Can higher dimensional spheres be regularly partitioned/discretized?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A circle can be partitioned into $ninmathbb{N}$ congruent 1-spherical line segments similar to the regular polygons.
A sphere can be partitioned into $nin{4,6,20}$ congruent 2-spherical equilateral triangles similar to the tetra-, octa-, and icosahedron.
Is that the end of the story, or is it possible to partition a glome into congruent 3-spherical tetrahedrons for some $n$s?
geometry spheres platonic-solids
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A circle can be partitioned into $ninmathbb{N}$ congruent 1-spherical line segments similar to the regular polygons.
A sphere can be partitioned into $nin{4,6,20}$ congruent 2-spherical equilateral triangles similar to the tetra-, octa-, and icosahedron.
Is that the end of the story, or is it possible to partition a glome into congruent 3-spherical tetrahedrons for some $n$s?
geometry spheres platonic-solids
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A circle can be partitioned into $ninmathbb{N}$ congruent 1-spherical line segments similar to the regular polygons.
A sphere can be partitioned into $nin{4,6,20}$ congruent 2-spherical equilateral triangles similar to the tetra-, octa-, and icosahedron.
Is that the end of the story, or is it possible to partition a glome into congruent 3-spherical tetrahedrons for some $n$s?
geometry spheres platonic-solids
A circle can be partitioned into $ninmathbb{N}$ congruent 1-spherical line segments similar to the regular polygons.
A sphere can be partitioned into $nin{4,6,20}$ congruent 2-spherical equilateral triangles similar to the tetra-, octa-, and icosahedron.
Is that the end of the story, or is it possible to partition a glome into congruent 3-spherical tetrahedrons for some $n$s?
geometry spheres platonic-solids
geometry spheres platonic-solids
asked Nov 21 at 9:27
Oppenede
356111
356111
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The question is equivalent to asking for regular polytopes whose facets are simplices. There are two infinite families: the simplices themselves (which are generalizations of tetrahedra), and the cross-polytopes (which are generalizations of octahedra). In four dimensions, there is also the 600-cell.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The question is equivalent to asking for regular polytopes whose facets are simplices. There are two infinite families: the simplices themselves (which are generalizations of tetrahedra), and the cross-polytopes (which are generalizations of octahedra). In four dimensions, there is also the 600-cell.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The question is equivalent to asking for regular polytopes whose facets are simplices. There are two infinite families: the simplices themselves (which are generalizations of tetrahedra), and the cross-polytopes (which are generalizations of octahedra). In four dimensions, there is also the 600-cell.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The question is equivalent to asking for regular polytopes whose facets are simplices. There are two infinite families: the simplices themselves (which are generalizations of tetrahedra), and the cross-polytopes (which are generalizations of octahedra). In four dimensions, there is also the 600-cell.
The question is equivalent to asking for regular polytopes whose facets are simplices. There are two infinite families: the simplices themselves (which are generalizations of tetrahedra), and the cross-polytopes (which are generalizations of octahedra). In four dimensions, there is also the 600-cell.
answered Nov 21 at 11:19
Rahul
32.9k467165
32.9k467165
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007479%2fcan-higher-dimensional-spheres-be-regularly-partitioned-discretized%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown