Is there a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$ which has positive Lebesgue-measure and no interior points?
$begingroup$
As the title says, I would like to know how to construct a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$ which does not have interior points but positive Lebesgue-measure?
As a hint, it is given $(0,1)setminus K$...
measure-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As the title says, I would like to know how to construct a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$ which does not have interior points but positive Lebesgue-measure?
As a hint, it is given $(0,1)setminus K$...
measure-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
what is an inner point? do you mean interior point?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:48
$begingroup$
Yes, sorry. My english!.. I meant a point, for which there is a neighboorhoud within the set.
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 17:51
1
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… this may help you.
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:53
$begingroup$
what is $k$ in the hint?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As the title says, I would like to know how to construct a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$ which does not have interior points but positive Lebesgue-measure?
As a hint, it is given $(0,1)setminus K$...
measure-theory
$endgroup$
As the title says, I would like to know how to construct a compact subset of $mathbb{R}$ which does not have interior points but positive Lebesgue-measure?
As a hint, it is given $(0,1)setminus K$...
measure-theory
measure-theory
edited Nov 6 '13 at 17:57
GA316
2,6691232
2,6691232
asked Nov 6 '13 at 17:43
math12math12
1,89411844
1,89411844
$begingroup$
what is an inner point? do you mean interior point?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:48
$begingroup$
Yes, sorry. My english!.. I meant a point, for which there is a neighboorhoud within the set.
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 17:51
1
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… this may help you.
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:53
$begingroup$
what is $k$ in the hint?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
what is an inner point? do you mean interior point?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:48
$begingroup$
Yes, sorry. My english!.. I meant a point, for which there is a neighboorhoud within the set.
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 17:51
1
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… this may help you.
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:53
$begingroup$
what is $k$ in the hint?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:54
$begingroup$
what is an inner point? do you mean interior point?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:48
$begingroup$
what is an inner point? do you mean interior point?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:48
$begingroup$
Yes, sorry. My english!.. I meant a point, for which there is a neighboorhoud within the set.
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 17:51
$begingroup$
Yes, sorry. My english!.. I meant a point, for which there is a neighboorhoud within the set.
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 17:51
1
1
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… this may help you.
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:53
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… this may help you.
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:53
$begingroup$
what is $k$ in the hint?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:54
$begingroup$
what is $k$ in the hint?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, indeed. A more generalized version of the construction of the Cantor set is something called a "fat Cantor set." As with the usual Cantor set, it is compact and has no interior points, but unlike the usual Cantor set, it has positive measure.
In fact, for any $0<a<1,$ there is a fat Cantor set of measure $1-a$. See Brian M. Scott's excellent answer here for more details, but the idea is to remove the middle $frac{a}3$ of each component interval at each stage, rather than the entire middle third.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you please have a look on this: classes.yale.edu/fractals/labs/paperfoldinglab/… Why does this set have no interior points?
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 18:05
$begingroup$
Well, notice what happens at each stage. In the first stage, we remove an interval of length $frac14,$ leaving us two intervals of length $frac38.$ In the second stage, we remove an interval of length $frac16,$ leaving us $4$ intervals of length $frac5{32}$. In the third stage, we remove $4$ intervals of length $frac1{64},$ leaving us $8$ intervals of length $frac9{128}.$ In the fourth stage, we remove $8$ intervals of length $frac1{256},$ leaving $16$ intervals of length $frac{17}{512}$. And so on....
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:18
1
$begingroup$
More generally, it can be shown (by induction) that after the $n$th stage, there are $2^n$ intervals of length $dfrac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}.$ It can be shown that $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}=0,$$ so given any positive length $ell,$ there is some stage at which no interval of length $ell$ can lie within the set at that stage, and so no such interval can lie within the fat Cantor set. Since this holds for all positive lengths $ell,$ then the fat Cantor set contains no open interval.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f554590%2fis-there-a-compact-subset-of-mathbbr-which-has-positive-lebesgue-measure-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, indeed. A more generalized version of the construction of the Cantor set is something called a "fat Cantor set." As with the usual Cantor set, it is compact and has no interior points, but unlike the usual Cantor set, it has positive measure.
In fact, for any $0<a<1,$ there is a fat Cantor set of measure $1-a$. See Brian M. Scott's excellent answer here for more details, but the idea is to remove the middle $frac{a}3$ of each component interval at each stage, rather than the entire middle third.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you please have a look on this: classes.yale.edu/fractals/labs/paperfoldinglab/… Why does this set have no interior points?
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 18:05
$begingroup$
Well, notice what happens at each stage. In the first stage, we remove an interval of length $frac14,$ leaving us two intervals of length $frac38.$ In the second stage, we remove an interval of length $frac16,$ leaving us $4$ intervals of length $frac5{32}$. In the third stage, we remove $4$ intervals of length $frac1{64},$ leaving us $8$ intervals of length $frac9{128}.$ In the fourth stage, we remove $8$ intervals of length $frac1{256},$ leaving $16$ intervals of length $frac{17}{512}$. And so on....
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:18
1
$begingroup$
More generally, it can be shown (by induction) that after the $n$th stage, there are $2^n$ intervals of length $dfrac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}.$ It can be shown that $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}=0,$$ so given any positive length $ell,$ there is some stage at which no interval of length $ell$ can lie within the set at that stage, and so no such interval can lie within the fat Cantor set. Since this holds for all positive lengths $ell,$ then the fat Cantor set contains no open interval.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, indeed. A more generalized version of the construction of the Cantor set is something called a "fat Cantor set." As with the usual Cantor set, it is compact and has no interior points, but unlike the usual Cantor set, it has positive measure.
In fact, for any $0<a<1,$ there is a fat Cantor set of measure $1-a$. See Brian M. Scott's excellent answer here for more details, but the idea is to remove the middle $frac{a}3$ of each component interval at each stage, rather than the entire middle third.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you please have a look on this: classes.yale.edu/fractals/labs/paperfoldinglab/… Why does this set have no interior points?
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 18:05
$begingroup$
Well, notice what happens at each stage. In the first stage, we remove an interval of length $frac14,$ leaving us two intervals of length $frac38.$ In the second stage, we remove an interval of length $frac16,$ leaving us $4$ intervals of length $frac5{32}$. In the third stage, we remove $4$ intervals of length $frac1{64},$ leaving us $8$ intervals of length $frac9{128}.$ In the fourth stage, we remove $8$ intervals of length $frac1{256},$ leaving $16$ intervals of length $frac{17}{512}$. And so on....
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:18
1
$begingroup$
More generally, it can be shown (by induction) that after the $n$th stage, there are $2^n$ intervals of length $dfrac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}.$ It can be shown that $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}=0,$$ so given any positive length $ell,$ there is some stage at which no interval of length $ell$ can lie within the set at that stage, and so no such interval can lie within the fat Cantor set. Since this holds for all positive lengths $ell,$ then the fat Cantor set contains no open interval.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, indeed. A more generalized version of the construction of the Cantor set is something called a "fat Cantor set." As with the usual Cantor set, it is compact and has no interior points, but unlike the usual Cantor set, it has positive measure.
In fact, for any $0<a<1,$ there is a fat Cantor set of measure $1-a$. See Brian M. Scott's excellent answer here for more details, but the idea is to remove the middle $frac{a}3$ of each component interval at each stage, rather than the entire middle third.
$endgroup$
Yes, indeed. A more generalized version of the construction of the Cantor set is something called a "fat Cantor set." As with the usual Cantor set, it is compact and has no interior points, but unlike the usual Cantor set, it has positive measure.
In fact, for any $0<a<1,$ there is a fat Cantor set of measure $1-a$. See Brian M. Scott's excellent answer here for more details, but the idea is to remove the middle $frac{a}3$ of each component interval at each stage, rather than the entire middle third.
edited Dec 9 '18 at 13:38
answered Nov 6 '13 at 17:51
Cameron BuieCameron Buie
85.2k771155
85.2k771155
$begingroup$
Could you please have a look on this: classes.yale.edu/fractals/labs/paperfoldinglab/… Why does this set have no interior points?
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 18:05
$begingroup$
Well, notice what happens at each stage. In the first stage, we remove an interval of length $frac14,$ leaving us two intervals of length $frac38.$ In the second stage, we remove an interval of length $frac16,$ leaving us $4$ intervals of length $frac5{32}$. In the third stage, we remove $4$ intervals of length $frac1{64},$ leaving us $8$ intervals of length $frac9{128}.$ In the fourth stage, we remove $8$ intervals of length $frac1{256},$ leaving $16$ intervals of length $frac{17}{512}$. And so on....
