Show that $n mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq epsilon sqrt{n}} to 0$
$begingroup$
Let $(X_n)_n$ be a sequence of identically distributed random variables with $mathbb{E}X_1^2 < infty$. Show that
$$lim_{n to infty} nmathbb{P}{|X_1| geq epsilon sqrt{n}} = 0$$ for all $epsilon > 0$.
Here is the solution my teaching assistant provides:
We know that
$$int_0^infty mathbb{P}{X_1^2 geq tepsilon^2}dt = mathbb{E}left[frac{X_1^2}{epsilon^2}right]< infty$$
Hence $$sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{P}{X_1^2 geq n epsilon^2} = sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq sqrt{n} epsilon}< infty$$
and because $sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n}= infty$, it follows that $n mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq epsilon sqrt{n}} to 0$ when $n to infty$.
Questions:
How do we deduce the last step? (I.e. $n mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq sqrt{n}epsilon} to 0$ from divergence of the harmonic series?)
I do not think this is correct. I think we can fix the argument with the Borel Cantelli lemma though.
probability-theory measure-theory probability-limit-theorems borel-cantelli-lemmas
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(X_n)_n$ be a sequence of identically distributed random variables with $mathbb{E}X_1^2 < infty$. Show that
$$lim_{n to infty} nmathbb{P}{|X_1| geq epsilon sqrt{n}} = 0$$ for all $epsilon > 0$.
Here is the solution my teaching assistant provides:
We know that
$$int_0^infty mathbb{P}{X_1^2 geq tepsilon^2}dt = mathbb{E}left[frac{X_1^2}{epsilon^2}right]< infty$$
Hence $$sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{P}{X_1^2 geq n epsilon^2} = sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq sqrt{n} epsilon}< infty$$
and because $sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n}= infty$, it follows that $n mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq epsilon sqrt{n}} to 0$ when $n to infty$.
Questions:
How do we deduce the last step? (I.e. $n mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq sqrt{n}epsilon} to 0$ from divergence of the harmonic series?)
I do not think this is correct. I think we can fix the argument with the Borel Cantelli lemma though.
probability-theory measure-theory probability-limit-theorems borel-cantelli-lemmas
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
It is true that, if $(x_n)$ is positive and nonincreasing and if the series $sum x_n$ converges then $nx_nto0$, hence the solution in the book is formally correct... except that the divergence of the series $sum frac1n$ is off-topic hence mentioning it here is squarely misleading. One could also mention that the exercise can be completely solved by a, different, one-line argument. Which book is this taken from?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 14:29
$begingroup$
@Did What short solution did you have in mind? I'd like to see a one line approach! And I wrote down that it comes from a book, but it was in fact the solution my teaching assistant wrote down.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 16:13
1
$begingroup$
Consider $A_n={|X|>epsilonsqrt n}$ and $Y_n=X^2mathbf 1_{A_n}$, then $Y_nto0$ almost surely and $|Y_n|leqslant X^2$ with $E(X^2)$ finite hence $E(Y_n)to0$ by Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem. But $E(Y_n)geqslantepsilon^2nP(A_n)$ hence $nP(A_n)to0$, qed.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 22:06
$begingroup$
Very elegant indeed. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 22:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(X_n)_n$ be a sequence of identically distributed random variables with $mathbb{E}X_1^2 < infty$. Show that
$$lim_{n to infty} nmathbb{P}{|X_1| geq epsilon sqrt{n}} = 0$$ for all $epsilon > 0$.
Here is the solution my teaching assistant provides:
We know that
$$int_0^infty mathbb{P}{X_1^2 geq tepsilon^2}dt = mathbb{E}left[frac{X_1^2}{epsilon^2}right]< infty$$
Hence $$sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{P}{X_1^2 geq n epsilon^2} = sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq sqrt{n} epsilon}< infty$$
and because $sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n}= infty$, it follows that $n mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq epsilon sqrt{n}} to 0$ when $n to infty$.
Questions:
How do we deduce the last step? (I.e. $n mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq sqrt{n}epsilon} to 0$ from divergence of the harmonic series?)
I do not think this is correct. I think we can fix the argument with the Borel Cantelli lemma though.
probability-theory measure-theory probability-limit-theorems borel-cantelli-lemmas
$endgroup$
Let $(X_n)_n$ be a sequence of identically distributed random variables with $mathbb{E}X_1^2 < infty$. Show that
$$lim_{n to infty} nmathbb{P}{|X_1| geq epsilon sqrt{n}} = 0$$ for all $epsilon > 0$.
Here is the solution my teaching assistant provides:
We know that
$$int_0^infty mathbb{P}{X_1^2 geq tepsilon^2}dt = mathbb{E}left[frac{X_1^2}{epsilon^2}right]< infty$$
Hence $$sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{P}{X_1^2 geq n epsilon^2} = sum_{n=1}^infty mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq sqrt{n} epsilon}< infty$$
and because $sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n}= infty$, it follows that $n mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq epsilon sqrt{n}} to 0$ when $n to infty$.
Questions:
How do we deduce the last step? (I.e. $n mathbb{P}{|X_1| geq sqrt{n}epsilon} to 0$ from divergence of the harmonic series?)
I do not think this is correct. I think we can fix the argument with the Borel Cantelli lemma though.
probability-theory measure-theory probability-limit-theorems borel-cantelli-lemmas
probability-theory measure-theory probability-limit-theorems borel-cantelli-lemmas
edited Dec 16 '18 at 22:08
Did
248k23224463
248k23224463
asked Dec 16 '18 at 13:52
Math_QEDMath_QED
7,62931452
7,62931452
2
$begingroup$
It is true that, if $(x_n)$ is positive and nonincreasing and if the series $sum x_n$ converges then $nx_nto0$, hence the solution in the book is formally correct... except that the divergence of the series $sum frac1n$ is off-topic hence mentioning it here is squarely misleading. One could also mention that the exercise can be completely solved by a, different, one-line argument. Which book is this taken from?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 14:29
$begingroup$
@Did What short solution did you have in mind? I'd like to see a one line approach! And I wrote down that it comes from a book, but it was in fact the solution my teaching assistant wrote down.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 16:13
1
$begingroup$
Consider $A_n={|X|>epsilonsqrt n}$ and $Y_n=X^2mathbf 1_{A_n}$, then $Y_nto0$ almost surely and $|Y_n|leqslant X^2$ with $E(X^2)$ finite hence $E(Y_n)to0$ by Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem. But $E(Y_n)geqslantepsilon^2nP(A_n)$ hence $nP(A_n)to0$, qed.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 22:06
$begingroup$
Very elegant indeed. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 22:10
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
It is true that, if $(x_n)$ is positive and nonincreasing and if the series $sum x_n$ converges then $nx_nto0$, hence the solution in the book is formally correct... except that the divergence of the series $sum frac1n$ is off-topic hence mentioning it here is squarely misleading. One could also mention that the exercise can be completely solved by a, different, one-line argument. Which book is this taken from?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 14:29
$begingroup$
@Did What short solution did you have in mind? I'd like to see a one line approach! And I wrote down that it comes from a book, but it was in fact the solution my teaching assistant wrote down.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 16:13
1
$begingroup$
Consider $A_n={|X|>epsilonsqrt n}$ and $Y_n=X^2mathbf 1_{A_n}$, then $Y_nto0$ almost surely and $|Y_n|leqslant X^2$ with $E(X^2)$ finite hence $E(Y_n)to0$ by Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem. But $E(Y_n)geqslantepsilon^2nP(A_n)$ hence $nP(A_n)to0$, qed.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 22:06
$begingroup$
Very elegant indeed. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 22:10
2
2
$begingroup$
It is true that, if $(x_n)$ is positive and nonincreasing and if the series $sum x_n$ converges then $nx_nto0$, hence the solution in the book is formally correct... except that the divergence of the series $sum frac1n$ is off-topic hence mentioning it here is squarely misleading. One could also mention that the exercise can be completely solved by a, different, one-line argument. Which book is this taken from?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 14:29
$begingroup$
It is true that, if $(x_n)$ is positive and nonincreasing and if the series $sum x_n$ converges then $nx_nto0$, hence the solution in the book is formally correct... except that the divergence of the series $sum frac1n$ is off-topic hence mentioning it here is squarely misleading. One could also mention that the exercise can be completely solved by a, different, one-line argument. Which book is this taken from?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 14:29
$begingroup$
@Did What short solution did you have in mind? I'd like to see a one line approach! And I wrote down that it comes from a book, but it was in fact the solution my teaching assistant wrote down.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 16:13
$begingroup$
@Did What short solution did you have in mind? I'd like to see a one line approach! And I wrote down that it comes from a book, but it was in fact the solution my teaching assistant wrote down.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 16:13
1
1
$begingroup$
Consider $A_n={|X|>epsilonsqrt n}$ and $Y_n=X^2mathbf 1_{A_n}$, then $Y_nto0$ almost surely and $|Y_n|leqslant X^2$ with $E(X^2)$ finite hence $E(Y_n)to0$ by Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem. But $E(Y_n)geqslantepsilon^2nP(A_n)$ hence $nP(A_n)to0$, qed.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 22:06
$begingroup$
Consider $A_n={|X|>epsilonsqrt n}$ and $Y_n=X^2mathbf 1_{A_n}$, then $Y_nto0$ almost surely and $|Y_n|leqslant X^2$ with $E(X^2)$ finite hence $E(Y_n)to0$ by Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem. But $E(Y_n)geqslantepsilon^2nP(A_n)$ hence $nP(A_n)to0$, qed.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 22:06
$begingroup$
Very elegant indeed. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 22:10
$begingroup$
Very elegant indeed. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 22:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Indeed, it seems that what is written is that "if $a_n$, is a sequence of positive numbers such that $sum_n a_n/n$ is convergent, then $a_nto 0$. But this may not be true, for example if $a_n=1$ when $n$ has the for $2^k$ for some $kgeqslant 1$ and zero otherwise. However, it is true if there exists positive constants $c$ and $C$ such that for all $Ngeqslant 1$,
$$
ca_{2^{N+1}}leqslant min_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}a_nmbox{ and } max_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}leqslant Ca_{2^{N}} .
