RS-485 using USART or UART port on STM32












2












$begingroup$


On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?



I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Mortensen
    Feb 25 at 12:27
















2












$begingroup$


On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?



I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Mortensen
    Feb 25 at 12:27














2












2








2





$begingroup$


On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?



I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




On STM32F405 MCUs there are USART ports as well as UART ports available. If I need to implement RS-485 communication then which one of these should be used, USART or UART? Or are both of them equally good for RS-485 communication?



I have searched through the datasheet as well as reference manual for the MCU, but it does not provide additional information regarding the RS-485 implementation.







stm32 uart rs485 3.3v






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 25 at 12:48









Peter Mortensen

1,60031422




1,60031422










asked Feb 25 at 4:48









scico111scico111

376111




376111








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Mortensen
    Feb 25 at 12:27














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Mortensen
    Feb 25 at 12:27








2




2




$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Feb 25 at 12:27




$begingroup$
Why is this question tagged with "3.3v"? How is this relevant?
$endgroup$
– Peter Mortensen
Feb 25 at 12:27










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Feb 25 at 5:36








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Feb 25 at 9:05












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424220%2frs-485-using-usart-or-uart-port-on-stm32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Feb 25 at 5:36








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Feb 25 at 9:05
















5












$begingroup$

It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Feb 25 at 5:36








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Feb 25 at 9:05














5












5








5





$begingroup$

It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



It doesn't matter as even if you're using a USART (which provides an additional CLK pin for synchronous operation) you'll only be using the UART part (RXD/TXD). Keep in mind that you'll need an additional pin for the Data Enable signal.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Feb 25 at 5:05









Tom L.Tom L.

6,70511228




6,70511228








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Feb 25 at 5:36








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Feb 25 at 9:05














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Feb 25 at 5:36








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Feb 25 at 9:05








2




2




$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
Feb 25 at 5:36






$begingroup$
If you use full-duplex RS485, then you don't need a data enable signal. You only need one for half-duplex RS485
$endgroup$
– Toor
Feb 25 at 5:36






3




3




$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Feb 25 at 9:05




$begingroup$
@Toor For practical purposes, RS-485 without data enable signal would be RS-422.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Feb 25 at 9:05


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424220%2frs-485-using-usart-or-uart-port-on-stm32%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

Aardman Animations

Are they similar matrix