Analizing the stability of the equilibrium points of the system $ddot{x}=(x-a)(x^2-a)$
$require{amsmath}$
$DeclareMathOperator{Tr}{Tr}$
$DeclareMathOperator{Det}{Det}$
Investigate the stability of the equilibrium points of the system $ddot{x}=(x-a)(x^2-a)$ for all real values of the parameter $a$. (Hints: It might help to
graph the right-hand side. An alternative is to rewrite the equation as $ddot{x}=−V′(x)$ for a suitable potential energy function $V$ and then use your intuition about particles
moving in potentials.)
I am not really sure on how to approach the problem with the given hints, since it would require plotting the graph for different critical values for $a$, which I am not really sure how to find. Thus, I am wondering if the following is correct.
The system $ddot{x}=(x-a)(x^2-a)$ can be re-written as
$$begin{cases}
dot{x}=y\
dot{y}=(x-a)(x^2-a)
end{cases}$$
with fixed points $P_1(a,0),,P_2(sqrt{a},0)$ and $P_3(sqrt{a},0)$.
The Jacobian is
$$J(x,y)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
3x^2-2ax-a &0
end{bmatrix}$$
and thus
$$J(a,0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
a^2-a &0
end{bmatrix};quad J(sqrt{a},0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
2a-2a^{3/2} &0
end{bmatrix}; quad J(-sqrt{a},0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
2a+2a^{3/2} &0
end{bmatrix}.$$
It can be noticed that the $Trleft[J(x,y)right]=0$ and that
$$begin{aligned}
&1.,Detleft[J(a,0)right]=a(1-a)implies text{Saddle for }a<0 wedge a>1, text{Center for }0<a<1.\
&2.,Detleft[J(sqrt{a},0)right]=2a(sqrt{a}-1)implies text{Saddle for }0<a<1, text{Center for }a>1.\
&3.,Detleft[J(-sqrt{a},0)right]=-2a(sqrt{a}+1)implies text{Saddle for }a>0.
end{aligned}$$
If $a=0$ the system reduces to $ddot{x}=x^3$ where the only fixed point is at $(0,0)$ and thus it is unstable. On the other hand, if $a=1$ then the system reduces to $ddot{x}=x^3-x^2-x+1$ with fixed points at $(1,0),(-1,0)$, both being unstable.
Is my work correct?
differential-equations analysis dynamical-systems
|
show 1 more comment
$require{amsmath}$
$DeclareMathOperator{Tr}{Tr}$
$DeclareMathOperator{Det}{Det}$
Investigate the stability of the equilibrium points of the system $ddot{x}=(x-a)(x^2-a)$ for all real values of the parameter $a$. (Hints: It might help to
graph the right-hand side. An alternative is to rewrite the equation as $ddot{x}=−V′(x)$ for a suitable potential energy function $V$ and then use your intuition about particles
moving in potentials.)
I am not really sure on how to approach the problem with the given hints, since it would require plotting the graph for different critical values for $a$, which I am not really sure how to find. Thus, I am wondering if the following is correct.
The system $ddot{x}=(x-a)(x^2-a)$ can be re-written as
$$begin{cases}
dot{x}=y\
dot{y}=(x-a)(x^2-a)
end{cases}$$
with fixed points $P_1(a,0),,P_2(sqrt{a},0)$ and $P_3(sqrt{a},0)$.
The Jacobian is
$$J(x,y)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
3x^2-2ax-a &0
end{bmatrix}$$
and thus
$$J(a,0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
a^2-a &0
end{bmatrix};quad J(sqrt{a},0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
2a-2a^{3/2} &0
end{bmatrix}; quad J(-sqrt{a},0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
2a+2a^{3/2} &0
end{bmatrix}.$$
It can be noticed that the $Trleft[J(x,y)right]=0$ and that
$$begin{aligned}
&1.,Detleft[J(a,0)right]=a(1-a)implies text{Saddle for }a<0 wedge a>1, text{Center for }0<a<1.\
&2.,Detleft[J(sqrt{a},0)right]=2a(sqrt{a}-1)implies text{Saddle for }0<a<1, text{Center for }a>1.\
&3.,Detleft[J(-sqrt{a},0)right]=-2a(sqrt{a}+1)implies text{Saddle for }a>0.
end{aligned}$$
If $a=0$ the system reduces to $ddot{x}=x^3$ where the only fixed point is at $(0,0)$ and thus it is unstable. On the other hand, if $a=1$ then the system reduces to $ddot{x}=x^3-x^2-x+1$ with fixed points at $(1,0),(-1,0)$, both being unstable.
