Is there a mathematical treatment of continuously (or smoothly) deforming surfaces, or, in general,...
$begingroup$
I'm wondering if there's been any attempts to construct formal mathematical descriptions of deforming surfaces, whether evolving to some steady state configuration or reacting to some pulse, force, or perturbation.
I know there are way ways to treat these problems numerically, e.g. the immersed boundary method for free boundary problems, and my limited impressions of general relativity suggest that there is some rigorous, differential description of how mass deforms space-time dynamically.
I guess the model situation I'm thinking of is some sphere (or torus; insert smooth surface here) whose boundary can stretch due to some interaction with an external vector field (e.g. electric, fluid flow) or local perturbation (e.g. chemical reaction). Have there been attempts to abstract these scientifically motivated problems to some level of rigorous analysis?
differential-geometry soft-question smooth-manifolds
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm wondering if there's been any attempts to construct formal mathematical descriptions of deforming surfaces, whether evolving to some steady state configuration or reacting to some pulse, force, or perturbation.
I know there are way ways to treat these problems numerically, e.g. the immersed boundary method for free boundary problems, and my limited impressions of general relativity suggest that there is some rigorous, differential description of how mass deforms space-time dynamically.
I guess the model situation I'm thinking of is some sphere (or torus; insert smooth surface here) whose boundary can stretch due to some interaction with an external vector field (e.g. electric, fluid flow) or local perturbation (e.g. chemical reaction). Have there been attempts to abstract these scientifically motivated problems to some level of rigorous analysis?
differential-geometry soft-question smooth-manifolds
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
The whole field of geometric flows studies this kind of thing - particularly of the "evolving to a steady-state configuration" variety.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Carapetis
Apr 28 '16 at 15:58
$begingroup$
Let's assume I have a background in undergraduate differential geometry and some first year graduate analysis. What do I need to do to get involved in this field? Is there a canonical text or comprehensive review of geometric flows?
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
Apr 28 '16 at 16:02
1
$begingroup$
The field is very broad and deep. You need a better background than the one you currently have. To get some feel for it, take a look at the Wikipedia article in the mean curvature flow. My suggestion is to get a better background in Riemannian Geometry (say, do Carmo) and nonlinear PDEs (say, Evans) before trying geometric flows.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
May 2 '16 at 3:35
$begingroup$
@studiosus didn't expect to be able to jump into it immediately. I just wanted a heading, so to speak. Thanks for the advice!
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
May 2 '16 at 3:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm wondering if there's been any attempts to construct formal mathematical descriptions of deforming surfaces, whether evolving to some steady state configuration or reacting to some pulse, force, or perturbation.
I know there are way ways to treat these problems numerically, e.g. the immersed boundary method for free boundary problems, and my limited impressions of general relativity suggest that there is some rigorous, differential description of how mass deforms space-time dynamically.
I guess the model situation I'm thinking of is some sphere (or torus; insert smooth surface here) whose boundary can stretch due to some interaction with an external vector field (e.g. electric, fluid flow) or local perturbation (e.g. chemical reaction). Have there been attempts to abstract these scientifically motivated problems to some level of rigorous analysis?
differential-geometry soft-question smooth-manifolds
$endgroup$
I'm wondering if there's been any attempts to construct formal mathematical descriptions of deforming surfaces, whether evolving to some steady state configuration or reacting to some pulse, force, or perturbation.
I know there are way ways to treat these problems numerically, e.g. the immersed boundary method for free boundary problems, and my limited impressions of general relativity suggest that there is some rigorous, differential description of how mass deforms space-time dynamically.
I guess the model situation I'm thinking of is some sphere (or torus; insert smooth surface here) whose boundary can stretch due to some interaction with an external vector field (e.g. electric, fluid flow) or local perturbation (e.g. chemical reaction). Have there been attempts to abstract these scientifically motivated problems to some level of rigorous analysis?
differential-geometry soft-question smooth-manifolds
differential-geometry soft-question smooth-manifolds
asked Apr 28 '16 at 15:55
CasaBonitaCasaBonita
1206
1206
2
$begingroup$
The whole field of geometric flows studies this kind of thing - particularly of the "evolving to a steady-state configuration" variety.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Carapetis
Apr 28 '16 at 15:58
$begingroup$
Let's assume I have a background in undergraduate differential geometry and some first year graduate analysis. What do I need to do to get involved in this field? Is there a canonical text or comprehensive review of geometric flows?
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
Apr 28 '16 at 16:02
1
$begingroup$
The field is very broad and deep. You need a better background than the one you currently have. To get some feel for it, take a look at the Wikipedia article in the mean curvature flow. My suggestion is to get a better background in Riemannian Geometry (say, do Carmo) and nonlinear PDEs (say, Evans) before trying geometric flows.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
May 2 '16 at 3:35
$begingroup$
@studiosus didn't expect to be able to jump into it immediately. I just wanted a heading, so to speak. Thanks for the advice!
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
May 2 '16 at 3:42
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
The whole field of geometric flows studies this kind of thing - particularly of the "evolving to a steady-state configuration" variety.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Carapetis
Apr 28 '16 at 15:58
$begingroup$
Let's assume I have a background in undergraduate differential geometry and some first year graduate analysis. What do I need to do to get involved in this field? Is there a canonical text or comprehensive review of geometric flows?
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
Apr 28 '16 at 16:02
1
$begingroup$
The field is very broad and deep. You need a better background than the one you currently have. To get some feel for it, take a look at the Wikipedia article in the mean curvature flow. My suggestion is to get a better background in Riemannian Geometry (say, do Carmo) and nonlinear PDEs (say, Evans) before trying geometric flows.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
May 2 '16 at 3:35
$begingroup$
@studiosus didn't expect to be able to jump into it immediately. I just wanted a heading, so to speak. Thanks for the advice!
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
May 2 '16 at 3:42
2
2
$begingroup$
The whole field of geometric flows studies this kind of thing - particularly of the "evolving to a steady-state configuration" variety.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Carapetis
Apr 28 '16 at 15:58
$begingroup$
The whole field of geometric flows studies this kind of thing - particularly of the "evolving to a steady-state configuration" variety.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Carapetis
Apr 28 '16 at 15:58
$begingroup$
Let's assume I have a background in undergraduate differential geometry and some first year graduate analysis. What do I need to do to get involved in this field? Is there a canonical text or comprehensive review of geometric flows?
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
Apr 28 '16 at 16:02
$begingroup$
Let's assume I have a background in undergraduate differential geometry and some first year graduate analysis. What do I need to do to get involved in this field? Is there a canonical text or comprehensive review of geometric flows?
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
Apr 28 '16 at 16:02
1
1
$begingroup$
The field is very broad and deep. You need a better background than the one you currently have. To get some feel for it, take a look at the Wikipedia article in the mean curvature flow. My suggestion is to get a better background in Riemannian Geometry (say, do Carmo) and nonlinear PDEs (say, Evans) before trying geometric flows.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
May 2 '16 at 3:35
$begingroup$
The field is very broad and deep. You need a better background than the one you currently have. To get some feel for it, take a look at the Wikipedia article in the mean curvature flow. My suggestion is to get a better background in Riemannian Geometry (say, do Carmo) and nonlinear PDEs (say, Evans) before trying geometric flows.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
May 2 '16 at 3:35
$begingroup$
@studiosus didn't expect to be able to jump into it immediately. I just wanted a heading, so to speak. Thanks for the advice!
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
May 2 '16 at 3:42
$begingroup$
@studiosus didn't expect to be able to jump into it immediately. I just wanted a heading, so to speak. Thanks for the advice!
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
May 2 '16 at 3:42
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1762838%2fis-there-a-mathematical-treatment-of-continuously-or-smoothly-deforming-surfac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1762838%2fis-there-a-mathematical-treatment-of-continuously-or-smoothly-deforming-surfac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
The whole field of geometric flows studies this kind of thing - particularly of the "evolving to a steady-state configuration" variety.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Carapetis
Apr 28 '16 at 15:58
$begingroup$
Let's assume I have a background in undergraduate differential geometry and some first year graduate analysis. What do I need to do to get involved in this field? Is there a canonical text or comprehensive review of geometric flows?
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
Apr 28 '16 at 16:02
1
$begingroup$
The field is very broad and deep. You need a better background than the one you currently have. To get some feel for it, take a look at the Wikipedia article in the mean curvature flow. My suggestion is to get a better background in Riemannian Geometry (say, do Carmo) and nonlinear PDEs (say, Evans) before trying geometric flows.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
May 2 '16 at 3:35
$begingroup$
@studiosus didn't expect to be able to jump into it immediately. I just wanted a heading, so to speak. Thanks for the advice!
$endgroup$
– CasaBonita
May 2 '16 at 3:42