Synthetic division, quadratic formula and grouping
$begingroup$
I'm learning mathematics by myself. I've searched about this topic but I'm not able to get an answer. Also, my language is not English.
For example, let's factor this polynomial
$6x^4+13x^3+6x^2-3x-2$
I use synthetic division and I get $(x+1)^2$ as a factor.
So $6x^2+x-2$ is what's left.
Now I have two options: quadratic formula or grouping, if I'm right.
If I do grouping, the steps are
$6x^2+4x-3x-2$
$2x(3x+2)-1(3x+2)$
And I get $(2x-1)(3x+2)$, which it seems correct.
But if I decide to use quadratic formula I get $x_1=frac{1}{2},x_2=-frac{2}{3}$ as zeroes, and $(x-frac{1}{2})(x+frac{2}{3})$ as factors, which is wrong.
Obviously I'm failing to understand something but I can't find what. Is there any step I am missing? Why the results are so different? Shouldn't be the same?
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm learning mathematics by myself. I've searched about this topic but I'm not able to get an answer. Also, my language is not English.
For example, let's factor this polynomial
$6x^4+13x^3+6x^2-3x-2$
I use synthetic division and I get $(x+1)^2$ as a factor.
So $6x^2+x-2$ is what's left.
Now I have two options: quadratic formula or grouping, if I'm right.
If I do grouping, the steps are
$6x^2+4x-3x-2$
$2x(3x+2)-1(3x+2)$
And I get $(2x-1)(3x+2)$, which it seems correct.
But if I decide to use quadratic formula I get $x_1=frac{1}{2},x_2=-frac{2}{3}$ as zeroes, and $(x-frac{1}{2})(x+frac{2}{3})$ as factors, which is wrong.
Obviously I'm failing to understand something but I can't find what. Is there any step I am missing? Why the results are so different? Shouldn't be the same?
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The zeros don't determine the factors, since there are still leading coefficients to take care of. In particular, $(x - 1/2)(x + 2/3)$ is just off by a factor of $6$.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 23:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I've noticed that. But I though that the results shoud be just the same. What's the difference?
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Knowing the zeros doesn't determine the scaling: Both $x-1$ and $2(x - 1)$ are lines with roots at $x = 1$, right?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 4 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@A.G. dress few graphs with the same zeros, e.g. $(x-1)(x+2),;2(x-1)(x+2),;-3(x-1)(x+2)$ and observe.
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 4 '18 at 10:55
$begingroup$
@T.Bongers Now I get it. I didn't know about the leading coefficient. Thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 16:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm learning mathematics by myself. I've searched about this topic but I'm not able to get an answer. Also, my language is not English.
For example, let's factor this polynomial
$6x^4+13x^3+6x^2-3x-2$
I use synthetic division and I get $(x+1)^2$ as a factor.
So $6x^2+x-2$ is what's left.
Now I have two options: quadratic formula or grouping, if I'm right.
If I do grouping, the steps are
$6x^2+4x-3x-2$
$2x(3x+2)-1(3x+2)$
And I get $(2x-1)(3x+2)$, which it seems correct.
But if I decide to use quadratic formula I get $x_1=frac{1}{2},x_2=-frac{2}{3}$ as zeroes, and $(x-frac{1}{2})(x+frac{2}{3})$ as factors, which is wrong.
Obviously I'm failing to understand something but I can't find what. Is there any step I am missing? Why the results are so different? Shouldn't be the same?
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
I'm learning mathematics by myself. I've searched about this topic but I'm not able to get an answer. Also, my language is not English.
For example, let's factor this polynomial
$6x^4+13x^3+6x^2-3x-2$
I use synthetic division and I get $(x+1)^2$ as a factor.
So $6x^2+x-2$ is what's left.
Now I have two options: quadratic formula or grouping, if I'm right.
If I do grouping, the steps are
$6x^2+4x-3x-2$
$2x(3x+2)-1(3x+2)$
And I get $(2x-1)(3x+2)$, which it seems correct.
But if I decide to use quadratic formula I get $x_1=frac{1}{2},x_2=-frac{2}{3}$ as zeroes, and $(x-frac{1}{2})(x+frac{2}{3})$ as factors, which is wrong.
Obviously I'm failing to understand something but I can't find what. Is there any step I am missing? Why the results are so different? Shouldn't be the same?
algebra-precalculus
algebra-precalculus
edited Dec 4 '18 at 0:00
A.G.
asked Dec 3 '18 at 23:55
A.G.A.G.
63
63
$begingroup$
The zeros don't determine the factors, since there are still leading coefficients to take care of. In particular, $(x - 1/2)(x + 2/3)$ is just off by a factor of $6$.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 23:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I've noticed that. But I though that the results shoud be just the same. What's the difference?
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Knowing the zeros doesn't determine the scaling: Both $x-1$ and $2(x - 1)$ are lines with roots at $x = 1$, right?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 4 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@A.G. dress few graphs with the same zeros, e.g. $(x-1)(x+2),;2(x-1)(x+2),;-3(x-1)(x+2)$ and observe.
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 4 '18 at 10:55
$begingroup$
@T.Bongers Now I get it. I didn't know about the leading coefficient. Thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 16:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The zeros don't determine the factors, since there are still leading coefficients to take care of. In particular, $(x - 1/2)(x + 2/3)$ is just off by a factor of $6$.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 23:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I've noticed that. But I though that the results shoud be just the same. What's the difference?
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Knowing the zeros doesn't determine the scaling: Both $x-1$ and $2(x - 1)$ are lines with roots at $x = 1$, right?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 4 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@A.G. dress few graphs with the same zeros, e.g. $(x-1)(x+2),;2(x-1)(x+2),;-3(x-1)(x+2)$ and observe.
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 4 '18 at 10:55
$begingroup$
@T.Bongers Now I get it. I didn't know about the leading coefficient. Thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 16:06
$begingroup$
The zeros don't determine the factors, since there are still leading coefficients to take care of. In particular, $(x - 1/2)(x + 2/3)$ is just off by a factor of $6$.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 23:58
$begingroup$
The zeros don't determine the factors, since there are still leading coefficients to take care of. In particular, $(x - 1/2)(x + 2/3)$ is just off by a factor of $6$.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 23:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I've noticed that. But I though that the results shoud be just the same. What's the difference?
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Yes, I've noticed that. But I though that the results shoud be just the same. What's the difference?
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Knowing the zeros doesn't determine the scaling: Both $x-1$ and $2(x - 1)$ are lines with roots at $x = 1$, right?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 4 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
Knowing the zeros doesn't determine the scaling: Both $x-1$ and $2(x - 1)$ are lines with roots at $x = 1$, right?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 4 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@A.G. dress few graphs with the same zeros, e.g. $(x-1)(x+2),;2(x-1)(x+2),;-3(x-1)(x+2)$ and observe.
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 4 '18 at 10:55
$begingroup$
@A.G. dress few graphs with the same zeros, e.g. $(x-1)(x+2),;2(x-1)(x+2),;-3(x-1)(x+2)$ and observe.
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 4 '18 at 10:55
$begingroup$
@T.Bongers Now I get it. I didn't know about the leading coefficient. Thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 16:06
$begingroup$
@T.Bongers Now I get it. I didn't know about the leading coefficient. Thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 16:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that $(2x-1) = 2(x-frac{1}{2})$ and $(3x+2)=3(x+frac{2}{3})$ so if either of them are zero then you can cancel out the leading coefficient to solve for $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024902%2fsynthetic-division-quadratic-formula-and-grouping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that $(2x-1) = 2(x-frac{1}{2})$ and $(3x+2)=3(x+frac{2}{3})$ so if either of them are zero then you can cancel out the leading coefficient to solve for $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that $(2x-1) = 2(x-frac{1}{2})$ and $(3x+2)=3(x+frac{2}{3})$ so if either of them are zero then you can cancel out the leading coefficient to solve for $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that $(2x-1) = 2(x-frac{1}{2})$ and $(3x+2)=3(x+frac{2}{3})$ so if either of them are zero then you can cancel out the leading coefficient to solve for $x$.
$endgroup$
Note that $(2x-1) = 2(x-frac{1}{2})$ and $(3x+2)=3(x+frac{2}{3})$ so if either of them are zero then you can cancel out the leading coefficient to solve for $x$.
answered Dec 3 '18 at 23:58
CyclotomicFieldCyclotomicField
2,1981313
2,1981313
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024902%2fsynthetic-division-quadratic-formula-and-grouping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The zeros don't determine the factors, since there are still leading coefficients to take care of. In particular, $(x - 1/2)(x + 2/3)$ is just off by a factor of $6$.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 23:58
$begingroup$
Yes, I've noticed that. But I though that the results shoud be just the same. What's the difference?
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Knowing the zeros doesn't determine the scaling: Both $x-1$ and $2(x - 1)$ are lines with roots at $x = 1$, right?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 4 '18 at 0:07
$begingroup$
@A.G. dress few graphs with the same zeros, e.g. $(x-1)(x+2),;2(x-1)(x+2),;-3(x-1)(x+2)$ and observe.
$endgroup$
– user376343
Dec 4 '18 at 10:55
$begingroup$
@T.Bongers Now I get it. I didn't know about the leading coefficient. Thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– A.G.
Dec 4 '18 at 16:06