Is my work correct?
differential-equations analysis dynamical-systems
Isn't this question better suited for Physics SE?
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:11
4
@BertrandWittgenstein'sGhost this is part of dynamical systems, so no. I could certainly ask there too, but there is no point really
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:13
That's funny what you did, It was a genuine question. No need to get defensive. Cheers!
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:23
I haven't checked all your algebra carefully but it looks like you've go the right idea!
– Robert Lewis
Nov 29 '18 at 2:32
1
@AlexanderJ93 yes you're right the determinant is always negative. Thanks
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:52
|
show 1 more comment
$require{amsmath}$
$DeclareMathOperator{Tr}{Tr}$
$DeclareMathOperator{Det}{Det}$
Investigate the stability of the equilibrium points of the system $ddot{x}=(x-a)(x^2-a)$ for all real values of the parameter $a$. (Hints: It might help to
graph the right-hand side. An alternative is to rewrite the equation as $ddot{x}=−V′(x)$ for a suitable potential energy function $V$ and then use your intuition about particles
moving in potentials.)
I am not really sure on how to approach the problem with the given hints, since it would require plotting the graph for different critical values for $a$, which I am not really sure how to find. Thus, I am wondering if the following is correct.
The system $ddot{x}=(x-a)(x^2-a)$ can be re-written as
$$begin{cases}
dot{x}=y\
dot{y}=(x-a)(x^2-a)
end{cases}$$
with fixed points $P_1(a,0),,P_2(sqrt{a},0)$ and $P_3(sqrt{a},0)$.
The Jacobian is
$$J(x,y)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
3x^2-2ax-a &0
end{bmatrix}$$
and thus
$$J(a,0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
a^2-a &0
end{bmatrix};quad J(sqrt{a},0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
2a-2a^{3/2} &0
end{bmatrix}; quad J(-sqrt{a},0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
2a+2a^{3/2} &0
end{bmatrix}.$$
It can be noticed that the $Trleft[J(x,y)right]=0$ and that
$$begin{aligned}
&1.,Detleft[J(a,0)right]=a(1-a)implies text{Saddle for }a<0 wedge a>1, text{Center for }0<a<1.\
&2.,Detleft[J(sqrt{a},0)right]=2a(sqrt{a}-1)implies text{Saddle for }0<a<1, text{Center for }a>1.\
&3.,Detleft[J(-sqrt{a},0)right]=-2a(sqrt{a}+1)implies text{Saddle for }a>0.
end{aligned}$$
If $a=0$ the system reduces to $ddot{x}=x^3$ where the only fixed point is at $(0,0)$ and thus it is unstable. On the other hand, if $a=1$ then the system reduces to $ddot{x}=x^3-x^2-x+1$ with fixed points at $(1,0),(-1,0)$, both being unstable.
Is my work correct?
differential-equations analysis dynamical-systems
$require{amsmath}$
$DeclareMathOperator{Tr}{Tr}$
$DeclareMathOperator{Det}{Det}$
Investigate the stability of the equilibrium points of the system $ddot{x}=(x-a)(x^2-a)$ for all real values of the parameter $a$. (Hints: It might help to
graph the right-hand side. An alternative is to rewrite the equation as $ddot{x}=−V′(x)$ for a suitable potential energy function $V$ and then use your intuition about particles
moving in potentials.)
I am not really sure on how to approach the problem with the given hints, since it would require plotting the graph for different critical values for $a$, which I am not really sure how to find. Thus, I am wondering if the following is correct.
The system $ddot{x}=(x-a)(x^2-a)$ can be re-written as
$$begin{cases}
dot{x}=y\
dot{y}=(x-a)(x^2-a)
end{cases}$$
with fixed points $P_1(a,0),,P_2(sqrt{a},0)$ and $P_3(sqrt{a},0)$.
The Jacobian is
$$J(x,y)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
3x^2-2ax-a &0
end{bmatrix}$$
and thus
$$J(a,0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
a^2-a &0
end{bmatrix};quad J(sqrt{a},0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
2a-2a^{3/2} &0
end{bmatrix}; quad J(-sqrt{a},0)=begin{bmatrix}
0 &1\
2a+2a^{3/2} &0
end{bmatrix}.$$
It can be noticed that the $Trleft[J(x,y)right]=0$ and that
$$begin{aligned}
&1.,Detleft[J(a,0)right]=a(1-a)implies text{Saddle for }a<0 wedge a>1, text{Center for }0<a<1.\
&2.,Detleft[J(sqrt{a},0)right]=2a(sqrt{a}-1)implies text{Saddle for }0<a<1, text{Center for }a>1.\
&3.,Detleft[J(-sqrt{a},0)right]=-2a(sqrt{a}+1)implies text{Saddle for }a>0.
end{aligned}$$
If $a=0$ the system reduces to $ddot{x}=x^3$ where the only fixed point is at $(0,0)$ and thus it is unstable. On the other hand, if $a=1$ then the system reduces to $ddot{x}=x^3-x^2-x+1$ with fixed points at $(1,0),(-1,0)$, both being unstable.
Is my work correct?
differential-equations analysis dynamical-systems
differential-equations analysis dynamical-systems
edited Nov 29 '18 at 2:51
asked Nov 29 '18 at 2:06
DMH16
578217
578217
Isn't this question better suited for Physics SE?
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:11
4
@BertrandWittgenstein'sGhost this is part of dynamical systems, so no. I could certainly ask there too, but there is no point really
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:13
That's funny what you did, It was a genuine question. No need to get defensive. Cheers!
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:23
I haven't checked all your algebra carefully but it looks like you've go the right idea!
– Robert Lewis
Nov 29 '18 at 2:32
1
@AlexanderJ93 yes you're right the determinant is always negative. Thanks
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:52
|
show 1 more comment
Isn't this question better suited for Physics SE?
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:11
4
@BertrandWittgenstein'sGhost this is part of dynamical systems, so no. I could certainly ask there too, but there is no point really
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:13
That's funny what you did, It was a genuine question. No need to get defensive. Cheers!
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:23
I haven't checked all your algebra carefully but it looks like you've go the right idea!
– Robert Lewis
Nov 29 '18 at 2:32
1
@AlexanderJ93 yes you're right the determinant is always negative. Thanks
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:52
Isn't this question better suited for Physics SE?
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:11
Isn't this question better suited for Physics SE?
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:11
4
4
@BertrandWittgenstein'sGhost this is part of dynamical systems, so no. I could certainly ask there too, but there is no point really
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:13
@BertrandWittgenstein'sGhost this is part of dynamical systems, so no. I could certainly ask there too, but there is no point really
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:13
That's funny what you did, It was a genuine question. No need to get defensive. Cheers!
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:23
That's funny what you did, It was a genuine question. No need to get defensive. Cheers!
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:23
I haven't checked all your algebra carefully but it looks like you've go the right idea!
– Robert Lewis
Nov 29 '18 at 2:32
I haven't checked all your algebra carefully but it looks like you've go the right idea!
– Robert Lewis
Nov 29 '18 at 2:32
1
1
@AlexanderJ93 yes you're right the determinant is always negative. Thanks
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:52
@AlexanderJ93 yes you're right the determinant is always negative. Thanks
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:52
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Almost everything looks right.
For $a > 0$, $-2a < 0$ and $sqrt{a}+1 > 0$, so $Det[J(-sqrt{a},0)] < 0$. This equilibrium should be a saddle then for positive $a$.
Also, when analyzing the stability of a system with a parameter, it helps to draw the bifurcation diagram, i.e. the graph of the fixed points with respect to the parameter. The fixed point equations $x = a, x = sqrt{a}, x = -sqrt{a}$ can be graphed on the $ax$-plane. Intersections of these curves are the bifurcations, which are the only places where the behavior can change.
This is the bifurcation diagram for your system. The lower black curve is the $x=-sqrt{a}$ equilibrium, which doesn't have any intersections for $a>0$, so there will be no change in behavior.
Edit:
This isn't specifically asked about in the question but it is an important feature of this equation. For $a>0, aneq 1$, there are centers at one fixed point and saddles at another nearby fixed point. When this happens, a periodic orbit will collide with the saddle point, creating a closed path from a fixed point back around to itself. This is called a homoclinic orbit, and usually has a "teardrop" shape, as seen below for $a = frac{1}{2}$.
Just out of curiosity, what software did you use to sketch the phase plane?
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 4:49
1
pplane, which can be found here as a java application: math.rice.edu/~dfield/dfpp.html I strongly recommend it to any student in dynamics. It's limited to plane dynamics (obviously) but can be extremely helpful in learning and verifying results.
– AlexanderJ93
Nov 29 '18 at 5:03
Thanks you for the suggestion!
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 5:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018055%2fanalizing-the-stability-of-the-equilibrium-points-of-the-system-ddotx-x-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Almost everything looks right.
For $a > 0$, $-2a < 0$ and $sqrt{a}+1 > 0$, so $Det[J(-sqrt{a},0)] < 0$. This equilibrium should be a saddle then for positive $a$.
Also, when analyzing the stability of a system with a parameter, it helps to draw the bifurcation diagram, i.e. the graph of the fixed points with respect to the parameter. The fixed point equations $x = a, x = sqrt{a}, x = -sqrt{a}$ can be graphed on the $ax$-plane. Intersections of these curves are the bifurcations, which are the only places where the behavior can change.
This is the bifurcation diagram for your system. The lower black curve is the $x=-sqrt{a}$ equilibrium, which doesn't have any intersections for $a>0$, so there will be no change in behavior.
Edit:
This isn't specifically asked about in the question but it is an important feature of this equation. For $a>0, aneq 1$, there are centers at one fixed point and saddles at another nearby fixed point. When this happens, a periodic orbit will collide with the saddle point, creating a closed path from a fixed point back around to itself. This is called a homoclinic orbit, and usually has a "teardrop" shape, as seen below for $a = frac{1}{2}$.
Just out of curiosity, what software did you use to sketch the phase plane?
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 4:49
1
pplane, which can be found here as a java application: math.rice.edu/~dfield/dfpp.html I strongly recommend it to any student in dynamics. It's limited to plane dynamics (obviously) but can be extremely helpful in learning and verifying results.
– AlexanderJ93
Nov 29 '18 at 5:03
Thanks you for the suggestion!
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 5:47
add a comment |
Almost everything looks right.
For $a > 0$, $-2a < 0$ and $sqrt{a}+1 > 0$, so $Det[J(-sqrt{a},0)] < 0$. This equilibrium should be a saddle then for positive $a$.
Also, when analyzing the stability of a system with a parameter, it helps to draw the bifurcation diagram, i.e. the graph of the fixed points with respect to the parameter. The fixed point equations $x = a, x = sqrt{a}, x = -sqrt{a}$ can be graphed on the $ax$-plane. Intersections of these curves are the bifurcations, which are the only places where the behavior can change.
This is the bifurcation diagram for your system. The lower black curve is the $x=-sqrt{a}$ equilibrium, which doesn't have any intersections for $a>0$, so there will be no change in behavior.
Edit:
This isn't specifically asked about in the question but it is an important feature of this equation. For $a>0, aneq 1$, there are centers at one fixed point and saddles at another nearby fixed point. When this happens, a periodic orbit will collide with the saddle point, creating a closed path from a fixed point back around to itself. This is called a homoclinic orbit, and usually has a "teardrop" shape, as seen below for $a = frac{1}{2}$.
Just out of curiosity, what software did you use to sketch the phase plane?
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 4:49
1
pplane, which can be found here as a java application: math.rice.edu/~dfield/dfpp.html I strongly recommend it to any student in dynamics. It's limited to plane dynamics (obviously) but can be extremely helpful in learning and verifying results.
– AlexanderJ93
Nov 29 '18 at 5:03
Thanks you for the suggestion!
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 5:47
add a comment |
Almost everything looks right.
For $a > 0$, $-2a < 0$ and $sqrt{a}+1 > 0$, so $Det[J(-sqrt{a},0)] < 0$. This equilibrium should be a saddle then for positive $a$.
Also, when analyzing the stability of a system with a parameter, it helps to draw the bifurcation diagram, i.e. the graph of the fixed points with respect to the parameter. The fixed point equations $x = a, x = sqrt{a}, x = -sqrt{a}$ can be graphed on the $ax$-plane. Intersections of these curves are the bifurcations, which are the only places where the behavior can change.
This is the bifurcation diagram for your system. The lower black curve is the $x=-sqrt{a}$ equilibrium, which doesn't have any intersections for $a>0$, so there will be no change in behavior.
Edit:
This isn't specifically asked about in the question but it is an important feature of this equation. For $a>0, aneq 1$, there are centers at one fixed point and saddles at another nearby fixed point. When this happens, a periodic orbit will collide with the saddle point, creating a closed path from a fixed point back around to itself. This is called a homoclinic orbit, and usually has a "teardrop" shape, as seen below for $a = frac{1}{2}$.
Almost everything looks right.
For $a > 0$, $-2a < 0$ and $sqrt{a}+1 > 0$, so $Det[J(-sqrt{a},0)] < 0$. This equilibrium should be a saddle then for positive $a$.
Also, when analyzing the stability of a system with a parameter, it helps to draw the bifurcation diagram, i.e. the graph of the fixed points with respect to the parameter. The fixed point equations $x = a, x = sqrt{a}, x = -sqrt{a}$ can be graphed on the $ax$-plane. Intersections of these curves are the bifurcations, which are the only places where the behavior can change.
This is the bifurcation diagram for your system. The lower black curve is the $x=-sqrt{a}$ equilibrium, which doesn't have any intersections for $a>0$, so there will be no change in behavior.
Edit:
This isn't specifically asked about in the question but it is an important feature of this equation. For $a>0, aneq 1$, there are centers at one fixed point and saddles at another nearby fixed point. When this happens, a periodic orbit will collide with the saddle point, creating a closed path from a fixed point back around to itself. This is called a homoclinic orbit, and usually has a "teardrop" shape, as seen below for $a = frac{1}{2}$.
edited Nov 29 '18 at 3:19
answered Nov 29 '18 at 2:57
AlexanderJ93
6,093823
6,093823
Just out of curiosity, what software did you use to sketch the phase plane?
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 4:49
1
pplane, which can be found here as a java application: math.rice.edu/~dfield/dfpp.html I strongly recommend it to any student in dynamics. It's limited to plane dynamics (obviously) but can be extremely helpful in learning and verifying results.
– AlexanderJ93
Nov 29 '18 at 5:03
Thanks you for the suggestion!
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 5:47
add a comment |
Just out of curiosity, what software did you use to sketch the phase plane?
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 4:49
1
pplane, which can be found here as a java application: math.rice.edu/~dfield/dfpp.html I strongly recommend it to any student in dynamics. It's limited to plane dynamics (obviously) but can be extremely helpful in learning and verifying results.
– AlexanderJ93
Nov 29 '18 at 5:03
Thanks you for the suggestion!
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 5:47
Just out of curiosity, what software did you use to sketch the phase plane?
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 4:49
Just out of curiosity, what software did you use to sketch the phase plane?
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 4:49
1
1
pplane, which can be found here as a java application: math.rice.edu/~dfield/dfpp.html I strongly recommend it to any student in dynamics. It's limited to plane dynamics (obviously) but can be extremely helpful in learning and verifying results.
– AlexanderJ93
Nov 29 '18 at 5:03
pplane, which can be found here as a java application: math.rice.edu/~dfield/dfpp.html I strongly recommend it to any student in dynamics. It's limited to plane dynamics (obviously) but can be extremely helpful in learning and verifying results.
– AlexanderJ93
Nov 29 '18 at 5:03
Thanks you for the suggestion!
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 5:47
Thanks you for the suggestion!
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 5:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018055%2fanalizing-the-stability-of-the-equilibrium-points-of-the-system-ddotx-x-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Isn't this question better suited for Physics SE?
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:11
4
@BertrandWittgenstein'sGhost this is part of dynamical systems, so no. I could certainly ask there too, but there is no point really
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:13
That's funny what you did, It was a genuine question. No need to get defensive. Cheers!
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Nov 29 '18 at 2:23
I haven't checked all your algebra carefully but it looks like you've go the right idea!
– Robert Lewis
Nov 29 '18 at 2:32
1
@AlexanderJ93 yes you're right the determinant is always negative. Thanks
– DMH16
Nov 29 '18 at 2:52