Integral of Gaussian curvature over S












0












$begingroup$


Let f: $Bbb R^2 rightarrow Bbb R$ be a smooth function such that $f(x, y) = 0$ for all $(x, y)$ outside the unit disk, i.e., for all $(x, y)$ with $x^2 + y^2 geqq 1.$ Consider the surface $S$ in $Bbb R^3$ given by the graph of $f$ over the disk $x^2 + y^2 leqq 2.$ What can you say about the integral of the Gaussian curvature over S? Prove.



I assume Gauss-Bonnet is what I'd need to use here but I'm having trouble getting there with the information given - meaning I'm unsure of how to derive the values necessary for Gauss-Bonnet.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let f: $Bbb R^2 rightarrow Bbb R$ be a smooth function such that $f(x, y) = 0$ for all $(x, y)$ outside the unit disk, i.e., for all $(x, y)$ with $x^2 + y^2 geqq 1.$ Consider the surface $S$ in $Bbb R^3$ given by the graph of $f$ over the disk $x^2 + y^2 leqq 2.$ What can you say about the integral of the Gaussian curvature over S? Prove.



    I assume Gauss-Bonnet is what I'd need to use here but I'm having trouble getting there with the information given - meaning I'm unsure of how to derive the values necessary for Gauss-Bonnet.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let f: $Bbb R^2 rightarrow Bbb R$ be a smooth function such that $f(x, y) = 0$ for all $(x, y)$ outside the unit disk, i.e., for all $(x, y)$ with $x^2 + y^2 geqq 1.$ Consider the surface $S$ in $Bbb R^3$ given by the graph of $f$ over the disk $x^2 + y^2 leqq 2.$ What can you say about the integral of the Gaussian curvature over S? Prove.



      I assume Gauss-Bonnet is what I'd need to use here but I'm having trouble getting there with the information given - meaning I'm unsure of how to derive the values necessary for Gauss-Bonnet.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let f: $Bbb R^2 rightarrow Bbb R$ be a smooth function such that $f(x, y) = 0$ for all $(x, y)$ outside the unit disk, i.e., for all $(x, y)$ with $x^2 + y^2 geqq 1.$ Consider the surface $S$ in $Bbb R^3$ given by the graph of $f$ over the disk $x^2 + y^2 leqq 2.$ What can you say about the integral of the Gaussian curvature over S? Prove.



      I assume Gauss-Bonnet is what I'd need to use here but I'm having trouble getting there with the information given - meaning I'm unsure of how to derive the values necessary for Gauss-Bonnet.







      differential-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 4 '18 at 19:45









      jman63jman63

      33




      33






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          By the local Gauss-Bonnet theorem,
          $$ int_{S} K , mathrm dA = 2pi -int_gamma k_g , mathrm ds, $$
          where $gamma$ is the positively oriented circle $x^2+y^2=2$. Since $f(x,y)=0$ for $x^2+y^2geq 1$, it follows that $S$ is planar everywhere except in the unit circle. In particular, the geodesic curvature of $gamma$ can be easily computed by taking e.g. $(0,0,1)$ as the unit normal along $gamma$, and parametrizing $gamma$ accordingly.



          Can you proceed?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I suppose you'd parametrize with cos, sin, and then just compute the integral once you've computed geodesic curvature?
            $endgroup$
            – jman63
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:52










          • $begingroup$
            Yes! You could even compute the integral without parametrizing, but I usually mess up the signs if I do that.
            $endgroup$
            – MisterRiemann
            Dec 7 '18 at 7:20











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026055%2fintegral-of-gaussian-curvature-over-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          By the local Gauss-Bonnet theorem,
          $$ int_{S} K , mathrm dA = 2pi -int_gamma k_g , mathrm ds, $$
          where $gamma$ is the positively oriented circle $x^2+y^2=2$. Since $f(x,y)=0$ for $x^2+y^2geq 1$, it follows that $S$ is planar everywhere except in the unit circle. In particular, the geodesic curvature of $gamma$ can be easily computed by taking e.g. $(0,0,1)$ as the unit normal along $gamma$, and parametrizing $gamma$ accordingly.



          Can you proceed?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I suppose you'd parametrize with cos, sin, and then just compute the integral once you've computed geodesic curvature?
            $endgroup$
            – jman63
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:52










          • $begingroup$
            Yes! You could even compute the integral without parametrizing, but I usually mess up the signs if I do that.
            $endgroup$
            – MisterRiemann
            Dec 7 '18 at 7:20
















          0












          $begingroup$

          By the local Gauss-Bonnet theorem,
          $$ int_{S} K , mathrm dA = 2pi -int_gamma k_g , mathrm ds, $$
          where $gamma$ is the positively oriented circle $x^2+y^2=2$. Since $f(x,y)=0$ for $x^2+y^2geq 1$, it follows that $S$ is planar everywhere except in the unit circle. In particular, the geodesic curvature of $gamma$ can be easily computed by taking e.g. $(0,0,1)$ as the unit normal along $gamma$, and parametrizing $gamma$ accordingly.



          Can you proceed?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I suppose you'd parametrize with cos, sin, and then just compute the integral once you've computed geodesic curvature?
            $endgroup$
            – jman63
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:52










          • $begingroup$
            Yes! You could even compute the integral without parametrizing, but I usually mess up the signs if I do that.
            $endgroup$
            – MisterRiemann
            Dec 7 '18 at 7:20














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          By the local Gauss-Bonnet theorem,
          $$ int_{S} K , mathrm dA = 2pi -int_gamma k_g , mathrm ds, $$
          where $gamma$ is the positively oriented circle $x^2+y^2=2$. Since $f(x,y)=0$ for $x^2+y^2geq 1$, it follows that $S$ is planar everywhere except in the unit circle. In particular, the geodesic curvature of $gamma$ can be easily computed by taking e.g. $(0,0,1)$ as the unit normal along $gamma$, and parametrizing $gamma$ accordingly.



          Can you proceed?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          By the local Gauss-Bonnet theorem,
          $$ int_{S} K , mathrm dA = 2pi -int_gamma k_g , mathrm ds, $$
          where $gamma$ is the positively oriented circle $x^2+y^2=2$. Since $f(x,y)=0$ for $x^2+y^2geq 1$, it follows that $S$ is planar everywhere except in the unit circle. In particular, the geodesic curvature of $gamma$ can be easily computed by taking e.g. $(0,0,1)$ as the unit normal along $gamma$, and parametrizing $gamma$ accordingly.



          Can you proceed?







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 4 '18 at 19:57

























          answered Dec 4 '18 at 19:52









          MisterRiemannMisterRiemann

          5,8451624




          5,8451624












          • $begingroup$
            I suppose you'd parametrize with cos, sin, and then just compute the integral once you've computed geodesic curvature?
            $endgroup$
            – jman63
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:52










          • $begingroup$
            Yes! You could even compute the integral without parametrizing, but I usually mess up the signs if I do that.
            $endgroup$
            – MisterRiemann
            Dec 7 '18 at 7:20


















          • $begingroup$
            I suppose you'd parametrize with cos, sin, and then just compute the integral once you've computed geodesic curvature?
            $endgroup$
            – jman63
            Dec 7 '18 at 0:52










          • $begingroup$
            Yes! You could even compute the integral without parametrizing, but I usually mess up the signs if I do that.
            $endgroup$
            – MisterRiemann
            Dec 7 '18 at 7:20
















          $begingroup$
          I suppose you'd parametrize with cos, sin, and then just compute the integral once you've computed geodesic curvature?
          $endgroup$
          – jman63
          Dec 7 '18 at 0:52




          $begingroup$
          I suppose you'd parametrize with cos, sin, and then just compute the integral once you've computed geodesic curvature?
          $endgroup$
          – jman63
          Dec 7 '18 at 0:52












          $begingroup$
          Yes! You could even compute the integral without parametrizing, but I usually mess up the signs if I do that.
          $endgroup$
          – MisterRiemann
          Dec 7 '18 at 7:20




          $begingroup$
          Yes! You could even compute the integral without parametrizing, but I usually mess up the signs if I do that.
          $endgroup$
          – MisterRiemann
          Dec 7 '18 at 7:20


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026055%2fintegral-of-gaussian-curvature-over-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Probability when a professor distributes a quiz and homework assignment to a class of n students.

          Aardman Animations

          Are they similar matrix