Why can a 5x4 matrix never be surjective?












0












$begingroup$


My thought is that since a matrix can only be surjective if null(T)= n-m, no matrix can have a nullity of -1 therefore a 5x4 matrix cannot be surjective. Is this a valid proof?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Recall that rank(T)= dim( Im(T)).
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 4 '18 at 15:07
















0












$begingroup$


My thought is that since a matrix can only be surjective if null(T)= n-m, no matrix can have a nullity of -1 therefore a 5x4 matrix cannot be surjective. Is this a valid proof?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Recall that rank(T)= dim( Im(T)).
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 4 '18 at 15:07














0












0








0





$begingroup$


My thought is that since a matrix can only be surjective if null(T)= n-m, no matrix can have a nullity of -1 therefore a 5x4 matrix cannot be surjective. Is this a valid proof?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




My thought is that since a matrix can only be surjective if null(T)= n-m, no matrix can have a nullity of -1 therefore a 5x4 matrix cannot be surjective. Is this a valid proof?







linear-algebra matrices






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 4 '18 at 15:03









Elliot SilverElliot Silver

304




304












  • $begingroup$
    Recall that rank(T)= dim( Im(T)).
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 4 '18 at 15:07


















  • $begingroup$
    Recall that rank(T)= dim( Im(T)).
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 4 '18 at 15:07
















$begingroup$
Recall that rank(T)= dim( Im(T)).
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 4 '18 at 15:07




$begingroup$
Recall that rank(T)= dim( Im(T)).
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 4 '18 at 15:07










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

A $5×4$ matrix represents a linear transformation $T$ from a $4$ dimensional vector space to a $5$ dimensional vector space. If $T$ is surjective, then the rank of $T=5$. But rank nullity theorem implies that $operatorname{rank}(T)+operatorname{nullity}(T)=4$, i.e.
$operatorname{nullity}(T)=-1,$a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    HINT



    Recall that a basis for $mathbb{R^5}$ requires exactly $5$ linearly independent vectors.



    What is the maximum rank for $Ain M_{5times 4}$?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I'm supposed to justify it using the rank nullity theorem
      $endgroup$
      – Elliot Silver
      Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










    • $begingroup$
      @ElliotSilver Yes that's a direct consequance, I've added an additional tip for that.
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










    • $begingroup$
      The max rank would be 5?
      $endgroup$
      – Elliot Silver
      Dec 4 '18 at 15:08










    • $begingroup$
      @ElliotSilver Recall that for a $ntimes m$ matrix $rank(A) le min (m,n)$. That's an important concept you should clarify. Refer to Rank.
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 4 '18 at 15:09












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for trying to help, but I don't think I understand what you mean, the rank is 5 which is less or equal to 5?
      $endgroup$
      – Elliot Silver
      Dec 4 '18 at 15:12











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025685%2fwhy-can-a-5x4-matrix-never-be-surjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    A $5×4$ matrix represents a linear transformation $T$ from a $4$ dimensional vector space to a $5$ dimensional vector space. If $T$ is surjective, then the rank of $T=5$. But rank nullity theorem implies that $operatorname{rank}(T)+operatorname{nullity}(T)=4$, i.e.
    $operatorname{nullity}(T)=-1,$a contradiction.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      A $5×4$ matrix represents a linear transformation $T$ from a $4$ dimensional vector space to a $5$ dimensional vector space. If $T$ is surjective, then the rank of $T=5$. But rank nullity theorem implies that $operatorname{rank}(T)+operatorname{nullity}(T)=4$, i.e.
      $operatorname{nullity}(T)=-1,$a contradiction.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        A $5×4$ matrix represents a linear transformation $T$ from a $4$ dimensional vector space to a $5$ dimensional vector space. If $T$ is surjective, then the rank of $T=5$. But rank nullity theorem implies that $operatorname{rank}(T)+operatorname{nullity}(T)=4$, i.e.
        $operatorname{nullity}(T)=-1,$a contradiction.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        A $5×4$ matrix represents a linear transformation $T$ from a $4$ dimensional vector space to a $5$ dimensional vector space. If $T$ is surjective, then the rank of $T=5$. But rank nullity theorem implies that $operatorname{rank}(T)+operatorname{nullity}(T)=4$, i.e.
        $operatorname{nullity}(T)=-1,$a contradiction.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 4 '18 at 15:22

























        answered Dec 4 '18 at 15:13









        Thomas ShelbyThomas Shelby

        2,408221




        2,408221























            0












            $begingroup$

            HINT



            Recall that a basis for $mathbb{R^5}$ requires exactly $5$ linearly independent vectors.



