is $f(x,y)=e^{x-y}$ globallyconvex?
$begingroup$
The function is positive $forall (x,y)in R^2$.If I consider the restriction to y-axis $f(0,y)=e^{-y}rightarrow 0^+$ for $yrightarrow +infty$ so Inf f=$0$.
To study convexity can I consider the matrix Hessian?
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function is positive $forall (x,y)in R^2$.If I consider the restriction to y-axis $f(0,y)=e^{-y}rightarrow 0^+$ for $yrightarrow +infty$ so Inf f=$0$.
To study convexity can I consider the matrix Hessian?
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function is positive $forall (x,y)in R^2$.If I consider the restriction to y-axis $f(0,y)=e^{-y}rightarrow 0^+$ for $yrightarrow +infty$ so Inf f=$0$.
To study convexity can I consider the matrix Hessian?
real-analysis
$endgroup$
The function is positive $forall (x,y)in R^2$.If I consider the restriction to y-axis $f(0,y)=e^{-y}rightarrow 0^+$ for $yrightarrow +infty$ so Inf f=$0$.
To study convexity can I consider the matrix Hessian?
real-analysis
real-analysis
asked Dec 4 '18 at 15:14
Giulia B.Giulia B.
415211
415211
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For convexity I would start by changing coordiantes from $(x,y)$ to $(p,q)=(x-y,x+y)$. Then $f(p,q)=e^p$, and it is easy to directly compare $f(v)$ and $f(w)$ with $f(tv+(1-t)w)$. One then sees that the function inherits convexity from the real exponential function.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $p = (p_1,p_2)$ and $q = (q_1,q_2)$ and $0 le t le 1$,
$$f(t p + (1-t) q) = exp(t(p_1 - p_2)+(1-t)(q_1-q_2)) le
t exp(p_1-p_2) + (1-t) exp(q_1 - q_2) = t f(p) + (1-t) f(q)$$
by convexity of $exp$.
Somewhat more generally, if $g$ is an affine map and $h$ is convex then $h circ g$ is convex.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The function is globally convex but hasn't absolute minimum?
$endgroup$
– Giulia B.
Dec 4 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Yes. Why is that surprising to you?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 4 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Yes: for precisely the same reason that $x mapsto e^x$ is globally convex but has no absolute minimum.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 4 '18 at 15:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take any $(x,y), (z,w)inmathbb{R}^2$, and any $t in mathbb{R}$. Then $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w)) = e^{tx+(1-t)z - ty - (1-t)w} = e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)}$, and $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w) = te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w}$. We need to show that the former is never greater than the latter.
But $g: mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}: x mapsto e^x$ is convex, so we have (taking our points in the definition of the convexity of $g$ to be $x-y$ and $z-w$)
$$e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)} leq te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w},$$
But the left-hand-side of this is exactly $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w))$, and the right-hand-side is exactly $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w)$, so indeed, $f$ is convex.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025694%2fis-fx-y-ex-y-globallyconvex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For convexity I would start by changing coordiantes from $(x,y)$ to $(p,q)=(x-y,x+y)$. Then $f(p,q)=e^p$, and it is easy to directly compare $f(v)$ and $f(w)$ with $f(tv+(1-t)w)$. One then sees that the function inherits convexity from the real exponential function.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For convexity I would start by changing coordiantes from $(x,y)$ to $(p,q)=(x-y,x+y)$. Then $f(p,q)=e^p$, and it is easy to directly compare $f(v)$ and $f(w)$ with $f(tv+(1-t)w)$. One then sees that the function inherits convexity from the real exponential function.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For convexity I would start by changing coordiantes from $(x,y)$ to $(p,q)=(x-y,x+y)$. Then $f(p,q)=e^p$, and it is easy to directly compare $f(v)$ and $f(w)$ with $f(tv+(1-t)w)$. One then sees that the function inherits convexity from the real exponential function.
$endgroup$
For convexity I would start by changing coordiantes from $(x,y)$ to $(p,q)=(x-y,x+y)$. Then $f(p,q)=e^p$, and it is easy to directly compare $f(v)$ and $f(w)$ with $f(tv+(1-t)w)$. One then sees that the function inherits convexity from the real exponential function.
answered Dec 4 '18 at 15:19
Henning MakholmHenning Makholm
239k17304541
239k17304541
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $p = (p_1,p_2)$ and $q = (q_1,q_2)$ and $0 le t le 1$,
$$f(t p + (1-t) q) = exp(t(p_1 - p_2)+(1-t)(q_1-q_2)) le
t exp(p_1-p_2) + (1-t) exp(q_1 - q_2) = t f(p) + (1-t) f(q)$$
by convexity of $exp$.
Somewhat more generally, if $g$ is an affine map and $h$ is convex then $h circ g$ is convex.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The function is globally convex but hasn't absolute minimum?
$endgroup$
– Giulia B.
Dec 4 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Yes. Why is that surprising to you?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 4 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Yes: for precisely the same reason that $x mapsto e^x$ is globally convex but has no absolute minimum.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 4 '18 at 15:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $p = (p_1,p_2)$ and $q = (q_1,q_2)$ and $0 le t le 1$,
$$f(t p + (1-t) q) = exp(t(p_1 - p_2)+(1-t)(q_1-q_2)) le
t exp(p_1-p_2) + (1-t) exp(q_1 - q_2) = t f(p) + (1-t) f(q)$$
by convexity of $exp$.
Somewhat more generally, if $g$ is an affine map and $h$ is convex then $h circ g$ is convex.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The function is globally convex but hasn't absolute minimum?
$endgroup$
– Giulia B.
Dec 4 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Yes. Why is that surprising to you?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 4 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Yes: for precisely the same reason that $x mapsto e^x$ is globally convex but has no absolute minimum.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 4 '18 at 15:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $p = (p_1,p_2)$ and $q = (q_1,q_2)$ and $0 le t le 1$,
$$f(t p + (1-t) q) = exp(t(p_1 - p_2)+(1-t)(q_1-q_2)) le
t exp(p_1-p_2) + (1-t) exp(q_1 - q_2) = t f(p) + (1-t) f(q)$$
by convexity of $exp$.
Somewhat more generally, if $g$ is an affine map and $h$ is convex then $h circ g$ is convex.
$endgroup$
If $p = (p_1,p_2)$ and $q = (q_1,q_2)$ and $0 le t le 1$,
$$f(t p + (1-t) q) = exp(t(p_1 - p_2)+(1-t)(q_1-q_2)) le
t exp(p_1-p_2) + (1-t) exp(q_1 - q_2) = t f(p) + (1-t) f(q)$$
by convexity of $exp$.
Somewhat more generally, if $g$ is an affine map and $h$ is convex then $h circ g$ is convex.
answered Dec 4 '18 at 15:22
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
320k23210462
320k23210462
$begingroup$
The function is globally convex but hasn't absolute minimum?
$endgroup$
– Giulia B.
Dec 4 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Yes. Why is that surprising to you?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 4 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Yes: for precisely the same reason that $x mapsto e^x$ is globally convex but has no absolute minimum.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 4 '18 at 15:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function is globally convex but hasn't absolute minimum?
$endgroup$
– Giulia B.
Dec 4 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Yes. Why is that surprising to you?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 4 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Yes: for precisely the same reason that $x mapsto e^x$ is globally convex but has no absolute minimum.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 4 '18 at 15:26
$begingroup$
The function is globally convex but hasn't absolute minimum?
$endgroup$
– Giulia B.
Dec 4 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
The function is globally convex but hasn't absolute minimum?
$endgroup$
– Giulia B.
Dec 4 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Yes. Why is that surprising to you?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 4 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Yes. Why is that surprising to you?
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 4 '18 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Yes: for precisely the same reason that $x mapsto e^x$ is globally convex but has no absolute minimum.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 4 '18 at 15:26
$begingroup$
Yes: for precisely the same reason that $x mapsto e^x$ is globally convex but has no absolute minimum.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 4 '18 at 15:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take any $(x,y), (z,w)inmathbb{R}^2$, and any $t in mathbb{R}$. Then $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w)) = e^{tx+(1-t)z - ty - (1-t)w} = e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)}$, and $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w) = te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w}$. We need to show that the former is never greater than the latter.
But $g: mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}: x mapsto e^x$ is convex, so we have (taking our points in the definition of the convexity of $g$ to be $x-y$ and $z-w$)
$$e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)} leq te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w},$$
But the left-hand-side of this is exactly $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w))$, and the right-hand-side is exactly $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w)$, so indeed, $f$ is convex.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take any $(x,y), (z,w)inmathbb{R}^2$, and any $t in mathbb{R}$. Then $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w)) = e^{tx+(1-t)z - ty - (1-t)w} = e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)}$, and $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w) = te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w}$. We need to show that the former is never greater than the latter.
But $g: mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}: x mapsto e^x$ is convex, so we have (taking our points in the definition of the convexity of $g$ to be $x-y$ and $z-w$)
$$e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)} leq te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w},$$
But the left-hand-side of this is exactly $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w))$, and the right-hand-side is exactly $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w)$, so indeed, $f$ is convex.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take any $(x,y), (z,w)inmathbb{R}^2$, and any $t in mathbb{R}$. Then $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w)) = e^{tx+(1-t)z - ty - (1-t)w} = e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)}$, and $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w) = te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w}$. We need to show that the former is never greater than the latter.
But $g: mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}: x mapsto e^x$ is convex, so we have (taking our points in the definition of the convexity of $g$ to be $x-y$ and $z-w$)
$$e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)} leq te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w},$$
But the left-hand-side of this is exactly $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w))$, and the right-hand-side is exactly $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w)$, so indeed, $f$ is convex.
$endgroup$
Take any $(x,y), (z,w)inmathbb{R}^2$, and any $t in mathbb{R}$. Then $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w)) = e^{tx+(1-t)z - ty - (1-t)w} = e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)}$, and $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w) = te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w}$. We need to show that the former is never greater than the latter.
But $g: mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}: x mapsto e^x$ is convex, so we have (taking our points in the definition of the convexity of $g$ to be $x-y$ and $z-w$)
$$e^{t(x-y)+(1-t)(z-w)} leq te^{x-y}+(1-t)e^{z-w},$$
But the left-hand-side of this is exactly $f(t(x,y)+(1-t)(z,w))$, and the right-hand-side is exactly $tf(x,y)+(1-t)f(z,w)$, so indeed, $f$ is convex.
answered Dec 4 '18 at 15:25
user3482749user3482749
4,057618
4,057618
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025694%2fis-fx-y-ex-y-globallyconvex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown