one is (and that it's basically yours but with a horizontal dividing line).
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 12:29
+1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 22:55
+1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 22:55
@EthanBolker I think my second one is (and that it's basically yours but with a horizontal dividing line).
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 12:29
@EthanBolker I think my second one is (and that it's basically yours but with a horizontal dividing line).
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 12:29
add a comment |
Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:
Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.
Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.
1
I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
– user113102
Nov 27 '18 at 23:24
And I now see that I've repeated exactly the same.
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:
Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.
Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.
1
I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
– user113102
Nov 27 '18 at 23:24
And I now see that I've repeated exactly the same.
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:
Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.
Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.
Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:
Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.
Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 23:02
user113102
863
863
1
I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
– user113102
Nov 27 '18 at 23:24
And I now see that I've repeated exactly the same.
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
1
I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
– user113102
Nov 27 '18 at 23:24
And I now see that I've repeated exactly the same.
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:13
1
1
I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
– user113102
Nov 27 '18 at 23:24
I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
– user113102
Nov 27 '18 at 23:24
And I now see that I've repeated exactly the same.
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:13
And I now see that I've repeated exactly the same.
– timtfj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:13
add a comment |
Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.
Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.
(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)
2
"since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:28
I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
– Reyansh Laghari
Nov 27 '18 at 19:31
@ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 19:36
1
@Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 20:51
1
It’s ok now, +1.
– Oldboy
Nov 28 '18 at 6:15
add a comment |
Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.
Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.
(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)
2
"since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:28
I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
– Reyansh Laghari
Nov 27 '18 at 19:31
@ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 19:36
1
@Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 20:51
1
It’s ok now, +1.
– Oldboy
Nov 28 '18 at 6:15
add a comment |
Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.
Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.
(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)
Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.
Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.
(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)
edited Nov 28 '18 at 16:05
answered Nov 27 '18 at 19:18
Ethan Bolker
41.3k547108
41.3k547108
2
"since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:28
I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
– Reyansh Laghari
Nov 27 '18 at 19:31
@ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 19:36
1
@Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 20:51
1
It’s ok now, +1.
– Oldboy
Nov 28 '18 at 6:15
add a comment |
2
"since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:28
I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
– Reyansh Laghari
Nov 27 '18 at 19:31
@ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 19:36
1
@Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 20:51
1
It’s ok now, +1.
– Oldboy
Nov 28 '18 at 6:15
2
2
"since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:28
"since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:28
I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
– Reyansh Laghari
Nov 27 '18 at 19:31
I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
– Reyansh Laghari
Nov 27 '18 at 19:31
@ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 19:36
@ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 19:36
1
1
@Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 20:51
@Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 27 '18 at 20:51
1
1
It’s ok now, +1.
– Oldboy
Nov 28 '18 at 6:15
It’s ok now, +1.
– Oldboy
Nov 28 '18 at 6:15
add a comment |
This is a special case of the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem (or a corollary thereof):
Theorem. Every increasing function from a certain set to itself has at least one fixed point
This is sometimes given as a nice exercise in real analysis courses, in the following form: Fixed point of a monotone on [0,1].
add a comment |
This is a special case of the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem (or a corollary thereof):
Theorem. Every increasing function from a certain set to itself has at least one fixed point
This is sometimes given as a nice exercise in real analysis courses, in the following form: Fixed point of a monotone on [0,1].
add a comment |
This is a special case of the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem (or a corollary thereof):
Theorem. Every increasing function from a certain set to itself has at least one fixed point
This is sometimes given as a nice exercise in real analysis courses, in the following form: Fixed point of a monotone on [0,1].
This is a special case of the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem (or a corollary thereof):
Theorem. Every increasing function from a certain set to itself has at least one fixed point
This is sometimes given as a nice exercise in real analysis courses, in the following form: Fixed point of a monotone on [0,1].
answered Dec 4 '18 at 19:37
barto
13.6k32682
13.6k32682
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.
Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.
Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.
We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.
So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.
Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.
Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.
Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.
add a comment |
Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.
Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.
Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.
We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.
So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.
Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.
Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.
Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.
add a comment |
Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.
Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.
Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.
We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.
So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.
Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.
Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.
Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.
Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.
Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.
Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.
We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.
So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.
Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.
Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.
Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.
edited Nov 28 '18 at 15:59
answered Nov 28 '18 at 15:24
timtfj
1,006318
1,006318
add a comment |
add a comment |
Another proof, this time not by induction.
[Edit: on being tidied up, this turned out to be basically an expanded version of the other proofs that don't use induction.]
Consider a book of $k$ lemmas and $k$ pages.
For $1le n le k$ and $ ninmathbb N$, let
$p_n$ be the page number of the $n$th lemma
$D_n=n-p_n$ be the difference between the lemma number and its page number.
We are asked to prove that for some $n$, $D_n=0$.
Suppose we have assigned pages to the first $n$ lemmas. The next lemma can be on either the same page as lemma $n$ or a later page, i.e.
$$p_{n+1}ge p_n$$
from which
$$D_{n+1}le D_n+1$$
That is, $D_n$ can't increase by more than $1$ between one lemma and the next.
If the first lemma is on the first page ($p_1=1$), or the last lemma is on the last page ($p_k=k$), we already have a lemma on its own-numbered page. So we need only consider the case where $p_1>1$ and $p_k<k$, making $D_1<0$ and $D_k>0$.
$D_n$ must therefore increase from a negative value to a positive one somewhere between $n=1$ and $n=k$. But it can only increase in steps of $1$. So for $D_n$ to change sign, there must be a value of $n$ for which $D_n=0$, ie for which lemma $n$ is on page $n$.
There is therefore at least one lemma on a page with the same number as the lemma.
add a comment |
Another proof, this time not by induction.
[Edit: on being tidied up, this turned out to be basically an expanded version of the other proofs that don't use induction.]
Consider a book of $k$ lemmas and $k$ pages.
For $1le n le k$ and $ ninmathbb N$, let
$p_n$ be the page number of the $n$th lemma
$D_n=n-p_n$ be the difference between the lemma number and its page number.
We are asked to prove that for some $n$, $D_n=0$.
Suppose we have assigned pages to the first $n$ lemmas. The next lemma can be on either the same page as lemma $n$ or a later page, i.e.
$$p_{n+1}ge p_n$$
from which
$$D_{n+1}le D_n+1$$
That is, $D_n$ can't increase by more than $1$ between one lemma and the next.
If the first lemma is on the first page ($p_1=1$), or the last lemma is on the last page ($p_k=k$), we already have a lemma on its own-numbered page. So we need only consider the case where $p_1>1$ and $p_k<k$, making $D_1<0$ and $D_k>0$.
$D_n$ must therefore increase from a negative value to a positive one somewhere between $n=1$ and $n=k$. But it can only increase in steps of $1$. So for $D_n$ to change sign, there must be a value of $n$ for which $D_n=0$, ie for which lemma $n$ is on page $n$.
There is therefore at least one lemma on a page with the same number as the lemma.
add a comment |
Another proof, this time not by induction.
[Edit: on being tidied up, this turned out to be basically an expanded version of the other proofs that don't use induction.]
Consider a book of $k$ lemmas and $k$ pages.
For $1le n le k$ and $ ninmathbb N$, let
$p_n$ be the page number of the $n$th lemma
$D_n=n-p_n$ be the difference between the lemma number and its page number.
We are asked to prove that for some $n$, $D_n=0$.
Suppose we have assigned pages to the first $n$ lemmas. The next lemma can be on either the same page as lemma $n$ or a later page, i.e.
$$p_{n+1}ge p_n$$
from which
$$D_{n+1}le D_n+1$$
That is, $D_n$ can't increase by more than $1$ between one lemma and the next.
If the first lemma is on the first page ($p_1=1$), or the last lemma is on the last page ($p_k=k$), we already have a lemma on its own-numbered page. So we need only consider the case where $p_1>1$ and $p_k<k$, making $D_1<0$ and $D_k>0$.
$D_n$ must therefore increase from a negative value to a positive one somewhere between $n=1$ and $n=k$. But it can only increase in steps of $1$. So for $D_n$ to change sign, there must be a value of $n$ for which $D_n=0$, ie for which lemma $n$ is on page $n$.
There is therefore at least one lemma on a page with the same number as the lemma.
Another proof, this time not by induction.
[Edit: on being tidied up, this turned out to be basically an expanded version of the other proofs that don't use induction.]
Consider a book of $k$ lemmas and $k$ pages.
For $1le n le k$ and $ ninmathbb N$, let
$p_n$ be the page number of the $n$th lemma
$D_n=n-p_n$ be the difference between the lemma number and its page number.
We are asked to prove that for some $n$, $D_n=0$.
Suppose we have assigned pages to the first $n$ lemmas. The next lemma can be on either the same page as lemma $n$ or a later page, i.e.
$$p_{n+1}ge p_n$$
from which
$$D_{n+1}le D_n+1$$
That is, $D_n$ can't increase by more than $1$ between one lemma and the next.
If the first lemma is on the first page ($p_1=1$), or the last lemma is on the last page ($p_k=k$), we already have a lemma on its own-numbered page. So we need only consider the case where $p_1>1$ and $p_k<k$, making $D_1<0$ and $D_k>0$.
$D_n$ must therefore increase from a negative value to a positive one somewhere between $n=1$ and $n=k$. But it can only increase in steps of $1$. So for $D_n$ to change sign, there must be a value of $n$ for which $D_n=0$, ie for which lemma $n$ is on page $n$.
There is therefore at least one lemma on a page with the same number as the lemma.
edited Dec 11 '18 at 16:34
answered Dec 10 '18 at 20:59
timtfj
1,006318
1,006318
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016149%2fgiven-a-book-with-100-pages-and-a-100-lemmas-prove-that-there-is-some-lemma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
Nov 27 '18 at 18:52
8
@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
Nov 27 '18 at 19:13
I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
Nov 28 '18 at 0:34
1
Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39