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:18
1
$begingroup$
More generally, it can be shown (by induction) that after the $n$th stage, there are $2^n$ intervals of length $dfrac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}.$ It can be shown that $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}=0,$$ so given any positive length $ell,$ there is some stage at which no interval of length $ell$ can lie within the set at that stage, and so no such interval can lie within the fat Cantor set. Since this holds for all positive lengths $ell,$ then the fat Cantor set contains no open interval.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you please have a look on this: classes.yale.edu/fractals/labs/paperfoldinglab/… Why does this set have no interior points?
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 18:05
$begingroup$
Well, notice what happens at each stage. In the first stage, we remove an interval of length $frac14,$ leaving us two intervals of length $frac38.$ In the second stage, we remove an interval of length $frac16,$ leaving us $4$ intervals of length $frac5{32}$. In the third stage, we remove $4$ intervals of length $frac1{64},$ leaving us $8$ intervals of length $frac9{128}.$ In the fourth stage, we remove $8$ intervals of length $frac1{256},$ leaving $16$ intervals of length $frac{17}{512}$. And so on....
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:18
1
$begingroup$
More generally, it can be shown (by induction) that after the $n$th stage, there are $2^n$ intervals of length $dfrac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}.$ It can be shown that $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}=0,$$ so given any positive length $ell,$ there is some stage at which no interval of length $ell$ can lie within the set at that stage, and so no such interval can lie within the fat Cantor set. Since this holds for all positive lengths $ell,$ then the fat Cantor set contains no open interval.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Could you please have a look on this: classes.yale.edu/fractals/labs/paperfoldinglab/… Why does this set have no interior points?
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 18:05
$begingroup$
Could you please have a look on this: classes.yale.edu/fractals/labs/paperfoldinglab/… Why does this set have no interior points?
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 18:05
$begingroup$
Well, notice what happens at each stage. In the first stage, we remove an interval of length $frac14,$ leaving us two intervals of length $frac38.$ In the second stage, we remove an interval of length $frac16,$ leaving us $4$ intervals of length $frac5{32}$. In the third stage, we remove $4$ intervals of length $frac1{64},$ leaving us $8$ intervals of length $frac9{128}.$ In the fourth stage, we remove $8$ intervals of length $frac1{256},$ leaving $16$ intervals of length $frac{17}{512}$. And so on....
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:18
$begingroup$
Well, notice what happens at each stage. In the first stage, we remove an interval of length $frac14,$ leaving us two intervals of length $frac38.$ In the second stage, we remove an interval of length $frac16,$ leaving us $4$ intervals of length $frac5{32}$. In the third stage, we remove $4$ intervals of length $frac1{64},$ leaving us $8$ intervals of length $frac9{128}.$ In the fourth stage, we remove $8$ intervals of length $frac1{256},$ leaving $16$ intervals of length $frac{17}{512}$. And so on....
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:18
1
1
$begingroup$
More generally, it can be shown (by induction) that after the $n$th stage, there are $2^n$ intervals of length $dfrac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}.$ It can be shown that $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}=0,$$ so given any positive length $ell,$ there is some stage at which no interval of length $ell$ can lie within the set at that stage, and so no such interval can lie within the fat Cantor set. Since this holds for all positive lengths $ell,$ then the fat Cantor set contains no open interval.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:21
$begingroup$
More generally, it can be shown (by induction) that after the $n$th stage, there are $2^n$ intervals of length $dfrac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}.$ It can be shown that $$lim_{ntoinfty}frac{2^n+1}{2^{2n+1}}=0,$$ so given any positive length $ell,$ there is some stage at which no interval of length $ell$ can lie within the set at that stage, and so no such interval can lie within the fat Cantor set. Since this holds for all positive lengths $ell,$ then the fat Cantor set contains no open interval.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Nov 6 '13 at 18:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f554590%2fis-there-a-compact-subset-of-mathbbr-which-has-positive-lebesgue-measure-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
what is an inner point? do you mean interior point?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:48
$begingroup$
Yes, sorry. My english!.. I meant a point, for which there is a neighboorhoud within the set.
$endgroup$
– math12
Nov 6 '13 at 17:51
1
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… this may help you.
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:53
$begingroup$
what is $k$ in the hint?
$endgroup$
– GA316
Nov 6 '13 at 17:54