Proving that meromorphic on the extended plane implies polynomial.












1












$begingroup$


As the title says, I am trying to prove that if $f(z)$ is meromorphic on the extended plane, then $f(z)$ is rational. Is my proof below complete?



My proof so far is as follows: We can enumerate the poles of $f(z)$ as $z_1, z_2, dots, z_n$ $(1)$. Then, we see that $f(z) = frac{h(z)}{prod_{i = 1}^{n} (z-z_i)^{h_i}}$, where $h(z)$ is an analytic function. Since $f(z)$ is meromorphic, $h(z)$ has a non-essential singularity at $infty$ $(2)$. However, by a previous exercise, we know any function that is analytic everywhere in the non-extended plane and has a non-essential singularity at $infty$ must be a polynomial. So, $h(z)$ is a polynomial and hence, $f(z)$ is a rational function.



My worries are regarding $(1)$ and $(2)$. To prove $(1)$ we know if there are infinitely many poles in a bounded region, then there must be a limit point of poles. However, this can never happen as $f(z)$ is meromorphic. Now, suppose the poles are the natural numbers $1, 2, dots in mathbb{C}$. Then every neighborhood of $infty$ contains infinitely many naturals so we again have an accumulation of poles. Therefore, meromorphic functions only have finitely many poles.



For $(2)$, how would I show that $f(z)$ doesn't have an essential singularity at $infty$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    By definition, $ f(z) $ does not have an essential singularity at $ infty $ as it is meromorphic. The same holds for $ h(z) $ as it equals $ f(z) prod (z-z_i)^{h_i} $.
    $endgroup$
    – hellHound
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:39










  • $begingroup$
    @hellHound Oh yes, essential singularities result in non-analytic behavior in some neighborhood around the point.
    $endgroup$
    – Yunus Syed
    Dec 3 '18 at 23:37










  • $begingroup$
    Meromorphic at $infty$ implies for some $A,n,B,r$ : $|f(1/z) - A z^n| < B |z^{n+1}|$ for $|z| < r$ so $f(z)$ has no poles (nor zeros) for $|z| > 1/R$. Thus you are looking at $z_i$ in the compact set $|z| le 1/R$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 3 '18 at 23:53


















1












$begingroup$


As the title says, I am trying to prove that if $f(z)$ is meromorphic on the extended plane, then $f(z)$ is rational. Is my proof below complete?



My proof so far is as follows: We can enumerate the poles of $f(z)$ as $z_1, z_2, dots, z_n$ $(1)$. Then, we see that $f(z) = frac{h(z)}{prod_{i = 1}^{n} (z-z_i)^{h_i}}$, where $h(z)$ is an analytic function. Since $f(z)$ is meromorphic, $h(z)$ has a non-essential singularity at $infty$ $(2)$. However, by a previous exercise, we know any function that is analytic everywhere in the non-extended plane and has a non-essential singularity at $infty$ must be a polynomial. So, $h(z)$ is a polynomial and hence, $f(z)$ is a rational function.



My worries are regarding $(1)$ and $(2)$. To prove $(1)$ we know if there are infinitely many poles in a bounded region, then there must be a limit point of poles. However, this can never happen as $f(z)$ is meromorphic. Now, suppose the poles are the natural numbers $1, 2, dots in mathbb{C}$. Then every neighborhood of $infty$ contains infinitely many naturals so we again have an accumulation of poles. Therefore, meromorphic functions only have finitely many poles.



For $(2)$, how would I show that $f(z)$ doesn't have an essential singularity at $infty$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    By definition, $ f(z) $ does not have an essential singularity at $ infty $ as it is meromorphic. The same holds for $ h(z) $ as it equals $ f(z) prod (z-z_i)^{h_i} $.
    $endgroup$
    – hellHound
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:39










  • $begingroup$
    @hellHound Oh yes, essential singularities result in non-analytic behavior in some neighborhood around the point.
    $endgroup$
    – Yunus Syed
    Dec 3 '18 at 23:37










  • $begingroup$
    Meromorphic at $infty$ implies for some $A,n,B,r$ : $|f(1/z) - A z^n| < B |z^{n+1}|$ for $|z| < r$ so $f(z)$ has no poles (nor zeros) for $|z| > 1/R$. Thus you are looking at $z_i$ in the compact set $|z| le 1/R$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 3 '18 at 23:53
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


As the title says, I am trying to prove that if $f(z)$ is meromorphic on the extended plane, then $f(z)$ is rational. Is my proof below complete?



My proof so far is as follows: We can enumerate the poles of $f(z)$ as $z_1, z_2, dots, z_n$ $(1)$. Then, we see that $f(z) = frac{h(z)}{prod_{i = 1}^{n} (z-z_i)^{h_i}}$, where $h(z)$ is an analytic function. Since $f(z)$ is meromorphic, $h(z)$ has a non-essential singularity at $infty$ $(2)$. However, by a previous exercise, we know any function that is analytic everywhere in the non-extended plane and has a non-essential singularity at $infty$ must be a polynomial. So, $h(z)$ is a polynomial and hence, $f(z)$ is a rational function.



My worries are regarding $(1)$ and $(2)$. To prove $(1)$ we know if there are infinitely many poles in a bounded region, then there must be a limit point of poles. However, this can never happen as $f(z)$ is meromorphic. Now, suppose the poles are the natural numbers $1, 2, dots in mathbb{C}$. Then every neighborhood of $infty$ contains infinitely many naturals so we again have an accumulation of poles. Therefore, meromorphic functions only have finitely many poles.



For $(2)$, how would I show that $f(z)$ doesn't have an essential singularity at $infty$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




As the title says, I am trying to prove that if $f(z)$ is meromorphic on the extended plane, then $f(z)$ is rational. Is my proof below complete?



My proof so far is as follows: We can enumerate the poles of $f(z)$ as $z_1, z_2, dots, z_n$ $(1)$. Then, we see that $f(z) = frac{h(z)}{prod_{i = 1}^{n} (z-z_i)^{h_i}}$, where $h(z)$ is an analytic function. Since $f(z)$ is meromorphic, $h(z)$ has a non-essential singularity at $infty$ $(2)$. However, by a previous exercise, we know any function that is analytic everywhere in the non-extended plane and has a non-essential singularity at $infty$ must be a polynomial. So, $h(z)$ is a polynomial and hence, $f(z)$ is a rational function.



My worries are regarding $(1)$ and $(2)$. To prove $(1)$ we know if there are infinitely many poles in a bounded region, then there must be a limit point of poles. However, this can never happen as $f(z)$ is meromorphic. Now, suppose the poles are the natural numbers $1, 2, dots in mathbb{C}$. Then every neighborhood of $infty$ contains infinitely many naturals so we again have an accumulation of poles. Therefore, meromorphic functions only have finitely many poles.



For $(2)$, how would I show that $f(z)$ doesn't have an essential singularity at $infty$?







complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 3 '18 at 22:14









Yunus SyedYunus Syed

1,217218




1,217218












  • $begingroup$
    By definition, $ f(z) $ does not have an essential singularity at $ infty $ as it is meromorphic. The same holds for $ h(z) $ as it equals $ f(z) prod (z-z_i)^{h_i} $.
    $endgroup$
    – hellHound
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:39










  • $begingroup$
    @hellHound Oh yes, essential singularities result in non-analytic behavior in some neighborhood around the point.
    $endgroup$
    – Yunus Syed
    Dec 3 '18 at 23:37










  • $begingroup$
    Meromorphic at $infty$ implies for some $A,n,B,r$ : $|f(1/z) - A z^n| < B |z^{n+1}|$ for $|z| < r$ so $f(z)$ has no poles (nor zeros) for $|z| > 1/R$. Thus you are looking at $z_i$ in the compact set $|z| le 1/R$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 3 '18 at 23:53




















  • $begingroup$
    By definition, $ f(z) $ does not have an essential singularity at $ infty $ as it is meromorphic. The same holds for $ h(z) $ as it equals $ f(z) prod (z-z_i)^{h_i} $.
    $endgroup$
    – hellHound
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:39










  • $begingroup$
    @hellHound Oh yes, essential singularities result in non-analytic behavior in some neighborhood around the point.
    $endgroup$
    – Yunus Syed
    Dec 3 '18 at 23:37










  • $begingroup$
    Meromorphic at $infty$ implies for some $A,n,B,r$ : $|f(1/z) - A z^n| < B |z^{n+1}|$ for $|z| < r$ so $f(z)$ has no poles (nor zeros) for $|z| > 1/R$. Thus you are looking at $z_i$ in the compact set $|z| le 1/R$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 3 '18 at 23:53


















$begingroup$
By definition, $ f(z) $ does not have an essential singularity at $ infty $ as it is meromorphic. The same holds for $ h(z) $ as it equals $ f(z) prod (z-z_i)^{h_i} $.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 3 '18 at 22:39




$begingroup$
By definition, $ f(z) $ does not have an essential singularity at $ infty $ as it is meromorphic. The same holds for $ h(z) $ as it equals $ f(z) prod (z-z_i)^{h_i} $.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 3 '18 at 22:39












$begingroup$
@hellHound Oh yes, essential singularities result in non-analytic behavior in some neighborhood around the point.
$endgroup$
– Yunus Syed
Dec 3 '18 at 23:37




$begingroup$
@hellHound Oh yes, essential singularities result in non-analytic behavior in some neighborhood around the point.
$endgroup$
– Yunus Syed
Dec 3 '18 at 23:37












$begingroup$
Meromorphic at $infty$ implies for some $A,n,B,r$ : $|f(1/z) - A z^n| < B |z^{n+1}|$ for $|z| < r$ so $f(z)$ has no poles (nor zeros) for $|z| > 1/R$. Thus you are looking at $z_i$ in the compact set $|z| le 1/R$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 3 '18 at 23:53






$begingroup$
Meromorphic at $infty$ implies for some $A,n,B,r$ : $|f(1/z) - A z^n| < B |z^{n+1}|$ for $|z| < r$ so $f(z)$ has no poles (nor zeros) for $|z| > 1/R$. Thus you are looking at $z_i$ in the compact set $|z| le 1/R$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 3 '18 at 23:53












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

(1) a meromorphic function $f$ on a riemann surface $X$ is a olomorphic function $f: X/S to mathbb{C}$ such that $S$ is a closed and discrete subset of $X$ and each point of $S$ is a non essential pole of $f$



In your case the extended plane $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a compact Riemann surface and so every closed and discrete subset of $mathbb{C}_infty$ is finite.. then the set $S$ of non essential pole of a meromorphic function $f$ on $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a finite set $S={a_1,dots, a_n}$;



(2) every meromorphic function $f$ on a compact riemann surface $X$ verify the follow identity:



$sum_{pin X} ord_p(f)=0$



So in the case $X=mathbb{C}_infty$ you have that



$sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)+ord_infty (f)=0$



so



$ord_infty (f)=-sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)$



Now you can prove your theorem:



Let $g(z):=prod_{k=1}^n(z-a_k)^{l_k}$ where $l_k:=ord_{a_k}(f)$. Then you have that $g(z)$ is a non null meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ so $frac{f}{g}$ is a meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ but for every $a_kneq infty$ you have that



$ord_{a_k}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{a_k}(f)-ord_{a_k}(g)=l_k-l_k=0$



And



$ord_{infty}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{infty}(g)=$



$=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(prod_{k=1}^n (frac{1}{w}-a_k)^{l_k} =$



$=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(w^{-sum_{k=1}^n l_k}(prod_{k=1}^n (1-a_kw)^{l_k})=$



$=ord_{infty}(f)+sum_{k=1}^n l_k= 0$



So $frac{f}{g}$ is a olomorphic function on the compact Riemann surface $mathbb{C}_infty$ then it is costant.



In other words $ f$ is a rational function






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024767%2fproving-that-meromorphic-on-the-extended-plane-implies-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    (1) a meromorphic function $f$ on a riemann surface $X$ is a olomorphic function $f: X/S to mathbb{C}$ such that $S$ is a closed and discrete subset of $X$ and each point of $S$ is a non essential pole of $f$



    In your case the extended plane $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a compact Riemann surface and so every closed and discrete subset of $mathbb{C}_infty$ is finite.. then the set $S$ of non essential pole of a meromorphic function $f$ on $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a finite set $S={a_1,dots, a_n}$;



    (2) every meromorphic function $f$ on a compact riemann surface $X$ verify the follow identity:



    $sum_{pin X} ord_p(f)=0$



    So in the case $X=mathbb{C}_infty$ you have that



    $sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)+ord_infty (f)=0$



    so



    $ord_infty (f)=-sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)$



    Now you can prove your theorem:



    Let $g(z):=prod_{k=1}^n(z-a_k)^{l_k}$ where $l_k:=ord_{a_k}(f)$. Then you have that $g(z)$ is a non null meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ so $frac{f}{g}$ is a meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ but for every $a_kneq infty$ you have that



    $ord_{a_k}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{a_k}(f)-ord_{a_k}(g)=l_k-l_k=0$



    And



    $ord_{infty}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{infty}(g)=$



    $=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(prod_{k=1}^n (frac{1}{w}-a_k)^{l_k} =$



    $=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(w^{-sum_{k=1}^n l_k}(prod_{k=1}^n (1-a_kw)^{l_k})=$



    $=ord_{infty}(f)+sum_{k=1}^n l_k= 0$



    So $frac{f}{g}$ is a olomorphic function on the compact Riemann surface $mathbb{C}_infty$ then it is costant.



    In other words $ f$ is a rational function






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      (1) a meromorphic function $f$ on a riemann surface $X$ is a olomorphic function $f: X/S to mathbb{C}$ such that $S$ is a closed and discrete subset of $X$ and each point of $S$ is a non essential pole of $f$



      In your case the extended plane $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a compact Riemann surface and so every closed and discrete subset of $mathbb{C}_infty$ is finite.. then the set $S$ of non essential pole of a meromorphic function $f$ on $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a finite set $S={a_1,dots, a_n}$;



      (2) every meromorphic function $f$ on a compact riemann surface $X$ verify the follow identity:



      $sum_{pin X} ord_p(f)=0$



      So in the case $X=mathbb{C}_infty$ you have that



      $sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)+ord_infty (f)=0$



      so



      $ord_infty (f)=-sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)$



      Now you can prove your theorem:



      Let $g(z):=prod_{k=1}^n(z-a_k)^{l_k}$ where $l_k:=ord_{a_k}(f)$. Then you have that $g(z)$ is a non null meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ so $frac{f}{g}$ is a meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ but for every $a_kneq infty$ you have that



      $ord_{a_k}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{a_k}(f)-ord_{a_k}(g)=l_k-l_k=0$



      And



      $ord_{infty}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{infty}(g)=$



      $=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(prod_{k=1}^n (frac{1}{w}-a_k)^{l_k} =$



      $=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(w^{-sum_{k=1}^n l_k}(prod_{k=1}^n (1-a_kw)^{l_k})=$



      $=ord_{infty}(f)+sum_{k=1}^n l_k= 0$



      So $frac{f}{g}$ is a olomorphic function on the compact Riemann surface $mathbb{C}_infty$ then it is costant.



