Pipe executed command into the same output file of the command
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I've had a look at various tips (ss64.com Command Redirection) and tricks but couldn't find an answer to my question:
Question
Is it possible to pipe the command I am going to execute into the same redirected output I will be creating?
Example with netstat
Input command
C:Usersmemyselfandi> netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
The actual command would be: netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
Output (The text file netstat_with_programs.txt)
This is the actual content of the netstat_with_programs.txt
file. (The command is basically documenting itself in the output file.)
netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
Active connections
Proto Local Address Remoteaddress State PID
TCP 0.0.0.0:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 888
RpcSs
[svchost.exe]
TCP 0.0.0.0:2382 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 1396
[sqlbrowser.exe]
TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 376
TermService
[svchost.exe]
....
Example with arp
Input command
C:usersmemyselfandi> arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
The actual command is: arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
Output (The contents of arp_output.txt)
This is the actual content of the arp_output.txt
file. (The command is basically documenting itself in the output file.)
arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
Interface: 10.57.209.191 --- 0x5
Internet Address Physical Address Type
10.57.209.2 80-e0-1d-58-8a-50 dynamic
10.57.209.3 80-e0-1d-58-8b-88 dynamic
10.57.209.9 00-50-56-8d-91-fe dynamic
10.57.209.10 00-50-56-8d-91-fe dynamic
10.57.209.175 00-50-56-b5-44-16 dynamic
10.57.209.255 ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff static
224.0.0.22 01-00-5e-00-00-16 static
224.0.0.252 01-00-5e-00-00-fc static
230.0.0.1 01-00-5e-00-00-01 static
239.255.255.250 01-00-5e-7f-ff-fa static
So basically I would be documenting the command I am executing in the output I am creating.
Based on the possible solutions provided by @barlop in the comments, I went ahead and executed both commands:
With ECHO
echo netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt && netstat -obna >>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
...this produced the following first line in the output file, which doesn't fully satisfy the requirements:
netstat -obna
....
With %aaa% variable
set aaa=netstat -obna
echo (%aaa%>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt) && (echo %aaa%|cmd)>>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
...this produces the same output, which doesn't fully meet the requirements:
netstat -obna
...
windows command-line cmd.exe
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I've had a look at various tips (ss64.com Command Redirection) and tricks but couldn't find an answer to my question:
Question
Is it possible to pipe the command I am going to execute into the same redirected output I will be creating?
Example with netstat
Input command
C:Usersmemyselfandi> netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
The actual command would be: netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
Output (The text file netstat_with_programs.txt)
This is the actual content of the netstat_with_programs.txt
file. (The command is basically documenting itself in the output file.)
netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
Active connections
Proto Local Address Remoteaddress State PID
TCP 0.0.0.0:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 888
RpcSs
[svchost.exe]
TCP 0.0.0.0:2382 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 1396
[sqlbrowser.exe]
TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 376
TermService
[svchost.exe]
....
Example with arp
Input command
C:usersmemyselfandi> arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
The actual command is: arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
Output (The contents of arp_output.txt)
This is the actual content of the arp_output.txt
file. (The command is basically documenting itself in the output file.)
arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
Interface: 10.57.209.191 --- 0x5
Internet Address Physical Address Type
10.57.209.2 80-e0-1d-58-8a-50 dynamic
10.57.209.3 80-e0-1d-58-8b-88 dynamic
10.57.209.9 00-50-56-8d-91-fe dynamic
10.57.209.10 00-50-56-8d-91-fe dynamic
10.57.209.175 00-50-56-b5-44-16 dynamic
10.57.209.255 ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff static
224.0.0.22 01-00-5e-00-00-16 static
224.0.0.252 01-00-5e-00-00-fc static
230.0.0.1 01-00-5e-00-00-01 static
239.255.255.250 01-00-5e-7f-ff-fa static
So basically I would be documenting the command I am executing in the output I am creating.
Based on the possible solutions provided by @barlop in the comments, I went ahead and executed both commands:
With ECHO
echo netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt && netstat -obna >>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
...this produced the following first line in the output file, which doesn't fully satisfy the requirements:
netstat -obna
....
With %aaa% variable
set aaa=netstat -obna
echo (%aaa%>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt) && (echo %aaa%|cmd)>>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
...this produces the same output, which doesn't fully meet the requirements:
netstat -obna
...
windows command-line cmd.exe
Your English is completely ambiguous and thus not clear what you are asking. You should provide examples showing exactly what you mean. Show the contents ofC:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
before and after. Demonstrating exactly what you mean rather than trying to use your highly ambigious words.
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:13
Also your title gives no indication of exactly what you are talking about
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:16
I'd be interested to know which part of my question is ambiguous? The input is clearly stated in my question.netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
. The output of my command is a text file which contains the contents outlined in the Output section of my question, which includes the command I executed. I don't think that my question is either ambiguous, nor syntactically, orthographically or typographically incorrect. I would appreciate if you could exactly explain which part of the question you are unable to grasp.
– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:22
Because it is a>
the file is previously non-existent. I am not adding (>>
) to an existing file.
– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:26
You have now corrected the unclear part of your question
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:36
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I've had a look at various tips (ss64.com Command Redirection) and tricks but couldn't find an answer to my question:
Question
Is it possible to pipe the command I am going to execute into the same redirected output I will be creating?
Example with netstat
Input command
C:Usersmemyselfandi> netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
The actual command would be: netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
Output (The text file netstat_with_programs.txt)
This is the actual content of the netstat_with_programs.txt
file. (The command is basically documenting itself in the output file.)
netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
Active connections
Proto Local Address Remoteaddress State PID
TCP 0.0.0.0:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 888
RpcSs
[svchost.exe]
TCP 0.0.0.0:2382 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 1396
[sqlbrowser.exe]
TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 376
TermService
[svchost.exe]
....
Example with arp
Input command
C:usersmemyselfandi> arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
The actual command is: arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
Output (The contents of arp_output.txt)
This is the actual content of the arp_output.txt
file. (The command is basically documenting itself in the output file.)
arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
Interface: 10.57.209.191 --- 0x5
Internet Address Physical Address Type
10.57.209.2 80-e0-1d-58-8a-50 dynamic
10.57.209.3 80-e0-1d-58-8b-88 dynamic
10.57.209.9 00-50-56-8d-91-fe dynamic
10.57.209.10 00-50-56-8d-91-fe dynamic
10.57.209.175 00-50-56-b5-44-16 dynamic
10.57.209.255 ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff static
224.0.0.22 01-00-5e-00-00-16 static
224.0.0.252 01-00-5e-00-00-fc static
230.0.0.1 01-00-5e-00-00-01 static
239.255.255.250 01-00-5e-7f-ff-fa static
So basically I would be documenting the command I am executing in the output I am creating.
Based on the possible solutions provided by @barlop in the comments, I went ahead and executed both commands:
With ECHO
echo netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt && netstat -obna >>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
...this produced the following first line in the output file, which doesn't fully satisfy the requirements:
netstat -obna
....
With %aaa% variable
set aaa=netstat -obna
echo (%aaa%>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt) && (echo %aaa%|cmd)>>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
...this produces the same output, which doesn't fully meet the requirements:
netstat -obna
...
windows command-line cmd.exe
I've had a look at various tips (ss64.com Command Redirection) and tricks but couldn't find an answer to my question:
Question
Is it possible to pipe the command I am going to execute into the same redirected output I will be creating?
Example with netstat
Input command
C:Usersmemyselfandi> netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
The actual command would be: netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
Output (The text file netstat_with_programs.txt)
This is the actual content of the netstat_with_programs.txt
file. (The command is basically documenting itself in the output file.)
netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
Active connections
Proto Local Address Remoteaddress State PID
TCP 0.0.0.0:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 888
RpcSs
[svchost.exe]
TCP 0.0.0.0:2382 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 1396
[sqlbrowser.exe]
TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 376
TermService
[svchost.exe]
....
Example with arp
Input command
C:usersmemyselfandi> arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
The actual command is: arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
Output (The contents of arp_output.txt)
This is the actual content of the arp_output.txt
file. (The command is basically documenting itself in the output file.)
arp -a >C:temparp_output.txt
Interface: 10.57.209.191 --- 0x5
Internet Address Physical Address Type
10.57.209.2 80-e0-1d-58-8a-50 dynamic
10.57.209.3 80-e0-1d-58-8b-88 dynamic
10.57.209.9 00-50-56-8d-91-fe dynamic
10.57.209.10 00-50-56-8d-91-fe dynamic
10.57.209.175 00-50-56-b5-44-16 dynamic
10.57.209.255 ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff static
224.0.0.22 01-00-5e-00-00-16 static
224.0.0.252 01-00-5e-00-00-fc static
230.0.0.1 01-00-5e-00-00-01 static
239.255.255.250 01-00-5e-7f-ff-fa static
So basically I would be documenting the command I am executing in the output I am creating.
Based on the possible solutions provided by @barlop in the comments, I went ahead and executed both commands:
With ECHO
echo netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt && netstat -obna >>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
...this produced the following first line in the output file, which doesn't fully satisfy the requirements:
netstat -obna
....
With %aaa% variable
set aaa=netstat -obna
echo (%aaa%>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt) && (echo %aaa%|cmd)>>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
...this produces the same output, which doesn't fully meet the requirements:
netstat -obna
...
windows command-line cmd.exe
windows command-line cmd.exe
edited Dec 4 at 16:06
asked Dec 4 at 12:49
hot2use
335212
335212
Your English is completely ambiguous and thus not clear what you are asking. You should provide examples showing exactly what you mean. Show the contents ofC:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
before and after. Demonstrating exactly what you mean rather than trying to use your highly ambigious words.
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:13
Also your title gives no indication of exactly what you are talking about
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:16
I'd be interested to know which part of my question is ambiguous? The input is clearly stated in my question.netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
. The output of my command is a text file which contains the contents outlined in the Output section of my question, which includes the command I executed. I don't think that my question is either ambiguous, nor syntactically, orthographically or typographically incorrect. I would appreciate if you could exactly explain which part of the question you are unable to grasp.
– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:22
Because it is a>
the file is previously non-existent. I am not adding (>>
) to an existing file.
– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:26
You have now corrected the unclear part of your question
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:36
|
show 3 more comments
Your English is completely ambiguous and thus not clear what you are asking. You should provide examples showing exactly what you mean. Show the contents ofC:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
before and after. Demonstrating exactly what you mean rather than trying to use your highly ambigious words.
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:13
Also your title gives no indication of exactly what you are talking about
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:16
I'd be interested to know which part of my question is ambiguous? The input is clearly stated in my question.netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
. The output of my command is a text file which contains the contents outlined in the Output section of my question, which includes the command I executed. I don't think that my question is either ambiguous, nor syntactically, orthographically or typographically incorrect. I would appreciate if you could exactly explain which part of the question you are unable to grasp.
– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:22
Because it is a>
the file is previously non-existent. I am not adding (>>
) to an existing file.
– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:26
You have now corrected the unclear part of your question
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:36
Your English is completely ambiguous and thus not clear what you are asking. You should provide examples showing exactly what you mean. Show the contents of
C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
before and after. Demonstrating exactly what you mean rather than trying to use your highly ambigious words.– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:13
Your English is completely ambiguous and thus not clear what you are asking. You should provide examples showing exactly what you mean. Show the contents of
C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
before and after. Demonstrating exactly what you mean rather than trying to use your highly ambigious words.– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:13
Also your title gives no indication of exactly what you are talking about
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:16
Also your title gives no indication of exactly what you are talking about
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:16
I'd be interested to know which part of my question is ambiguous? The input is clearly stated in my question.
netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
. The output of my command is a text file which contains the contents outlined in the Output section of my question, which includes the command I executed. I don't think that my question is either ambiguous, nor syntactically, orthographically or typographically incorrect. I would appreciate if you could exactly explain which part of the question you are unable to grasp.– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:22
I'd be interested to know which part of my question is ambiguous? The input is clearly stated in my question.
netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
. The output of my command is a text file which contains the contents outlined in the Output section of my question, which includes the command I executed. I don't think that my question is either ambiguous, nor syntactically, orthographically or typographically incorrect. I would appreciate if you could exactly explain which part of the question you are unable to grasp.– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:22
Because it is a
>
the file is previously non-existent. I am not adding (>>
) to an existing file.– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:26
Because it is a
>
the file is previously non-existent. I am not adding (>>
) to an existing file.– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:26
You have now corrected the unclear part of your question
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:36
You have now corrected the unclear part of your question
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:36
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
This is impossible because the shell, which takes the command and executes it, has no idea of what the arguments do that it is passing to the command.
For example in our theoretical rot13write
C:foobar.txt
, is P:sbbone.gkg
rot13write -qevir "P" -svyr "sbbone" rkg ".gkg"
That may tell rot13write
to write to the drive P
, the file foobar
, and the extension txt
. Or it may all be a joke and that path could have already been hard coded into the executable. You don't know, and neither does a shell.
So the shell can not echo to the file that a program is mysteriously writing to, because the shell doesn't know of that sufficiently; and, the program which does know how it is invoked is under no obligation to do anything with that data (like print the invocation command to the file it's outputting to). What you can do is
- Have the shell echo all its commands. Most shells support this.
- Have the program that you execute write to standard output (as it normally does) which the program will inherit from the shell that spawned it (this is how programs you call and the shell write to the same place -- the psuedo terminal)
- Redirect the shells standard output to destination file.
This will do everything you want except show the flag and output location in the command.
This looks like this in command prompt (I think)
cmd /c "netstat" > myOutput.txt | type myOutput.txt
And it looks like this in PowerShell,
powershell -command "Set-PSDebug -Trace 1; netstat" | tee myOutput.txt
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
If the problem is to display (or redirect to a file) the redirection symbol (>
) with the ECHO
command, then you just need to escape it. The escape symbol in this case would be ^
:
ECHO netstat -obna ^>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
netstat -obna >>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
The second command in the above snippet is using >>
instead of >
because you want to add the output to the same file rather than to overwrite it.
I was just starting to wonder why it didn't work, until I realised that your solution is to execute two commands. Good solution, but it breaks the flow somewhat.
– hot2use
Dec 5 at 10:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380687%2fpipe-executed-command-into-the-same-output-file-of-the-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
This is impossible because the shell, which takes the command and executes it, has no idea of what the arguments do that it is passing to the command.
For example in our theoretical rot13write
C:foobar.txt
, is P:sbbone.gkg
rot13write -qevir "P" -svyr "sbbone" rkg ".gkg"
That may tell rot13write
to write to the drive P
, the file foobar
, and the extension txt
. Or it may all be a joke and that path could have already been hard coded into the executable. You don't know, and neither does a shell.
So the shell can not echo to the file that a program is mysteriously writing to, because the shell doesn't know of that sufficiently; and, the program which does know how it is invoked is under no obligation to do anything with that data (like print the invocation command to the file it's outputting to). What you can do is
- Have the shell echo all its commands. Most shells support this.
- Have the program that you execute write to standard output (as it normally does) which the program will inherit from the shell that spawned it (this is how programs you call and the shell write to the same place -- the psuedo terminal)
- Redirect the shells standard output to destination file.
This will do everything you want except show the flag and output location in the command.
This looks like this in command prompt (I think)
cmd /c "netstat" > myOutput.txt | type myOutput.txt
And it looks like this in PowerShell,
powershell -command "Set-PSDebug -Trace 1; netstat" | tee myOutput.txt
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This is impossible because the shell, which takes the command and executes it, has no idea of what the arguments do that it is passing to the command.
For example in our theoretical rot13write
C:foobar.txt
, is P:sbbone.gkg
rot13write -qevir "P" -svyr "sbbone" rkg ".gkg"
That may tell rot13write
to write to the drive P
, the file foobar
, and the extension txt
. Or it may all be a joke and that path could have already been hard coded into the executable. You don't know, and neither does a shell.
So the shell can not echo to the file that a program is mysteriously writing to, because the shell doesn't know of that sufficiently; and, the program which does know how it is invoked is under no obligation to do anything with that data (like print the invocation command to the file it's outputting to). What you can do is
- Have the shell echo all its commands. Most shells support this.
- Have the program that you execute write to standard output (as it normally does) which the program will inherit from the shell that spawned it (this is how programs you call and the shell write to the same place -- the psuedo terminal)
- Redirect the shells standard output to destination file.
This will do everything you want except show the flag and output location in the command.
This looks like this in command prompt (I think)
cmd /c "netstat" > myOutput.txt | type myOutput.txt
And it looks like this in PowerShell,
powershell -command "Set-PSDebug -Trace 1; netstat" | tee myOutput.txt
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This is impossible because the shell, which takes the command and executes it, has no idea of what the arguments do that it is passing to the command.
For example in our theoretical rot13write
C:foobar.txt
, is P:sbbone.gkg
rot13write -qevir "P" -svyr "sbbone" rkg ".gkg"
That may tell rot13write
to write to the drive P
, the file foobar
, and the extension txt
. Or it may all be a joke and that path could have already been hard coded into the executable. You don't know, and neither does a shell.
So the shell can not echo to the file that a program is mysteriously writing to, because the shell doesn't know of that sufficiently; and, the program which does know how it is invoked is under no obligation to do anything with that data (like print the invocation command to the file it's outputting to). What you can do is
- Have the shell echo all its commands. Most shells support this.
- Have the program that you execute write to standard output (as it normally does) which the program will inherit from the shell that spawned it (this is how programs you call and the shell write to the same place -- the psuedo terminal)
- Redirect the shells standard output to destination file.
This will do everything you want except show the flag and output location in the command.
This looks like this in command prompt (I think)
cmd /c "netstat" > myOutput.txt | type myOutput.txt
And it looks like this in PowerShell,
powershell -command "Set-PSDebug -Trace 1; netstat" | tee myOutput.txt
This is impossible because the shell, which takes the command and executes it, has no idea of what the arguments do that it is passing to the command.
For example in our theoretical rot13write
C:foobar.txt
, is P:sbbone.gkg
rot13write -qevir "P" -svyr "sbbone" rkg ".gkg"
That may tell rot13write
to write to the drive P
, the file foobar
, and the extension txt
. Or it may all be a joke and that path could have already been hard coded into the executable. You don't know, and neither does a shell.
So the shell can not echo to the file that a program is mysteriously writing to, because the shell doesn't know of that sufficiently; and, the program which does know how it is invoked is under no obligation to do anything with that data (like print the invocation command to the file it's outputting to). What you can do is
- Have the shell echo all its commands. Most shells support this.
- Have the program that you execute write to standard output (as it normally does) which the program will inherit from the shell that spawned it (this is how programs you call and the shell write to the same place -- the psuedo terminal)
- Redirect the shells standard output to destination file.
This will do everything you want except show the flag and output location in the command.
This looks like this in command prompt (I think)
cmd /c "netstat" > myOutput.txt | type myOutput.txt
And it looks like this in PowerShell,
powershell -command "Set-PSDebug -Trace 1; netstat" | tee myOutput.txt
answered Dec 4 at 16:40
Evan Carroll
4,225852101
4,225852101
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
If the problem is to display (or redirect to a file) the redirection symbol (>
) with the ECHO
command, then you just need to escape it. The escape symbol in this case would be ^
:
ECHO netstat -obna ^>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
netstat -obna >>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
The second command in the above snippet is using >>
instead of >
because you want to add the output to the same file rather than to overwrite it.
I was just starting to wonder why it didn't work, until I realised that your solution is to execute two commands. Good solution, but it breaks the flow somewhat.
– hot2use
Dec 5 at 10:10
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
If the problem is to display (or redirect to a file) the redirection symbol (>
) with the ECHO
command, then you just need to escape it. The escape symbol in this case would be ^
:
ECHO netstat -obna ^>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
netstat -obna >>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
The second command in the above snippet is using >>
instead of >
because you want to add the output to the same file rather than to overwrite it.
I was just starting to wonder why it didn't work, until I realised that your solution is to execute two commands. Good solution, but it breaks the flow somewhat.
– hot2use
Dec 5 at 10:10
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If the problem is to display (or redirect to a file) the redirection symbol (>
) with the ECHO
command, then you just need to escape it. The escape symbol in this case would be ^
:
ECHO netstat -obna ^>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
netstat -obna >>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
The second command in the above snippet is using >>
instead of >
because you want to add the output to the same file rather than to overwrite it.
If the problem is to display (or redirect to a file) the redirection symbol (>
) with the ECHO
command, then you just need to escape it. The escape symbol in this case would be ^
:
ECHO netstat -obna ^>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
netstat -obna >>C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
The second command in the above snippet is using >>
instead of >
because you want to add the output to the same file rather than to overwrite it.
answered Dec 4 at 20:16
Andriy M
230310
230310
I was just starting to wonder why it didn't work, until I realised that your solution is to execute two commands. Good solution, but it breaks the flow somewhat.
– hot2use
Dec 5 at 10:10
add a comment |
I was just starting to wonder why it didn't work, until I realised that your solution is to execute two commands. Good solution, but it breaks the flow somewhat.
– hot2use
Dec 5 at 10:10
I was just starting to wonder why it didn't work, until I realised that your solution is to execute two commands. Good solution, but it breaks the flow somewhat.
– hot2use
Dec 5 at 10:10
I was just starting to wonder why it didn't work, until I realised that your solution is to execute two commands. Good solution, but it breaks the flow somewhat.
– hot2use
Dec 5 at 10:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380687%2fpipe-executed-command-into-the-same-output-file-of-the-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Your English is completely ambiguous and thus not clear what you are asking. You should provide examples showing exactly what you mean. Show the contents of
C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
before and after. Demonstrating exactly what you mean rather than trying to use your highly ambigious words.– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:13
Also your title gives no indication of exactly what you are talking about
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:16
I'd be interested to know which part of my question is ambiguous? The input is clearly stated in my question.
netstat -obna >C:tempnetstat_with_programs.txt
. The output of my command is a text file which contains the contents outlined in the Output section of my question, which includes the command I executed. I don't think that my question is either ambiguous, nor syntactically, orthographically or typographically incorrect. I would appreciate if you could exactly explain which part of the question you are unable to grasp.– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:22
Because it is a
>
the file is previously non-existent. I am not adding (>>
) to an existing file.– hot2use
Dec 4 at 15:26
You have now corrected the unclear part of your question
– barlop
Dec 4 at 15:36