Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?
This is a follow up to my previous question. In all the examples given there was some other advantage that decided the battle and not encirclement. For example at Narva
They attacked inexperienced Russian regiments and crumbled them one by one.
Also Finnish Motti tactics in the winter war, Teutoburg etc are a type of divide and conquer ambush tactic and not simply an encirclement. At Alesia there are no historical details but I have not seen evidence Rome had less cavalry than the enemy.
I cant find any examples where the encircler didn't have have a superior local number of motivated cavalry.
Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?
war
add a comment |
This is a follow up to my previous question. In all the examples given there was some other advantage that decided the battle and not encirclement. For example at Narva
They attacked inexperienced Russian regiments and crumbled them one by one.
Also Finnish Motti tactics in the winter war, Teutoburg etc are a type of divide and conquer ambush tactic and not simply an encirclement. At Alesia there are no historical details but I have not seen evidence Rome had less cavalry than the enemy.
I cant find any examples where the encircler didn't have have a superior local number of motivated cavalry.
Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?
war
add a comment |
This is a follow up to my previous question. In all the examples given there was some other advantage that decided the battle and not encirclement. For example at Narva
They attacked inexperienced Russian regiments and crumbled them one by one.
Also Finnish Motti tactics in the winter war, Teutoburg etc are a type of divide and conquer ambush tactic and not simply an encirclement. At Alesia there are no historical details but I have not seen evidence Rome had less cavalry than the enemy.
I cant find any examples where the encircler didn't have have a superior local number of motivated cavalry.
Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?
war
This is a follow up to my previous question. In all the examples given there was some other advantage that decided the battle and not encirclement. For example at Narva
They attacked inexperienced Russian regiments and crumbled them one by one.
Also Finnish Motti tactics in the winter war, Teutoburg etc are a type of divide and conquer ambush tactic and not simply an encirclement. At Alesia there are no historical details but I have not seen evidence Rome had less cavalry than the enemy.
I cant find any examples where the encircler didn't have have a superior local number of motivated cavalry.
Has an encirclement ever succeeded with numerically inferior cavalry?
war
war
edited Dec 16 at 18:37
Mark C. Wallace♦
23.3k972111
23.3k972111
asked Dec 14 at 20:44
John
201
201
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.
In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.
General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.
That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.
1
I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 0:09
1
@PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:44
2
@PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:57
The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.
– Evargalo
Dec 15 at 12:11
add a comment |
The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.
Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.
Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.
AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.
2
Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides
– Samuel Russell
Dec 15 at 1:09
1
@SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 1:22
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50101%2fhas-an-encirclement-ever-succeeded-with-numerically-inferior-cavalry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.
In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.
General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.
That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.
1
I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 0:09
1
@PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:44
2
@PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:57
The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.
– Evargalo
Dec 15 at 12:11
add a comment |
I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.
In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.
General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.
That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.
1
I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 0:09
1
@PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:44
2
@PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:57
The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.
– Evargalo
Dec 15 at 12:11
add a comment |
I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.
In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.
General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.
That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.
I'm not sure if this counts as a valid answer, but ships of the line are always superior to cavalry. Or, in this case: nearly always.
In 1793 the Dutch fleet was frozen at anchor, moored close to Den Helder, near the island of Texel. That winter was quite severe. Even the Rhine river froze over, as were parts of the North Sea close to shore. The Dutch republic was at war with the French republic - and losing. A French cavalry unit captured the fleet intact.
General Pichechru (in Dutch he's known as Pietje Cru) knew the ships were iced in. He ordered the very appropriate named general Jan Willem de Winter to capture the fleet intact. He used hussars and infantry, carried on the backs of the horses. The hooves were covered with fabric to muffle the sound. The hussars rode up to the ships, quietly, and the infantry boarded the ships. The fleet was captured intact, without casualties.
That capture ended the war. It's one of the very few examples in history of cavalry capturing a fleet.
edited Dec 16 at 0:58
answered Dec 15 at 0:03
Jos
8,20112142
8,20112142
1
I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 0:09
1
@PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:44
2
@PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:57
The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.
– Evargalo
Dec 15 at 12:11
add a comment |
1
I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 0:09
1
@PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:44
2
@PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:57
The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.
– Evargalo
Dec 15 at 12:11
1
1
I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 0:09
I learned that story at my father's knee - well done!
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 0:09
1
1
@PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:44
@PieterGeerkens I think this is the only example in history of general Winter actually being present in the flesh on a battlefield.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:44
2
2
@PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:57
@PieterGeerkens Oh. Was there a general (de) Winter present? I meant literally, not figuratively. The chap capturing that fleet was named de Winter.
– Jos
Dec 15 at 0:57
The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.
– Evargalo
Dec 15 at 12:11
The general is named 'Pichegru' in French.
– Evargalo
Dec 15 at 12:11
add a comment |
The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.
Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.
Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.
AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.
2
Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides
– Samuel Russell
Dec 15 at 1:09
1
@SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 1:22
add a comment |
The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.
Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.
Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.
AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.
2
Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides
– Samuel Russell
Dec 15 at 1:09
1
@SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 1:22
add a comment |
The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.
Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.
Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.
AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.
The Battle of Cowpens where 300 British cavalry (250 of the British Legion plus 50 of the 17th Light Dragoons) outnumbered American Cavalry of only ~180 men and horses ("82 Continental light dragoons; 55 state dragoons; 45 militia dragoons") by almost 2:1.
Total forces for both sides were about 1,150 British against about 1,900 (most poorly trained and disciplined militia) Americans.
Caught in a clever double envelopment that has been compared with the Battle of Cannae in ancient times, many of the British surrendered.
AN interesting note - in both this battle and Cannae, Morgan and Hannibal leverage the very weakness of their main battle line into a tactical advantage that sets up the double envelopment.
edited Dec 14 at 22:43
answered Dec 14 at 21:06
Pieter Geerkens
39.1k6116187
39.1k6116187
2
Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides
– Samuel Russell
Dec 15 at 1:09
1
@SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 1:22
add a comment |
2
Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides
– Samuel Russell
Dec 15 at 1:09
1
@SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 1:22
2
2
Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides
– Samuel Russell
Dec 15 at 1:09
Do Dragoons really count as cavalry??!!?!one. ducks and hides
– Samuel Russell
Dec 15 at 1:09
1
1
@SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 1:22
@SamuelRussell: Emmanuel Grouchy's dragoons were always competent cavalry. Prior to the 1840's I doubt a British dragoon, light or heavy, could have distinguished a carbine from a pistol.
– Pieter Geerkens
Dec 15 at 1:22
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50101%2fhas-an-encirclement-ever-succeeded-with-numerically-inferior-cavalry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown