What is this shape that looks like a rectangle with rounded ends called?











up vote
14
down vote

favorite
1












A rounded rectangle but with full radius.



This cannot be a rounded rectangle because those are not fully or "perfectly" rounded at the two ends. This is more like an elongated circle? A flat cylinder?



I searched a lot, but among all guides or pictures that identify and name different shapes, I couldn't get this particular shape. The closest I could get was a stretched ellipse.



There are only two processes to get this shape as far as I know: the first one is making a long rectangle and making its corner radius exactly half of the height. The second one is putting two circles a distance apart and adding a rectangle between those. So, are these something like "perfect rounded rectangles" or "rectangular circles"?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
    – Vinny
    yesterday










  • Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
    – Abhimanyu
    yesterday






  • 1




    I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
    – Vinny
    yesterday










  • Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
    – mayersdesign
    yesterday






  • 1




    This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
    – rschwieb
    yesterday















up vote
14
down vote

favorite
1












A rounded rectangle but with full radius.



This cannot be a rounded rectangle because those are not fully or "perfectly" rounded at the two ends. This is more like an elongated circle? A flat cylinder?



I searched a lot, but among all guides or pictures that identify and name different shapes, I couldn't get this particular shape. The closest I could get was a stretched ellipse.



There are only two processes to get this shape as far as I know: the first one is making a long rectangle and making its corner radius exactly half of the height. The second one is putting two circles a distance apart and adding a rectangle between those. So, are these something like "perfect rounded rectangles" or "rectangular circles"?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
    – Vinny
    yesterday










  • Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
    – Abhimanyu
    yesterday






  • 1




    I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
    – Vinny
    yesterday










  • Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
    – mayersdesign
    yesterday






  • 1




    This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
    – rschwieb
    yesterday













up vote
14
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
14
down vote

favorite
1






1





A rounded rectangle but with full radius.



This cannot be a rounded rectangle because those are not fully or "perfectly" rounded at the two ends. This is more like an elongated circle? A flat cylinder?



I searched a lot, but among all guides or pictures that identify and name different shapes, I couldn't get this particular shape. The closest I could get was a stretched ellipse.



There are only two processes to get this shape as far as I know: the first one is making a long rectangle and making its corner radius exactly half of the height. The second one is putting two circles a distance apart and adding a rectangle between those. So, are these something like "perfect rounded rectangles" or "rectangular circles"?










share|improve this question















A rounded rectangle but with full radius.



This cannot be a rounded rectangle because those are not fully or "perfectly" rounded at the two ends. This is more like an elongated circle? A flat cylinder?



I searched a lot, but among all guides or pictures that identify and name different shapes, I couldn't get this particular shape. The closest I could get was a stretched ellipse.



There are only two processes to get this shape as far as I know: the first one is making a long rectangle and making its corner radius exactly half of the height. The second one is putting two circles a distance apart and adding a rectangle between those. So, are these something like "perfect rounded rectangles" or "rectangular circles"?







shapes terminology






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 40 mins ago









Glorfindel

1873515




1873515










asked yesterday









Abhimanyu

2501311




2501311








  • 2




    I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
    – Vinny
    yesterday










  • Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
    – Abhimanyu
    yesterday






  • 1




    I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
    – Vinny
    yesterday










  • Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
    – mayersdesign
    yesterday






  • 1




    This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
    – rschwieb
    yesterday














  • 2




    I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
    – Vinny
    yesterday










  • Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
    – Abhimanyu
    yesterday






  • 1




    I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
    – Vinny
    yesterday










  • Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
    – mayersdesign
    yesterday






  • 1




    This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
    – rschwieb
    yesterday








2




2




I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
– Vinny
yesterday




I would call it "rounded stroke cap"
– Vinny
yesterday












Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
– Abhimanyu
yesterday




Yes, that seems like a good name. This is a stroke cap after all, while the stroke has rounded corners. But we specifically make this shape too, in general designs, using rounded rectangles and not strokes. This shape might be an important, big, and bold part of the layout. Calling it just a stroke cap won't be enough.
– Abhimanyu
yesterday




1




1




I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
– Vinny
yesterday




I see... In this case, I guess "Stadium shape" as suggested by @Danielillo might be more suitable.
– Vinny
yesterday












Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
– mayersdesign
yesterday




Worth noting that I was completely wrong. I instantly thought "lozenge" but that's a diamond apparently! Who knew? Not me!
– mayersdesign
yesterday




1




1




This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
– rschwieb
yesterday




This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange math.stackexchange.com/q/539262/29335
– rschwieb
yesterday










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
21
down vote



accepted










Stadium Shape



As a geometric figure.




A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.




enter image description here



Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com





Capsule Shape



Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
    – Rafael
    yesterday










  • Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
    – tgm1024
    19 hours ago






  • 1




    Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
    – GerardFalla
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
    – whatsisname
    3 hours ago


















up vote
23
down vote













While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
    – btown
    yesterday


















up vote
4
down vote













For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.



On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.



But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.



    Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.



      See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong






      share|improve this answer





















      • By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
        – miroxlav
        17 hours ago








      • 1




        @miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
        – Pete Kirkham
        15 hours ago










      • Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
        – Rafael
        14 hours ago










      • @PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
        – miroxlav
        12 hours ago










      • Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
        – David Horizonef
        59 mins ago


















      up vote
      -1
      down vote













      Ok, we need to clarify a few things.




      1. While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.


      2. You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.


      3. From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.



      Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:




      1. To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.


      2. To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.







      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      tgm1024 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
        – Danielillo
        17 hours ago






      • 1




        One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
        – Danielillo
        17 hours ago








      • 1




        I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
        – PieBie
        39 mins ago











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "174"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117005%2fwhat-is-this-shape-that-looks-like-a-rectangle-with-rounded-ends-called%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest
































      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      21
      down vote



      accepted










      Stadium Shape



      As a geometric figure.




      A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.




      enter image description here



      Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com





      Capsule Shape



      Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape






      share|improve this answer



















      • 2




        In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
        – Rafael
        yesterday










      • Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
        – tgm1024
        19 hours ago






      • 1




        Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
        – GerardFalla
        11 hours ago






      • 1




        I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
        – whatsisname
        3 hours ago















      up vote
      21
      down vote



      accepted










      Stadium Shape



      As a geometric figure.




      A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.




      enter image description here



      Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com





      Capsule Shape



      Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape






      share|improve this answer



















      • 2




        In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
        – Rafael
        yesterday










      • Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
        – tgm1024
        19 hours ago






      • 1




        Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
        – GerardFalla
        11 hours ago






      • 1




        I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
        – whatsisname
        3 hours ago













      up vote
      21
      down vote



      accepted







      up vote
      21
      down vote



      accepted






      Stadium Shape



      As a geometric figure.




      A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.




      enter image description here



      Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com





      Capsule Shape



      Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape






      share|improve this answer














      Stadium Shape



      As a geometric figure.




      A stadium is a geometric figure consisting of a rectangle with top and bottom lengths a whose ends are capped off with semicircles of radius r.




      enter image description here



      Sources mathworld.wolfram.com/Stadium.html / mentalfloss.com





      Capsule Shape



      Following @Rafael's answer, there are many results in Google as Capsule Shape







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited yesterday

























      answered yesterday









      Danielillo

      17.7k12665




      17.7k12665








      • 2




        In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
        – Rafael
        yesterday










      • Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
        – tgm1024
        19 hours ago






      • 1




        Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
        – GerardFalla
        11 hours ago






      • 1




        I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
        – whatsisname
        3 hours ago














      • 2




        In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
        – Rafael
        yesterday










      • Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
        – tgm1024
        19 hours ago






      • 1




        Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
        – GerardFalla
        11 hours ago






      • 1




        I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
        – whatsisname
        3 hours ago








      2




      2




      In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
      – Rafael
      yesterday




      In the US I'm sure a lot of ppl think of a Baseball stadium.
      – Rafael
      yesterday












      Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
      – tgm1024
      19 hours ago




      Given your sources, the 2nd source (mentalfloss) refers back to the first (so it's only one source), and that first source refers directly to its own Wolfram and Mathematica languages/products.
      – tgm1024
      19 hours ago




      1




      1




      Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
      – GerardFalla
      11 hours ago




      Perhaps because of my primarily 3D design area of knowledge, I refer to this form and shape as a capsule - though that is most often applied to the 3D solid of similar form, it's also often used for the 2D silhouette of that same form. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(geometry)
      – GerardFalla
      11 hours ago




      1




      1




      I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
      – whatsisname
      3 hours ago




      I've seen it called a "racetrack" as well, same basic idea.
      – whatsisname
      3 hours ago










      up vote
      23
      down vote













      While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
        – btown
        yesterday















      up vote
      23
      down vote













      While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
        – btown
        yesterday













      up vote
      23
      down vote










      up vote
      23
      down vote









      While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.






      share|improve this answer












      While perhaps not the "technical" term for it.. I see it often called a Pill Shape.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      Scott

      142k14195403




      142k14195403








      • 1




        This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
        – btown
        yesterday














      • 1




        This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
        – btown
        yesterday








      1




      1




      This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
      – btown
      yesterday




      This is the terminology Twitter's design team uses: getbootstrap.com/docs/4.1/components/badge/#pill-badges
      – btown
      yesterday










      up vote
      4
      down vote













      For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.



      On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.



      But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        4
        down vote













        For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.



        On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.



        But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.



          On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.



          But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.






          share|improve this answer












          For me, it is a rounded rectangle just because the tool I would use is a rectangle and I would round it.



          On a 3D model, I would use a sphere and move some vertexes.



          But for non-graphic designers, I would call it a "Pill shape" Probably Penicillin pill shape.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Rafael

          21.9k12254




          21.9k12254






















              up vote
              3
              down vote













              Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.



              Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                3
                down vote













                Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.



                Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.



                  Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.






                  share|improve this answer












                  Obround is another alternative. See this question on math.stackexchange or the wiktionary definition.



                  Two out of Wikipedia's five stadium references use obround instead.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 15 hours ago









                  Pete Kirkham

                  1413




                  1413






















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.



                      See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
                        – miroxlav
                        17 hours ago








                      • 1




                        @miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
                        – Pete Kirkham
                        15 hours ago










                      • Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
                        – Rafael
                        14 hours ago










                      • @PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
                        – miroxlav
                        12 hours ago










                      • Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
                        – David Horizonef
                        59 mins ago















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.



                      See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
                        – miroxlav
                        17 hours ago








                      • 1




                        @miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
                        – Pete Kirkham
                        15 hours ago










                      • Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
                        – Rafael
                        14 hours ago










                      • @PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
                        – miroxlav
                        12 hours ago










                      • Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
                        – David Horizonef
                        59 mins ago













                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote









                      A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.



                      See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong






                      share|improve this answer












                      A technical word for this kind of shape is Oblong.



                      See : https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/oblong







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 22 hours ago









                      David Horizonef

                      345




                      345












                      • By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
                        – miroxlav
                        17 hours ago








                      • 1




                        @miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
                        – Pete Kirkham
                        15 hours ago










                      • Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
                        – Rafael
                        14 hours ago










                      • @PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
                        – miroxlav
                        12 hours ago










                      • Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
                        – David Horizonef
                        59 mins ago


















                      • By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
                        – miroxlav
                        17 hours ago








                      • 1




                        @miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
                        – Pete Kirkham
                        15 hours ago










                      • Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
                        – Rafael
                        14 hours ago










                      • @PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
                        – miroxlav
                        12 hours ago










                      • Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
                        – David Horizonef
                        59 mins ago
















                      By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
                      – miroxlav
                      17 hours ago






                      By definition, an oblong is more general term, not describing shape of the corners. It might work in some communities but be confusing in general use.
                      – miroxlav
                      17 hours ago






                      1




                      1




                      @miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
                      – Pete Kirkham
                      15 hours ago




                      @miroxlav the definition changes between UK and US English.
                      – Pete Kirkham
                      15 hours ago












                      Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
                      – Rafael
                      14 hours ago




                      Quote: "If you stretch a circle until it becomes an oval" you get an oval, an ellipse.
                      – Rafael
                      14 hours ago












                      @PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
                      – miroxlav
                      12 hours ago




                      @PeteKirkham – it does, but which one exactly describes the above shape? I think neither.
                      – miroxlav
                      12 hours ago












                      Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
                      – David Horizonef
                      59 mins ago




                      Agree that oblong has very large meaning but it could be a word for this kind of shape. Also there is no specific word for every trapezoid maybe there is none for an elongated shape without perfectly rounded corner.
                      – David Horizonef
                      59 mins ago










                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote













                      Ok, we need to clarify a few things.




                      1. While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.


                      2. You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.


                      3. From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.



                      Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:




                      1. To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.


                      2. To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.







                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      tgm1024 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                        – Danielillo
                        17 hours ago






                      • 1




                        One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
                        – Danielillo
                        17 hours ago








                      • 1




                        I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
                        – PieBie
                        39 mins ago















                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote













                      Ok, we need to clarify a few things.




                      1. While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.


                      2. You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.


                      3. From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.



                      Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:




                      1. To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.


                      2. To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.







                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      tgm1024 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                        – Danielillo
                        17 hours ago






                      • 1




                        One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
                        – Danielillo
                        17 hours ago








                      • 1




                        I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
                        – PieBie
                        39 mins ago













                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote









                      Ok, we need to clarify a few things.




                      1. While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.


                      2. You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.


                      3. From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.



                      Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:




                      1. To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.


                      2. To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.







                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      tgm1024 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      Ok, we need to clarify a few things.




                      1. While it's ok for the purposes of the question ("what's it called"), be aware that we are strictly in common usage territory here. There simply is no recognized terminology for this shape in Mathematics. Again, common usage satisfies the OP's question, but this addressing any notion that it's understood in mathematics.


                      2. You cannot use Wolfram as a source for this. Wolfram drills down it's citations to either Mathematica or their own Wolfram Language, neither of which represent the mathematics discipline as some kind of terminology force. Those are specific languages/products and need to be treated solely as that.


                      3. From a technical common usage position, in computer graphics and GUI design, both the decades of my primary experience, it is implemented and referred to (not rigidly defined) as a variant of a rounded rectangle, where the vertical legs have shortened to the point where the two quarter-circles have touched. Rounded rectangles in almost all cases, follow the circular curve on their corners.



                      Continuing on, an important further critique of the other answers:




                      1. To the answer from @Daniellio that shows two sources cited for it being called a stadium shape, **the second source refers directly to the first!* C'mon guys, you can't do that. It is one source, from Wolfram. And see point #1 above as to why you cannot use them.


                      2. To the answer calling it an oblong from @DavidHorizonef, No, it is not an oblong. An oblong is an elongated shape, and in curved situations, it is more akin to an oval, without parallel sides. Even the source he cites says this clearly.








                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      tgm1024 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 17 hours ago









                      Ovaryraptor

                      4,23211028




                      4,23211028






                      New contributor




                      tgm1024 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered 19 hours ago









                      tgm1024

                      1152




                      1152




                      New contributor




                      tgm1024 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      tgm1024 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      tgm1024 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.












                      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                        – Danielillo
                        17 hours ago






                      • 1




                        One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
                        – Danielillo
                        17 hours ago








                      • 1




                        I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
                        – PieBie
                        39 mins ago


















                      • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                        – Danielillo
                        17 hours ago






                      • 1




                        One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
                        – Danielillo
                        17 hours ago








                      • 1




                        I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
                        – PieBie
                        39 mins ago
















                      This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                      – Danielillo
                      17 hours ago




                      This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
                      – Danielillo
                      17 hours ago




                      1




                      1




                      One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
                      – Danielillo
                      17 hours ago






                      One of the links is for the image, the other for the explanation. When the content, either in images or text is not mine I usually put the corresponding links. My apologies if this effort is not enough for you.
                      – Danielillo
                      17 hours ago






                      1




                      1




                      I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
                      – PieBie
                      39 mins ago




                      I agree with @Danielillo. This is not an answer to the question, it is a critique of the scientific method of the other answers. However, this is not a scientific forum, nor does it pretend to be. We are just designers, who voluntarily invest time in trying to help out others. If our answers are not up to your standard, you are free add your own, better, answer or ignore this Stack completely. You are not free to add pretentious know-it-all reviews of other answers. We will welcome your contributions to our site with much delight if you can invest as much energy in being constructive.
                      – PieBie
                      39 mins ago


















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded



















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117005%2fwhat-is-this-shape-that-looks-like-a-rectangle-with-rounded-ends-called%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest




















































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                      Aardman Animations

                      Are they similar matrix