Proving exponentiation in $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ is one to one












2












$begingroup$


We saw in our crypto class that in the group $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes, that if for some $a$, $gcd(a, phi(pq) = (p-1)(q-1))$ = 1 (where $phi$ is Euler's totient function) then the function $f(x) = x^a$ is one to one, and he lecturer proved this by calculating the inverse of $a$ (the RSA trapdoor). What I have trouble understanding is why this proves the function is one to one. We computed an inverse function, that is showed that there is an inverse, but how does this show that there is no other inverse for an element?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
    $endgroup$
    – DudeMan
    Dec 28 '18 at 17:12
















2












$begingroup$


We saw in our crypto class that in the group $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes, that if for some $a$, $gcd(a, phi(pq) = (p-1)(q-1))$ = 1 (where $phi$ is Euler's totient function) then the function $f(x) = x^a$ is one to one, and he lecturer proved this by calculating the inverse of $a$ (the RSA trapdoor). What I have trouble understanding is why this proves the function is one to one. We computed an inverse function, that is showed that there is an inverse, but how does this show that there is no other inverse for an element?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
    $endgroup$
    – DudeMan
    Dec 28 '18 at 17:12














2












2








2





$begingroup$


We saw in our crypto class that in the group $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes, that if for some $a$, $gcd(a, phi(pq) = (p-1)(q-1))$ = 1 (where $phi$ is Euler's totient function) then the function $f(x) = x^a$ is one to one, and he lecturer proved this by calculating the inverse of $a$ (the RSA trapdoor). What I have trouble understanding is why this proves the function is one to one. We computed an inverse function, that is showed that there is an inverse, but how does this show that there is no other inverse for an element?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




We saw in our crypto class that in the group $mathbb{Z}^{*}_{pq}$ where $p$ and $q$ are primes, that if for some $a$, $gcd(a, phi(pq) = (p-1)(q-1))$ = 1 (where $phi$ is Euler's totient function) then the function $f(x) = x^a$ is one to one, and he lecturer proved this by calculating the inverse of $a$ (the RSA trapdoor). What I have trouble understanding is why this proves the function is one to one. We computed an inverse function, that is showed that there is an inverse, but how does this show that there is no other inverse for an element?







group-theory number-theory cryptography






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 28 '18 at 17:21









Shaun

9,620113684




9,620113684










asked Dec 28 '18 at 17:07









ElooEloo

1418




1418












  • $begingroup$
    If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
    $endgroup$
    – DudeMan
    Dec 28 '18 at 17:12


















  • $begingroup$
    If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
    $endgroup$
    – DudeMan
    Dec 28 '18 at 17:12
















$begingroup$
If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
$endgroup$
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 17:12




$begingroup$
If you can compute an inverse function, then by definition your function is both one-to-one and onto.
$endgroup$
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 17:12










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055088%2fproving-exponentiation-in-mathbbz-pq-is-one-to-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If $f$ is an function and $g$ and $h$ are inverse functions for $f,$ then $g=h$ since $$g=g(fh)=(gf)h=h.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 28 '18 at 17:15









          D. BroganD. Brogan

          643513




          643513























              0












              $begingroup$

              In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  In general: if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ a positive integer. Then the map $f: G rightarrow G$ defined by $f(g)=g^k$ is a bijection if and only if $gcd(k,|G|)=1$. (The proof of the "if" uses Bézout's Lemma, the "only if" leverages Cauchy's Theorem)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 28 '18 at 20:39









                  Nicky HeksterNicky Hekster

                  29k63456




                  29k63456






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055088%2fproving-exponentiation-in-mathbbz-pq-is-one-to-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

                      Aardman Animations

                      Are they similar matrix