Transform an inhomogeneous dirichlet problem into a homogeneous one? i.e. Burgers equation












0












$begingroup$


I need to transform an inhomogeneous dirichlet problem into a homogeneous one. For exeample the burgers equation:
$$begin{cases} partial_t u(x,t) + u(x,t) partial_x u(x,t)=0\
u(0,t)=0,& forall tin [0,1]\
u(x,0)=g(x),&forall xin [0,1] end{cases}
$$



So how can I transform this problem to something with zero boundaries?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming that $g(0)=0$, you can look at $u(x,t)=v(x,t)+h(x,t)$ where $h(x,t)$ is a function that you choose for yourself with the property $h(x,0)=g(x)$ and $h(0,t)=0$. If $g(0) neq 0$ then you must be more careful in handling the corner singularity.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:15








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That said, homogeneous spatial boundary data is usually desirable but homogeneous temporal boundary data (i.e. initial or final data) is typically not a problem for most methods of solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    Regarding what the equation describes, I would be happy with $g$ having compact support and $g(0)=0$. But how to choose $h$? And then I would solve $partial_t (v+h) + (v+h) partial_x (v+h)=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – cptflint
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:18










  • $begingroup$
    You pick $h$ to be "simple" so that the resulting inhomogeneous PDE for $v$ is not too difficult to solve. Unfortunately here the nonlinearity produces a difficulty because you cannot simply move all the terms involving $h$ to the other side as a forcing, since there are terms $h partial_x v$ and $v partial_x h$. But at least these terms are linear in $v$...
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:20












  • $begingroup$
    resulting inhomogeneous PDE? So my problem is, that I am in need of zero boundaries.
    $endgroup$
    – cptflint
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:23
















0












$begingroup$


I need to transform an inhomogeneous dirichlet problem into a homogeneous one. For exeample the burgers equation:
$$begin{cases} partial_t u(x,t) + u(x,t) partial_x u(x,t)=0\
u(0,t)=0,& forall tin [0,1]\
u(x,0)=g(x),&forall xin [0,1] end{cases}
$$



So how can I transform this problem to something with zero boundaries?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming that $g(0)=0$, you can look at $u(x,t)=v(x,t)+h(x,t)$ where $h(x,t)$ is a function that you choose for yourself with the property $h(x,0)=g(x)$ and $h(0,t)=0$. If $g(0) neq 0$ then you must be more careful in handling the corner singularity.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:15








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That said, homogeneous spatial boundary data is usually desirable but homogeneous temporal boundary data (i.e. initial or final data) is typically not a problem for most methods of solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    Regarding what the equation describes, I would be happy with $g$ having compact support and $g(0)=0$. But how to choose $h$? And then I would solve $partial_t (v+h) + (v+h) partial_x (v+h)=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – cptflint
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:18










  • $begingroup$
    You pick $h$ to be "simple" so that the resulting inhomogeneous PDE for $v$ is not too difficult to solve. Unfortunately here the nonlinearity produces a difficulty because you cannot simply move all the terms involving $h$ to the other side as a forcing, since there are terms $h partial_x v$ and $v partial_x h$. But at least these terms are linear in $v$...
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:20












  • $begingroup$
    resulting inhomogeneous PDE? So my problem is, that I am in need of zero boundaries.
    $endgroup$
    – cptflint
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:23














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I need to transform an inhomogeneous dirichlet problem into a homogeneous one. For exeample the burgers equation:
$$begin{cases} partial_t u(x,t) + u(x,t) partial_x u(x,t)=0\
u(0,t)=0,& forall tin [0,1]\
u(x,0)=g(x),&forall xin [0,1] end{cases}
$$



So how can I transform this problem to something with zero boundaries?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I need to transform an inhomogeneous dirichlet problem into a homogeneous one. For exeample the burgers equation:
$$begin{cases} partial_t u(x,t) + u(x,t) partial_x u(x,t)=0\
u(0,t)=0,& forall tin [0,1]\
u(x,0)=g(x),&forall xin [0,1] end{cases}
$$



So how can I transform this problem to something with zero boundaries?







pde boundary-value-problem






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 5 '18 at 21:12









cptflintcptflint

208




208












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming that $g(0)=0$, you can look at $u(x,t)=v(x,t)+h(x,t)$ where $h(x,t)$ is a function that you choose for yourself with the property $h(x,0)=g(x)$ and $h(0,t)=0$. If $g(0) neq 0$ then you must be more careful in handling the corner singularity.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:15








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That said, homogeneous spatial boundary data is usually desirable but homogeneous temporal boundary data (i.e. initial or final data) is typically not a problem for most methods of solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    Regarding what the equation describes, I would be happy with $g$ having compact support and $g(0)=0$. But how to choose $h$? And then I would solve $partial_t (v+h) + (v+h) partial_x (v+h)=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – cptflint
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:18










  • $begingroup$
    You pick $h$ to be "simple" so that the resulting inhomogeneous PDE for $v$ is not too difficult to solve. Unfortunately here the nonlinearity produces a difficulty because you cannot simply move all the terms involving $h$ to the other side as a forcing, since there are terms $h partial_x v$ and $v partial_x h$. But at least these terms are linear in $v$...
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:20












  • $begingroup$
    resulting inhomogeneous PDE? So my problem is, that I am in need of zero boundaries.
    $endgroup$
    – cptflint
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:23


















  • $begingroup$
    Assuming that $g(0)=0$, you can look at $u(x,t)=v(x,t)+h(x,t)$ where $h(x,t)$ is a function that you choose for yourself with the property $h(x,0)=g(x)$ and $h(0,t)=0$. If $g(0) neq 0$ then you must be more careful in handling the corner singularity.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:15








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That said, homogeneous spatial boundary data is usually desirable but homogeneous temporal boundary data (i.e. initial or final data) is typically not a problem for most methods of solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    Regarding what the equation describes, I would be happy with $g$ having compact support and $g(0)=0$. But how to choose $h$? And then I would solve $partial_t (v+h) + (v+h) partial_x (v+h)=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – cptflint
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:18










  • $begingroup$
    You pick $h$ to be "simple" so that the resulting inhomogeneous PDE for $v$ is not too difficult to solve. Unfortunately here the nonlinearity produces a difficulty because you cannot simply move all the terms involving $h$ to the other side as a forcing, since there are terms $h partial_x v$ and $v partial_x h$. But at least these terms are linear in $v$...
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:20












  • $begingroup$
    resulting inhomogeneous PDE? So my problem is, that I am in need of zero boundaries.
    $endgroup$
    – cptflint
    Dec 5 '18 at 21:23
















$begingroup$
Assuming that $g(0)=0$, you can look at $u(x,t)=v(x,t)+h(x,t)$ where $h(x,t)$ is a function that you choose for yourself with the property $h(x,0)=g(x)$ and $h(0,t)=0$. If $g(0) neq 0$ then you must be more careful in handling the corner singularity.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 5 '18 at 21:15






$begingroup$
Assuming that $g(0)=0$, you can look at $u(x,t)=v(x,t)+h(x,t)$ where $h(x,t)$ is a function that you choose for yourself with the property $h(x,0)=g(x)$ and $h(0,t)=0$. If $g(0) neq 0$ then you must be more careful in handling the corner singularity.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 5 '18 at 21:15






2




2




$begingroup$
That said, homogeneous spatial boundary data is usually desirable but homogeneous temporal boundary data (i.e. initial or final data) is typically not a problem for most methods of solution.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 5 '18 at 21:17




$begingroup$
That said, homogeneous spatial boundary data is usually desirable but homogeneous temporal boundary data (i.e. initial or final data) is typically not a problem for most methods of solution.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 5 '18 at 21:17












$begingroup$
Regarding what the equation describes, I would be happy with $g$ having compact support and $g(0)=0$. But how to choose $h$? And then I would solve $partial_t (v+h) + (v+h) partial_x (v+h)=0$?
$endgroup$
– cptflint
Dec 5 '18 at 21:18




$begingroup$
Regarding what the equation describes, I would be happy with $g$ having compact support and $g(0)=0$. But how to choose $h$? And then I would solve $partial_t (v+h) + (v+h) partial_x (v+h)=0$?
$endgroup$
– cptflint
Dec 5 '18 at 21:18












$begingroup$
You pick $h$ to be "simple" so that the resulting inhomogeneous PDE for $v$ is not too difficult to solve. Unfortunately here the nonlinearity produces a difficulty because you cannot simply move all the terms involving $h$ to the other side as a forcing, since there are terms $h partial_x v$ and $v partial_x h$. But at least these terms are linear in $v$...
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 5 '18 at 21:20






$begingroup$
You pick $h$ to be "simple" so that the resulting inhomogeneous PDE for $v$ is not too difficult to solve. Unfortunately here the nonlinearity produces a difficulty because you cannot simply move all the terms involving $h$ to the other side as a forcing, since there are terms $h partial_x v$ and $v partial_x h$. But at least these terms are linear in $v$...
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 5 '18 at 21:20














$begingroup$
resulting inhomogeneous PDE? So my problem is, that I am in need of zero boundaries.
$endgroup$
– cptflint
Dec 5 '18 at 21:23




$begingroup$
resulting inhomogeneous PDE? So my problem is, that I am in need of zero boundaries.
$endgroup$
– cptflint
Dec 5 '18 at 21:23










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027658%2ftransform-an-inhomogeneous-dirichlet-problem-into-a-homogeneous-one-i-e-burger%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027658%2ftransform-an-inhomogeneous-dirichlet-problem-into-a-homogeneous-one-i-e-burger%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

When does type information flow backwards in C++?

Grease: Live!