      In other words $ f$ is a rational function






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        (1) a meromorphic function $f$ on a riemann surface $X$ is a olomorphic function $f: X/S to mathbb{C}$ such that $S$ is a closed and discrete subset of $X$ and each point of $S$ is a non essential pole of $f$



        In your case the extended plane $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a compact Riemann surface and so every closed and discrete subset of $mathbb{C}_infty$ is finite.. then the set $S$ of non essential pole of a meromorphic function $f$ on $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a finite set $S={a_1,dots, a_n}$;



        (2) every meromorphic function $f$ on a compact riemann surface $X$ verify the follow identity:



        $sum_{pin X} ord_p(f)=0$



        So in the case $X=mathbb{C}_infty$ you have that



        $sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)+ord_infty (f)=0$



        so



        $ord_infty (f)=-sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)$



        Now you can prove your theorem:



        Let $g(z):=prod_{k=1}^n(z-a_k)^{l_k}$ where $l_k:=ord_{a_k}(f)$. Then you have that $g(z)$ is a non null meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ so $frac{f}{g}$ is a meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ but for every $a_kneq infty$ you have that



        $ord_{a_k}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{a_k}(f)-ord_{a_k}(g)=l_k-l_k=0$



        And



        $ord_{infty}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{infty}(g)=$



        $=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(prod_{k=1}^n (frac{1}{w}-a_k)^{l_k} =$



        $=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(w^{-sum_{k=1}^n l_k}(prod_{k=1}^n (1-a_kw)^{l_k})=$



        $=ord_{infty}(f)+sum_{k=1}^n l_k= 0$



        So $frac{f}{g}$ is a olomorphic function on the compact Riemann surface $mathbb{C}_infty$ then it is costant.



        In other words $ f$ is a rational function






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        (1) a meromorphic function $f$ on a riemann surface $X$ is a olomorphic function $f: X/S to mathbb{C}$ such that $S$ is a closed and discrete subset of $X$ and each point of $S$ is a non essential pole of $f$



        In your case the extended plane $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a compact Riemann surface and so every closed and discrete subset of $mathbb{C}_infty$ is finite.. then the set $S$ of non essential pole of a meromorphic function $f$ on $mathbb{C}_infty$ is a finite set $S={a_1,dots, a_n}$;



        (2) every meromorphic function $f$ on a compact riemann surface $X$ verify the follow identity:



        $sum_{pin X} ord_p(f)=0$



        So in the case $X=mathbb{C}_infty$ you have that



        $sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)+ord_infty (f)=0$



        so



        $ord_infty (f)=-sum_{k=1}^n ord_{a_k}(f)$



        Now you can prove your theorem:



        Let $g(z):=prod_{k=1}^n(z-a_k)^{l_k}$ where $l_k:=ord_{a_k}(f)$. Then you have that $g(z)$ is a non null meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ so $frac{f}{g}$ is a meromorphic function of $mathbb{C}_infty$ but for every $a_kneq infty$ you have that



        $ord_{a_k}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{a_k}(f)-ord_{a_k}(g)=l_k-l_k=0$



        And



        $ord_{infty}(frac{f}{g})= ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{infty}(g)=$



        $=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(prod_{k=1}^n (frac{1}{w}-a_k)^{l_k} =$



        $=ord_{infty}(f)-ord_{0}(w^{-sum_{k=1}^n l_k}(prod_{k=1}^n (1-a_kw)^{l_k})=$



        $=ord_{infty}(f)+sum_{k=1}^n l_k= 0$



        So $frac{f}{g}$ is a olomorphic function on the compact Riemann surface $mathbb{C}_infty$ then it is costant.



        In other words $ f$ is a rational function







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 3 '18 at 23:02









        Federico FalluccaFederico Fallucca

        1,86819




        1,86819






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024767%2fproving-that-meromorphic-on-the-extended-plane-implies-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Index of /

            Tribalistas

            Listed building