Computing iterated integrals over positive integers (question about stack exchange solution)












1












$begingroup$


I am referring to this question: here



How does one go about computing the iterated integrals?



I am confused as to how the first one simplifies to $f(1,1)$ and why the second one has:



$sum_{y} 2^{-y-1} - 2^{-y} = - sum_{y} 2^{y-1}$



Any clarification is appreciated.



Edit 1: I assume we are supposed to compute each part by taking the sections of $f$, where we fix one variable.



So, for example, the inside part of the first integral is $sum_{y} f_x(y)$ (where $f_x(y) = f(x,y)$ and $x$ is fixed). For a fixed $x$ this should evaluate to $(2-2^{-x}) + (-2 + 2^{-(x+1)})$ where the first summand is coming from the case where $y=x$ and the second comes from the case where $y=x-1$. In which case, they would evaluate to the same thing.



Edit 2: But obviously this shouldn’t be the case as we violated the non-negativity requirement of Tonelli’s and I think (from what I’ve gathered from the correct solution) we violated integrability of Fubini’s.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I am referring to this question: here



    How does one go about computing the iterated integrals?



    I am confused as to how the first one simplifies to $f(1,1)$ and why the second one has:



    $sum_{y} 2^{-y-1} - 2^{-y} = - sum_{y} 2^{y-1}$



    Any clarification is appreciated.



    Edit 1: I assume we are supposed to compute each part by taking the sections of $f$, where we fix one variable.



    So, for example, the inside part of the first integral is $sum_{y} f_x(y)$ (where $f_x(y) = f(x,y)$ and $x$ is fixed). For a fixed $x$ this should evaluate to $(2-2^{-x}) + (-2 + 2^{-(x+1)})$ where the first summand is coming from the case where $y=x$ and the second comes from the case where $y=x-1$. In which case, they would evaluate to the same thing.



    Edit 2: But obviously this shouldn’t be the case as we violated the non-negativity requirement of Tonelli’s and I think (from what I’ve gathered from the correct solution) we violated integrability of Fubini’s.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I am referring to this question: here



      How does one go about computing the iterated integrals?



      I am confused as to how the first one simplifies to $f(1,1)$ and why the second one has:



      $sum_{y} 2^{-y-1} - 2^{-y} = - sum_{y} 2^{y-1}$



      Any clarification is appreciated.



      Edit 1: I assume we are supposed to compute each part by taking the sections of $f$, where we fix one variable.



      So, for example, the inside part of the first integral is $sum_{y} f_x(y)$ (where $f_x(y) = f(x,y)$ and $x$ is fixed). For a fixed $x$ this should evaluate to $(2-2^{-x}) + (-2 + 2^{-(x+1)})$ where the first summand is coming from the case where $y=x$ and the second comes from the case where $y=x-1$. In which case, they would evaluate to the same thing.



      Edit 2: But obviously this shouldn’t be the case as we violated the non-negativity requirement of Tonelli’s and I think (from what I’ve gathered from the correct solution) we violated integrability of Fubini’s.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am referring to this question: here



      How does one go about computing the iterated integrals?



      I am confused as to how the first one simplifies to $f(1,1)$ and why the second one has:



      $sum_{y} 2^{-y-1} - 2^{-y} = - sum_{y} 2^{y-1}$



      Any clarification is appreciated.



      Edit 1: I assume we are supposed to compute each part by taking the sections of $f$, where we fix one variable.



      So, for example, the inside part of the first integral is $sum_{y} f_x(y)$ (where $f_x(y) = f(x,y)$ and $x$ is fixed). For a fixed $x$ this should evaluate to $(2-2^{-x}) + (-2 + 2^{-(x+1)})$ where the first summand is coming from the case where $y=x$ and the second comes from the case where $y=x-1$. In which case, they would evaluate to the same thing.



      Edit 2: But obviously this shouldn’t be the case as we violated the non-negativity requirement of Tonelli’s and I think (from what I’ve gathered from the correct solution) we violated integrability of Fubini’s.







      real-analysis integration analysis measure-theory product-measure






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 6 '18 at 2:10







      Jane Doe

















      asked Dec 4 '18 at 19:27









      Jane DoeJane Doe

      19112




      19112






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026023%2fcomputing-iterated-integrals-over-positive-integers-question-about-stack-exchan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026023%2fcomputing-iterated-integrals-over-positive-integers-question-about-stack-exchan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

          When does type information flow backwards in C++?

          Grease: Live!