Equation with 3 unknown x values
I have an equation that has 3 unknown values ($x_1$, $x_2$ and $x_3$)
I know how to solve equations when only 1 $x$ exist but how do you solve an equation with 3 $x$ like this one?
Thank you!
$$0.43125x_1 + 0.35x_2 + 0.21875x_3 = 100$$
differential-equations
add a comment |
I have an equation that has 3 unknown values ($x_1$, $x_2$ and $x_3$)
I know how to solve equations when only 1 $x$ exist but how do you solve an equation with 3 $x$ like this one?
Thank you!
$$0.43125x_1 + 0.35x_2 + 0.21875x_3 = 100$$
differential-equations
math.stackexchange.com/a/649328/525520
– T. Ford
Nov 29 '18 at 19:07
add a comment |
I have an equation that has 3 unknown values ($x_1$, $x_2$ and $x_3$)
I know how to solve equations when only 1 $x$ exist but how do you solve an equation with 3 $x$ like this one?
Thank you!
$$0.43125x_1 + 0.35x_2 + 0.21875x_3 = 100$$
differential-equations
I have an equation that has 3 unknown values ($x_1$, $x_2$ and $x_3$)
I know how to solve equations when only 1 $x$ exist but how do you solve an equation with 3 $x$ like this one?
Thank you!
$$0.43125x_1 + 0.35x_2 + 0.21875x_3 = 100$$
differential-equations
differential-equations
edited Dec 20 '18 at 9:38
Martín Vacas Vignolo
3,790623
3,790623
asked Nov 29 '18 at 19:04
Andreas
11
11
math.stackexchange.com/a/649328/525520
– T. Ford
Nov 29 '18 at 19:07
add a comment |
math.stackexchange.com/a/649328/525520
– T. Ford
Nov 29 '18 at 19:07
math.stackexchange.com/a/649328/525520
– T. Ford
Nov 29 '18 at 19:07
math.stackexchange.com/a/649328/525520
– T. Ford
Nov 29 '18 at 19:07
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
"but how do you solve an equation with 3 x like this one?"
You don't. There isn't a unique solution, if that's what you want. In fact, the set of solution is an affine space of dimension $2$.
add a comment |
I understand. I perheps put the problem incorrectly. I can try to describe the problem as it is and perheps there is another approach to it:
If we assume we have 100 occurences and our goal is to get the TOTAL number to
be 100.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. What number to add here?
2. In 35% of the occurences. What number to add here?
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. What number to add here?
All the numbers that we added should be equal to 100 but
I am not sure how to do this?
(The 3 different numbers should be equally balanced in the same way as the % of the occurences (43.125%, 35%, 21.875%))
add a comment |
I have tried with a solution but this doesn't seem correct.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. I will add 43.125
2. In 35% of the occurences. I will add 35
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. I will add 21.875
Mathematical calculation: (100 occurences)
43.125 occurences * 43.125 = 1859.77
35 occurences * 35 = 1225
21.875 occurences * 21.875 = 478.52
1859.77 + 1225 + 478.52 = 3563.29
3563.29 / 100 occurences = 35.63
I get 35.63 here. The goal would be to get 100 here.
I wonder what I am doing wrong or how to set this up?
add a comment |
Federico is absolutely right, and the link he provides is pretty explanatory.
This is basic linear algebra so if you find this interesting you should review simultaneous linear equations and matrices, here’s a link.
Now, I’ll start by simplifying the question a little bit so it’s easier to follow and maybe you’ll understand it a little better, because at first the whole ‘no unique solution’ thing can be a little confusing.
Say we have the following relationship:
$$
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z = 100
$$
1. Solve for $x$:
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4x &= 100 -0.3y -0.2z \
x. &= frac{100}{0.4} -frac{0.3}{0.4}y -frac{0.2}{0.4}z \
x &= 250 - 0.75y - 0.5z \
end{align}
$$
Now we have a solution for $x$ observe that $y$ and $z$ are independent variables, so set them to some arbitrary values
solve $y$
Let $y=s$ such that $s$ is some arbitrary real number
solve $z$
Let $z=t$ such that $t$ is some arbitrary real number
Conclusion
Thus the values for the variables must be :
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75s - 0.5t \
y &= s \
z &= t \
end{align}
$$
Any values satisfying that will hence satisfy the initial equation.
Example
Say we choose arbitrary values for $s$ and $t$ :
$$
begin{align}
s &= 4 \
t &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now by substitution we can solve for fixed equation values:
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75times 4 - 0.5 times 2 \
&= 250 - 3 - 1 \
&= 246 \
y &= 4 \
z &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now let’s test our values by substitution
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4 times 246 + 0.3 times 4 + 0.2 times 2 &= 100 \
98.4 + 1.2 + 0.4 &= 100 \
99.6+ 0.4 &= 100 \
100 &= 100 \
end{align}
$$
So the solution is verified as working, but take in mind what Federico said, there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given $x_1$ value.
add a comment |
Thank you very much for that well explanation.
