Proving exponentiation in $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ is one to one
$begingroup$
We saw in our crypto class that in the group $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes, that if for some $a$, $gcd(a, phi(pq) = (p-1)(q-1))$ = 1 (where $phi$ is Euler's totient function) then the function $f(x) = x^a$ is one to one, and he lecturer proved this by calculating the inverse of $a$ (the RSA trapdoor). What I have trouble understanding is why this proves the function is one to one. We computed an inverse function, that is showed that there is an inverse, but how does this show that there is no other inverse for an element?
group-theory number-theory cryptography
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We saw in our crypto class that in the group $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes, that if for some $a$, $gcd(a, phi(pq) = (p-1)(q-1))$ = 1 (where $phi$ is Euler's totient function) then the function $f(x) = x^a$ is one to one, and he lecturer proved this by calculating the inverse of $a$ (the RSA trapdoor). What I have trouble understanding is why this proves the function is one to one. We computed an inverse function, that is showed that there is an inverse, but how does this show that there is no other inverse for an element?
group-theory number-theory cryptography
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
$endgroup$
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 17:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We saw in our crypto class that in the group $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes, that if for some $a$, $gcd(a, phi(pq) = (p-1)(q-1))$ = 1 (where $phi$ is Euler's totient function) then the function $f(x) = x^a$ is one to one, and he lecturer proved this by calculating the inverse of $a$ (the RSA trapdoor). What I have trouble understanding is why this proves the function is one to one. We computed an inverse function, that is showed that there is an inverse, but how does this show that there is no other inverse for an element?
group-theory number-theory cryptography
$endgroup$
We saw in our crypto class that in the group $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes, that if for some $a$, $gcd(a, phi(pq) = (p-1)(q-1))$ = 1 (where $phi$ is Euler's totient function) then the function $f(x) = x^a$ is one to one, and he lecturer proved this by calculating the inverse of $a$ (the RSA trapdoor). What I have trouble understanding is why this proves the function is one to one. We computed an inverse function, that is showed that there is an inverse, but how does this show that there is no other inverse for an element?
group-theory number-theory cryptography
group-theory number-theory cryptography
edited Dec 28 '18 at 17:21
Shaun
9,620113684
9,620113684
asked Dec 28 '18 at 17:07
ElooEloo
1418
1418
$begingroup$
If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
$endgroup$
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 17:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
$endgroup$
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 17:12
$begingroup$
If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
$endgroup$
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 17:12
$begingroup$
If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
$endgroup$
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 17:12
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055088%2fproving-exponentiation-in-mathbbz-pq-is-one-to-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$
$endgroup$
If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$
answered Dec 28 '18 at 17:15
D. BroganD. Brogan
643513
643513
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)
$endgroup$
In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)
answered Dec 28 '18 at 20:39
Nicky HeksterNicky Hekster
29k63456
29k63456
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055088%2fproving-exponentiation-in-mathbbz-pq-is-one-to-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
$endgroup$
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 17:12