            What is the maximum rank for $Ain M_{5times 4}$?






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I'm supposed to justify it using the rank nullity theorem
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










            • $begingroup$
              @ElliotSilver Yes that's a direct consequance, I've added an additional tip for that.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










            • $begingroup$
              The max rank would be 5?
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:08










            • $begingroup$
              @ElliotSilver Recall that for a $ntimes m$ matrix $rank(A) le min (m,n)$. That's an important concept you should clarify. Refer to Rank.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:09












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for trying to help, but I don't think I understand what you mean, the rank is 5 which is less or equal to 5?
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:12
















            0












            $begingroup$

            HINT



            Recall that a basis for $mathbb{R^5}$ requires exactly $5$ linearly independent vectors.



            What is the maximum rank for $Ain M_{5times 4}$?






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I'm supposed to justify it using the rank nullity theorem
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










            • $begingroup$
              @ElliotSilver Yes that's a direct consequance, I've added an additional tip for that.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










            • $begingroup$
              The max rank would be 5?
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:08










            • $begingroup$
              @ElliotSilver Recall that for a $ntimes m$ matrix $rank(A) le min (m,n)$. That's an important concept you should clarify. Refer to Rank.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:09












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for trying to help, but I don't think I understand what you mean, the rank is 5 which is less or equal to 5?
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:12














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            HINT



            Recall that a basis for $mathbb{R^5}$ requires exactly $5$ linearly independent vectors.



            What is the maximum rank for $Ain M_{5times 4}$?






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            HINT



            Recall that a basis for $mathbb{R^5}$ requires exactly $5$ linearly independent vectors.



            What is the maximum rank for $Ain M_{5times 4}$?







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 4 '18 at 15:05

























            answered Dec 4 '18 at 15:04









            gimusigimusi

            92.9k94494




            92.9k94494












            • $begingroup$
              I'm supposed to justify it using the rank nullity theorem
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










            • $begingroup$
              @ElliotSilver Yes that's a direct consequance, I've added an additional tip for that.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










            • $begingroup$
              The max rank would be 5?
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:08










            • $begingroup$
              @ElliotSilver Recall that for a $ntimes m$ matrix $rank(A) le min (m,n)$. That's an important concept you should clarify. Refer to Rank.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:09












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for trying to help, but I don't think I understand what you mean, the rank is 5 which is less or equal to 5?
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:12


















            • $begingroup$
              I'm supposed to justify it using the rank nullity theorem
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










            • $begingroup$
              @ElliotSilver Yes that's a direct consequance, I've added an additional tip for that.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:05










            • $begingroup$
              The max rank would be 5?
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:08










            • $begingroup$
              @ElliotSilver Recall that for a $ntimes m$ matrix $rank(A) le min (m,n)$. That's an important concept you should clarify. Refer to Rank.
              $endgroup$
              – gimusi
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:09












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for trying to help, but I don't think I understand what you mean, the rank is 5 which is less or equal to 5?
              $endgroup$
              – Elliot Silver
              Dec 4 '18 at 15:12
















            $begingroup$
            I'm supposed to justify it using the rank nullity theorem
            $endgroup$
            – Elliot Silver
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:05




            $begingroup$
            I'm supposed to justify it using the rank nullity theorem
            $endgroup$
            – Elliot Silver
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:05












            $begingroup$
            @ElliotSilver Yes that's a direct consequance, I've added an additional tip for that.
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:05




            $begingroup$
            @ElliotSilver Yes that's a direct consequance, I've added an additional tip for that.
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:05












            $begingroup$
            The max rank would be 5?
            $endgroup$
            – Elliot Silver
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:08




            $begingroup$
            The max rank would be 5?
            $endgroup$
            – Elliot Silver
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:08












            $begingroup$
            @ElliotSilver Recall that for a $ntimes m$ matrix $rank(A) le min (m,n)$. That's an important concept you should clarify. Refer to Rank.
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:09






            $begingroup$
            @ElliotSilver Recall that for a $ntimes m$ matrix $rank(A) le min (m,n)$. That's an important concept you should clarify. Refer to Rank.
            $endgroup$
            – gimusi
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:09














            $begingroup$
            Thank you for trying to help, but I don't think I understand what you mean, the rank is 5 which is less or equal to 5?
            $endgroup$
            – Elliot Silver
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:12




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for trying to help, but I don't think I understand what you mean, the rank is 5 which is less or equal to 5?
            $endgroup$
            – Elliot Silver
            Dec 4 '18 at 15:12


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025685%2fwhy-can-a-5x4-matrix-never-be-surjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix