RS-485 using USART or UART port on STM32
$begingroup$
On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?
I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.
stm32 uart rs485 3.3v
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?
I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.
stm32 uart rs485 3.3v
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "3.3v
"? How is this relevant?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Feb 25 at 12:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?
I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.
stm32 uart rs485 3.3v
$endgroup$
On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?
I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.
stm32 uart rs485 3.3v
stm32 uart rs485 3.3v
edited Feb 25 at 12:48
Peter Mortensen
1,60031422
1,60031422
asked Feb 25 at 4:48
scico111scico111
376111
376111
2
$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "3.3v
"? How is this relevant?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Feb 25 at 12:27
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "3.3v
"? How is this relevant?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Feb 25 at 12:27
2
2
$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "
3.3v
"? How is this relevant?$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Feb 25 at 12:27
$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "
3.3v
"? How is this relevant?$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Feb 25 at 12:27
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
Feb 25 at 5:36
3
$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Feb 25 at 9:05
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424220%2frs-485-using-usart-or-uart-port-on-stm32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
Feb 25 at 5:36
3
$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Feb 25 at 9:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
Feb 25 at 5:36
3
$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Feb 25 at 9:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.
$endgroup$
It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.
answered Feb 25 at 5:05
Tom L.Tom L.
6,70511228
6,70511228
2
$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
Feb 25 at 5:36
3
$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Feb 25 at 9:05
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
Feb 25 at 5:36
3
$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Feb 25 at 9:05
2
2
$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
Feb 25 at 5:36
$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
Feb 25 at 5:36
3
3
$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Feb 25 at 9:05
$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Feb 25 at 9:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424220%2frs-485-using-usart-or-uart-port-on-stm32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "
3.3v
"? How is this relevant?$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Feb 25 at 12:27