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042629%2fshow-that-n-mathbbp-x-1-geq-epsilon-sqrtn-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Indeed, it seems that what is written is that "if $a_n$, is a sequence of positive numbers such that $sum_n a_n/n$ is convergent, then $a_nto 0$. But this may not be true, for example if $a_n=1$ when $n$ has the for $2^k$ for some $kgeqslant 1$ and zero otherwise. However, it is true if there exists positive constants $c$ and $C$ such that for all $Ngeqslant 1$,
$$
ca_{2^{N+1}}leqslant min_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}a_nmbox{ and } max_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}leqslant Ca_{2^{N}} .
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Indeed, it seems that what is written is that "if $a_n$, is a sequence of positive numbers such that $sum_n a_n/n$ is convergent, then $a_nto 0$. But this may not be true, for example if $a_n=1$ when $n$ has the for $2^k$ for some $kgeqslant 1$ and zero otherwise. However, it is true if there exists positive constants $c$ and $C$ such that for all $Ngeqslant 1$,
$$
ca_{2^{N+1}}leqslant min_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}a_nmbox{ and } max_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}leqslant Ca_{2^{N}} .
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Indeed, it seems that what is written is that "if $a_n$, is a sequence of positive numbers such that $sum_n a_n/n$ is convergent, then $a_nto 0$. But this may not be true, for example if $a_n=1$ when $n$ has the for $2^k$ for some $kgeqslant 1$ and zero otherwise. However, it is true if there exists positive constants $c$ and $C$ such that for all $Ngeqslant 1$,
$$
ca_{2^{N+1}}leqslant min_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}a_nmbox{ and } max_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}leqslant Ca_{2^{N}} .
$$
$endgroup$
Indeed, it seems that what is written is that "if $a_n$, is a sequence of positive numbers such that $sum_n a_n/n$ is convergent, then $a_nto 0$. But this may not be true, for example if $a_n=1$ when $n$ has the for $2^k$ for some $kgeqslant 1$ and zero otherwise. However, it is true if there exists positive constants $c$ and $C$ such that for all $Ngeqslant 1$,
$$
ca_{2^{N+1}}leqslant min_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}a_nmbox{ and } max_{2^Nleqslant nleqslant 2^{N+1}}leqslant Ca_{2^{N}} .
$$
answered Dec 16 '18 at 14:14
Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo
127k16151264
127k16151264
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042629%2fshow-that-n-mathbbp-x-1-geq-epsilon-sqrtn-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
It is true that, if $(x_n)$ is positive and nonincreasing and if the series $sum x_n$ converges then $nx_nto0$, hence the solution in the book is formally correct... except that the divergence of the series $sum frac1n$ is off-topic hence mentioning it here is squarely misleading. One could also mention that the exercise can be completely solved by a, different, one-line argument. Which book is this taken from?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 14:29
$begingroup$
@Did What short solution did you have in mind? I'd like to see a one line approach! And I wrote down that it comes from a book, but it was in fact the solution my teaching assistant wrote down.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 16:13
1
$begingroup$
Consider $A_n={|X|>epsilonsqrt n}$ and $Y_n=X^2mathbf 1_{A_n}$, then $Y_nto0$ almost surely and $|Y_n|leqslant X^2$ with $E(X^2)$ finite hence $E(Y_n)to0$ by Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem. But $E(Y_n)geqslantepsilon^2nP(A_n)$ hence $nP(A_n)to0$, qed.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 16 '18 at 22:06
$begingroup$
Very elegant indeed. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Dec 16 '18 at 22:10