"there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given x1 value".
That seems to be true for me also as I have discovered that as well which was one of the questionmarks that I was start thinking of. I beleive a good solution then would be to test out the 2 second variables to "search" for a valid solution that is looked for.
Thank you very much for your help!
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019047%2fequation-with-3-unknown-x-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
"but how do you solve an equation with 3 x like this one?"
You don't. There isn't a unique solution, if that's what you want. In fact, the set of solution is an affine space of dimension $2$.
add a comment |
"but how do you solve an equation with 3 x like this one?"
You don't. There isn't a unique solution, if that's what you want. In fact, the set of solution is an affine space of dimension $2$.
add a comment |
"but how do you solve an equation with 3 x like this one?"
You don't. There isn't a unique solution, if that's what you want. In fact, the set of solution is an affine space of dimension $2$.
"but how do you solve an equation with 3 x like this one?"
You don't. There isn't a unique solution, if that's what you want. In fact, the set of solution is an affine space of dimension $2$.
answered Nov 29 '18 at 19:07
Federico
4,799514
4,799514
add a comment |
add a comment |
I understand. I perheps put the problem incorrectly. I can try to describe the problem as it is and perheps there is another approach to it:
If we assume we have 100 occurences and our goal is to get the TOTAL number to
be 100.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. What number to add here?
2. In 35% of the occurences. What number to add here?
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. What number to add here?
All the numbers that we added should be equal to 100 but
I am not sure how to do this?
(The 3 different numbers should be equally balanced in the same way as the % of the occurences (43.125%, 35%, 21.875%))
add a comment |
I understand. I perheps put the problem incorrectly. I can try to describe the problem as it is and perheps there is another approach to it:
If we assume we have 100 occurences and our goal is to get the TOTAL number to
be 100.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. What number to add here?
2. In 35% of the occurences. What number to add here?
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. What number to add here?
All the numbers that we added should be equal to 100 but
I am not sure how to do this?
(The 3 different numbers should be equally balanced in the same way as the % of the occurences (43.125%, 35%, 21.875%))
add a comment |
I understand. I perheps put the problem incorrectly. I can try to describe the problem as it is and perheps there is another approach to it:
If we assume we have 100 occurences and our goal is to get the TOTAL number to
be 100.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. What number to add here?
2. In 35% of the occurences. What number to add here?
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. What number to add here?
All the numbers that we added should be equal to 100 but
I am not sure how to do this?
(The 3 different numbers should be equally balanced in the same way as the % of the occurences (43.125%, 35%, 21.875%))
I understand. I perheps put the problem incorrectly. I can try to describe the problem as it is and perheps there is another approach to it:
If we assume we have 100 occurences and our goal is to get the TOTAL number to
be 100.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. What number to add here?
2. In 35% of the occurences. What number to add here?
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. What number to add here?
All the numbers that we added should be equal to 100 but
I am not sure how to do this?
(The 3 different numbers should be equally balanced in the same way as the % of the occurences (43.125%, 35%, 21.875%))
edited Nov 29 '18 at 21:15
answered Nov 29 '18 at 19:18
Andreas
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
I have tried with a solution but this doesn't seem correct.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. I will add 43.125
2. In 35% of the occurences. I will add 35
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. I will add 21.875
Mathematical calculation: (100 occurences)
43.125 occurences * 43.125 = 1859.77
35 occurences * 35 = 1225
21.875 occurences * 21.875 = 478.52
1859.77 + 1225 + 478.52 = 3563.29
3563.29 / 100 occurences = 35.63
I get 35.63 here. The goal would be to get 100 here.
I wonder what I am doing wrong or how to set this up?
add a comment |
I have tried with a solution but this doesn't seem correct.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. I will add 43.125
2. In 35% of the occurences. I will add 35
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. I will add 21.875
Mathematical calculation: (100 occurences)
43.125 occurences * 43.125 = 1859.77
35 occurences * 35 = 1225
21.875 occurences * 21.875 = 478.52
1859.77 + 1225 + 478.52 = 3563.29
3563.29 / 100 occurences = 35.63
I get 35.63 here. The goal would be to get 100 here.
I wonder what I am doing wrong or how to set this up?
add a comment |
I have tried with a solution but this doesn't seem correct.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. I will add 43.125
2. In 35% of the occurences. I will add 35
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. I will add 21.875
Mathematical calculation: (100 occurences)
43.125 occurences * 43.125 = 1859.77
35 occurences * 35 = 1225
21.875 occurences * 21.875 = 478.52
1859.77 + 1225 + 478.52 = 3563.29
3563.29 / 100 occurences = 35.63
I get 35.63 here. The goal would be to get 100 here.
I wonder what I am doing wrong or how to set this up?
I have tried with a solution but this doesn't seem correct.
1. In 43.125% of the occurences. I will add 43.125
2. In 35% of the occurences. I will add 35
3. In 21.875% of the occurences. I will add 21.875
Mathematical calculation: (100 occurences)
43.125 occurences * 43.125 = 1859.77
35 occurences * 35 = 1225
21.875 occurences * 21.875 = 478.52
1859.77 + 1225 + 478.52 = 3563.29
3563.29 / 100 occurences = 35.63
I get 35.63 here. The goal would be to get 100 here.
I wonder what I am doing wrong or how to set this up?
answered Nov 29 '18 at 22:02
Andreas
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
Federico is absolutely right, and the link he provides is pretty explanatory.
This is basic linear algebra so if you find this interesting you should review simultaneous linear equations and matrices, here’s a link.
Now, I’ll start by simplifying the question a little bit so it’s easier to follow and maybe you’ll understand it a little better, because at first the whole ‘no unique solution’ thing can be a little confusing.
Say we have the following relationship:
$$
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z = 100
$$
1. Solve for $x$:
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4x &= 100 -0.3y -0.2z \
x. &= frac{100}{0.4} -frac{0.3}{0.4}y -frac{0.2}{0.4}z \
x &= 250 - 0.75y - 0.5z \
end{align}
$$
Now we have a solution for $x$ observe that $y$ and $z$ are independent variables, so set them to some arbitrary values
solve $y$
Let $y=s$ such that $s$ is some arbitrary real number
solve $z$
Let $z=t$ such that $t$ is some arbitrary real number
Conclusion
Thus the values for the variables must be :
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75s - 0.5t \
y &= s \
z &= t \
end{align}
$$
Any values satisfying that will hence satisfy the initial equation.
Example
Say we choose arbitrary values for $s$ and $t$ :
$$
begin{align}
s &= 4 \
t &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now by substitution we can solve for fixed equation values:
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75times 4 - 0.5 times 2 \
&= 250 - 3 - 1 \
&= 246 \
y &= 4 \
z &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now let’s test our values by substitution
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4 times 246 + 0.3 times 4 + 0.2 times 2 &= 100 \
98.4 + 1.2 + 0.4 &= 100 \
99.6+ 0.4 &= 100 \
100 &= 100 \
end{align}
$$
So the solution is verified as working, but take in mind what Federico said, there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given $x_1$ value.
add a comment |
Federico is absolutely right, and the link he provides is pretty explanatory.
This is basic linear algebra so if you find this interesting you should review simultaneous linear equations and matrices, here’s a link.
Now, I’ll start by simplifying the question a little bit so it’s easier to follow and maybe you’ll understand it a little better, because at first the whole ‘no unique solution’ thing can be a little confusing.
Say we have the following relationship:
$$
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z = 100
$$
1. Solve for $x$:
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4x &= 100 -0.3y -0.2z \
x. &= frac{100}{0.4} -frac{0.3}{0.4}y -frac{0.2}{0.4}z \
x &= 250 - 0.75y - 0.5z \
end{align}
$$
Now we have a solution for $x$ observe that $y$ and $z$ are independent variables, so set them to some arbitrary values
solve $y$
Let $y=s$ such that $s$ is some arbitrary real number
solve $z$
Let $z=t$ such that $t$ is some arbitrary real number
Conclusion
Thus the values for the variables must be :
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75s - 0.5t \
y &= s \
z &= t \
end{align}
$$
Any values satisfying that will hence satisfy the initial equation.
Example
Say we choose arbitrary values for $s$ and $t$ :
$$
begin{align}
s &= 4 \
t &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now by substitution we can solve for fixed equation values:
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75times 4 - 0.5 times 2 \
&= 250 - 3 - 1 \
&= 246 \
y &= 4 \
z &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now let’s test our values by substitution
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4 times 246 + 0.3 times 4 + 0.2 times 2 &= 100 \
98.4 + 1.2 + 0.4 &= 100 \
99.6+ 0.4 &= 100 \
100 &= 100 \
end{align}
$$
So the solution is verified as working, but take in mind what Federico said, there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given $x_1$ value.
add a comment |
Federico is absolutely right, and the link he provides is pretty explanatory.
This is basic linear algebra so if you find this interesting you should review simultaneous linear equations and matrices, here’s a link.
Now, I’ll start by simplifying the question a little bit so it’s easier to follow and maybe you’ll understand it a little better, because at first the whole ‘no unique solution’ thing can be a little confusing.
Say we have the following relationship:
$$
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z = 100
$$
1. Solve for $x$:
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4x &= 100 -0.3y -0.2z \
x. &= frac{100}{0.4} -frac{0.3}{0.4}y -frac{0.2}{0.4}z \
x &= 250 - 0.75y - 0.5z \
end{align}
$$
Now we have a solution for $x$ observe that $y$ and $z$ are independent variables, so set them to some arbitrary values
solve $y$
Let $y=s$ such that $s$ is some arbitrary real number
solve $z$
Let $z=t$ such that $t$ is some arbitrary real number
Conclusion
Thus the values for the variables must be :
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75s - 0.5t \
y &= s \
z &= t \
end{align}
$$
Any values satisfying that will hence satisfy the initial equation.
Example
Say we choose arbitrary values for $s$ and $t$ :
$$
begin{align}
s &= 4 \
t &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now by substitution we can solve for fixed equation values:
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75times 4 - 0.5 times 2 \
&= 250 - 3 - 1 \
&= 246 \
y &= 4 \
z &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now let’s test our values by substitution
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4 times 246 + 0.3 times 4 + 0.2 times 2 &= 100 \
98.4 + 1.2 + 0.4 &= 100 \
99.6+ 0.4 &= 100 \
100 &= 100 \
end{align}
$$
So the solution is verified as working, but take in mind what Federico said, there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given $x_1$ value.
Federico is absolutely right, and the link he provides is pretty explanatory.
This is basic linear algebra so if you find this interesting you should review simultaneous linear equations and matrices, here’s a link.
Now, I’ll start by simplifying the question a little bit so it’s easier to follow and maybe you’ll understand it a little better, because at first the whole ‘no unique solution’ thing can be a little confusing.
Say we have the following relationship:
$$
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z = 100
$$
1. Solve for $x$:
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4x &= 100 -0.3y -0.2z \
x. &= frac{100}{0.4} -frac{0.3}{0.4}y -frac{0.2}{0.4}z \
x &= 250 - 0.75y - 0.5z \
end{align}
$$
Now we have a solution for $x$ observe that $y$ and $z$ are independent variables, so set them to some arbitrary values
solve $y$
Let $y=s$ such that $s$ is some arbitrary real number
solve $z$
Let $z=t$ such that $t$ is some arbitrary real number
Conclusion
Thus the values for the variables must be :
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75s - 0.5t \
y &= s \
z &= t \
end{align}
$$
Any values satisfying that will hence satisfy the initial equation.
Example
Say we choose arbitrary values for $s$ and $t$ :
$$
begin{align}
s &= 4 \
t &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now by substitution we can solve for fixed equation values:
$$
begin{align}
x &= 250 - 0.75times 4 - 0.5 times 2 \
&= 250 - 3 - 1 \
&= 246 \
y &= 4 \
z &= 2 \
end{align}
$$
Now let’s test our values by substitution
$$
begin{align}
0.4x + 0.3y + 0.2z &= 100 \
0.4 times 246 + 0.3 times 4 + 0.2 times 2 &= 100 \
98.4 + 1.2 + 0.4 &= 100 \
99.6+ 0.4 &= 100 \
100 &= 100 \
end{align}
$$
So the solution is verified as working, but take in mind what Federico said, there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given $x_1$ value.
answered Nov 29 '18 at 22:58
Jones Turner
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thank you very much for that well explanation.
"there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given x1 value".
That seems to be true for me also as I have discovered that as well which was one of the questionmarks that I was start thinking of. I beleive a good solution then would be to test out the 2 second variables to "search" for a valid solution that is looked for.
Thank you very much for your help!
add a comment |
Thank you very much for that well explanation.
"there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given x1 value".
That seems to be true for me also as I have discovered that as well which was one of the questionmarks that I was start thinking of. I beleive a good solution then would be to test out the 2 second variables to "search" for a valid solution that is looked for.
Thank you very much for your help!
add a comment |
Thank you very much for that well explanation.
"there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given x1 value".
That seems to be true for me also as I have discovered that as well which was one of the questionmarks that I was start thinking of. I beleive a good solution then would be to test out the 2 second variables to "search" for a valid solution that is looked for.
Thank you very much for your help!
Thank you very much for that well explanation.
"there are infinite solutions because the latter variables can be adjusted around any given x1 value".
That seems to be true for me also as I have discovered that as well which was one of the questionmarks that I was start thinking of. I beleive a good solution then would be to test out the 2 second variables to "search" for a valid solution that is looked for.
Thank you very much for your help!
answered Nov 30 '18 at 1:45
Andreas
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019047%2fequation-with-3-unknown-x-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
math.stackexchange.com/a/649328/525520
– T. Ford
Nov 29 '18 at 19:07