Proving $lim_{xto 0}cosleft(frac{1}{x}right)$ doesn't exist [closed]
$begingroup$
I have tried this by analizing the limits when $x=2{pi}k$ and $x=k+frac{pi}{2}$ when $kin Bbb N$. In the first case, I have written $lim_{kto 0}cos(frac{1}{2{pi}k})=lim_{kto infty}cos(2{pi}k)=1$ and in the second case $lim_{kto 0}cos(frac{1}{k+frac{pi}{2}})=lim_{kto infty}cos(k+frac{pi}{2})=0$. So the limit doesn't exist.
I would like to know if this is reasoning is correct and the if it would be posible to prove the inexistence of this limit with the $epsilon - delta$ definition.
Thanks in advance
limits
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by RRL, Jyrki Lahtonen, metamorphy, Did, Cesareo Dec 20 '18 at 12:23
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Jyrki Lahtonen, metamorphy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have tried this by analizing the limits when $x=2{pi}k$ and $x=k+frac{pi}{2}$ when $kin Bbb N$. In the first case, I have written $lim_{kto 0}cos(frac{1}{2{pi}k})=lim_{kto infty}cos(2{pi}k)=1$ and in the second case $lim_{kto 0}cos(frac{1}{k+frac{pi}{2}})=lim_{kto infty}cos(k+frac{pi}{2})=0$. So the limit doesn't exist.
I would like to know if this is reasoning is correct and the if it would be posible to prove the inexistence of this limit with the $epsilon - delta$ definition.
Thanks in advance
limits
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by RRL, Jyrki Lahtonen, metamorphy, Did, Cesareo Dec 20 '18 at 12:23
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Jyrki Lahtonen, metamorphy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
$begingroup$
You seem to think that $cos(1/x)=cos(x)$ for all real number x.
$endgroup$
– Philippe Malot
Dec 16 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
No, there are several confusions/mistakes in your development.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Dec 16 '18 at 13:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have tried this by analizing the limits when $x=2{pi}k$ and $x=k+frac{pi}{2}$ when $kin Bbb N$. In the first case, I have written $lim_{kto 0}cos(frac{1}{2{pi}k})=lim_{kto infty}cos(2{pi}k)=1$ and in the second case $lim_{kto 0}cos(frac{1}{k+frac{pi}{2}})=lim_{kto infty}cos(k+frac{pi}{2})=0$. So the limit doesn't exist.
I would like to know if this is reasoning is correct and the if it would be posible to prove the inexistence of this limit with the $epsilon - delta$ definition.
Thanks in advance
limits
$endgroup$
I have tried this by analizing the limits when $x=2{pi}k$ and $x=k+frac{pi}{2}$ when $kin Bbb N$. In the first case, I have written $lim_{kto 0}cos(frac{1}{2{pi}k})=lim_{kto infty}cos(2{pi}k)=1$ and in the second case $lim_{kto 0}cos(frac{1}{k+frac{pi}{2}})=lim_{kto infty}cos(k+frac{pi}{2})=0$. So the limit doesn't exist.
I would like to know if this is reasoning is correct and the if it would be posible to prove the inexistence of this limit with the $epsilon - delta$ definition.
Thanks in advance
limits
limits
edited Dec 16 '18 at 14:45
gimusi
92.8k84494
92.8k84494
asked Dec 16 '18 at 13:38
AndarrkorAndarrkor
496
496
closed as off-topic by RRL, Jyrki Lahtonen, metamorphy, Did, Cesareo Dec 20 '18 at 12:23
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Jyrki Lahtonen, metamorphy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by RRL, Jyrki Lahtonen, metamorphy, Did, Cesareo Dec 20 '18 at 12:23
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Jyrki Lahtonen, metamorphy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
$begingroup$
You seem to think that $cos(1/x)=cos(x)$ for all real number x.
$endgroup$
– Philippe Malot
Dec 16 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
No, there are several confusions/mistakes in your development.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Dec 16 '18 at 13:48
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You seem to think that $cos(1/x)=cos(x)$ for all real number x.
$endgroup$
– Philippe Malot
Dec 16 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
No, there are several confusions/mistakes in your development.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Dec 16 '18 at 13:48
1
1
$begingroup$
You seem to think that $cos(1/x)=cos(x)$ for all real number x.
$endgroup$
– Philippe Malot
Dec 16 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
You seem to think that $cos(1/x)=cos(x)$ for all real number x.
$endgroup$
– Philippe Malot
Dec 16 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
No, there are several confusions/mistakes in your development.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Dec 16 '18 at 13:48
$begingroup$
No, there are several confusions/mistakes in your development.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Dec 16 '18 at 13:48
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The reasoning is correct, that is we construct two subsequence with two different limit to show that the limit doesn't exist since the limit if exists is unique.
However, there are some typos
$$x_k = frac1{2pi k}$$
Similarly, $$y_k = frac1{left(2k + frac12right) pi}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using the $epsilon$-$delta$ definition is not a huge step from what you have. For any proposed limit $L$, choose $epsilon=frac{1}{2}$. If $|L-0|<epsilon$, then $|1-L|geq frac{1}{2}$, foiling your adversary as there is no $delta$ making all values within $epsilon$ of $L$ after a certain point. If $|L-1|<epsilon$, then $|L|>frac12$, and we exceed a distance of $epsilon$ when the value of the function is $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You actually looked at the sequences $a_k=dfrac{1}{2pi k}$ and $b_k=dfrac{2}{pi+4pi k}$. Each of those approaches $0$ as $k$ goes to infinity. Then you can write that $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(a_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cos(2pi k)=1$$ and $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(b_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cosleft(frac{pi}{2}+2pi kright)=0$$
By Heine we conclude the limit does not exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We will prove that the right-hand limit doesn't exist. Observe that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x}=infty$.
Since $f(x)=cos x$ is a continuous function,using the above relation we get that: $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)=f(lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}f(frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$.
However, $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)$ doesn't exist because $f$ is a periodic nonconstant function (see the link provided by @FJ.marsan) ,so $lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.Hence $lim_{x to 0}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi}$ is
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,cdots$$
while the sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi+dfracpi2}$ is
$$0,0,0,0,0,0,cdots$$
For a pure $epsilon-delta$ proof, notice that whatever $delta$, the range of $cosdfrac1x$ is $[-1,1]$, which doesn't shrink.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Non constant periodic functions has no limit at infinity. Take a look at Why do non-constant periodic functions have no limit at infinity?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes your idea is correct with the adjustments already suggested, more simply we can consider
$$x_n=frac2{kpi}to 0$$
then
$$cosleft(frac{1}{x_n}right)=cosleft(frac{kpi}{2}right)$$
which has $3$ different limit points.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The reasoning is correct, that is we construct two subsequence with two different limit to show that the limit doesn't exist since the limit if exists is unique.
However, there are some typos
$$x_k = frac1{2pi k}$$
Similarly, $$y_k = frac1{left(2k + frac12right) pi}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reasoning is correct, that is we construct two subsequence with two different limit to show that the limit doesn't exist since the limit if exists is unique.
However, there are some typos
$$x_k = frac1{2pi k}$$
Similarly, $$y_k = frac1{left(2k + frac12right) pi}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reasoning is correct, that is we construct two subsequence with two different limit to show that the limit doesn't exist since the limit if exists is unique.
However, there are some typos
$$x_k = frac1{2pi k}$$
Similarly, $$y_k = frac1{left(2k + frac12right) pi}$$
$endgroup$
The reasoning is correct, that is we construct two subsequence with two different limit to show that the limit doesn't exist since the limit if exists is unique.
However, there are some typos
$$x_k = frac1{2pi k}$$
Similarly, $$y_k = frac1{left(2k + frac12right) pi}$$
edited Dec 16 '18 at 14:00
answered Dec 16 '18 at 13:46
Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh
102k1466118
102k1466118
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using the $epsilon$-$delta$ definition is not a huge step from what you have. For any proposed limit $L$, choose $epsilon=frac{1}{2}$. If $|L-0|<epsilon$, then $|1-L|geq frac{1}{2}$, foiling your adversary as there is no $delta$ making all values within $epsilon$ of $L$ after a certain point. If $|L-1|<epsilon$, then $|L|>frac12$, and we exceed a distance of $epsilon$ when the value of the function is $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using the $epsilon$-$delta$ definition is not a huge step from what you have. For any proposed limit $L$, choose $epsilon=frac{1}{2}$. If $|L-0|<epsilon$, then $|1-L|geq frac{1}{2}$, foiling your adversary as there is no $delta$ making all values within $epsilon$ of $L$ after a certain point. If $|L-1|<epsilon$, then $|L|>frac12$, and we exceed a distance of $epsilon$ when the value of the function is $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using the $epsilon$-$delta$ definition is not a huge step from what you have. For any proposed limit $L$, choose $epsilon=frac{1}{2}$. If $|L-0|<epsilon$, then $|1-L|geq frac{1}{2}$, foiling your adversary as there is no $delta$ making all values within $epsilon$ of $L$ after a certain point. If $|L-1|<epsilon$, then $|L|>frac12$, and we exceed a distance of $epsilon$ when the value of the function is $0$.
$endgroup$
Using the $epsilon$-$delta$ definition is not a huge step from what you have. For any proposed limit $L$, choose $epsilon=frac{1}{2}$. If $|L-0|<epsilon$, then $|1-L|geq frac{1}{2}$, foiling your adversary as there is no $delta$ making all values within $epsilon$ of $L$ after a certain point. If $|L-1|<epsilon$, then $|L|>frac12$, and we exceed a distance of $epsilon$ when the value of the function is $0$.
answered Dec 16 '18 at 13:49
Matt SamuelMatt Samuel
38.5k63768
38.5k63768
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You actually looked at the sequences $a_k=dfrac{1}{2pi k}$ and $b_k=dfrac{2}{pi+4pi k}$. Each of those approaches $0$ as $k$ goes to infinity. Then you can write that $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(a_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cos(2pi k)=1$$ and $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(b_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cosleft(frac{pi}{2}+2pi kright)=0$$
By Heine we conclude the limit does not exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You actually looked at the sequences $a_k=dfrac{1}{2pi k}$ and $b_k=dfrac{2}{pi+4pi k}$. Each of those approaches $0$ as $k$ goes to infinity. Then you can write that $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(a_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cos(2pi k)=1$$ and $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(b_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cosleft(frac{pi}{2}+2pi kright)=0$$
By Heine we conclude the limit does not exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You actually looked at the sequences $a_k=dfrac{1}{2pi k}$ and $b_k=dfrac{2}{pi+4pi k}$. Each of those approaches $0$ as $k$ goes to infinity. Then you can write that $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(a_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cos(2pi k)=1$$ and $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(b_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cosleft(frac{pi}{2}+2pi kright)=0$$
By Heine we conclude the limit does not exist.
$endgroup$
You actually looked at the sequences $a_k=dfrac{1}{2pi k}$ and $b_k=dfrac{2}{pi+4pi k}$. Each of those approaches $0$ as $k$ goes to infinity. Then you can write that $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(a_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cos(2pi k)=1$$ and $$lim_{ktoinfty}cos(b_k)=lim_{ktoinfty}cosleft(frac{pi}{2}+2pi kright)=0$$
By Heine we conclude the limit does not exist.
answered Dec 16 '18 at 13:50
Galc127Galc127
3,3121334
3,3121334
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We will prove that the right-hand limit doesn't exist. Observe that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x}=infty$.
Since $f(x)=cos x$ is a continuous function,using the above relation we get that: $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)=f(lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}f(frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$.
However, $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)$ doesn't exist because $f$ is a periodic nonconstant function (see the link provided by @FJ.marsan) ,so $lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.Hence $lim_{x to 0}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We will prove that the right-hand limit doesn't exist. Observe that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x}=infty$.
Since $f(x)=cos x$ is a continuous function,using the above relation we get that: $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)=f(lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}f(frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$.
However, $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)$ doesn't exist because $f$ is a periodic nonconstant function (see the link provided by @FJ.marsan) ,so $lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.Hence $lim_{x to 0}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We will prove that the right-hand limit doesn't exist. Observe that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x}=infty$.
Since $f(x)=cos x$ is a continuous function,using the above relation we get that: $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)=f(lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}f(frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$.
However, $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)$ doesn't exist because $f$ is a periodic nonconstant function (see the link provided by @FJ.marsan) ,so $lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.Hence $lim_{x to 0}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.
$endgroup$
We will prove that the right-hand limit doesn't exist. Observe that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x}=infty$.
Since $f(x)=cos x$ is a continuous function,using the above relation we get that: $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)=f(lim_{x to 0^{+}} frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}f(frac{1}{x})=lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$.
However, $lim_{ytoinfty}f(y)$ doesn't exist because $f$ is a periodic nonconstant function (see the link provided by @FJ.marsan) ,so $lim_{x to 0^+}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.Hence $lim_{x to 0}cosfrac{1}{x}$ doesn't exist.
answered Dec 16 '18 at 13:56
user563216
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi}$ is
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,cdots$$
while the sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi+dfracpi2}$ is
$$0,0,0,0,0,0,cdots$$
For a pure $epsilon-delta$ proof, notice that whatever $delta$, the range of $cosdfrac1x$ is $[-1,1]$, which doesn't shrink.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi}$ is
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,cdots$$
while the sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi+dfracpi2}$ is
$$0,0,0,0,0,0,cdots$$
For a pure $epsilon-delta$ proof, notice that whatever $delta$, the range of $cosdfrac1x$ is $[-1,1]$, which doesn't shrink.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi}$ is
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,cdots$$
while the sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi+dfracpi2}$ is
$$0,0,0,0,0,0,cdots$$
For a pure $epsilon-delta$ proof, notice that whatever $delta$, the range of $cosdfrac1x$ is $[-1,1]$, which doesn't shrink.
$endgroup$
The sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi}$ is
$$1,1,1,1,1,1,cdots$$
while the sequence with $x=dfrac1{2kpi+dfracpi2}$ is
$$0,0,0,0,0,0,cdots$$
For a pure $epsilon-delta$ proof, notice that whatever $delta$, the range of $cosdfrac1x$ is $[-1,1]$, which doesn't shrink.
edited Dec 16 '18 at 13:56
answered Dec 16 '18 at 13:50
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
128k675227
128k675227
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Non constant periodic functions has no limit at infinity. Take a look at Why do non-constant periodic functions have no limit at infinity?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Non constant periodic functions has no limit at infinity. Take a look at Why do non-constant periodic functions have no limit at infinity?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Non constant periodic functions has no limit at infinity. Take a look at Why do non-constant periodic functions have no limit at infinity?
$endgroup$
Non constant periodic functions has no limit at infinity. Take a look at Why do non-constant periodic functions have no limit at infinity?
answered Dec 16 '18 at 13:44
R. N. MarleyR. N. Marley
768
768
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes your idea is correct with the adjustments already suggested, more simply we can consider
$$x_n=frac2{kpi}to 0$$
then
$$cosleft(frac{1}{x_n}right)=cosleft(frac{kpi}{2}right)$$
which has $3$ different limit points.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes your idea is correct with the adjustments already suggested, more simply we can consider
$$x_n=frac2{kpi}to 0$$
then
$$cosleft(frac{1}{x_n}right)=cosleft(frac{kpi}{2}right)$$
which has $3$ different limit points.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes your idea is correct with the adjustments already suggested, more simply we can consider
$$x_n=frac2{kpi}to 0$$
then
$$cosleft(frac{1}{x_n}right)=cosleft(frac{kpi}{2}right)$$
which has $3$ different limit points.
$endgroup$
Yes your idea is correct with the adjustments already suggested, more simply we can consider
$$x_n=frac2{kpi}to 0$$
then
$$cosleft(frac{1}{x_n}right)=cosleft(frac{kpi}{2}right)$$
which has $3$ different limit points.
answered Dec 16 '18 at 14:48
gimusigimusi
92.8k84494
92.8k84494
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You seem to think that $cos(1/x)=cos(x)$ for all real number x.
$endgroup$
– Philippe Malot
Dec 16 '18 at 13:46
$begingroup$
No, there are several confusions/mistakes in your development.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Dec 16 '18 at 13:48